Credit: @juliehangart

Game Changer & Make Some Noise

gracie abrams

if i look back, i am lost
Sade Olutola
$LAYYYTER
noise dept.

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Interview Vampire Daily

Product Placement

ellievsbear
taylor price
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

Discoholic đŞŠ
No title available

Origami Around
KIROKAZE
No title available

pixel skylines
No title available
official daine visual archive
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Canada

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from Maldives
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Ecuador
seen from Pakistan

seen from TĂźrkiye
seen from Moldova
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Bulgaria

seen from TĂźrkiye

seen from Oman
seen from Kenya
@thellmaqueen
Credit: @juliehangart
grandmacore asks:
knitting: do you like making things?
home videos: how have you grown in the last year?
hug: what is your love life like?
wallpaper: who are some of your favorite artists?
film camera: do you prefer reading books or watching movies?
crochet blanket: what is your favorite way to relax?
tea time: if you could tell anyone you loved them right now, who would you tell?
knickknack: do you collect anything? if so, what?
garden: what is your favorite fruit?
flower: have you ever told someone you love them as more than a friend?
pie: do you like baking or cooking more?
figurine: do you fall in love easily?
quilt: who is your favorite author?
hard candy: what is your favorite time of day?
antique: how would you describe your aesthetic?
perfume: where would you go if you could go anywhere right now?
cross stitch: who are your favorite musicians/bands?
rocking chair: what are some of your favorite words?
ephemera: what is your best friend like?
cookie: what are some of your goals?
beauty and the beast but reverse, i kiss the love of my life and she turns into a sick fucking monster and itâs awesome
shrek
No, fuck you, post un-cancelled
This is good shit.
A girl is born to loving parents. A king and queen, a noble and his wife, an inventor and his spouse⌠same story, different versions, and all. are. true. Tragedy strikes the motherâ though god, why always the mother? Let it be the father this time. He dies; we need not explain how. The stories never grant their dead women such courtesy.
Her husband dead, the woman remarries. She marries as a clever political maneuver, to keep her throne secure; she marries for new love and the promise that her daughter will have another parent to be loved by; she marries out of desperation for security in a world that grants her little without a ring on her finger.
She is betrayed. The new husband, the step-father, does little to deserve his new titles. He is cruel, he is neglectful, he is absent. Perhaps his wife does not survive, or if she does, she is reduced to a shadow of her old self. This, too, is an old story with many versions.
Then the witch. The woman uncontrolled, the woman powerful, the woman terrible. She comes and she brings fear and magic. The magic is change.
âI give you a gift,â she says, or else, âI curse you.â Perhaps she says, âI curse you,â to the step-father, but to the daughter this is a gift. Words can mean more than one thing; that is their very great power.
âI curse you, girl,â she says. âWhen you receive true loveâs first kiss, you will become a monster. You will be huge and terrible, a threat to all. You will have terror in your face and death in your hands.â
And the girl, she is afraid. But this is not new. She has been afraid for years.
Perhaps she finally flees to the forest, terrified of both her step-father and now herself. She swears off the company of men. Lost and hungry, she thinks she will die, but she is rescued by a company of women with untamed hair and pickaxes in iron-palmed hands. Seven become eight. She finds a home amidst these women. She shares a bed until her own bunk can be built, but by the time the new bed is framed, it isnât necessary. Itâs dangerous for the cursed girl to feel so tenderly towards another person, but this is not a man she is beginning to love, so⌠surely thatâs safe, isnât it? Surely true loveâs kiss exists only between a man and wife; after all, thatâs what the stories always said. So one day, she lets herself fall, and they kiss.
Orâ perhaps, after the curse, she remains in her home. Cruel as this home and family is, itâs not so simple to just leave. People who say this have never experienced it. She continues to live in the shadows of her own house, flinching at shouts and obeying orders. She scrubs, she cooks, she laundersâ but in the small private moments, she is gentle still. She feeds the mice and scatters cornmeal for the birds. She coaxes a whipped stray dog to the kitchen doorstep, day by day, giving it food and water and all the time it needs to believe that her hand will not strike it. Slowly, it comes to trust her. The broken tail starts to wag; the sad eyes brighten. And one day, as it lies curled up in her lap in an ash-streaked hearth, the dog lifts its head and timidly licks her cheek.
The curse breaks. The curse breaks. The curse breaks. It always does. It always will. Change is inevitable: thatâs the storyâs promise.
All this time, the girl has been afraid of becoming a monster. She does not want to hurt others like she has been hurt. But she has been cursed, and now kissed. She grows. She becomes huge, and therefore terrible (isnât that always the case with women?). She can no longer hide in corners, or be hidden away in locked rooms. She is twice as tall as her step-father, and five times as strong.
She is powerful.
âMy, what big hands you have,â the woodswoman whispers, marvelling, her pickaxe-callused fingers wrapped around the girlâs. âWhat strong arms you have. What long legs you have. Iâve never seen a gem as wonderful and unique as you.â
âKill the beast!â shouts the step-father, who tripped over the stray dog in the courtyardâ and his daughter roars âNO,â rising over the garden wall from where she has been sitting all afternoon feeding her birds and mice. She was afraid of her strength with their fragile bodies in her hands, but now in her rage all she feels is brave.
As the witch said, it is true that her face brings terror to those who look on it. At least, to those who look on it when she is enraged. An angry giant is terrifying to most, but especially to those who have earned her wrath. The only sad thing about this is that the girl had to be made dangerous before her tormentors finally learned respect for her rage and fear.
She stays in the forest, or she goes to the forest. One way or another, the cursed girl ends up there, in the wild, outside of society. Forests are places of power, of un-making and re-making, of disruption and interruption, where rules change and queer things are common. All the stories say this. Forests are for witches, and giant women, and all other monsters.
âShe steals babies,â people whisper in town. (But the truth is that itâs not stealing if desperate mothers leave their babies in the forest loam, swaddled against the cold as well as they can be, with notes begging for their protection. Please, I cannot care for this child. Please, heâll kill her. Please, nobody can know. Please, sheâs my firstborn. Please take her like you took the whipped dog, the half-drowned cats, the beaten horse.)
âShe kills huntsmen!â people cry in town. (But the truth is that these men were hunting women, runaways and lost girls, or the woodswomen of the mine. Eight have become ten, fourteen, twenty-five. The cursed girl has learned to swing both a pickaxe and a club the size of a tree. She will not let harm come to the new family she has found.)
âShe is a beast!â people howl in town. âShe has hard, rough skin like scales! She has hair all over! She has a hooked nose! She is dusky, brown, black as night! She is lustful, she is angry, she is unrepentant!â (The truth is, these are not things that make someone a monster.)
The girl knows now that the curse is a gift. Words can mean more than one thing; that is their very great power. Words are magic, and magic is change, and changeâ thank goodnessâ is inevitable.
Henry V (Act III, Scene I)
Johnny Flynn as George Knightley Emma (2020) dir. Autumn de Wilde
Y he look like Boris Johnson tho :T
ěë°ëšěŠ = Fuck-it Expense
Someone wrote an article about this!
Reading about abusive men and the way they think. Very unsettling and an incredible book so far. Here are my very professional notes.
what book is this?
This is from âWhy Does He DO Thatâ by Lundy Bancroft.
Iâm so glad Iâm seeing more and more Lundy Bancroft quotes on my dash because this book CHANGES THE LIVES OF ABUSE VICTIMS. The programs run for rehabilitating abusive men through the courts? Bancroft DESIGNED THEM. His programs are replicated ALL OVER THE WORLD. He literally wrote THE book on abuser rehabilitation.
Hereâs a link to a pdf copy. If you havenât read this book yet, read this book.
Can we talk about how it seems like the entirety of the book is online on PDF, this making it accessible to anyone with an internet connection?
That is how we stop abuse.
We enable everyone to know what it looks like, so that when it happens, they can shut it down.
Arm yrself with knowledge!
Changed my life, would reccomend.
Reblogging for the PDF link.
âBB
Always reblogging because this isnât just a partner abuse thing, this is a common abuse tactic PERIOD: Parents, siblings, bosses, general assholes, etcâŚ
http://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/07/20/why-does-he-do-that/why-does-he-do-that.pdf
new link (the old one is broken)
Pretty sure Iâve reblogged this like eight times, donât care.
Link to pdf
I started reading this book and itâs incredible.
The author describes in detail how abusers can change and what has to happen before they are willing to do so.
This gets rid of the idea of abusers as just inhuman monsters who canât help themselves, and replaces it with understanding of how abusers are made and how they can change.
HOWEVER, the author points out that not all abusive men do change, and they never change because their partner begged them to.
In fact, it sounds like the best way to get an abusive man to change is to leave him.
This is the book that made my husband want a divorce after I introduced it to him and I have never been more thankful in my life lol
The Haunted House
Happy Halloween! My new picture book WHAT COLOR IS NIGHT? is out next week! Find it at your favorite bookstore, or order online here:
AMAZON (international shipping available): amzn.to/2ps40Qn
B&N: bit.ly/2oBlGbC
INDIEBOUND: bit.ly/2mYvD2u
Iâve compiled every raw ass quote from tumblr shitposts into my phone and iâm gonna use every single one of them in my campaign at some point.
peruse my quotes, if u want
So I recently got a wealth of new quotes to add to the list, thanks to @gayotic-stupid ! DISCLAIMER: Very few of these are from tumblr shit posts. Like my previous reblog, some of these are just cool quotes you can use in your writing or your dnd campaign. Reblog away!
âIâll do whatever you want" âThen Perishâ
I thought there were no heroes left in this world
You kneel before my throne unaware it was born on lies
Take this gift, for the gods surely wonât
God wishes he were me
God gave me depression because if my ambitions went unchecked I wouldâve bested him in hand to hand combat by age 16
âI know youâve all heard talk of being the emperorâs chosen and heroes of the Imperium, but the truth is, you are essentially nothing to this Imperium. Youâre farmers, workers, and criminals, picked to be a part of the most expendable force known to man. You will be sent into battle. You will be sent often. Many of you will die, and you will die often. I do not expect you to like it, but I am asking that you accept this and make your peace with it.
My father taught me as a child that if you shoot for the moon and miss, the cold vacuum of space will suck out your eyeballs. Failure is not an option. Go kill them.
All these moments will be lost in time, like tears in the rain.
You are alone, child. There is only darkness for you, and only death for your people. These ancients are just the beginning. I will command a great and terrible army, and we will sail to a billion worlds. We will sail until every light has been extinguished. You are strong, child, but I am beyond strength. I am the end, and I have come for you.
To feel sorrow is to deserve peace.
No pet is perfect, it becomes perfect when you accept it for what it is.
You could sooner divert a river from its course than deny my natureÂ
You cant shake the devilâs hand and say youâre only kidding.
No one will know the violence it took become this gentle.
Theres no light at the end of the tunnel so itâs a good thing we brought matches.
Itâs not my job to pry, itâs the governmentâs.Â
And lo, he did reach into his bag of talent, and verily, it was found to be barren -Yamaha 10:99
Every comment is a prayer, bringing me closer to emerging from my cursed plane. Thank you for heralding the apocalypse this old god brings.
People say âphaseâ like impermanence means insignificance. Show me a permanent state of the self.
The answer to dispair is actionÂ
EDIT: âyouâll be reduced down to a single atom once im done with youâ because its fucking hilarious in context and raw as fuck without it
May I add âwhat is a god to a woman?â âa snackâ
"I have dreamt of death so many times it has become a stale memory" - prolly misquoting Good Omens
There are only 2 types of people:
*sees doggo*
OMG CAN I PET?? WHAT'S THEIR NAME?!
vs.
Admiring silence and shuffle on.
November 2019 Writing Prompts
Just reblog if you think youâre going to use them (and tag your work with #patient prompts if youâd like me to see!)
Sunrise
Windswept
Shadow
Late night talk
Abandon
Misty
Breathless
âItâs beautiful.â
Drifting
Shiver
Blanket nest
Whispering
Lantern
Slow dance
Broken
âWhere are you going?â
Searching
Bare
Break the ice
Lonely
Healing
Cradle
Puddles
Tunnel
Bitterness
Heartbeat
âTake my hand.â
Fatigue
Expanse
Twirling hug
An attempt is made.
Amazing Nature Phenomenons
á´á´á´Ąá´Ę ÉŞá´á´É´ (ĘĘá´á´ á´ á´Ęá´á´É´á´) ÉŞÉ´á´ á´É´á´sÉŞá´
á´á´ĘÇŤá´á´ÉŞsá´ ÉŞá´á´: Ęá´á´á´ Ęá´ÉŞá´á´Ę-Ęá´ssÉŞá´
sá´á´á´Ęá´á´ĘĘ sá´á´Ęá´
ɢĘá´á´É´ ŇĘá´sĘ sá´É´sá´á´
sÉ´á´á´Ą á´ĘÉŞá´É´á´Ę: á´á´á´É´á´ á´ĘĘá´s-á´É´á´á´Ęá´ÉŞá´á´
sá´Ę á´á´É´á´Ę
sá´ĘÉŞá´á´á´ ÉŞá´á´Ęá´Ęɢs:á´É´á´á´Ęá´ÉŞá´á´
ĘɪɢĘá´ á´ÉŞĘĘá´Ęs
sá´Ęá´Ę á´ á´ á´Ęá´É´ÉŞ (Ęá´ŇĘá´á´á´ÉŞÉ´É˘ á´ á´sá´Ęá´) Ęá´ĘÉŞá´ ÉŞá´
á´á´á´Ęsá´Ęá´á´
á´Ęá´ á´Ň sá´Ęá´Ęá´:á´á´á´ĘÉŞá´á´É´ÉŞá´
ŇÉŞĘá´ Ęá´ÉŞÉ´Ęá´á´Ą
á´á´Ęá´Ęá´á´á´ (É´á´á´ á´Ę á´É´á´ ɪɴɢ á´Ąá´á´ á´) á´á´á´á´˘á´É´ ĘÉŞá´ á´Ę-ĘĘá´á´˘ÉŞĘ
á´á´Ęá´Ęá´ Ęá´Ęá´á´ĘÉŞs
ɢĘá´á´á´ ĘĘá´á´ Ęá´Ęá´:Ęá´ĘÉŞá´˘á´
Ęá´ÉŞÉ´Ęá´á´Ą á´á´á´á´ĘĘá´á´á´s á´Ęá´á´s
sá´á´É´á´ Ňá´Ęá´sá´:á´á´á´ á´É˘á´sá´á´Ę
á´á´á´á´á´á´á´Ęá´ ĘɪɢĘá´É´ÉŞÉ´É˘ (É´á´á´ á´Ęá´É´á´ ɪɴɢ sá´á´Ęá´) á´ á´É´á´á´˘á´á´Ęá´
á´á´á´á´á´á´á´s á´Ęá´á´á´ s
á´ĄĘÉŞá´á´ Ęá´ÉŞÉ´Ęá´á´Ą
á´É´á´ á´Ęá´Ąá´á´á´Ę á´Ęá´á´ á´ÉŞĘá´Ęá´s
ĘÉŞá´Ęá´á´ÉŞÉ´á´sá´á´É´á´ á´Ąá´á´ á´s
á´á´Ęɴɪɴɢ ɢĘá´ĘĘ á´Ęá´á´á´ s
á´ á´Ęá´á´É´ÉŞá´ ĘɪɢĘá´ÉŞÉ´É˘
É´á´á´Ęá´á´á´s á´Ęá´á´á´ s
Ęá´ÉŞÉ´Ęá´á´Ą á´á´á´É´á´á´ÉŞÉ´s:á´ĘÉŞÉ´á´
Ęá´É´á´ÉŞá´á´Ęá´Ę á´Ęá´á´á´
Please take a look at how beautiful Earth is
How you gonna loan something that doesnât belong to you in the first place? Peak caucasity
A lot of people who are reblogging and commenting on this donât understand whatâs happening here. The term âloanâ in museum parlance doesnât mean what you think it does. As someone whoâs worked in museums on repatriation (giving stuff back) projects, let me demonstrate why this isnât audacious caucasity, but is actually going to be highly beneficial for the Nigerian museum in the long run and will probably lead to more looted objects given back to their African countries of origin.
This is going to be a long post, but itâs important because this is the kind of thing that really needs public support. Itâs not âoh, letâs compromise! weâll share! ;).â Itâs the first step in a multi-step process that is going to likely end in total repatriation for most (if not all- Britain, as per usual when it comes to artifacts, is being a shit) of the looted bronzes.
So. Why short-term loans and not just giving stuff back? Well, the first thing you need to realize is that this going to set a multinational legal precedent. This canât be a quick process because that leaves more room for error in favor of the European institutions- which we know can happen because that is what happened with some of the repatriation laws in the US. When NAGPRA, the Native American Grave Protection and Repatriation Act, was passed in 1990, museums were given five years to inventory their collections and identify which of the federally recognized tribes objects originated from. As a result of this short timeline, massive quantities of Native American artifacts were labeled as being culturally unidentifiable and as such technically immune to repatriation. That means a lot of Native American artifacts and even remains, despite being federally required to go back, have been loopholed into staying in museums. It essentially created a legal way for museums to ignore the law, and some museums have really abused the hell out of this loophole. This needs to not happen with the European repatriation practices. If repatriation is going to happen in the best way, you have to take careful steps.Â
The loan agreements are best summed up by this quote from the Benin Dialogue Group:Â âThis event occurs within a wider context and does not imply that Nigerian partners have waived claims for the eventual return of works of art removed from the Royal Court of Benin, nor have the European museums excluded the possibility of such returns.â
People are missing this, I think, because they donât understand what repatriation actually is and how it works. Thereâs a lot of moving parts! Museum repatriation isnât just âhey we took these, now here you go.â Repatriation takes into account fragility of the artifacts- if we ship them back now, will we be handing their actual owners a pile of dust?- as well as who actually has the best claim to them. That doesnât mean âwhich European museum claims them,â it means âhey, Europe and America REALLY FCKED UP AFRICAN SOCIOPOLITICAL GROUPS due to chattel slavery and the way the Scramble for Africa divided the continent.â But more on that in a sec. First, thereâs something really important to understand about European museums.
In many European countries, thereâs not actually a protocol in place for giving stuff back. There should be, but there isnât- and as such, this is something thatâs very new for a lot of museums. In fact, in some cases, itâs illegal for museums to divest their collections, which is not a fair set of laws- but it means that loans are a way around this. Isnât the most important thing getting the objects back in their place of origin so that the artistsâ descent communities have access to them? (I personally think thatâs the most important thing. Possession is nine tenths of the law, so once the bronzes are home, then we can argue the law.)Â
This also isnât a case of giving something back to an individual- itâs giving something back to a country and the culture from whence it came. You canât just go to the Nigerian embassy and hand the first staffer you see a bunch of art and artifacts- museum people have to be very careful about the transfer. This is true on both sides of the equation. Repatriation also has to take into account who the stuff should belong to.Â
For instance:Â Why are the Benin bronzes going back to Nigeria, when Benin the country is still extant? Because they were looted from Benin City, which is in modern-day Nigeria, which happened because African national borders are also relics of colonialism. Country lines were, by and large, not decided by African peoples; they were settled by Europeans during their pillaging of the continent for resources. Loans mean that these items can be displayed in Africa, for African people, while the details of permanent homing are figured out.
That leads us to the next thing people arenât getting: These loans arenât like borrowing a book from the library. Items arenât being loaned to an individual, and thereâs not a due date. In many cases, loans are actually more convenient than artifact transfers. Thereâs a lot of big-picture stuff to look at here, and for a brand new institution thatâs not even built yet, loans make so much more sense than an actual transference of ownership for the first couple of years. Why? Logistics.Â
The Nigerian museum will be brand new, and as such, will be in the process of establishing its collection protocols, including rules about preservation (how will they store and care for the artifacts that arenât on display? if youâre a new museum, you gotta decide that for yourself!), cataloging, and information coherence. Part of the point of museums is to keep information together. Every museum has its own system for this, and if they just straight-up adopted a European database system, theyâd be using systems of categorization are based on colonial ideas of classification and hierarchy, using ethnic/social affiliations decided by European colonizers and largely bare of the language that African peoples describe themselves with. (Iâve seen these databases. Itâs not pretty.) So theyâll adapt their own system, and then thatâs where we get to the data entry part- which can take literal years for even a small collection. See, once something enters a museum collection, dataâs attached to it- who put it there, where they got it- and as it continues to exist in a museum collection, data accumulates. âLoaningâ stuff back for a short period actually takes some of the burden off the Nigerian museum because the stuff will remain in the European museumsâ system while the Nigerian museum builds up its database. Give the Nigerian museum some time- as they grow physically and develop their systems, theyâll be better equipped to permanently house these artifacts. Which they will.
And this really is literal, I canât stress that enough. This isnât a âOh, the African museum wonât have the resources, weâd better hold on to the stuff for themâ patronizing thing, this is a âliterally this museum is not finished yet, decisions about cataloging and storage have not yet been madeâ thing.Â
Physical storage is another Big Deal for why the European museums are agreeing to loans rather than outright repatriation. There is a TON OF LOOTED STUFF. The three-year rotating loan system means that for the first time, the looted artifacts will be able to be seen at home. But the looted artifacts arenât going to be the only thing in this museum! Nigerian art didnât stop happening after the 1800s- this museum is going to be a celebration of modern African art as well, and pre-1800s art. Loans mean that while the museum is building that storage space, they can display different objects without worrying about where to put them when they want to cycle in new bronzes. Museum buildings donât spring out of the ground overnight. Safe, climate-controlled storage doesnât blossom with the dew. Like, give them some time. These loans are a two-way street. If the Nigerian art museum didnât like the terms and conditions, they wouldnât have agreed to them. France was willing to give more- hell, the French side of the consortium has put new legislation in place to sidestep French laws about museums not being allowed to divest their collections so that they could just give things to Nigeria instead of doing loans. But the new Nigerian museum had agency and made decisions, too. They want these loans.Â
And then another thing: Different European museums and countries have different opinions about cooperation. This is one of the most complex repatriation cases to ever exist because we have multiple international governments who all contributed to the looting, and all of whom have different ideas about what theyâre responsible for. France is leading the charge here- both their government and the French museum world considers it a major priority to permanently return West African artifacts. On the other hand, the British Museum and the V and A donât treat repatriation as something worth doing, let alone a priority. Is this fair? Nope. Itâs another miserable piece of the British Empireâs legacy, but realistically speaking- who can make them give stuff back? It took substantial public outcry to get the British museum on board with this, because colonizers are the ones who make the rules about what they do with the stuff they took. Germany, too, is agreeing to permanent loans, but thereâs a definite sense of colonial expectations and arbitrary standards for what African museums âââââââdeserveâââââââ to have artifacts back. The idea of loans makes true repatriation more palatable to these old institutions- which I know a lot of people think donât deserve to exist- but they do. They do exist, and they need to be held accountable for what theyâve done and what theyâre doing. Even if you donât like the term loan, this is an incredible step towards returning looted objects to their places of origin permanently. If the three-year rotating loan system works, it will be proof of concept that European museums can give things back in an equitable way. Loans of this nature are new and unprecedented, and are more than just borrowing things or patronizingly pretending to return items- but really, theyâre still the colonizersâ. These loans are the first step forward towards equitable looting restitutions. Even though the language- just the term âloanâ- is upsetting to some, these loans have the potential and likelihood to turn into something permanent and quite wonderful.
999 reasons. Ahriman has been a bad son
THE BEST RED BOIIIÂ
Inuits in the Arctic can survive perfectly on a plant based diet đ¤
Vegans: We care about all life! We're all equal!
Also vegans: I think Inuit people should starve :)
Animals in nature: *kill and eat each other all the time.*
vegans:
Commercial agriculture: *develops certain GMOs and pesticides that kill keystone bug species, which disrupts the environment and kills many different animals up the food chain as a result*
Vegans:
Commercial agriculture: *destroys local ecosystems by ripping out native species and replacing them with massive farms of exotic monocultures, resulting in the deaths and endangerment of millions of species*
Vegans:
Inuit people: *live in an environment where growing plant based food is extremely difficult, and where grocery prices are inflated past affordability so they hunt a few large animals every year which feed their entire community*
Vegans: thatâs immoral and evil, actually.
Also Inuit people: waste very little of what they catch. Don't over fish/hunt/harvest to the point of ecosystem collapse
Factory farming is the enemy. Overfishing is the enemy. CAPITALISM IS THE ENEMY. Indigenous people mostly have a sustainable relationship with the animals they harvest.
White veganism is a form of colonialism.
(By which I donât mean everyone who chooses not to consume animal products, of course).
And, THIS is quite interesting, which I uncovered on a search for âinuit + vegetarianâ
https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2016/03/eating-green-could-be-your-genes
Inuits are literally not genetically designed to be vegetarian because of the diet they have adapted to. Which means that they probably canât live perfectly on a plant-based diet without extensive supplementation. Theyâre adapted to be fish eaters. People in parts of India, on the other hand, have been managing without meat for generations and have adapted to be vegetarians. Ergo, people should not be harassed for eating their culturally appropriate diet.
(I do get salty about people whaling to sell the meat to tourists, ahem. But Arctic peoples catching one or two a year to store for the winter is a very different thing).
Reblog for anons to tell you your aesthetic.