best of Loki in Thor: Ragnarok (2017)
Sade Olutola

No title available
Three Goblin Art
ojovivo
KIROKAZE
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Stranger Things

Discoholic 🪩

Andulka
art blog(derogatory)
Cosimo Galluzzi
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
todays bird
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

PR's Tumblrdome
sheepfilms
dirt enthusiast

Kiana Khansmith
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Oman

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from United States
@tommyjoker
best of Loki in Thor: Ragnarok (2017)
i bet dragons would probably think it’s really cool that we produce water in our mouths
good shit: when a character with a reputation for being selfish and uncaring gets injured while doing something to protect others
good shit: when they pretend they’re not injured and did nothing to protect anyone, because they want to keep up that selfish reputation
good shit: when the characters they were protecting only find out about any of this when the character collapses from the injuries they’re trying to hide
Okay, this is in incredibly petty nitpick, but: if you’re writing a fantasy setting with same-sex marriage, a same-sex noble or royal couple typically would not have titles of the same rank - e.g., a prince and a prince, or two queens.
It depends on which system of ranking you use, of course (there are several), but in most systems there’s actually a rule covering this scenario: in the event that a consort’s courtesy title being of the same rank as their spouse’s would potentially create confusion over who holds the title by right and who by courtesy, the consort instead receives the next-highest title on the ladder.
So the husband of a prince would be a duke; the wife of a queen, a princess; and so forth.
(You actually see this rule in practice in the United Kingdom, albeit not in the context of a same-sex marriage; the Queen’s husband is styled a prince because if he were a king, folks might get confused about which of them was the reigning monarch.)
The only common situation where you’d expect to see, for example, two queens in the same marriage is if the reigning monarchs of two different realms married each other - and even then, you’d more likely end up with a complicated arrangement where each party is technically a princess of the other’s realm in addition to being queen of her own.
You’ve gotta keep it nice and unambiguous who’s actually in charge!
Okay, I’ve received a whole lot of asks about this post, so I’m going to cover all of the responses in one go:
1. The system described above is, admittedly, merely one of the most common. Other historically popular alternatives include:
The consort’s courtesy title is of the same rank as their spouse’s, with “-consort” appended to it: prince and prince-consort, queen and queen-consort, etc. This is how, e.g., present-day Monaco does it.
The consort is simply styled Lord or Lady So-and-so, and receives no specific title. I can’t think of any country that still does it this way, off the top of my head, but historically it was a thing.
(Naturally, your setting needn’t adhere to any of these, but it would be highly irregular for it to lack some mechanism for clarifying the chain of command.)
2. The reason why the consort of a prince is historically a princess even though those titles are the same rank is basically sexism. This can go a couple of ways:
In many realms, there was no such thing as being a princess by right; the daughter of a monarch would be styled Lady So-and-so and receive no specific title, so the only way to be a princess was to marry a prince.
In realms where women could hold titles by right, typically a masculine title was informally presumed to outrank its feminine counterpart. So, e.g., kings outrank queens, princes outrank princesses, etc.
In either case, no ambiguity exists.
(Interestingly, this suggests that in a more egalitarian setting where masculine titles are not presumed to outrank their feminine counterparts, or vice versa, you’d need to explicitly disambiguate rankings even outside the context of same-sex marriages. Food for thought!)
3. It would also be possible to have two kings or two queens in the same marriage without multiple realms being involved in the case of a true co-monarchy. However, true co-monarchies are highly irregular and, from a political standpoint, immensely complicated affairs. If you’re planning on writing one of those, be prepared to do your research!
4. The next rank down from “countess” is either “viscountess” or “baroness”, depending on which peerage system you’re using.
(Yes, that last one actually came up multiple times. Apparently there are a lot of stories about gay countesses out there!)
I’m here
Favourite movie scenes: 2/?
Now we know who’s been stealing from your stores, Severus
Reenactor throws a spear at a drone
What a time to be alive.
“The medieval warrior, realizing the consequences of his impulsive act, immediately approached the owner of the drone and offered to pay for the damage.
The owner of the drone was so impressed by the brilliant attack that he suggested organizing a competition for bringing down “dragons” with short spears next year.
Drone owners have another year to develop a unique “dragon-like” design for their flying machines.” (x)
I am 100% cooler with this knowing that the spear-thrower realized “oops maybe I shouldn’t have done that” and tried to make it right, and that the guy who the drone belonged to was cool with it
just so everyone knows, this has already been memorialized in a runestone
Everything about this post blesses those involved with a +4 on their next Today is Good Day roll
I crack up every time at seeing that runestone.
Random-Fandom-Whump’s Favorite Movie Whump Moments [1/?]
Tangled, 2010
under-giffed scenes // a 2017 rewatch ↳ 2.07 [prompt by @tracionn]
“What are we holding on to, Sam?” “That there’s some good in this world, Mr Frodo. And it’s worth fighting for.”
If I did my math right[Which I dunno if I did]… when filming this scene the cast knew Chandler was being fired… which makes me ask - Was the sadness surrounding the hug real??
And that’s how I want you to think of her! That was Carrie!
Our Lady of No Fucks Given,
Patron Saint of Meds and Snark -
She has loved us, she has left us
And she guides us through the dark.
May the Force Be With You
“By the end of [The Last Jedi], he’s gone from being a wannabe Vader to someone who is standing on his own feet as a complex villain taking the reins.” - Rian Johnson on Kylo Ren
Bless the Disneyland face characters for giving us the hug that MOVIE DIDN’T
Sources: x . x . x . x
“Asgardians don’t hug”, my ass XDDD
OMG LOKI’S FACE!!!