I'm currently more active on my side blog (diabolocracy).
!!Antiship DNI, thanks!!
This account is Proship.
Minors just don't contact me privately and we're gucci.
My Mature posts are marked Mature and if you see them then you lied about your age but I'm not your fucking babysitter š¤·
Mature posts that aren't marked Mature were posted by other people and I am not liable for their content.
Follow at your own discretion.
Hate anons will be put on blast and ridiculed āļø
Instead of an extended DNI, I'll just say this: conservatives of any stripe will not have a fun time here. Especially American conservatives. Neither will Christians, Catholics, or Evangelicals if you're the type that puts your religion before all else and gets absolutely huffy at the mere thought of someone exercising their free will to do something your cringe god doesn't want you to do. The only ones who need to mind your god's wishes are those who follow him. There are other people.
As for me, I am The Supreme Chancellor of Edge Who Rescues Lost Bugs From the Side of the Road, or, as my friend has called me, "Chancellor Cringitine."
A meme that has somehow taken on human form and barely knows how to function as one. Life is suffering!
35/N/The Frigid North; happily 'degenerate' and 'problematic' sex-positive asexual trixic; the kind of socialist conservatives piss the bed about; diagnosed in less than fifteen minutes with schizoid personality disorder by a small town psychiatrist; demonolater and theistic Satanist with a focus on Beelzebub and Pazuzu although I've never formally said hi to either because social anxiety is a bitch.
Obligatory Pinned About
Because a description isnāt enough sometimes.
The runner of this blog is
- unabashedly Proship
- unabashedly Leftist
- unabashedly Satanic
Proship
Definition: Ship and let ship. Fiction is fiction. An anti-harassment stance. The ability to mind oneās own business. An abject disinterest in other peopleās wank material.
Leftist
Definition: Pro-Socialism. Pro-UBI. Pro-LGBT+. Pro-choice. Anti-Capitalism. Someone that makes Conservatives, Republicans, TERFs, and so on, cry and piss the bed.
If something up there strikes your ire: block me. Itās that simple, babygirl.
Otherwise--well, I block liberally. If Iām in your DNI and I see you liking or reblogging my things I will block you for my own sake. If I come across a post tagged āproship dniā I have a tendency to block every person who leaves a positive interaction, too, soĀ š¤·Ā
Some of you fuckers are crazy little bitches.Ā If perchance you take it upon yourself to send some silly babble before I get the chance, Iāll respond in kind whilst mocking you with my friends on Discord.
For your own sake, since I know someĀ āantisā have embarked upon such shenanigans with others in the past, donāt even try to send me gore. I know how to find things that will have you waking in a cold sweat at night. Iāve used and will use the archived Rotten as a drawing reference. Iāve born witness to the Pain Olympics. I used to be a casual /b/astard. I have no qualms about returning fire.
Besides, most of the examples Iāve seen the more unhinged ants send people is just plain fuckin weak. And yes, I will critique and mock your shitty excuse for shock imagery!Ā
As for my art,Ā some people on this site are weird about tagging. I, personally, donāt care. Go ham. If something looks shippy to you, it probably is.
Tag as kin/id/me or whatever too, I reeeeally donāt care, though as a forewarning you might be interacting with a kin twin (me) in some cases.
Icons are fine for personal use; reposting is a no unless itās to an image archiving site like Gelbooru; Iām too stupid to know how to set up paypal or whatever so commissions are a no but art trades are a maybe if Iām in the mood (also Iām on ArtFight).
Iām a Canadian who uses DuckDuckGo. Itās so annoyingly our government canāt just leave the internet alone. We are not the UK and there is no need to follow Keir Starmerās terrible decisions. Just make a bill that requires schools to teach about internet safety.
We are, however, part of the Commonwealth, unfortunately. What the UK and Australia do, of course they're going to try doing here, too š. We might as well consider ourselves as being part of a Hivemind Government. The people at the head are going to try to do the same things. That is my understanding of it, mind you.
And I do agree, the better route would be educating the children on internet safety. Kids aren't born knowing how to keep themselves safe. You don't ban children from crossing roads on their own, you teach them how to cross roads safely.
An even better route (at least when combined with the above education), since all this hubbub is because "endless scrolling" and "algorithms" are predatory... Would be to pressure companies into getting rid of or fixing them. They're bad for adults too. Kids, infamously, grow up to become adults, who will become effected by those things anyway. But I digress
The Trump administration is cynically exploiting calls for stricter AI regulation to pass broad censorship measures at the federal level.
So, in terrible news, Trump's trying to pull some strings to pass this massive internet censorship bill, featuring all the kinds of internet censorship we're terrified of, including mandatory ID for accessing basically any website, specifically to crush state regulation of AI, because apparently this man will always see the moral bottom of the barrel and start digging.
So, if you live in the US and hate censorship and AI you know what to do, contact your congresspeople and tell them do not fucking dare let this through or so help us god...
In Canada, Bill C-22 is being forced through today. Bill C-22, AKA the "Lawful Access Act" will require an ambiguously defined group of online service providers to keep a record of all user metadata for up to 6 months (as of the third reading), as well as provide the government a backdoor to access it, anytime, with no warrant. In the bill, the definition of electronic service provider is broad enough to include any online service, including encrypted messaging apps, VPNs, email providers, banking apps, and cloud storage services.
While it has been amended slightly since the first reading, it is still dangerous and the Liberal majority government does not care about privacy concerns, dismissing those against Bill C-22 as ātinfoil hatā and āparanoidā conspiracy theories. (While, of course, they are pushing for Bill C-22, an age verification bill, and purposely overlooking generative AI as per their push for Canadians to adopt AI usage more at the same time.)
Already privacy focused companies such as Signal and DuckDuckGo have threatened to leave Canada completely over Bill C-22.
Email and/or call your local MPs, especially Liberal MPs. If you have done so already, contact others.
Please share this news, whether you are Canadian or not. Most news outlets have done very little coverage over these bills, and too few Canadians know of their existence.
Government just prematurely ended debate on Bill C-22
The federal government decided to use a so-called āguillotineā time-limit all further clause by clause on Bill C-22 to just 30 minutes.1 This will block ANY committee debate that scrutinizes the dangerous surveillance powers in Part 2 of the bill.2
The government wants to jam Bill C-22 today, and vote it through the House tomorrow (June 19). Weāre calling on MPs of all parties to refuse to advance Part 2 without full committee study, but we need you to help turn the pressure up.
Message your MP and demand they reject Bill C-22 TODAY! And if you can also chip in to support the critical work at the Senate and over the summer to stop C-22, please give what you can. Stop Bill C-22! Donate $10 to stop mass surveillance!
Why do we need to stop Bill C-22? This bill includes provisions that will compromise the security of every person in Canada. It would let the Minister of Public Safety issue secret orders compelling apps, messaging services, and other providers to build government access into their systems ā orders that come with mandatory, permanent gag rules and no meaningful judicial check.3
Experts and major privacy-focused companies condemned this portion of the bill. Signal, DuckDuckGo, Proton, Windscribe, NordVPN, Apple, and Meta are among those warning that C-22 threatens encryption ā the very foundation of your online privacy.4
The government is forcing through a secret-order regime it cannot defend on the merits, on an artificial deadline of its own making. Part 2 should be split off and sent back, not rushed past the public before the summer break. Please take 30 seconds to send a message to your MP today.Ā And if you can, give what you can to support our work defending Canadian privacy. Add your voice now! Chip in to defend Canadian privacy!
Whatever happens this Friday, our work is just starting. We heard rumours Senate would start studying this bill early so government could force C-22 this month; and by turning up the heat with our peers, we helped stop that. Through July, August and September, we will keep fighting for real study of C-22ās problems and amendments that remove its huge privacy problems.Ā
But weāre a very small team, and right now our June drive is well below our target to stay viable through this year. If youāre able to give, please give now.
Thank you for all you do.
Matt at OpenMedia
P.S. The Liberal government is using their majority in Parliament to gag debate on the most reckless surveillance powers Canada has seen in a generation. Theyāve signalled it wants Bill C-22 passed before the House rises tomorrow (June 19). Please join us in calling on MPS of all parties to reject Bill C-22 NOW!
i wrote another essay in the youtube comment section. copy-pasting it just cuz i can lul
social media bans are just a grab for your personal data. to prove you are above 16 you'll have to fork over your government id to a third party website that may or may not actually delete the data after they 'verify' you. (conveniently, this fact is left out of any polls that ask, "do you support banning kids from social media?" - a lot of people do. but a lot of those people do not in fact support uploading their government ids to 'verify' their age, or digital ids, etc so it's a useless statistic really, but it's one a government can point to and say 'look! the people agree!') you won't know until they get hacked & you see weird behavior going on with regards to strange phone calls about bank accounts you didn't set up, etc. who is any safer for that?
it's also ineffective, takes choice away from parents' regarding what their kids can or cannot handle while at the same time kids will just migrate to less moderated websites, and to any liberal who thinks it's a good idea: what the libs put in place, another party can use against you. like, duh? you don't want 'your' side to have powers you don't want to see used against you if your worst nightmare of a candidate gets in! use your heads.
also it's a stepping stone to digital id and eroding your choice of staying anonymous online. no thanks! people are crazy! i don't need some unhinged lunatic hunting me for sport because i said something they don't like on the internet! i've seen people do this over clashing opinions on CARTOONSā¦
like, do people say some hateful things online? sure. but like, even youtube has a BLOCK FEATURE. BLOCK THOSE PEOPLE. wow so ez. sure sure, it might feel nice and tingly if someone spouting some hateful things gets their comeuppance but um. look to our southern neighbor. it only takes one election cycle for the government to start demonizing trans people, for example. do you really want to make it easier for them to find those people? lol??
and then there's the fact that if this "id verification" nonsense spreads far enough it will just become the default. there are still many, many countries where just being gay is illegal. there are countries where being certain religions is scrutinized, or being indigenous, etc, etc. if online anonymity is eroded completely they won't be able to seek online community anymore. among everything else, id verification is homophobic.
i've also seen an uptick in "your account has been compromised! please give your id so we can verify that you're you" scams. i have watched people almost fall for them in real time with the only reason they didn't being that i spammed that they were a SCAM until the scam account blocked me. and it isn't just old people falling for this, the site this took place on is mostly people in their ~20-30s.
i would also consider it a national security issue. all that personal civilian dataā¦ or do we not matter? maybe we should encourage politicians' kids to use their parent's ids to verify themselves. maybe then it will matter?
and we all know it isn't about the kids anyway, it's about the $$data$$. it's no coincidence i'm sure that they tabled c-34 shortly after carney declared "ai for all."
if it was just about verifying your age, those 'verification' companies would advise you - for your own safety - to censor out everything but your face and your date of birth. they don't need ANYTHING ELSEā¦ unless it isn't just to verify your age š¤
if this idiocy passes here (and i sincerely hope it doesn't; as we can see in the uk it is actually rather unpopular and quite the career killer! NO ONE LIKES STARMER, and the age verification nonsense is part of why he is utterly loathed - i recommend anyone reading this to point this & everything else about why this is such a bad idea out to their MPs) i plan to send in one of those censored examples.
if it isn't accepted i will become very annoying for all involved. this is a promise. and i highly recommend others do the same :) either do not comply, or - if you must - send in an id with all unnecessary data points cut out of the image and raise a ruckus about it if it's "not enough." because again, they don't need your full legal NAME, your weight, your height, etc, to prove your AGE.
also i'm pretty sure our charter guarantees us freedom of expression. do under-16s not count as human anymore? are they not citizens? social media is also used as a place to share art, writing, and other projects. soooā¦??
and if it's anything like australia's ban, then those kids (and adults who do not, or cannot, verify) run the risk of having all of their creative work deleted. not cool.
it doesn't even have to be creative work. laugh about those fancy photographs people take of their lattes all you want, yeah they're cringe, but they're also memories. social media has more or less taken the place of photo albums and scrap books and diaries.
governments try to say they'll make it safe. they'll fine sites if they don't really delete your data!!! but that doesn't really work. i'm sure they make more money keeping your data and selling it for ai training than they lose in any government fine. if they didn't, then they actually would delete that data because the pros wouldn't outweigh the cons (but most times, they don'tā¦ delete your data, that is).
in either case if your data gets leaked and sold you now have multiple copies of it probably being used by criminals to do who knows what and YOU have to deal with that while also juggling your busy life. yay!!!!
behold the sheer stupidity of politicians trying to regulate technologies that they don't understand! it's like none of them have ever been taught basic online safety (do not give out your personal dataā¦ like, sayā¦ YOUR GOVERNMENT ID)! but seeing as our "ai minister" is apparently technologically inept i guess that tracks. like, god, if people that useless can get a high ranking government position, maybe i should try for one. i at least went to trade school for some of this. but that probably makes me over qualifiedā¦
ā¦and if i had to deal with people so brain-numbingly stupid every day i'd off myself, probably.
The current laws being enforced on the UK public is not to protect children & teenagers, itās a blatant scheme disguised to fear-monger, isolate & control the countryās population. I donāt care if Iām sounding like a crazy conspiracy theorist, the idea that people can no longer have privacy if they want to access the bare minimum online is absolutely bizarre and dystopian.
If youāre against these acts by our government and want to fight against unlawful forms of censorship, thereās a few things you can do; (will be updated as time passes ā click on og post)
Support organisations such as Open Rights Group & Big Brother Watch
Sign petitions against Digital ID & The Online Safety Act
Contact & complain to your local MPs about your concerns around these new laws being put in place.
Attend any protests or rallies in your area if possible
Donāt give up, keep posting & sharing anything you can!
The U.K. doesnāt care about you or kids. Itās an authoritarian reign by the government to have the public under their dirty, oppressive, pro-genocidal hands.
UPDATES:
VPNs no longer work for iphones with newer ios updates
Google & Apple have until september to enforce their users into this new law which allows AI to scan their private photos / etc for nudity or anything deemed mature.
Bluesky was just added to the list of banned socials media sites and joins the following bans announced already ā youtube, reddit, x, facebook, threads, twitch, kick, instagram & tiktok
Canadian government considering implementing half-baked and horrendously insecure mandate for you to doxx yourself & put yourself at risk of identity theft if you want to use social media (and what, exactly, do they define as social media?). (But from what I've heard you can still chat with chatbots if you're under 16 don't worry!!!! ????)
AMOC collapse is pretty much inevitable.
Things continue to get more expensive.
Ahhh.
Just fucking kill me lmao. No, seriously. Someone get me outta here before I take myself out unironically
Canadian government proposes restricting social media for kids under 16
The short of it: The newly-proposed bill C-34, the "Safe Social Media Act", aims to ban people under 16 from using any social media site that doesn't adequately prove that it's safe for children to use. It also requires chatbots like ChatGPT to "mitigate the risk of harmful content" ā though chatbots will notably not be banned for under-16s (which suggests it might be the big AI money that's partially motivating this movement).
Now, this is not inherently a bad idea; I don't have to tell you how dangerous it is for kids to have unrestricted access to the Internet. But we all know where this is going. Whether or not it's a good idea to restrict people under 16 years of age from using social media, in practice this is almost certainly going be enforced either by using an AI-based algorithm to analyze user behavior a la YouTube's age verification system (which is notorious for false positives) or by outright forcing you to upload a scan of your ID (which, to be fair, is strictly illegal as far as I know ā for now). This is not speculation ā this is what happens time and again whenever a country or jurisdiction implements a policy like this.
Furthermore, censoring so-called "harmful content" is a dangerous attack on freedom of speech. We can't yet be sure that the commission created by this bill won't ban us from simply talking about dangerous topics. Do we want to risk that? And what about the requirement for chatbots to avoid creating harmful content ā sure, we shouldn't be using AI anyway, but do we want Google's search summary to get censored if you happen to search something "problematic"?
The bottom line: This is just another attempt by our government to establish further surveillance over all citizens. It's a good idea in principle, but in practice is far too sweeping and invasive.
As always, there are ways we can oppose this right now.
What you can do as a non-Canadian
You can share this post and make your Canadian friends aware of what's going on. Erosion of online privacy is an issue being faced in many countries across the world right now, and we need to stand together to oppose it.
One hilarious note: As I write this, I can't actually get to the official parl.ca page to view the full legal text of the bill ā the website seems to have been inadvertently DDOSed, or at least majorly slowed down, by the sheer number of people trying to access it. That's a good sign, since it shows that this bill is getting widespread attention. Now, I confess that means I am not yet fully informed on this matter. But I will be continuing to educate myself and research what this bill will mean going forward, and I will share important information as it becomes available to me.
I don't yet know of any official petitions against bill C-34, since it's so recent, but I'll post about them when I find them.
As always, have hope my friends. Hope is itself an act of resistance. All things must inevitably end ā even the hard times. Even if we lose here and now, laws written by humans can just as easily be un-written by them.
THE UK GOVERNMENT IS CURRENTLY USING THE GUISE OF āPROTECT THE CHILDRENā BY ANNOUNCING A BAN ON SOCIAL MEDIA FOR ANYONE UNDER 16.
This isnāt about protecting children from harm online.
This is about enforcing every single adult in the UK to comply with digital ID and age verification. The government are demanding tech companies to comply with installing/using device controls that would invoke the death of anonymity and privacy online for every single individual in this country.
Thatās such a weird thing to say and a weird account. No proships and profic isnāt good to be, I can just imagine the level of fucked up brain you have and I wanna tell you it deserves jail and most of all hell, imagine if you get kids ? Ughh I feel sorry for them and it wouldnāt look good because everything you say and post here reflects YOU, you are somehow what you imagine and dedicate your posts about. What you write about, ew like imagine going into detail and SPENDING your time on that DELIBERATELY, how and why do you WANT that? Are you traumatised or just fucked up, I wlasys wondered if people are born fucked up. I wonāt thank ao3, and there should be writer censorship and I will do everything in my power to make it reality. No one is acceptable to anyoneās fucked up fanfics, itās the GENERAL taste of people ALL over the world so you canāt expect people to not come for yāall. Accounts like you donāt deserve to be anywhere near internet and I hope you live a miserable life like you put through and wish to do for your fictional characters.
man people like you are so unironically stupid that itās entertaining. you can keep crying though I aināt reading all that.
Iāll keep writing my dark fics and enjoying my favorite horror movies because 1. thereās nothing you can do to stop me 2. Iām mature enough to separate fiction from reality 3. I donāt harass others over fictional characters just to feel morally superior.
This is some puritan āthere is nothing but the surface level thoughts in your mindā cult programming going on.
This is the kind of shit that keeps people from developing a healthy relationship with their own mind, this āif you think something evil you are evilā, or āevil thought equals evil actionā.
This is the thing that has people flip āwell, if Iām evil I might as well act evilā.
Most people are perfectly capable of developing a separation between their thoughts and āwouldnāt it be fun/what ifā scenarios or enjoying dark topics in a fictional setting but recoil at the idea of it happening in real life.
But then thereās people who were never taught the difference between inside thoughts and outside thoughts. Like dudes getting weird about their girlfriend living with her stepbrother, because these dudes cannot differentiate between the fantasy of porn and reality. And the solution isnāt to ban every offensive material, because that material comes from ideas people have, so you cannot outlaw people thinking, you can only teach people about the healthy boundary between fantasies and reality.
Thinking that a lack of censorship and the access to violent/immoral/sexual themes is the issue perpetuates the base idea: bad thoughts make a bad person, which does not create a moral framework for people to follow in their actions.
It kills any idea of behaving morally based on empathic and cognitive process because it eliminates every thought process in the beginning, when the thought is being labeled as ābadā. Because bad thoughts arenāt allowed, they make a bad person. It doesnāt allow for āwhy (do I have this thought)ā or any analysis of āhowā it may be harmful (a contained fantasy doesnāt harm others per se), āifā it may become harmful, and all the other little thoughts that have adjusted and educated people come to the conclusion that a dead dove fic is not harmful in and of itself. That it does not mean the person writing or reading it would act in that way in real life.
Iāve read (and written) nasty shit I would not enjoy happening in real life.
And thereās also a good tangent going into consent here, but Iāve been rambling enough already.
The bills the liberals wanna pass and the local conservative MP responses to the templates I send almost make me wish I'd voted conservative lol ........ if only they didn't have ouioui peepee at the lead š„“
