
@theartofmadeline
we're not kids anymore.
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Noah Kahan
Cosimo Galluzzi
occasionally subtle

tannertan36

Kiana Khansmith
todays bird
Game of Thrones Daily
NASA

Origami Around
cherry valley forever
h
Sade Olutola
almost home

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from Japan

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Germany

seen from Belgium
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Sweden
seen from Türkiye
seen from Nigeria
seen from Poland

seen from United States

seen from Indonesia

seen from T1
@thevirtualself-blog-blog
lairdhenn:
Amy Taubin | Minds on Fire
Link
Take Shelter (Jeff Nichols, 2011)
"The matter at hand is, as in Nichols’ highly astute debut Shotgun Stories (2007), American men grounded in stoicism yet suffering internal meltdowns. While the emotions trail the technology in the Hollywood version of action/suspense/horror, Nichols’ version positions a working man, a husband and father named Curtis LaForche (Michael Shannon), in the foreground of a classic Midwest landscape, and then watches as his mind comes crashing down around him in the form of his visions of spectacular, Turneresque storms that appear to be building toward some kind of apocalyptic crescendo. Form (effects) follows function (unarticulated male fear)."
Robert Koehler, Cinema Scope
Summer 2011 - Issue 47
Blow Up (Michelangelo Antonioni, 1966)
La Haine (Mathieu Kassovitz, 1995)
"The second interesting, and even more striking, absence is any direct reference to ethnicity. In 1995, La haine’s central black-blanc-beur trio made racial difference visible only to downplay it. Racist violence is a trigger for the film, but it rapidly disappears to make way for a consensual view of the three friends united in their social exclusion. La haine, in this respect, was typical of the beur films of the 1980s. However, the racial situation in France has significantly changed since 1995, and the rise of Islamic fundamentalism, exacerbated by 9/11, has increased both anti-Arab racism and partly Arab-fueled anti-Semitism. Very noticeably, the poor layers of society increasingly reject the traditional French (Jacobin) integrationist model, while the cités are perceived as recruitment grounds for Islamic terrorists. The banlieues as a result have seen a greater ghettoization, but this aggravated racial situation is a minefield that neither Kassovitz nor Sarkozy wishes to tackle—all the more ironic since, as Kassovitz points out, they are both the sons of Hungarian immigrants."
Ginette Vincendeau (link)
If religion is used to allow you to come to terms with death, and also to guide you in how you live your life, then I think art can do the same thing. But in a schematic way, in a much less rigid and absolute way, which is why it appeals to me and religion doesn’t.
David Cronenberg (via slashjunky)
"It's the difference between discovering the existence of a viral syndrome and finding that Henry has it."
Noël Carroll
That queasy feeling you get when watching a Wes Anderson movie.
iwdrm:
“Enough of symbolism and these escapist themes of purity and innocence.”
8½ (1963)
criterioncorner:
THE 5 BEST QUOTES FROM THE RARE NEW JEAN-LUC GODARD INTERVIEW
so everyone’s favorite crotchety auteur / eternal rapscallion / visual socialist isn’t too much for interviews, but he recently granted a rare one to German website Zeit Online in order to hype his most recent feature, Film Socialisme. or maybe he was just using Film Socialisme as an excuse to preach via outlets like Zeit Online… whatever.
anyway, the interview is every bit as provocative as you would expect, every bit as kooky as you would hope. it was exclusively published in German and so what you see below passages translated to the best of my ability, just a few of my favorite excerpts from a conversation that goes all over the place (including a critical but quickly dismissed KUNG-FU PANDA reference).
on the future of cinema:
“If you’re really looking for it, then you can find something on the net… in FILM SOCIALISME there is a recording that I copied from the Internet: two cats purring, creating a dialogue. The people who filmed this is achieved a pretty picture. But they go no further. There are too many shots on the net, and maybe three of 100,000 make something mildly interesting… … I have no Internet connection. But if someone says something is on there, then I’m going to have a friend help me to look at it… The network remains a democracy with much information but without much sense. It is dominated by high priests, called servers, which are themselves controlled by corporations.”
on technology:
“We are very dominated by what one might call simply ‘the technology.’ I have no mobile phone. People think the buttons or the display of their phone are there to control. But they are the buttons that control us. (Godard types on his old phone) when I select a number on this old machine, I do not feel that he knows me. Maybe a little. But I do not feel forced, it entlangzustreichen (“sweeps?”) on the thing. This is the same relationship as between a dog and his owner, which have a line between them. In this respect there are two masters or two slaves. In any case, the dog just like his master ruled that it reversed. This also applies to airplanes, cars, everything. Sometimes the technique seems obscene.”
on the capitalization of cinema:
“Well, there are great exhibitions of famous painters, attended en masse. One would think that people no longer go there because they satisfy the pictures of the ZDF, one of TV or CNN. But they have the desire to see something that does not speak in connection with language. They want to see pictures. But it shows them in buildings that look like mausoleums or churches that they attended in procession, as if walking into a temple. In the temple of profit. In this regard, I have a socialist approach to the art.” TIME: The cinema has its temples. “The multiplexes. Yes, the popcorn are temples where the cinema is only an accessory. I wonder how there can be a cultural critique of capitalism, when the culture itself has long been capitalized.”
on progress and the diversification of objects:
“I’m not against democracy or progress. I criticize only way we deal with it. I buy my cameras in ordinary photo discounters. But man has invented so many things that he cannot control it. You know so much more about the technology, but think so much less. And this concerns not only the technology. Look at this ashtray, he still looks all right. Why do we need thousands of additional models? Earlier saw the car from different brands, today they are all equal. A single company would do. Everyone wants to invent a little, everyone wants to create. So you have thousands created to satisfy the desire for creation.”
on contemporary filmmakers (both amateur and professional) fundamentally misusing the camera:
“Three quarters of the people who make movies today need no camera to see something… The people ultimately do not shoot, they write. And then copy to the camera what they have written. You [should use the camera to see something that would remain invisible without a camera. Something that needs a camera to exist at all.”
oldfilmsflicker:
Hollywood is a tough place. Landmarks get demolished. The Brown Derby is gone. The Tail o’ the Pup hot dog stand is in some warehouse in Torrance. In traffic, drivers swerve manically and cut you off, as if to signal they have to get there before you. In a culture so inward-looking and self-centered, focused only on the next big thing, we easily forget the paths and paving stones that led us to where we are. Film history is important to Los Angeles. A sense of community is scarce. Rocket Video offered both those things. I don’t know if Angelenos will miss a place like Rocket right away, but I think they will eventually. I know I already do.
(via My Store Just Died « Zócalo Public Square)
filmprojections:
Descriptions of neurotics are typically unflattering: they’re fearful, tense people, prone to catastrophise and will often shy away from challenges. Well, here’s some more uplifting news for folk matching this personality description. A study of film immersion has found that people who score highly in neuroticism (as measured by agreement with statements like “I worry a lot”) tend to feel more absorbed in films. This is associated with their enjoying horror and sad films less, but comedies more. David Weibel and his team had 64 participants (average age 28 years) watch three movie clips taken from The Shining (the scene where the boy is playing in the hallway); The Champ (a boy’s father dies after suffering a severe beating in the ring); and When Harry Met Sally (the scene where Sally fakes an orgasm in a cafe). The participants, half of whom were students, rated how immersed they felt in the clips and how detached they felt from their real, physical environment. They also said how much they’d enjoyed the film excerpts. The half of the participants who scored higher in neuroticism experienced more immersion during all three clips - happy, sad and scary - compared with the lower scorers in neuroticism. “A possible explanation,” the researchers said, “could be that neurotics usually have a highly reactive sympathetic nervous system making them sensitive to any environmental stimulation.” The more neurotic participants also liked the scary and sad clips less, but enjoyed the funny clip more. The implication is that immersion mediates enjoyment, but unfortunately this wasn’t tested. Weibel’s team said their finding has theoretical import because media experts tend to assume that engendering greater immersion in an audience will always lead to more enjoyment. “Our findings contradict this assumption,” they said. “In the two negatively connotated conditions, participants scoring high on neuroticism experienced more presence than those scoring low, but at the same time reported less enjoyment than individuals with low neuroticism scores. We therefore assume that for these participants, the feeling of being there in the sad or fearful world was experienced in a negative way. This in turn resulted in decreased enjoyment.” _________________________________ Weibel, D., Wissmath, B., & Stricker, D. (2011). The influence of neuroticism on spatial presence and enjoyment in films Personality and Individual Differences, 51 (7), 866-869 DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.011
Natura morta
Le chant du styrène (Alain Resnais, 1958)
Hiroshima mon amour (Alain Resnais, 1959)
Manhattan (Woody Allen, 1979)
I was privileged to attend a rare 35mm screening of this tonight at Ciné here in Athens, GA. The print (the only one available in America) was absolutely gorgeous. A really remarkable film.