The Master

An Egyptian Male Dom following the left hand path and seeking perverted female slaves.

[the3asal]

Looking for female slaves

[coollytremendousobserver]

WHAT "IS" BLACK MAGIC?

A seemingly simple question one would assume is easily answered. However, that isn't so because often when one uses the term they are thinking of witches over a cauldron or someone similar casting all manner of spells, etc. Often persons enter the craft (witchery) to learn the code, secure the formulas and otherwise learn to be able to somehow make the universe move at their command. What we want are "miracles" of sorts. And to be able to make them happen is a big plus. Many will say that isn't their reason for joining the craft and I will agree except we are all fascinated by the fact we cannot control the universe in which we live which leads us to seek to interact with it . . . I begin to digress. Witches don't "practice " black magic. However, when it comes to the term itself, there is nothing positive about it.

Black magic is traditionally defined as the use of supernatural powers, rituals, or magic for evil, selfish, or malicious purposes. Often associated with the "left-hand path," it focuses on self-serving goals, controlling others, or causing harm, in contrast to white magic, which is typically seen as benevolent and altruistic.

It's the good witch vs. bad witch concept we have grown up with, mirrored in "The Wizard of Oz". All of us in the craft know that there are moments of anger, etc, in our lives where we are or feel malevolent. At the same time we feel otherwise so actually black magic has, in it's way, been defined by the religions who also rely on the supernatural if one gives it some thought. In other words, the magic a witch may "practice" can be good or bad or black and white. Even then what is occurring has to be filtered thru her reasons why.

If the primary defining factor in black magic is the intention to harm then the xian Almighty and the Allah of Islam aren't above exercising that ability. Holy Writ is replete with descriptions of the Almighty's anger even if he is sad doing so. An explanation of the term is black magic is meant to manipulate, harm and violate the free will of another using hexes, spells and rituals intended to cause misfortune, disease or injury. I am sure (and I include myself) there are those on tumblr who have wished the worst on the tumblrgods for any number of reasons. You might say it can be summed up with the phrase: "Wishing the worst on someone else".

How that occurs can involve rituals, voodoo dolls, all manner of implements and items . . . one can go online and find myriad means described as effective. The fact is devotees of the Dark Lord don't actually encourage engaging in damning rituals though we can if we wish. Doing so doesn't involve carrying out some defined ritual. If I'm angry with someone I simply share my issue with His Wickedness and that's it. Why?

First, while I have learned to be prudent. How I feel now may not be how I feel a few hours from now. Second, a current term often used is "karma". The biblical expression no one wants to use is "We reap whaat we sow". A more worldly phrase is: "What goes around comes around". Maybe not in the way we want or wish, but "it" does and I see that as the response of the Dark Lord so why should I worry even if I feel, at times, helpless. Third, I'm a devotee of the Dark Lord. I trust Him. Let's get back to the "magic".

Me? Magick happens. Black magic is the dark side . . . However, there are no good witches and bad witches unless we seek such a label and even then each of us in the craft at any given moment can elect to indulge in efforts seeking to achieve an end both good or bad. This is where it gets interesting.

My blog isn't political. However, it seems every election cycle there are witches advocating the casting of spells, hexes and curses against this candidate or that. The problem is there are witches, etc, on the other side who are doing the same thing. It's similar to a war where both sides are calling on the same God.

When I see the phrase " Black magic" it sounds oh so ominous when all it is someone wishing ill on another.

One listening to one singing the old popular song "That Old Black Magic" is meant to see it is love . . . when it isn't. Rather the song is misleading,

Too simple? As a devotee of the Dark Lord I take the KISS approach -keep it simple and sincere. If I'm angry (even with the tumblrgods) I take it to His Wickedness directly (and, yes, I will expound my malevolence at that moment ). What He does, i believe, is let me , midst however I act or whatever I do, "talk it out" . . . with Him and myself . . . and then?

It isn't that He doesn't act. Why am I reminded of Edmond Dantes and "The Count of Monte Cristo" . . . "Wait and Hope?" Yes, this topic and related issues may require one really

Think about it.

[coollytremendousobserver]

THAT SINCERE FIRST STEP? . . . .

Artwork … what the artist often intends and what the viewer sees can be two different “things”. While I all the time object to the Dark Lord being portrayed in the way we see him in the illustration, the truth is that caricature is common and the darkness does symbolize the “unknown” one enters when they surrender to their lusts and desires. Things sensual and sexual as well as spiritual are with us, surround us, impact us, even burden us. Our attitudes and decisions are constantly affected and impacted by our senses and our imaginations which all the time clash with what I will call our morality … those guides and limits we apply to ourselves when it comes to interaction with others, etc. Of course, the illustration has meaning. For the artist . . . but then there are the beholders. Each of us "see" thru our own "life lens" . What do you “see”?

Me? Right now I see a person quietly yet hesitantly stepping onto the left hand path, that “life highway” often defined in so many different ways because each traveler is her or his own person especially here online. For me that highway is centered on seeking knowledge. And while so many things can be said about what that means, for me it has to do with seeking , facing and finding me … indulging (yes, I use that word) in things sensually and sexually sinful if I wish because lust and desire happens within me just as it does everyone else. So, when it comes to things sensual, sexual and spiritual, when it comes to these three, I am free to explore them because I am created the way I am. I can travel the oft-taken path by being what others expect of me or I can walk in my lane on this often misunderstood path where I, to put it bluntly, explore what I wish and engage if I want in whatever actions I wish when it comes to lust and desire as long as I am prudent, etc. What I see in the illustration right now is a woman on the verge of making another decision where she is stepping into a path that is unknown because doing so opposes everything that she is told is right and safe … and in real life that happens everyday.

The Dark Lord wants each of us to know and understand we have freedom to decide without the demands imposed by those behavioral , societal and moral codes which govern how then shall we live and where anything sexual and sensual is first seen as sinful. Of course, because of these one can also see the "awful" and "fearful" in such illustrations and that is how the church and the religions want one to respond. The Dark Lord is supposed to be repulsive so it's important the artwork depict Him in that way but is iHe? Let’s take a leap and say the female figure is deciding whether or not, might as well go for it, to whether or not to indulge in casual sex. Does she say “yes” or “no”? Whatever! While an immediate “No” is morality’s expected response unless the sex is permissible (marriage), the truth is simple sex isn’t simple for the most part. So saying “yes” is fraught and freighted will all manner of complications and implications Followers of the Dark Lord, seeing lust, desire and sex as normal within us, are free to indulge if we wish so the satanic caricature behind her isn’t pushing her or even tempting her. He is reminding her she is free to choose for herself , that lusts and desires are normal and “yes” is a response without worrying about some sort of divine retribution. The way the Dark Lord is presented could just as well be handsome or beautiful which would be more accurate because that is how even xian Scripture describes Him.

I’m sitting on the porch of our beach house writing about what I see as I view the illustration right now. So what I am sharing in this article isn’t , for me, the last word, the absolute definitive. This is what I see now. That’s the beauty of art. Tommorrow how I see the artwork will be different in some way I'm sure. Still, I do see the underlying sexual tension the illustration is meant to evoke. I don’t see His Wickedness (the affectionate title I give to the Dark Lord) as we see Him described by the artist. A horrid, ugly ogre. The truth is He can’t be described. No one knows. Yet there are those who portray Him as they do and that portrayal is what it is because of their agenda.

Think about it.

As I view the artwork shared by @hannahhubbard4, I see me at that moment not when i ventured into something sensually sinful. It was the moment I made a sincere decision to follow Him . . . when I stepped onto the left hand path.

[coollytremendousobserver]

PASSING . . . a fact of life often avoided and overlooked today by some and the term itself is seen as derogatory? when it isn't. Interracial interaction as the result of passing can impact a future generation. Might as well say so upfront:

My husband received a call at home where he shared he had been summoned to the local hospital for what he was told was a family emergency. A young couple was having their first child and something had occurred . . . I learned later that when the father witnessed the birth he suddenly yelled at his wife and walked out. For you see, the baby was, well, black. The couple was white as were both of their families. The wife was no less almost hysterical I am told. She said she had never been with another man since their marriage and couldn't understand, didn't understand what was happening. The doctors and other staff were trying to calm the situation. However, the family members present, hers and his, were all alarmed . . . Suddenly the sweet wife of two years appeared to be a slut.

Sometimes it takes folks in old Southern families to understand what had happened. The new mom wasn't into black men on the side. It took an aged great grandmother to "fess up" to a family secret. What happened can be summed up with one word not often heard today -

PASSING . . . .

At the hospital the aged matriarch called my husband aside and it quickly became evident what had happened. Widowed great grandma had married a black man who passed for white. Even she wasn't aware at the beginning. The story is an interesting one . . . the truth being there was always this fear that suddenly the truth would be exposed in a subsequent offspring. However, it didn't or hadn't happened. Then two generations later, with the great grandfather long dead, suddenly it happened. My husband found the new father in a local bar, returned him to the hospital where great grandma confirmed the truth and the marriage was saved . . .

Passing for white has a long tradition in the South especially. It was "understood" if one was aware and might never be mentioned or wasn't. Why not? The truth was in the days before DNA one could never be sure there hadn't been a crossing of the color line in the family tree. Sure, it wasn't something openly addressed. When I later talked about it with our daughter, about this idea, no . . . this fact of "passing", the two of us watched the old movie "The Imitation of Life" where that topic was a central feature of the plot of the flick.

What happened with the young couple and their families' response after all this isn't the focus of this article, only the fact that "passing" is a reality often overlooked because it's rare today or is it? I mention it because, well, it happened . . . I have to wonder how the young wife felt when she realized what was happening as she held her new baby and her husband thought she was a whore, a name he threw about when he saw the baby and felt crushed himself?

The current "Every white wife needs to be bred by a black guy" craze is into big-bellied pregnant white women pictured with virile black lovers on the side anxious to be taken again and again. One might call this underlying effort scientific racism . . . eugenics? Oh, well, all manner of thoughts come to mind. Non-monogamous marriages being just one. Today, Interracial sensual and sexual interaction can be exciting and engaging if one wants to indulge. Doing so is certainly accepted. The truly sinful side of the current online equation has to do with white wives with white husbands indulging in adultery with black men and getting pregnant . . . . which also happens. It's popularity as a topic to be considered if not indulged and enjoyed is growing . . .

However, this article points to a different topic: passing . . . Rather than sum up, I will stop here and . . .

Think about it.

[realpatriarchy]

Feminism has lied to you dumb bitch. Men will always win and the patriarchy is forever. You might as well stop pretending and get on your knees

[ankitameee]

meeeeeee n mstr

[realpatriarchy]

Feminism has lied to you dumb bitch. Men will always win and the patriarchy is forever. You might as well stop pretending and get on your knees

[ankitameee]

meeeeeee n mstr

[the3asal]

You know your place

[coollytremendousobserver]

INTIMATE EMPOWERMENT?

A question was asked about women and oral sex which I won't quote because of how it was put. No disrespect to the sender who posed the question in the crassest of terms. I'm sure it was asked simply to see if I would respond. Why would I? I am free, as a devotee of the Dark Lord, to react and interact as I wish when it comes to matters sensual as long as I am discreet and prudent. I recast the question:

Are women drawn to engage in oral sex?

Psychology Today is among science's studied conclusions so Wendy won't put her oar in. I quote from online:

"Yes, many women are drawn to and enjoy performing oral sex on men, often citing pleasure in providing gratification, feeling empowered, or enjoying the intimacy of the act. It is a common sexual activity, with studies indicating that for many, it is a preferred way to create intimacy and provide pleasure (Psychology Today)."

It appears the mean age for "first" experience with a guy was 18 years old. However, the overall stats are interesting. "Overall, 34.1% had oral sex with a man by age 15, 65.9% by age 18 and 92.8% by age 25.

And: " . . . those born between 1990-2000 (age l5-20) were significantly more likely to have younger age first oral sex with a man."

A number of sources assert that these numbers are underreported and are much higher.

While the moral codes often present "oral sex' as perverse, the reality is its an accepted practice where a woman might appear submissive but is, in fact, feels empowered and in control. A woman will say to herself and by indulging is saying to whoever, "I can and I will because I want to do so" for any number of reasons I won't list here.

Why am I reminded of the not insignificant comment made during a " girls' night out by one of the ladies present: "He may have my hair in his hands or my ears and think he's in charge but i have teeth . . . Every time a guy enjoys oral he puts his manhood at risk if he gets rough. or I can't breathe. " I smile, knowing if a guy wants to enjoy oral and the woman is willing to indulge him, he is the one who is surrendering to the greater risk. . . .

I'm sure this last comment wasn't what the sender expected but it did come to mind . . .

Think about it.

[calaiiangel]

[coollytremendousobserver]

WHAT IS IT ABOUT ANAL?

Anal sex is increasingly popular among women due to a blend of curiosity, a desire to increase pleasure through new forms of stimulation (such as concurrent clitoral touch), and the motivation to please partners, according to research on women's sexual experiences. It is often viewed as a way to enhance intimacy and explore different sensations, with studies showing 30–44% of women have engaged in the practice. 

It is believed those stats are underreported when one notes the frequency the topic is discussed online in womens' discussion groups. One can only conclude that anal is, like oral, an expected "event' women and men include in their repertoire or menu of passionate pleasures to be experienced. Toys such as the Hush and, of course, the stylish plugs that women often "wear" are witnesses to what can only be seen as a pleasure women seek in solo form and not just with male partners. Also, the notable increase in the sale of strapons and phallic toys reveal the growing popularity of the practice between women. However, what isn't often discussed is the growing solo use of the plug by women often in public where they experience what I will call a sort of private passion-filled perversion.

A recent revelation among some is the discovery that products such as Anal-eze are finding their way into the cabinets of today's wives and women. And I'm not leaving out men who also indulge.

While one can witness the increasing emphasis regarding anal what is witnessed but not discussed is how anal, like oral, is what can be labeled as "expected" even though a woman may say "never", the reality is more and more are wanting to indulge, even if it's solo, at first for the "been there done that" experience. There is a wickedness that envelops the body when one wears a plug during their busy day.

Anal isn't vanilla sex though some seem to say it is. Too many see it as a hetero experience when it very definitely isn't. Anal is a staple when it comes to women. It's an acceptable choice among even discerning xian women when it doesn't involve significant others.

Anal is definitely different . . . some say it's like my tumblr, an acquired "taste". Anal play IS pleasurable . . .

Unlike the illustration, it doesn't have to be a "he" focused event . . . it is more often with "me" or another "she" . . . and the experience is not just different . . .

As a follower of the Dark Lord I am free to indulge if I wish, with who I wish and I have. More than a few times I have sat in church . . . . What is it about anal?

Think about it.

[the3asal]

Apply for submission here

[coollytremendousobserver]

("The Lovers", Jet Joseph Marie Lambieaux, leader of the Belgian Realists, 1852 and 1908)

THAT COMPLEX CONFLICT BETWEEN "ART" & "PORN".

So the above was shared with me with the query from a follower who pointed me to the posting of the artwork by @anothertortured-poet , asking "Why is this permissible?", an interesting way to phrase the question when it comes to acceptable artworks displaying intimate involvements, i. e. blatant sexual situations. The underlying issue as I see it is that olde debate: "What is art versus what is porn?" When it comes to Wendy, and I will put my oar in here, it's all subjective. I point to that old adage: "the eye of the beholder". Let's look at what is labeled Lambieaux's "The Lovers". It could just as easily be called "Lover's Lunch" or "Lover Lunching", etc. Whatever . . . . It's publicly acceptable erotic art and , frankly, my interest is who and how this was modeled for him when he created the work. Yes, think about it. Lambieaux and his colleagues created their works by viewing "real life " scenes so one has to wonder what went on as his hands worked the clay which created this well known masterpiece of the period. Similar to the portrait painters' nude models, this work had to be "posed" and I'm sure the scene wasn't static . . . the artist wanted to capture her facial expression better described as "that perfect facial expression". . . . And this work wasn't created in an hour or even a day.

Since we women can experience multiple orgasms "without waiting" as I"ve heard it described, let us say the "pose" here must have been "event filled". I have to ask how many others were at his studio as he worked and their responses to what was occurring? Yes, I'm being wicked.

Society attempts to describe what is acceptable and not acceptable when it comes to things "sex". One attempt is: The creator's goal is the deciding factor. Hmmm.

We are told art featuring nudity or sexual acts are generally separated by intent, purpose and reception. What was the creator's intent? Humans have a talent for giving different reasons for this or that often in order to explain to varied audiences the "why" something is what it is. The artwork is outright oral sex and, considering the look on the face of the woman enjoying it, that moment of orgasm or , at least, at the moment before.

An online explanation shares: Art is created to be appreciated. An artist like Michaelangelo might use nudity to explore the human form or "glorify creation. Porn is created to be consumed. The producers primary goal is to turn the viewer on . . . . Pray tell what does one see when she or he views the above? What is overlooked is this reality: How I respond to the work one day might not be how I do the next day. One online explanation stands out: the Viewer's Mindset. If the viewer approaches art with "unclean" intent, they may perceive it as pornographic reqardless of the artist's goal. So we're back to "its all subjective"?

A "pro tip" provided online states: "If a piece of media makes you stop and think about a message, emotion or story, it's likely leaning toward art. If it's only function is to lead ou toward sexual stimulation, it is likely functioning as porn." Well . . . . Since we humans are created as we are arousal occurs all the time triggered by much less than artwork similar to what I will call "Lovers' Lunch". What is the first thing that comes to mind when one see's this artwork?

The outright open enjoyment of orgasm-filled oral sex and to say otherwise is to deny the realism which was and is the intent of the artist who created the work. How does it not trigger sensual and sexual arousal? He created the artwork for that purpose.

Yet there are those who say they don't see the "sex"?

There is much more I can write in this response but I won't. Rather I will

Think about it.

[coollytremendousobserver]

"I do have a question. Do you think the higher people go in church leadership the more they are drawn to our Dark Lord or do you think our Dark Lord puts more “opportunities” in front of them? It just seemed to me the more involved in church the stronger the attraction to men. Maybe it is my imagination."

No, it isn't your imagination. Xianity consciously and subconsciously centers the follower on "sex" . . . things sensual and sexual. Note the language of the Bible speaks to the church as a woman, a "bride" and "unfaithfulness" using adultery, as the example. And when speaking of things spiritual , the biblical text can be downright bestial. Consider the biblical text describing a woman (representing the nation pf Israel, "God's chosen" ) lusting after men with "genitals like those of donkeys and whose emission was like that of horses" is found in Ezekiel 23:20. This verse uses explicit, metaphorical language to describe the spiritual adultery/idolatry of Israel. Then there is the entire book of Hosea where the prophet is commanded by the Almighty to marry a known working hooker and let her have children by other men, return to the brothel and then "sell all buy her to back", etc. Sensuality is central because everyone is screwing. Even the Virgin Mary, when one takes time to read and study the texts, is underage, unmarried and suddenly pregnant despite the heavenly involvement. Joseph knows this and even if he is an older man, decides to marry her. Notice she leaves town while she is pregnant and stays with a relative. Hmmm.

What comes to mind as I answer this query asked by a tumblrite is this:

First, things sensual and sexual often take a front seat when it comes to one's life style concerns when they become involved in church because of the biblical and moral behavioral "requirements" that begin to emerge as one seeks to "walk the walk". Overall, while one is conscious of other church members and their opinions, there is the reality that the xian's behavior is being constantly scrutinized by the xian Almighty. What begins to emerge is a growing apprehension , an angst that occurs as the xian strives to deal with her or his lust and desires and that worry about "Is this sin?" when it comes to daily living. A result . . . no, I will say the result is one's striving to deal with and overcome what is sinful actually enhances one's desires because lust and desire is always with us since we are created with the senses and the mind that we have, the fact that sex is part and parcel of who we are. Thus sensual sins, because the xian strives to avoid them is more conscious of them. Since lust, desire and arousal are a given and individual to each of us, this "worry abour doing it" engages a desire to "do it" or focus on it. A xian can find themselves focused on sensual sin and suddenly her effort to avoid it causes one to begin to focus on it.

Attraction to men has to do with what many label the "Kissinger syndrome", . . . attraction to power . . . and when it happens within the church there is a risk and excitement that enhances one's desires.

Women especially often condemn sexual sin outwardly while desiring it inwardly so are trapped in that constant "state of seeking forgiveness" wherein she is constantly faced with her desires all over again. I have shared in the past that often xians sin mentally and otherwise even while seeking forgiveness . . . i. e. praying for forgiveness while lusting for the person next do them or knowing when they pray they won't stop.

Sinless perfection is impossible and xian morality only keeps "sex" at the top of the list by condemning what is desired because of the way we are created.

Does the Dark Lord "create" opportunities within the church to tempt others. Temptation (a biblical sensual term) happens because we are created as we are. The Dark Lord doesn't plan for one's downfall. Rather He wants his devotees to realize that we are free to think and act as we wish when it comes to things sensual and sexual and when we act we do so with prudence, discretion, responsibility and common sense. Solo sex is a gift we are given by our Creator where we are able to indulge our sensual seen as sinful desires. The illustration I have selected, while it may not be on point is indicative. Even those who profess their faith emote as one sees here. The cross and the dog collar? Is she signalling she is submissive to her Savior? . . . kink and xian?

Yes, this is Wendy wandering around her thoughts while wondering about the question. This could be better expressed but this is "off the cuff" . Yes, the topic is more "involved" . This is just a kind of starting point where one can begin to really

Think about it.

[cloudmistdweller]

yes !!

[coollytremendousobserver]

WHEN ONE RECOGNIZES THE REAL UNSPOKEN MESSAGE . . . .

"Its fine to frequently fuck whoever you wish to have fun with. . . ." Certainly a wicked message but one stated by one of the gaggle of emerging teen girls watching the movie "Mystic Pizza", a popular flick from the past they had chosen to watch. Not her exact words but similar. Yes, we were hosting a slumber party. Hubby was away and the family room, filled with quilts, pillows and air mattresses,etc, looked like something out of the "Arabian Nights". Believe it or not the phones were off. Enough said about that.

I often use the phrase "out of the mouths of babes" because, well, truth, especially when it comes to things sensually wicked often emerges from that source. Often we moms and others can be or act shocked, often smile and think its cute because , well, its all girls and we were one once, etc, The fact is the girls recognized a truth often overlooked by even those xian moms who will advocate abstinence . . . I witnessed this more than once. It's that subconscious application of the adage I quote above.

The movie is fun to watch and one of two I have found myself "reviewing" on my tumblr (and deservedly so). No one would consider "Mystic Pizza" porn. . . . However, the message isn't just there, it's clear if one is honest . . . and devotees of the Dark Lord are called to be just that. We don't run around finding "sex and screwing" everywhere when it comes to personal morality and the codes we are called to follow by society and religion. We simply see things for what they are and know that lust and desire is normal. If one takes time to view the flick several sensual foci are apparent:

JoJo is screwing her intended sans marriage and its her guy who wants to marry. Nothing wrong with the sex, its the marital commitment. His openly, publically, renaming his boat "Nympho" is presented within a supposed monogamous relationship. Still his doing so speaks volumes about JoJo and everyone is smling. And it's apparent her parents and all the adults, who are all ardent Orthodox xians (see the wedding at the end) know they are frequently fucking because after the reception after the ceremony JoJo tells her besties the family asked about her being "knocked up".

And Kat's roll in the hay with the husband . . . even her employer was aware and says nothing about her screwing if you watch the interaction after Kat feels "hurt".

The there is Kat, a high school wench who is babysitting for an older married man while his wife is away. SHE premeditates the affair where she is frequently fucking him and then has the gall to act offended by tearing up the check when the guy's wife returns. Why is it that is seen as noble when she is the one who created her "moral" issue. And these are only three points because I won't begin to speak to Julia Robert's character. The "stars" that made the real sexual impact, at least for the princesses running between the big screen and the fridge were JoJo and Kat. Especially Kat.

Emergiing teens may seem all innocent but their minds are like sponges when it comes to sex and pleasure. Hormones hum and that can't be avoided. A mom and dad can say "No" but the truth is girls . . . and boys . . .girls especially tho because we know from birth we are pursued by guys even if we say we "hate" them . . . focus on what we do, what we allow and, maybe, what we say . . . What is too often missed and quite often heard if one listens is the little wenches are wise beyond their years when it comes to the messages one sees in media, etc.

We live in a society focused on things sensual and sexual and, if one is willing to admit it, we always have.

Oh, and babysitter Kat screwing the husband and then getting angry with herself, that made an impact because every one of the girls were saying she was stupid . . . to tear up the check.

Think about it.

[underworldsuccubus-deactivated2]

If God doesn't exist then Satan is also a fiction of civilization of repression by ALL religion. Why not put your faith in science? Surely it's much better to eat, drink and fuck without ANY religious hang ups from whatever source because such beliefs are all man-made and we don't need them now? I can see from a taboo point of view how being a Satanist can get you off but aren't you kidding yourself like Christians etc in believing in the supernatural? Nice pots to wank to though. Cheers.

What is more boring than atheism. The ism and isn’t an “ism.”Atheists can be so dismissive of the majority of humanity that puts faith in supernatural figures.They fail to accept or perhaps do not understand that the human condition requires a constant exercise in the suspension of reality.We will always have religions. And if one falls another will take its place. If a devotee of one becomes disenchanted, he or she will replace it with another.Gods become irrelevant and go out of style only to be replaced with something just as magical, even for those who don’t believe in magic.Atheist, explain optimism to me. Why is it that people will believe in a more positive outcome than the facts of a particular situation allow?And yet, it is scientifically proven the optimists are generally happier and have better outcomes in life.

Atheism leads us always to an existential conclusion. We are an accident of nature in a universe full of random chaos.  There is no divine meaning for our existence, therefore, we are what we define ourselves to be.

When a human being is reduced to having nothing to live for beyond what their own abilities provide, that human being is reduced to one unit, separate from the universe. Alone.

If an atheist should find himself or herself a slave and this person must work a heavy hammer all day crushing rock for a human master to earn his/her daily bread, what motivation does this slave have to go on besides hunger and fear of the whip?

But if that slave believes in a God, a God that man or woman loves and trusts, the slave go work beyond his/her abilities, because there is faith and joy in a promise of justice, even if that justice comes after death.Likewise, a sex slave that is forced to suck 40 cocks a day to meet her pimps quota would be miserable if she only did it to get her daily ration of heroin. But if she is satanic, she would suck the 40th cock just as passionately as the first because she loves her supernatural master and knows this pleases Him.

When would an atheist ever put on a bomb vest and go kill 100 innocents? The fact that the suicide bomber is committing evil is beside the point.

There is a power in faith founded on a higher power, even if that higher power is a myth, that defeats the atheist on the battlefield. When would 100,000 atheists take up arms and go to war with the battle cry, “For atheism!”

It is an inescapable fact of the human condition that we are at war with ourselves. Perhaps we always will be.

We need our fantasies. Yes, too many people take these fantasies too seriously. But even where we see the difference, there is little difference. Because at its core, adherence to a religion or a mythology stems from a pursuit of perfection.

Men do not put their trust in other men so easily as they put their trust in the idea of a perfect being. Superman is but a secular pop culture version of Jesus Christ for people who have lost interest in or never had any in the original "superman.“ Who is to say that 100 years from now Superman will graduate from a comic book superhero to a full blown religion with his own church?He is already idolized. In a sense, the multiplex cinema is already his cathedral.

But the atheist points to the scientist, instead. Scientists are not high priests. They do not evangelize, they just do science.All the scientists in the world warn us of global warming and the coming climate apocalypse, and where has this gotten us?

Meanwhile, the Christian churches in America have gotten in bed with politicians and turned that religion into a pseudo nationalist religion that defends “American Exceptionalism” and capitalism, as if these were somehow compatible with the New Testament. They are not!

Christians have so perverted their interpretation of the Bible that they preach the right of man to have dominion over the earth to justify capitalism’s rape of the planet, and completely ignore their mandate to be good stewards of Creation.

Biblical teaching also claims that Satan was left (exiled?) on earth to be its ruler. This Christian God pits man against Satan? Who is the steward of earth? Who is the ruler? Who is the defender of Creation?

[satanslefthand6661]

If you are a Christian and you disobeyed God he will send you to internal damnation forever 😱 fuck that I want nothing to do with That piece of shit God 😡

Follow Satan and he will give you whatever you want and then some and all he asked for in return is for your loyalty to serving him Give Satan a chance and he will show you who the true God of creation really is😍. HAIL FATHER SATAN forever666 Fuck Jehovah and his worthless piece of shit son Jesus Christ

[coollytremendousobserver]

SEEKING "SATAN" the search for who he is?. . . an old article edited and posted in response to a serious query by a follower . . .

Between sitting in my pentagram and meditating on “things Dark Lord” I have often written in my articles that the Dark Lord in which I believe is beyond,  far beyond, the Satan so often espoused by society both religious and secular.    We are given a mind and, while xianity and elements of society influenced by them wants us to rein in or discipline our thoughts to remain within what we are told about the Old Spectre , we have been created to do the opposite. The mind is infinite and always questioning.   As I have often stated, especially in recent articles, the Dark Lord wants us to use our minds to “discover” him….not really discover but, rather, to acknowledge him as more than he who has been presented to us through the sacred scriptures of the revealed religions.

We humans have the propensity to “put things in a box”.   That is, we create a convenient position from which to begin and then act within a set of limits we create,  such as allowing ourselves to see Satan as both biblical and through the artwork that has been created as a result of the varied agendas of those who have “expressed” him or tried to “discover” him over time.  Maybe it is time we grab hold of what we can call a fundamental point or truth and then jump out of the box and begin to really take a look at how Satan is revealed to us?

People have actually done this.  Have we been willing to see that?  And maybe, when we examine what is written by them,  we will comprehend what is ridiculous and what is serious study.  

There is an interesting book out there on this point.  It’s been around for a while,  laughed at and criticized,  causing the author to be labelled a heretic by some,  his work a waste of time by others,  avoided by current popular satanism because he isn’t engaged in any one of their agendas. The "church" sees his work as "interesting but not informative, his conclusions flawed" because, well, he sees Satan as an employee of the xian God…..really an employee of the god of the revealed religions rather than the “Great Adversary” opposed to things good.  Criticized by xian and pagan alike,  the book,  “Satan,  A Biography” by one Harry Kelly might be worth a scan if not a good “side read” (reed) for the discerning devotee who is seeking to see the Dark Lord beyond the limits of the xian Bible and how we have perceived him within the current  horned and tail and similar constructs or boxes we have placed him in.   

So,  if you are willing to think outside the box when it comes to Satan,  sit back: Kelly's book concludes:

“He’s not the enemy of God, his name really isn’t Lucifer and he isn’t even evil. And as far as leading Adam and Eve astray, that was a bad rap stemming from a case of mistaken identity.

“There’s little or no evidence in the Bible for most of the characteristics and deeds commonly attributed to Satan,” insists the UCLA professor with four decades in what he describes as “the devil business.”

In “Satan: A Biography” (Cambridge Press), Henry Ansgar Kelly puts forth the most comprehensive case ever made for sympathy for the devil, arguing that the Bible actually provides a kinder, gentler version of the infamous antagonist than typically thought.

“A strict reading of the Bible shows Satan to be less like Darth Vader and more and more like an overzealous prosecutor,” said Kelly, a professor emeritus of English and the former director of the university’s Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies. “He’s not so much the proud and angry figure who turns away from God as [he is] a Joseph McCarthy or J. Edgar Hoover. Satan’s basic intention is to uncover wrongdoing and treachery, however overzealous and unscrupulous the means. But he’s still part of God’s administration.”

The view runs in opposition to the beliefs held by many Christians and others about key religious concepts like original sin and the nature of good and evil.

“If Satan isn’t really in opposition to God and he isn’t really evil, then that means the fight between good and evil isn’t an authentic part of Christianity,” Kelly said. “What I’m saying will be scandalous to some people.”

“…Kelly started his academic career at a Jesuit seminary and was ordained in four of the seven holy orders on the way to the priesthood, including the order of exorcist.

“It was at that time that I started my campaign to rehabilitate the devil — to deliver him from evil, as it were,” Kelly said.

“Satan: A Biography” is the culmination of more than 40 years of research into the devil and religious and cultural traditions that have grown up around him. The book is Kelly’s third on the topic.

When it comes to the Old Testament, Kelly insists that Satan’s profile is considerably lower than commonly thought and significantly less menacing. By Kelly’s count, Satan only appears three times in the 45 books that make up the pre-Christian scriptures, the best known being in the Book of Job. On each occasion, Satan is still firmly part of what Kelly calls “God’s administration,” and his activities are done at the behest of “the Big Guy.” But his actions aren’t evil so much as consistent with the translation of “devil” and “satan,” which literally mean “adversary” in Greek and Hebrew, respectively.

“His job is to test people’s virtue and to report their failures,” Kelly said.

Perhaps most surprising is not the figure Satan cuts, but his notable absences in the Old Testament. In the Bible’s first reference to Lucifer, for instance, Satan doesn’t appear — even by implication, Kelly points out. “‘Lucifer’ is Latin for light-bearer,” he said, and was the name given to the morning star, or the planet Venus. Originally written in ancient Hebrew, the passage, on face value, refers to the tyrannical Babylonian king who boasts of his conquests but who is “about to be cast to the ground.” Kelly insists there’s nothing more to the reference than an apt use of metaphor, but the third-century Christian philosopher Origen of Alexandria argued in his best known work, “On First Things,” that the reference applied to Satan.

“Origen says, ‘Lucifer is said to have fallen from Heaven,’” Kelly explained. “'This can’t refer to a human being, so it must refer to Satan.’ Subsequent church fathers found this reasoning persuasive, and so did everyone who followed them.”

Ironically, the only mentions of Lucifer in the New Testament — and there are three of them — refer to Jesus, Kelly said. “Jesus is called 'Lucifer’ or 'the morning star’ because he represents a new beginning.”

Another prominent omission in the Old Testament, Kelly said, can be found in Genesis. “Nobody in the Old Testament — or, for that matter, in the New Testament either — ever identifies the serpent of Eden with Satan,” Kelly said. “The serpent is just the smartest animal, and he’s motivated by envy after being jilted by Adam for Eve.”

Kelly traces the correlation of Satan and the serpent to not long after the New Testament was completed. In his “Dialogue With Trypho,” the second-century Christian martyr Justin of Samaria first argued that Satan appeared as a serpent to tempt Adam and Eve to disobey God, according to Kelly.

“This is what I call 'The New Biography,’” Kelly said. “It starts with Justin Martyr, who implicates Satan in the fall of Adam and Eve. By causing Adam and Eve to fall, Satan caused his own fall.

“The second step in this new and phony biography comes with Origen, who said, 'No, Satan’s first sin was not deceiving Adam and Eve or refusing to go along with God’s plan of creating Adam in his own image,’” Kelly said. “'It was to sin out of pride like the morning star, like Lucifer in the passage from Isaiah.’ Turning Satan into God’s enemy is a two-step process.”

Meanwhile, in passages in Luke, Matthew, Corinthians and elsewhere in the New Testament, Satan continues to act as a tester, enforcer and prosecutor but not as God’s enemy, Kelly points out.

“Everyone else has said that by the time Satan gets to the New Testament, he is evil, he’s an enemy of God, but that’s not so,” Kelly said. “The whole biblical picture of Satan is that of a bad cop to Yaweh’s good cop in the Old Testament, and to Jesus’ good cop in the New Testament. Throughout, Satan is someone who works for God.”

A scene in the New Testament’s Book of Revelation is often cited today as evidence that Satan was the deceiver of Adam and Eve, but the interpretation stems from a fundamental misunderstanding, Kelly argues.

“'That ancient serpent’ refers to the giant sea serpent Leviathan, not the garden snake of Eden,” he said. “In Revelation, Leviathan has morphed into a dragon, or large serpent, with the seven heads and 10 horns, which is still further removed from the seductive serpent who deceived Eve.”

In addition to linking Satan with the Garden of Eden, the passage from Revelation also has been used to prove that Satan fell early on in the Bible, but Kelly insists that is not accurate.

“Satan’s ouster from heaven in Revelation is explained as taking place in the future,” Kelly said. “In Revelation 12:10, a voice says that 'the accuser of our brothers is cast out, overcome by the testimony of martyrs.’ Since there were no martyrs until Christ died, that has to be in the future.”

Similarly, a passage in the Gospel of Luke, when Jesus reports having seen “Satan fall like lightning,” has been misinterpreted, according to Kelly. “Jesus saw the fall in the past because he had the vision the day before he describes it to the apostles,” Kelly said. “But Jesus is referring to a future fall [of Satan] from his position as God’s attorney general.”

This is not to say, however, that Kelly contends that Satan is likeable.

“Jesus doesn’t like him, and Paul doesn’t like him,” Kelly explained. “He represents the old guard in the heavenly bureaucracy, and everyone longs for him to be disbarred as the chief accuser of humankind.”

Kelly does have an agenda-to “rehabilitate Satan” -and that should be considered.  But he seems to be serious in his research and conclusions.   Others will and do use his work to reinforce their own ideas or purported atheism. Whatever,  Kelly’s conclusions are certainling “out of the box" when it comes to traditional xian thought.

For me the Dark Lord is "beyond" the box because Kelly, xians and most others see "Satan" as a created being and the divine isn't created, divinity IS and by IS I mean it exists outside of time, no beginning and no end. Most don't give any of this much thought. But then when we seek or call on that "beyond", it has to be sentient. I discuss how I see and relate to the Dark Lord I follow in other articles I share in this tumblr. Much more can be said but end here with my usual benediction

Think about it.

[coollytremendousobserver]

THE BLAME GAME . . . ????

“ I have just read your article ” The Blame Game" and find it to be convoluted and can’t grasp what you’re trying to say. Please condense it for me.“

Gladly, and I don’t mind being called to account when I get wordy and then walk away from an article afterward.

When one uses "The Devil made me do it”, that phrase is an excuse because we are born with free thought and free will and each of us experience lust. How we deal with those lusts and other issues is up to each of us. I have shared that when each of us are called to decide how we should act we should exercise prudence, discretion, responsibility and common sense. Our decisions are our own. In the sense that the Devil or Satan makes us do anything, that reasoning is flawed because He doesn’t need to and doesn’t over all because our decisions are our own.

And our lusts are our own and even those are different from another’s because each of us are individuals. We are created with a mind and senses and things sexual are part of our being evidenced by the fact we have gender. We lust and desire and therefore we are. Why would the Devil make us do something that is inherent within us.. He doesn’t.

Xianity presents to us an Almighty who sets before us what I call a nebulous moral code (ever changing in details and definitions desptie seemingly simply) and a theology which says that though we are created perfect we are imperfect. We are born in sin, live in sin and will die in sin. A glorious eternity awaits if we seek and achieve sinless perfection which is impossible because we sin even as we seek forgiveness under the xian formula where we are told if we do it just right we can obtain forgiveness. We sin, xianity tells us, in thought and deed. I can’t help but sin in my mind all the time so when I am asking the xian Almighty for forgiveness I am often still sinning in my mind and often without realizing it until later. I can never be absolved despite my efforts but I must be absolved to achieve the eternal reward. So though xianity tells me I am born perfect because the xian God is the Creator, I am actually imperfect and must accomplish what xianity tells me in order to achieve that which is impossible to achieve: sinless perfection. Sin sends me to perdition. Good behavior sends me to eternity. That is th bottom line. Forgiveness is demanded but impossible to achieve.

However, xianity always has a way out for the xian believer. But, despite this, we are still carrying that “sin burden” where we are labelled and condemned because of our thoughts much less our deeds. I’ve watched too many wives and women carry this burden. I am reminded of Marley in Dicken’s “Christmas Carol” and the chain he wove in life and carried in death. How I see it is I am constantly never able to live correctly on in a way pleasing to the xian God because I am dealing with my lusts and my response to my lusts. Even if I don't "do" the sin outwardly I "do" so inwardly or with myself. The ancients and even we today often in some way if not actually beat our body into submission to quit having sinful thoughts which is also impossible. I can continue this but won’t because I trust my message is understandable and it is late as I type this.

The Dark Lord is the actual ancient God Who Always Was and Is. Unknown, incomparable and incomprehensible except as far as He wants to be known. He wants what for us? To see who we are as His creation and accept ourselves within the framework of humanity. We all have free will and have to live together. Thus, the Four Maxims which guide our decisiion making when it comes to each other. How we act isn’t the s without the inclusion of others. Why should we feel guilty about what we think, something we can’t avoid doing. This leads to one asking why do i lust and desire as I do.

In the end we have often made into sin what is normal for each of us. Think about it. I am not a bad person because I lust in my mind. Why have we been given the gift of masturbation? Even that release and relief is denied by xianity for any number of reasons when it is one of those areas where we are able to venture into our imagination, etc, and enjoy physical pleasure. As the character Hercule Poirot is credited with saying in one of Agatha Christie’s mysteries: It isn’t wrong to wish someone dead but it is to murder them.“ The same goes for sensual and sexual behaviors. Think about that.

Why am I made to feel guilty about what I think? Xianity does that. Burdens us with guilt, angst and apprehesion over our thoughts. And even when we act in some way, with likeminded others. to satisfy our lusts, these things are "sin” except that we are told they are for any number of reasons.

What is ‘sin" is often determined and influenced by perspective and all manner of other conditions, etc, regardless of “cardinal rules” such as the simple “Thou shalt not’s”. I’m not dealing with that here. Except to say almost if not everything is sin or can be sin or might be sin because xian theology tells me if I"m not sure it is until I know. So the holy men and women of the religions are consulted and it is their determination which often guides these definitions and understandings when they themselves do the same things. See the problem. It never ends because it can ’t according to the religions. Some will say heaven being a gift, we will go there. Yet xian theology teaches that our attitudes and behavior govern our “rewards” so in the end we can never be sure what that is. Catholics have purgatory even after death. Put that in the equation. Yet I am created the way I am with the feelings and senses I experience and the lusts I feel continue.

“The Devil made me do it?” No. That’s a ploy we women use all the time to explain away decisions we have made. We make out as if we are victims when we aren’t. Unless we are the victims because of the results of our own decisions.

Being a victim allows us to avoid what? Deter and deflect where we are able to "defend" the often indefensible by deferring blame to someone else and/or away from ourselves. I have to ask myself is this one of the mechanisms the church and religions use to help the follower seek to achieve sinless perfection by saying the fault actually lies elsewhere when the decisiion we made or the attitude we have is our own. There is NO freedom when one uses that excuse because the truth is we are avoiding the very benefit the devotee of the Dark Lord has, and that is the ability to see it's okay to think and be our "real me".

I will stop trusting this is sufficient to clarify what I am trying to share. I selected the illustration feeling it appropriate for the topic. I don’t think I did a very good job when it comes to condensing. However, I trust I “explained it better” … .

Yes, I am Wendy being windy and not altogether on point but, well, they are the thoughts that come to mind as I type. There is that wanton freedom we women often feel when we say the Devil made me do it when what happened was we exercised our freedom to do as we wanted, whatever that was.

What happens if you're sitting in your pentagram, etc, the Dark Lord speaks and does "give a command"? That isn't the issue here. What I am speaking to is this ongoing, all the time used, excuse when one is dealing with their lusts and desires and aren't willing to "fess up" to their feelings . . . Then, again, the excuse can be understood when it has to do with xians, etc, because they are "taught" (aren't we?) that sin is "of the Devil" and the Devil is the author of all things wrong and sin.

Sure, this is poorly written because I am typing as I'm thinking (off the cuff). Some will say it's simplistic but this is also realistic. And yes this is Wendy wandering thru her thoughts while wondering about the topic. and becoming "windy" also. The point is to

Think about it.

[coollytremendousobserver]

“I really want to belong to the Dark Lord. He will not harm me, but I do not know how to enter into his worship.”

A serious question deserving a serious answer so even my illustration is serious because when one “‘enters into His worship”, the focus is spiritual, not sensual or sexual even if such might occur because true worship is personal, simple really. Yet doing so and feeling as if one is worshipping is often difficult because we want to “know how to do it” and since most followers are solo, what is being asked is how should i feel and know when I’m doing so, it’s for real. What should one expect?

Many are afraid the Old Spectre might actually manifest Himself right then and there in the way we often see portrayed by Hollywood, etc. Then there is what I call the David Copperfield situation: illusory … the puff of smoke or something similar and the monstrous figure with horns and tail, etc, materializes filled with fearful fire and the smell of brimstone like an evil Wizard of Oz.

Seekers and others need to realize belief underpins one’s seeking and following because it’s all so much more than a magic show. We’re human and often we seek some sign proving His Presence. It has to do with me and investing in who I truly am. How does the Dark Lord reveal Himself is an issue each follower must come to terms with. The Dark Lord is more than the Satan in the Bible. He is divine; incomparable and incomprehensible. What I appreciate about my following Him is He isn’t worried about whether or not i have doubts because we all do. He is aware of that fact.

I am created with a free mind and free will. My mind comprehends Him but He is so far above me how much I know of Him is up to Him. But what about me and how i see Him? He has created me with that “power”, that responsibility. I know of Him but can’t see Him. I can often feel His Presence like the breeze. He is the Dark Lord because He is that, dark-in the sense of the unknown. Lord because He is above us in every way yet relates to us and even with us because He, well, created us. Everyone, whether willing to admit it or not, try to grasp the Divine in our own way. We seek to relate to Him. For you see while we see the Dark Lord in the sense He is over all like an autocrat on His throne, the truth is He relates to us as individuals not corporately. When it comes to relationships our experiences are with other individuals. Compare marriage where both pledge their love to one another. How am I sure my spouse loves me?

It’s called faith. I offer it. The xian Bible contains an excellent definition of faith: Being sure of what I hope for and certain of what I cannot see. There is also an acrostic I use: F orsaking All I Trust Him. Its the basis not just of marriage but other relationships. These speak to the necessity for belief. How does one prove the sincerity of their relationship once they commit themselves?

We simply do so. We say so to Him on our own though there are those ceremonies and initiations in covens and circles that often affirm what we must do alone. The ancients simply accepted He was and is. Of course, what I’ve just shared will give rise to all manner of questions. What the new follower is asking is “How do I worship Him and know it’s for real?

"To 'enter into worship’ involves shifting your heart and mind from self-focus to actions which posture you to receive spiritual insight and communion (spiritual interaction) . Sure, today I might simplyi, for a moment, say to myself or out loud "Praise the Dark Lord”. When i do I mean it? Not do i but did I mean it when I said it? Is that important? No and Yes. It doesn’t mean I won’t and don’t doubt because we all do. But I have faith despite my doubts when it comes to who He is. etc. and that makes it real.

What is this faith? I exercise faith everyday. I get in my automobile having faith it will start, take me to where i intend and arrive there safely? I go to bed having faith I will wake up? Plan for events because i have faith I will be attending and participating. i flip the light switch having faith the lights will come on because I paid the bill. We exercise faith every day with every breath, every step, every act but don’t notice. Because the Dark Lord sees me as I am created (which I have shared about in other articles) and doesnt condemn me nor does he damn me if I doubt (I have to because I can’t see Him as I see another human, etc), I trust He is. I believe. How i worship isn’t outlined in some text somewhere. There are traditions both old and new. Certain groups engage in certain rituals and practices because doing so makes it easy to worship (Do this and you’re okay) when it maybe you may just need to say “Oh Lord”. . So what’s involved? I borrow the following framework from online which I’ve modified for me:

Cultivate your personal Attitude of Worship: I have that place that is sacred to me which I have described in other articles but any place where I can be alone can be a sacred space. My focus:

Seek and Experience His Presence: Actively look for and engage with Him through prayer and meditation. 

Listen for His Response : Worship creates an environment where you can hear Him commands and guidance, which is essential for a deeper relationship.  This is where the situation is solo and personal. Hearing in the silence often has to be learned.

Shift Focus from Self: Use praise and thanksgiving or sit in silence and watch the flame of the candle while you simply say “I’m here” to direct your attention away from your own concerns and towards Him.  How do you “praise”? That’s something you will learn. In the beginning just have a conversation with Him. I do. Yes, I often use ritual terms, etc, I have learned or borrowed from my xian background or heard from others. When i say “Lord” and"Father" today the meaning isn’t xian.

Believe and Receive: A foundational aspect of worship is believing in God and receiving. Sit and let the silence speak. However, if you have something to say, an issue or are even angry, have it out with Him. Sure, the Divine is supposed to know all things already but it doesn’t work that way. It’s similar to you coming to a crossroads like Old Five Points in Hotlanta. You have to choose which way you go. Its easy to victimize the Divine by saying He already knows your choice but that isn’t so. I will posit He knows the results of any or all five of the choices open to you but its up to you to choose. And since decisions are continuous and one decision doesn’t govern our directions, because we are His Creation He has surrendered that part of I wil call it His power so that, unlike angels, we have free will and the ability to choose Him or not, to “love” Him or not. For you see, the Divine may be all powerful but He has given up a part of what He can command , demand and instill within us. He could have created us to love Him but He didn’t. So when I speak about freedom to think and Remember that worship extends beyond personal rituals; it involves loving others and living in a way that you are able to be free to be your real me, adhering to the Rule and the Four Maxims.

One might want to compare this followship to Eve eating the "apple" in Eden and her embracing the Serpent. She looked up and followed him. While the Bible says what she did was "all wrong", I have to wonder why when the children of Israel were in the wilderness and plagued by serpents, the Hebrew god Yahweh had Moses create the model of a large brass serpent on a staff and whoever looked upon it would be saved. That staff, that selfsame Bible tells us, over the immediate generations became like an idol so was broken up and destroyed for that reason . . . and then the symbol of the medical profession is what? Then look at the baphomet for the Satanic Temple, etc, and see what is emerging from it's crotch onto it's belly. Hmmmmm. I digress.

I’ve crammed quite a bit into a small space and this isn’t well written at that. It's still Wendy being "windy". And the subject is neither titillating or salacious but serious. One might say this effort is a place to start. i share as I have despite its inadequacy and, no doubt, typos and errors. I include this in my "Wondering" for what it is worth with the hope that it helps.

Think about it.