Anfnajjrmwlqjfkwifjiwkdnslb
WHAT.
ojovivo

pixel skylines
Doug Jones
š
macklin celebrini has autism

Kiana Khansmith
tumblr dot com

izzy's playlists!
art blog(derogatory)
One Nice Bug Per Day

if i look back, i am lost
I'd rather be in outer space šø
No title available
Fieri Frames
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
official daine visual archive
Cosmic Funnies
ā
noise dept.
Color Me Curious
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Bangladesh

seen from United States
seen from Thailand

seen from Malaysia

seen from Netherlands

seen from Indonesia
seen from Ecuador
seen from Chile
seen from Azerbaijan

seen from Spain
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ecuador

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Brazil
@the-war-on-ignorance
Anfnajjrmwlqjfkwifjiwkdnslb
WHAT.
After issuing his guilty plea, Michael Flynn exits courthouse to chants of āLock him up.ā I love this song! Merry Indictmas! Treasonās Greetings!
Lucifer, weāre looking for a guy. Your point?
š½āš¼ļøššāØ
My question about ending net neutrality:
What problem is ending net neutrality trying to solve?
What failure of the current internet is ending net neutrality supposed to help us overcome? Weāve gone from no internet WHEN I STARTED GRADUATE SCHOOL to BILLIONS of interconnected devices, sites and pathways to information ā a network that has revolutionized whole industries and spread opportunities for learning and commerce around the world.
How is this a problem? How is the current system going to forestall the next generation of developments, thereby justifying the shift toĀ ānot net neutralityā?
Of course, I know the answer to my question. From Trump and the Republicansā point of view, the problem with net neutrality is that net neutrality requires internet providers to forego a revenue stream by preventing them from using their power as internet service providers to compel both internet users and internet content providers to pay to prioritize their activities on the web. In other words, net neutrality prevents what economists callĀ ārent-seekingā behavior in which powerful corporations or entities use their power to extract more than their market-negotiated share of your money and mine.Ā
Ending net neutrality is, in other words, yet another way to transfer wealth UP the social ladder, allowing the wealthy and powerful to use their wealth and power to increase their wealth and power ⦠at your expense.Ā
And that problem ā how to extractĀ ever more of your wealth for their benefit ā is, from Trump and the Republicansā twisted point of view, a problem worth solving.
Hero
Can we just let him out on good behaivor? Cause thatās fucking outstanding.
āIāve been getting these emails saying that, yāknow itās not my position to judge anybody. And I wanna make it quite clear that I didnāt judge him. Yāknow I know God is the only judge we have. I just set the appointment up.ā
I donāt even believe in God and thatās still a badass quote.
My nigga said he set the appointment up. Legendary.
His lawyer was smiling like a proud father
Yāknow I know God is the only judge we have. I just set the appointment upā
And this is the kind of shit they could stop us from seeing if net neutrality is abolished.
headlines I like to see
Why would you post the headline but not the article? (X)
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/with-net-neutrality-on-the-chopping-block-communities_us_5a0f467de4b0e6450602eaa5
We should be loud and clear in the coming weeks like weāve been before: net neutrality is crucial to helping everyone, regardless of where they live or how much money they make, get online.
But thereās another way we can fight for an open internet.
Last week, 19 towns across Colorado voted to allow the exploration of creating a local, public alternative to expensive private providers.
Fort Collins voters went the furthest, passing a measure to finance an assessment of starting a city-owned broadband utility, which would aim to provide faster service at a cheaper price. That means residents could have a say in whether a new public network maintains the principle of net neutrality, whatever the FCC decides in the future.
āPeople who donāt normally get excited or vote actually turned out this time and actually got energized,ā said one resident who had campaigned for the measure.
Not everyone was excited. Industry groups spent more than $450,000 campaigning against the measure. In fact, the very reason Colorado towns had to vote āyesā before even exploring public broadband is because of an industry-backed state law requiring municipalities to jump through hoops to take control of their internet infrastructure. (The industry has successfully pushed similar legislation in over 20 states.)
Comcast and the like are quaking in their boots about a public option, and they should be. Cities like Chattanooga, Tennessee, which became the first U.S. city to offer gigabit internet speed after going public, are outperforming private providers and even forcing them to innovate to play catch up.
Why shouldnāt internet access be a public good? The web should be like the Postal Service, which, because itās public, provides affordable mail service to everyone, rich or poor, in all areas of the country.
And why should a handful of corporate executives and investors get rich while providing expensive, slow access and unbearable customer service? Comcastās CEO, billionaire Brian Roberts, pocketed $33 million last year alone while running Americaās most hated corporation.
People need the internet for life in the 21st century, to communicate, apply for jobs, and access crucial resources. Everyone should have affordable access.
(17th Nov, 2017 - Donald Cohen)
I would completely support the internet being a public service; thereās no reason that it isnāt considered a fundamental use in this modern day and age, it touches every aspect of our lives just like public roads, education, and government- thereās no reason we shouldnāt have a non-privately owned option!
YES THIS??? FUCKING PLEASE.
After testing 125,000 kids in 52 countries and regions around the world, the OECD came to a somewhat obvious conclusion: girls are better than boys at working together to solve problems. Not only that, but in the first-ever PISA assessment of collaborative problem solving, girls scored higher in every region tested, by an average of 29 points, worth about half a year of schooling.
A PISA assessment in 52 countries finds girls are better than boys at solving problems together ā Quartz (via infoneer-pulse)
_
Not obvious to me, but still really interesting.
(via realcleverscience)
Not obvious to me *as a man
Very obvious to me on an all-girls physics competition team in high school :)
Saint Lucia is the only country in the world named after a woman.
The MermaidĀ (2016).
what the hell
I need to watch this now.Ā
itās a hilarious film
And deservedly so.
That photo isnāt the only gross/super weird one in the article, which includes thoughts from the photog and information about the parasitic fungus.
fall is not cute it is the season of death and ur sweater will not protect u. not even ur sweater paws.
jokes on you I love death and being dead and I will wear my sweater to the grave
Young asthma inhaler (young puff?)
Hereās a short compliation of my favorite paranormal vines to help cheer everyone up
@glumshoe
Ahhhh! I made it into a Vine compilation!Ā