hello vonnie

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

if i look back, i am lost
YOU ARE THE REASON
No title available
Game of Thrones Daily
art blog(derogatory)
Monterey Bay Aquarium
cherry valley forever
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

⁂
Sade Olutola
dirt enthusiast

No title available
styofa doing anything
tumblr dot com

shark vs the universe
Show & Tell

Origami Around
sheepfilms
seen from United Kingdom
seen from South Korea
seen from South Africa

seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from Netherlands
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Netherlands
seen from Israel

seen from Malaysia
seen from South Africa
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from Netherlands
seen from Türkiye
seen from Bulgaria
@thetreesmademedoit-blog
No one ‘earns’ millions and billions of dollars like do people not understand that. It’s the result of strategic exploitation. Like someone had to be paid pennies a day for years for someone else to make that kind of money
I feel like 2016 is the historical equivalent of the tunnel boat ride scene in Willy Wonka
For only $20 you too can fuck Satan
TAKE A LOOK AT THIS CREAM. TAKE A GOOD LONG LOOK.
MEMORIZE THE PACKAGING SO YOU MAKE SURE YOU NEVER BUY THIS CREAM FOR YOURSELF OR ANYONE YOU LOVE.
This post is about vaginas. My vagina in particular. I get yeast infections pretty regularly, and until recently I was able to afford to see a doctor who could prescribe me fluconazole.
Fluconazole, a drug also known by the brand name Diflucan, is a small pink pill. You take two pills a few days apart from each other to restore balance and harmony to your bountiful folds. I’ve never ever had a bad side effect from taking this pill.
Cut to November 2016. I’m a recent college grad without reliable health care coverage in the process of finding a job. And I’m dealing with a yeast infection. Before I moved out of state, my previous doctor told me about Miconazole. She said it was as effective as the pill and hallelujah, it’s over the counter! I decided to purchase the cream pictured above. This treatment only lasted 3 days, a convenient time frame for my schedule.
The application process was a little messy, and some of the cream came in contact with my vulva and labia. Within 5 minutes every piece of skin that had come in contact with the cream, excluding my hands, was on fire. I wanted to scream it was so painful. I began frantically searching for what I should do online.
I found a whole forum of people on drugs.com who had experienced something similar. These comments saved me, and these were just on the first page. There were 33 pages total, the earliest dated July 2009.
I was writhing in pain at 2AM when I found this forum (which I found by searching “my vagina burn itch hurts after miconazole” on Google). As soon as I read these comments I threw the devil cream directly into the trash and jumped in the shower. I didn’t feel any actual relief until I reached in and scraped the cream out of me. I paid $17 plus tax on this bullshit, but I could have just as easily ripped up my money or paid someone to not hurt me.
The moral of the story is that vaginal health care is is completely fucked up because we don’t have access to an over the counter cure for yeast infections that is safe for our bodies and also YOU SHOULD NEVER BUY THIS CREAM EVER.
Reblog to save a vagina.
my mental illness(es?) is trying to kill me again 🙃 not this time
Temporary jobs or not, you should still be able to house yourself on a minimum wage salary.
Sign our petition to raise the minimum wage.
Susanna and the Elders, Restored (Left)
Susanna and the Elders, Restored with X-ray (Right)
Kathleen Gilje, 1998
Oooh my gosh this is rad. This is so rad.
For those who don’t know about this painting, the artist was the Baroque artist Artemisia Gentileschi.
Gentileschi was a female painter in a time when it was very largely unheard of for a woman to be an artist. She managed to get the opportunity for training and eventual employment because her father, Orazio, was already a well established master painter who was very adamant that she get artistic training. He apparently saw a high degree of skill in some artwork she did as a hobby in childhood. He was very supportive of her and encouraged her to resist the “traditional attitude and psychological submission to brainwashing and the jealousy of her obvious talents.”
Gentileschi became extremely well known in her time for painting female figures from the Bible and their suffering. For example, the one seen above depicts the story from the Book of Daniel. Susanna is bathing in her garden when two elders began to spy on her in the nude. As she finishes they stop her and tell her that they will tell everyone that they saw her have an affair with a young man (she’s married so this is an offense punishable by death) unless she has sex with them. She refuses, they tell their tale, and she is going to be put to death when the protagonist of the book (Daniel) stops them.
So that painting above? That was her first major painting. She was SEVENTEEN-YEARS-OLD. For context, here is a painting of the same story by Alessandro Allori made just four years earlier in 1606:
Wowwwww. That does not look like a woman being threatened with a choice between death or rape. So imagine 17 year old Artemisia trying to approach painting the scene of a woman being assaulted. And she paints what is seen in the x-ray above. A woman in horrifying, grotesque anguish with what appears to be a knife poised in her clenched hand. Damn that shit is real. Who wants to guess that she was advised by, perhaps her father or others, to tone it down. Women can’t look that grotesque. Sexual assault can’t be depicted as that horrifying. And women definitely can’t be seen as having the potential to fight back. Certainly not in artwork. Women need to be soft. They need to wilt from their captors but still look pretty and be a damsel in distress. So she changed it.
What’s interesting to note is that she eventually painted and stuck with some of her own, less traditional depictions of women. However, that is more interesting with some context.
(Warning for reference to rape, torture, and images of paintings which show violence and blood.)
So, Gentileschi’s story continues in the very next year, 1611, when her father hires Agostino Tassi, an artist, to privately tutor her. It was in this time when Tassi raped her. He then proceeded to promise that he would marry her. He pointed out that if it got out that she had lost her virginity to a man she wasn’t going to marry then it would ruin her. Using this, he emotionally manipulated her into continuing a sexual relationship with him. However, he then proceeded to marry someone else. Horrified at this turn of events she went to her father. Orazio was having none of this shit and took Tassi to court. At that time, rape wasn’t technically an offense to warrant a trial, but the fact that he had taken her virginity (and therefore technically “damaged Orazio’s property”. ugh.) meant that the trial went along. It lasted for 7 months. During this time, to prove the truth of her words, Artemisia was given invasive gynecological examinations and was even questioned while being subjected to torture via thumb screws. It was also discovered during the trial that Tassi was planning to kill his current wife, have an affair with her sister, and steal a number of Orazio’s paintings. Tassi was found guilty and was given a prison sentence of…. ONE. YEAR……. Which he never even served because the verdict was annulled.
During this time and a bit after (1611-1612), Artemisia painted her most famous work of Judith Slaying Holofernes. This bible story involved Holofernes, an Assyrian general, leading troops to invade and destroy Bethulia, the home of Judith. Judith decides to deal with this issue by coming to him, flirting with him to get his guard down, and then plying him with food and lots of wine. When he passed out, Judith and her handmaiden took his sword and cut his head off. Issue averted. The subject was a very popular one for art at the time. Here is a version of the scene painted in 1598-99 by Carivaggio, whom was a great stylistic influence on Artemisia:
This depiction is a pretty good example of how this scene was typically depicted. Artists usually went out of their way to show Judith committing the act (or having committed it) while trying to detach her from the actual violence of it. In this way, they could avoid her losing the morality of her character and also avoid showing a woman committing such aggression. So here we see a young, rather delicate looking Judith in a pure white dress. She is daintily holding down this massive man and looks rather disgusted and upset at having to do this. Now, here is Artemisia’s:
Damn. Thats a whole different scene. Here Holofernes looks less like he’s simply surprised by the goings ons and more like a man choking on his own blood and struggling fruitlessly against his captors. The blood here is less of a bright red than in Carrivaggio’s but is somehow more sickening. It feels more real, and gushes in a much less stylized way than Carrivaggio’s. Not to mention, Judith here is far from removed from the violence. She is putting her physical weight into this act. Her hands (much stronger looking than most depictions of women’s hands in early artwork) are working hard. Her face, as well, is completely different. She doesn’t look upset, necessarily, but more determined.
It’s also worth note that the handmaiden is now involved in the action. It’s worth note because, during her rape trial, Artemisia stated that she had cried for help during the initial rape. Specifically she had called for Tassi’s female tenant in the building, Tuzia. Tuzia not only ignored her cries for help, but she also denied the whole happening. Tuzia had been a friend of Artemisia’s and in fact was one of her only female friends. Artemisia felt extremely betrayed, but rather than turning her against her own gender, this event instilled in her the deep importance of female relationships and solidarity among women. This can be seen in some of her artwork, and I believe in the one above, as well, with the inclusion of the handmaiden in the act.
So, I just added a million words worth of information dump on a post when no one asked me, but there we go. I could talk for ages about Artemisia as a person and her depictions of women (even beyond what I wrote above. Don’t get me started on her depictions of female nudes in comparison to how male artists painted nude women at the time.)
To sum up: Artemisia Gentileschi is rad as hell. This x-ray is also rad as hell and makes her even radder.
I love art history.
i remember around the time that i started questioning whether i fit in with the libfem community on tumblr a popular blogger i followed made a post about how during sex her boyfriend choked her too hard/the “wrong” way and she couldn’t breathe and she was worried she might pass out, and no one even batted an eyelash. instead of being concerned that she was being abused by her boyfriend, her followers sent her messages about the “right” method to use while choking during sex. that was a huge wake up call for me.
Wow, this might be impossible for you to comprehend, but women can consent to sex. Did you know that? So if she wants that man to choke her—even choke her until she passes out—that’s her choice and her goddamn body.
If she did not consent to that man choking her during sex, theeeen it’s assault.
Consent. Woman are capable of it.
do you really think that you are doing anything other than reaffirming my original experience/point? i’m sorry that comments like this threaten a culture that sexualizes violence against women to the point that it is aggressively defended against any sort of criticism. i definitely see a problem with a woman being seriously injured by a man during sex to the point that she passes out or worse. consent is clearly a grey area in a society that raises women to be aroused by their own abuse. so yes, the fact that the first reaction people have to a teenage girl posting that the man she’s involved with was choking her so vigorously that she was worried about passing out is to message her tips for him to safely abuse her rather than offering concern for her wellbeing, is an issue.
People on this website (and in sex pozzie feminism as a whole) need to stop talking about consent as if it is the last word in sexual ethics. Consent is an essential facet of an ethical act, but not all acts which are consensual are ethical. Consensual murder and consensual cannibalism are not ethical or moral acts, but when it comes to what gets people off we deaden all thought by screaming “consent! consent!” over and over again as if it erases the ethical harm of harming someone else in the name of orgasm.
Women are capable of consent. Men are also capable of realizing that just because something feels good doesn’t mean it’s a good thing to do, and “she wants me to” does not erase the context of committing violence against another person, nor does it even approach considering the overarching cultural context which might influence consent by treating violence, male aggression, and sexuality as inextricably intertwined forces.
THIS is why I hate the sex positive movement. The amount of bending over backwards to defend sexual brutality against women is astounding. Who cares that a woman was nearly choked out by her intimate partner in a culture where she’s been conditioned to glamorize that kind of behavior in the first place? Who cares if women are groomed to be submissive from childhood and taught to accept their pain as a natural part of sexuality? The most important thing is to maintain the illusion of consent!!! because otherwise we might have to admit that a man abusing a woman for sexual gratification is disgusting misogyny and that could lead to the sex poz movement’s worst nightmare: killing a dude’s precious boner.
Sex pozzies always, always focus on the (actual or perceived) consent of the individual woman because if they focused on ANYTHING else about the situation (social conditioning, sadistic and coercive men, dangers involved) their “but consent!!!” rhetoric falls apart. And they know it. Consent is the beginning, not the end, of the conversation because patriarchy teaches, encourages, and coerces women to consent to things they don’t want all the time.
CHOKING PEOPLE IS LIFE-THREATENING. DO YOU STUPID SEX POS IDIOTS UNDERSTAND THIS? CHOKING PEOPLE IS LIFE-THREATENING. MEN HAVE CHOKED WOMEN TO DEATH DURING BDSM/KINK/BONDAGE “GAMES.” SUPPORTING THE ENDANGERMENT OF WOMEN’S LIVES FOR MEN’S BONERS IS MISOGYNISTIC, MALE-APPEASING BULLSHIT AND ABSOLUTELY ANTI-FEMINIST.
You want to know what kind of men enjoy choking women? You want to know what goes on in their minds, what they get out of it? Here, have the perspective of a violent, sociopathic, woman-hating bag of dicks:
“Choking works because it’s a show of dominance. Women only want to have consensual sex with men they know could rape them.
[detailed instructions on how to choke women “correctly,” click link for the entire horrifying post]
“I like choking a woman right up until her eyes almost go lifeless. Women also love this. Once the life returns to her, it’s as if she came back from the other side.
I’ve also choked women unconscious. It’s no cause for alarm. She’ll be fine once you release the pressure from her carotid arteries, thus allowing blood flow to return to her brain.
You should also choke your girl when standing around. Consider it “choke PDA.” When she acts up, apply pressure to her carotid arteries by squeezing your biceps. – like a one-half rear naked choke.
Once you start choking women, you’ll be addicted. Women love it, too.
Choking is also a useful indicator of your alphaness.
If women do not regularly let you choke them, your game is weak. You are giving off a weak, vagina-drying vibe.”
This piece of male garbage assumes that all or most women enjoy having men throttle them into unconsciousness and that choking a woman IN PUBLIC who “acts up” (what does that mean—that she does something he doesn’t like?!) is fun and cool and acceptable.
It says a lot about whom the sex positive movement really benefits when self-professed feminists are cheering on violent, sadistic misogynists.
Even those in BDSM/kink communities discourage the practice of “breath play” due to the fact that there is no safe way to choke someone. Consider:
“1. Anytime there is pressure put on the neck, such as with choking you run the risk of causing severe and perhaps permanent damage to the carotid arteries. This may lead to numbness, weakness, dizziness and difficulties speaking.
2. The larynx is incredibly fragile and easily injured; pressure to the larynx should be avoided at all costs. Any injury, even a minor injury to the larynx, may cause swelling of the airways leading to coughing, choking and inability to speak, and possibly the inability to breath. 3. While choking someone the airway may become obstructed by the tongue. Swelling of the tongue and lips is quite normal when someone is being choked. Unfortunately it is impossible to tell just how much swelling is going to occur, since each individual is different, it is also impossible to tell when the swelling will reach that dangerous level. 4. Also the reduction of blood flow to the brain tissues during choking may cause ischemia. Since blood contains both oxygen and glucose, when ischemia occurs, it can lead to hypoxia which is a reduction of oxygen to the brain, as well as hypoglycemia which is low blood glucose level. Prolonged hypoxia – ischemia is associated with Ischemic Attack (stoke), Transient, Brain Infarction, Brain Edema, Coma and other conditions. 5. Another associated physical problem is cerebral anoxia. Hypoxia is the reduced oxygen flow to the brain; anoxia is the total absence of oxygen within the brain tissue. If oxygen is prevented from reaching the tissues for too long, tissue death can occur. If severe, it can cause irreversible brain damage. Less severe cases can cause sensory distortions and hallucinations. Hence pressure on the carotid arteries can lead to ischemia, which is directly associated with hypoxia and if the restriction of oxygen to the brain continues for more than three to five minutes then cerebral anoxia is a very real possibility. If the circulation to the brain is insufficient for more than three to five minutes the consequent damage can lead to death even days or weeks after the initial incident. 6. The lack of blood flow to the brain may also force the heart to beat more rapidly or beat erratically in an effort to increase the level of blood to the brain; hence, heart arrhythmia. 7. Oxygen deprivation of the heart or anoxaemia will trigger what is called premature ventricular contractions or PVC’s for short. Basically the lower the heart gets on oxygen the more PVC’s it generated and the more vulnerable to their effect the heart will become, thus this will increase the possibility of ventricular fibrillation and the risk of its causing a cardiac arrest. There is no way to know when this will happen to a particular person, during a particular session, not even with the most advanced cardiac monitors available.”
You don’t know when the person you’re suffocating is going to pass out, you don’t know how much pressure will severely harm or kill her, you don’t know if some medical issue she may have will make the act even more dangerous, you might not even know if she wants you to stop if you’ve also restricted her ability to revoke consent nonverbally, you just don’t know.
Is it too much to ask that people stop romanticising and encouraging violence against women and the sexualisation of acts upon women that can cause serious injury and death?
Lol what am I thinking, of course it is. Sex pozzies hate women.
Wow if there has ever been something that needs to be on my blog this is it.
we love radical feminism: thecallofthewild: home-of-amazons: ironfoxe: nextyearsgirl:…
All the obsession with consent is really doing is ensuring that men force “consent” through harassment, guilt tripping, or threats of violence, which means that plenty of “consenting” sex is actually rape, but sex pozzies don’t see a problem with it, because “sex positivity” is entirely about what men want.
I will only accept something as “sex positive” when it’s 100 percent focused on women, on women’s wants, putting women in the position of calling ALL the shots. That’s the only thing that maybe wouldn’t be perverted into becoming all about men’s dicks, yet again.
I’m so sorry.
You can be vegan all you want, good for you, but not being vegan doesn't make someone a bad person. Not everyone in the world will convert to being a vegan so maybe y'all should stop being angry people and just get over it.
Of course the whole world will never be vegan, but I strongly believe that someday a majority of the world will be vegan. In fact, the world will have to go mostly vegan or we are screwed, anon. Veganism is the future, out of necessity, and the UN agrees.
Animal agriculture is destroying our world.
40% of global marine catch is by-catch (basically we are throwing back enormous amounts of unusable species into the sea, dead and wasted)
An estimated 300,000 whales, dolphins and porpoises die in fishing nets every year.
Overgrazing is blamed for 35% of soil degradation, deforestation for 30%, and agriculture for 27%. These main causes are directly or indirectly related to the consumption of animal products.
Studies indicate that a varied vegan diet requires about a third of the land needed for conventional Western diets. We do not have enough land to feed everyone on an animal-based diet.
The livestock sector is a major player, responsible for 18% of greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2 equivalent. This is a higher share than transport.
Animal product consumption is causing deforestation: there are undiscovered plants and other things in these areas that could help with medicine, not to mention that rain forests and other land contributes to 20% or so of the Earth’s oxygen.
60% of deforestation is related to animal agriculture
For every 4 lbs of retail fish caught, 1 lb of other fish dies.
It has been predicted that all the world’s fisheries will collapse in 2048 unless something is done to stop it.
It is estimated that over-fishing threatens the food security of about 200 million people.
The Lives of Slaughterhouse Workers: they are usually on shitty contracts, are usually poor and people of color (PoC), how they don’t have basic working rights, and how often times they are undocumented, so they can’t go for help.
Big, rich, Western, white countries go into other countries: usually (again) poor, underprivileged, native areas that are (again) usually inhabited by PoC. This takes land away from the people in that region or country and gives it to a) the livestock and/or b) the crops raised for that livestock.
Even in the west, people who live near slaughter farms have shitty water, shitty soil, shitty air, and they get really really sick.
They’re also more likely to be poverty stricken.
Animal Agriculture Sickens Everyone
Nestle Milk Chocolate Products Brought To You By Child Slavery
Antibiotic use in meat production has been linked to the rise in ‘super bugs’, which are antibiotic-resistant bacteria, found in a lot of meats available in supermarkets. These maladies can kill people.
In 2004/5 there were 2270 injury claims made in the meat processing industry, most of which were due to falls, injuries with knives and ‘body stressing’.
People working in tanneries to make leather from the skin of animals that have been killed are exposed to numerous dangerous chemicals (chromium being the worst). The chemicals can cause cancer, skin diseases, respiratory illnesses while the machinery is also dangerous and can result in amputations. In India, people have died due to the exposure to these chemicals, due to unsafe working conditions. People have also died in Bangladesh and are affected by the chemicals in a multitude of ways. These chemicals can also leach into the water supply and affect the air and soil quality, which in turn causes illnesses and diseases in nearby populations.
No, not being vegan does not make someone a bad person… but if you’re aware of the slaughter you’re contributing to and you’re able to change that and choose not to, that is extremely problematic. Especially if you mourn the deaths of companion animals, but not the ones on your plate.
That’s it. I need to go vegan.
Super important post with lots of great links and resources. Give it a read! :)
okay liberals listen up coz im gonna put this in terms you can understand
fighting voldemort didn’t make harry as bad as voldemort
And remember, this is 2016. The government itself starves Native Americans who just protect their own land.
The media is silent, as usual.
God bless these warriors.
#NoDAPL #NoJusticeNoPeace
This is sickening.
at any protest
police: you’ll notice that we have not murdered anyone yet. we think that’s very nice of us. we’re being very restrained. you guys should meet us halfway and go home without any of your complaints being addressed, that would be a great compromise.
white liberal protesters: what a great proposal. i love it. lets shake hands with you
Your mixed feelings about your parents are valid.
Shout out to people like me who have parents who are loving but are black holes of emotional labor… It took me a long time to realize that it’s okay to have mixed feelings about your parents, about your relationship with them.
Sometimes parents can love you but be somewhat toxic to you and your growth, and that’s a very hard realization to come to if you, like me, grew up extremely close to them.
Sometimes parents can love you genuinely but lack emotional maturity, forcing you to perform disproportionate amounts of emotional labor. Some parents manifest symptoms of their mental illness in ways that are toxic to your mental illness.
Some parents, like mine, try so hard to be good parents but fall back on habits of emotional manipulation because they haven’t processed their own traumas and are modeling behavior they grew up with. That doesn’t make their behavior acceptable, and it’s okay to feel exhausted and hurt when they betray you. You don’t have to forgive every mistake.
I want you to know that it’s okay to protect yourself, to need some space apart from them. The love you have for your parents is still valid, and you are making the right decision.
Placing a safe emotional distance between myself and my parents has been one of the most difficult, heartbreaking processes I’ve ever gone through… it hurts to try to curb the strength of your own natural empathy around people you love. It feels disingenuous to your heart’s natural state.
But I promise you, you are not hard-hearted or ungrateful, and you are not abandoning them. You are making a decision about your own emotional, mental, and spiritual health.
I know what it’s like in that confusing grey area of love mixed with guilt and anxiety, of exhaustion and quasi-manipulation and unreciprocated emotional labor, and I promise you, you are not alone.
Your mixed feelings about your parents are valid.
still heartbroken, on top of everything 😿
“Man fucks woman: Subject verb object” Catharine MacKinnon (Quote found on this blog)
Think of all of the words we use to describe the act of having sex. Don’t be shy. Think of all the words you can. Go ahead. You might be thinking of words like:
Fuck Screw Nail Plow Rail Smash Shag Bang Bone Getting laid Scoring Getting it in Hooking up Come up with your own. This is by no means an exhaustive list. Now ask yourself:
How many of these describe sex as one person doing something to another?
How many of these describe sex as someone getting something from another?
How many have a violent connotation?
Language shapes and reflects our reality. In our society, we don’t see sex as a reciprocal act where both people’s pleasure are important. It’s something you do to someone, or something you get from someone. Is it any wonder then that we struggle with the concept of enthusiastic consent? People are wondering why it is so vital that both people are willing participants, as opposed to having one person just simply not refuse. It’s never been important that both people are invested in having sex. Because we don’t talk about sex as something people do together. We talk about sex as something that is done to someone.