Donated at Diversity Thrift RVA but bought immediately by a staff member before it even made it to the floor
oh my god
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Cosimo Galluzzi
No title available
tumblr dot com
h

Kiana Khansmith

No title available
NASA
The Stonewall Inn
d e v o n
Game of Thrones Daily
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Monterey Bay Aquarium
taylor price
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

@theartofmadeline
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

blake kathryn
Claire Keane
seen from Maldives

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Honduras

seen from India

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Poland

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Pakistan
seen from India
@undercoverspaceprincess
Donated at Diversity Thrift RVA but bought immediately by a staff member before it even made it to the floor
oh my god
slightly regret not getting this
@shiftythrifting
After some research, I’ve come to the conclusion that fish tank heel 70s platform shoes probably did not exist in the 70s and were just an urban legend.
No “vintage” fishtank heel shoes have ever shown up on ebay, and I’ve looked because I really want a pair. I’ve not found any advertisement campaign for them in period magazines, I’ve never found any “period” images of someone in fish tank heel shoes. All pop culture references to fishtank shoes (like the Simpsons’ Disco Stu and I’m Gonna Git You Sucka) are dated long after the disco era.
I am willing to concede the fact they might have existed, but if they existed at all, the absence of a national ad campaign or manufacturer may mean they were probably the work of individual small scale customizers and crafters. It may additionally, be a case where the urban legend about these shoes’ existence led to the existence of actual ones, as the stories led to a real demand.
My initial conclusion - that if goldfish chunky heels existed, they were not mass-market items but were individual examples created by individual custom shoemakers, is correct. It seems there was an interview in 1981 that confirmed their origin.
It seems that the origin of the shoes was a custom pair worn by one man, fashion trendsetter and athlete, the Pittsburgh Steelers’ “Frenchy” Fuqua. Frenchy was known not just for his great athletic skill, but also for being a fashion trendsetter in the disco era. He was among the first, for example, to popularize Musketeer hat wearing.
Many of his outfits are extremely dated, but some of his outfits still look stylish today.
In a 1981 interview with the New York Times, Frenchy Fuqua identified the origin of his goldfish platforms in 1977:
Frenchy laughed. ”Then I get a call from a friend. ‘Frenchy,’ he says, ‘I got somethin’ real sweet for you.’ ” ‘What is it?’ ” ‘How would you like some shoes you can put goldfish in?’ ”I said, ‘Hey, I got an outfit for it.’ ”It was my count suit, with the musketeer hat and gold cane and lavender cape and my valet, which was Franco Harris, who carried the cape and never let it touch ground. And, oh yes, my wine-red knickers. That’s why I switched from goldfish to tropical fish. The tropical-fish colors went better with my outfits.
”The shoes were actually fiberglass clogs with three-inch heels. I had two fish in each shoe. They were a little slippery to walk in, being glass, so you’d have to hold on to a rail when you went down stairs. But my biggest problem was that the fish kept dying. I kept running and adding water, and that just got my socks wet. I experimented with a small pump that ran up my pants, but that was uncomfortable. Finally I gave up the fish but kept the shoes – and put in a terrarium.”
In other words, they were a single item made by a single shoe customizer for a deeply influential and famous person. The very issues he identifies are why they were never a mass-market commodity. Still, I haven’t been able to find any images of Frenchy Fuqua in the goldfish platforms, which is interesting, because, as I often tell people, their belief that “everything is on the internet” is deeply unwarranted arrogance, considering how much no longer exists.
Also, a few people in the comments like @fan-collector-geek mentioned they remember an appearance by a guy on a talk show with aquarium heels. They may be remembering Tony Randall’s appearance on Johnny Carson show in 1977, where supposedly, he wore aquarium heels. I’m inclined to believe this happened as so many people remember it (and the exact same details), but I didn’t discuss it in the post have yet to be able to find any images of it - nothing. It just goes to show that we’re not doing as thorough a job as we should be of recording and archiving pop culture. The 77 date matches the idea the origin of aquarium shoes was Frenchy Fuqua.
As far as I can find aquarium heels were never mass-marketed by any company, but they were produced as show pieces and sold by several specialty shoe stores throughout the 20th century.
The earliest reference I was able to locate to clear heels containing fish was an unnamed Mexican inventor in 1937 who made transparent heels that could be filled with whatever the purchaser desired. His various designs supposedly included “flowers, animals, mermaid, portraits of movie stars, and goldfish swimming about in a liquid filling”.
Both transparent heels and the platform/wedge heel were cutting edge fashion in 1937 (Ferragamo would produce his legendary rainbow platforms for Judy Garland the following year), so it makes sense that people would experiment and combine both.
Countess Irene Ahlefeldt-Laurvig claimed to have worn transparent heels containing live mice to a ball in Paris in 1947, for which she supposedly received a censure from the Danish SPCA. But I can find no source on that other than her own word.
The first fully documented pair of goldfish heels I’ve been able to locate were a display piece produced for the National Shoe Convention in 1951.
Parisian fashion houses produced hollow lucite heels throughout the 1950s, filled with everything from flower petals to champagne. So someone could very well have stuck some goldfish in there at some point, but I so far haven’t located anything except passive “lol fashion is weird” jokes in various magazines and newspaper columns from the era.
The popular novel “The Fame Game” written by Rona Jaffee in 1969 contains the passage: “We’ll recreate the 40s, the Gilda Look. Peplums! Snoods! Platform shoes with ankle straps, wedgies with hollow lucite in which live goldfish swim around - and shoulder pads!” - Which rather interestingly suggests that people in the late 60s erroneously viewed aquarium shoes as a 1940s trend.
In 1972, Geller’s Shoe Store in Hartford, Connecticut displayed a pair of goldfish shoes titled “El Padrino” (The Godfather) - presumably a play on the “Luca Brasi sleeps with the fishes” line from The Godfather, which was released earlier the same year.
A shoe store in Washington, DC reproduced the style the following year and claimed to have sold three pairs for $65 a piece.
Bari’s in Orlando was also marketing goldfish shoes in 1973.
1973 is also the earliest reference I can find of Frenchy Fuqua’s aquarium shoes, suggesting he misremembered the date in his 1981 interview.
Fuqua continued to wear the shoes multiple times throughout the 1970s, changing the fish to coordinate with this ensembles, as he stated in the interview, and appears to have been the person most associated with the trend.
I had no idea I would become so invested in the history of goldfish disco shoes.
In the 1960′s Legally a woman couldn’t
Open a bank account or get a credit card without signed permission from her father or hr husband.
Serve on a jury - because it might inconvenience the family not to have the woman at home being her husband’s helpmate.
Obtain any form of birth control without her husband’s permission. You had to be married, and your hub and had to agree to postpone having children.
Get an Ivy League education. Ivy League schools were men’s colleges ntil the 70′s and 80′s. When they opened their doors to women it was agree that women went there for their MRS. Degee.
Experience equality in the workplace: Kennedy’s Commission on the Status of Women produced a report in 1963 that revealed, among other things, that women earned 59 cents for every dollar that men earned and were kept out of the more lucrative professional positions.
Keep her job if she was pregnant.Until the Pregnancy Discrimination Act in 1978, women were regularly fired from their workplace for being pregnant.
Refuse to have sex with her husband.The mid 70s saw most states recognize marital rape and in 1993 it became criminalized in all 50 states. Nevertheless, marital rape is still often treated differently to other forms of rape in some states even today.
Get a divorce with some degree of ease.Before the No Fault Divorce law in 1969, spouses had to show the faults of the other party, such as adultery, and could easily be overturned by recrimination.
Have a legal abortion in most states.The Roe v. Wade case in 1973 protected a woman’s right to abortion until viability.
Take legal action against workplace sexual harassment. According to The Week, the first time a court recognized office sexual harassment as grounds for legal action was in 1977.
Play college sports Title IX of the Education Amendments of protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive Federal financial assistance It was nt until this statute that colleges had teams for women’s sports
Apply for men’s Jobs The EEOC rules that sex-segregated help wanted ads in newspapers are illegal. This ruling is upheld in 1973 by the Supreme Court, opening the way for women to apply for higher-paying jobs hitherto open only to men.
This is why we needed feminism - this is why we know that feminism works
I just want to reiterate this stuff, because I legit get the feeling there are a lot of younger women for whom it hasn’t really sunk in what it is today’s GOP is actively trying to return to.
Did you go to a good college? Shame on you, you took a college placement that could have gone to a man who deserves and needs it to support or prepare for his wife & children. But if you really must attend college, well, some men like that, you can still get married if you focus on finding the right man.
Got a job? Why? A man could be doing that job. You should be at home caring for a family. You shouldn’t be taking that job away from a man who needs it (see college, above). You definitely don’t have a career – you’ll be pregnant and raising children soon, so no need to worry about promoting you.
This shit was within living memory. I’M A MILLENIAL and my mother was in the second class that allowed women at an Ivy League school. Men who are alive today either personally remember shit like this or have parents/family who have raised them into thinking this was the way America functioned back in the blissful Good Old Days. There are literally dudes in the GOP old enough to remember when it was like this and yearn for those days to return.
When people talk about resisting conservativism and the GOP, we’re not just talking about whether the wage gap is a myth or not. We’re talking about whether women even have the fundamental right to exist as individuals, to run their own households and compete for jobs and be considered on an equal footing with men in any arena at all in the first place.
I was a child in the 1960s, a teenager in the 1970s, a young adult in the 1980s. This is what it was like: When I was growing up, it was considered unfortunate if a girl was good at sports. Girls were not allowed in Little League. Girls’ teams didn’t exist in high school, except at all-girls’ high schools. Boys played sports, and girls were the cheerleaders. People used to ask me as a child what I wanted to be when I grew up. I said I wanted to be a brain surgeon or the first woman justice on the Supreme Court. Everyone told me it was impossible–those just weren’t realistic goals for a girl–the latter, especially, because you couldn’t trust women to judge fairly and rationally, after all. In the 1960s and 1970s, all women were identified by their marital status, even in arrest reports and obituaries. In elementary school, my science teacher referred to Pierre Curie as DOCTOR Curie and Marie Curie as MRS. Curie…because, as he put it, “she was just his wife.” (Both had doctorates and both were Nobel prize winners, so you would think that both would be accorded respect.) Companies could and did require women to wear dresses and skirts. Failure to do could and did get women fired. And it was legal. It was also legal to fire women for getting married or getting pregnant. The rationale was that a woman who was married or who had a child had no business working; that was what her husband was for. Aetna Insurance, the biggest insurance company in America, fired women for all of the above. A man could rape his wife. Legally. I can remember being twelve years old and reading about legal experts actually debating whether or not a man could actually be said to coerce his wife into having sex. This was a serious debate in 1974. The debate about marital rape came up in my law school, too, in 1984. Could a woman be raped by her husband? The guys all said no–a woman got married, so she was consenting to sex at all times. So I turned it around. I asked them if, since a man had gotten married, that meant that his wife could shove a dildo or a stick or something up his ass any time she wanted to for HER sexual pleasure. (Hey, I thought it was reasonable. If one gender was legally entitled to force sex on the other, then obviously the reverse should also be true.) The male law students didn’t like the idea. Interestingly, they commented that being treated like that would make them feel like a woman. My reaction was, “Thank you for proving my point…” The concept of date rape, when first proposed, was considered laughable. If a woman went out on a date, the argument of legal experts ran, sexual consent was implied. Even more sickening was the fact that in some states–even in the early 1980s–a man could rape his daughter…and it was no worse than a misdemeanor. Women taking self-defense classes in the 1970s and 1980s were frequently described in books and on TV as “cute.” The implication was that it was absurd for a woman to attempt to defend herself, but wasn’t it just adorable for her to try? I was expressly forbidden to take computer classes in junior and senior years of high school–1978-79 and 1979-80–because, as the principal told me, “Only boys have to know that kind of thing. You girls are going to get married, and you won’t use it.” When I was in college–from 1980 to 1984–there were no womens’ studies. The idea hadn’t occurred in many places because the presumption was that there was nothing TO study. My history professor–a man who had a doctorate in history–informed me quite seriously that women had never produced a noted painter, sculptor, composer, architect or scientist because…wait for it…womens’ brains were too small. (He was very surprised when I came up with a list of fifty women gifted in the arts and science, most of whom he had never heard of before.) When Walter Mondale picked Geraldine Ferraro as a running mate in 1984, the press hailed it as a disaster. What would happen, they asked fearfully, if Mondale died and Ferraro became president? What if an international crisis arose and she was menstruating? She could push the nuclear button in a fit of PMS! It would be the end of the WORLD!! …No, they WEREN’T kidding. On the surface, things are very different now than they were when I was a child, a teen and a young adult. But I’m afraid that people now do not realize what it was like then. I’ve read a lot of posts from young women who say that they are not feminists. If the only exposure to feminism they have is the work of extremists, I cannot blame them overmuch. I wish that I could tell them what feminism was like when it was new–when the dream of legal equality was just a dream, and hadn’t even begun to come true. When “woman’s work” was a sneer–and an overt putdown. When people tut-tutted over bright and athletic girls with the words, “Really, it’s a shame she’s not a boy.” That lack of feminism wasn’t all men opening doors and picking up checks. A lot of it was an attitude of patronizing contempt that hasn’t entirely died out, but which has become less publicly acceptable. I wish I could make them feel what it was like…when grown men were called “men” and grown women were “girls.”
Know your history.
So this, too, is what they mean saying “make America great again” and/or the good old days.
REBLOG FOREVER.
I am 70. I remember all those things. I was a student nurse from 64 to 67 and we were not permitted to “finish” a bed bath on a male or insert a catheter in a male. Seeing male genitals might cause us “harm” or upset our delicate sensibilities. Imagine when we graduated and were “thrown” to the wolves. Imagine if you were a male patient who had to be the first to be “practiced” on by a graduate nurse. (Ha!) At the school I attended no student nurse could be married. Only one school in my city (Atlanta) would even admit married women and Male Nurses weren’t even thought of. What man would want to be a nurse when he could be a Doctor. In all my training I only remember 3 or 4 Women who were Doctor’s and a very few, (less than 5 or 6) female interns or residents (and this was a teaching hospital) and most of those were OB/Gyns and one was a pediatrician.
When I graduated and was going to get married I wanted to go on birth control pills. You needed to be on them for a least one cycle before they were effective. I won’t go into what hoops I had to jump through to get a prescription from my Dr. (a man, natch) but when i went to the drug store to get the prescription filled I ended up having to get my future husband to “accompany” me so the pharmacist “interview” him and see if it was okay with him for me to be on the pill.
Even when we went to get a marriage license I had to get my Father’s signature and we had to go before a Judge because I was not yet 21 (I was 20 and 9 months).
I could go on and on, getting a credit card in MY name, etc., but I will tell you that WE MUST RESIST.
The number of people I know who romanticize gender inequality is frankly terrifying. A world never existed in which the lives of women were simplified by benevolent men who saw to her every want and need. That was not a thing. A world never existed in which women were all ladies, men were all gentlemen, & everything was some great big cishet fairytale. Feminists aren’t a bunch of upstarts who want to destroy a perfectly wholesome and non-harmful system. Just…look at history. Look at the posts above. We. Must. Resist..
About 8: The State of New York only added No-Fault Divorce as an option in 2010 (!!!)
I want to repeat here.
This is what they mean, when they say “Old-fashioned values”
When conservatives start waxing lyrical about the ‘good old days’, this is what they mean. They are fully aware how much things blew for women, and they would like to return to that.
Beautiful photos of the 1948 Talbot-Lago T26 Grand Sport Cabriolet.
I need this car.
contrary to popular belief not everyone has an innate sense of internal gender or care to have one or seek a name for it, some people go their whole lives without questioning their occupation in one of two gender roles, but for some people, if pressed, they don’t feel that internal sense of ‘i am a woman’ or ‘i am a man’, and in that case i feel the switch over to transgender vs cisgender relies on active identification of a gender other than the one they were assigned. if someone’s like ‘idk dude I just work here’ then that’s valid
#i would describe my gender as not exactly ‘idk dude i just work here’ #more like…..when someone assumes you work somewhere that you don’t #but you know how to help them so you do it anyway #my gender is wearing a red shirt at a target
These are the best tags
A portion of people in the notes are like ‘but that makes you trans. That’s called being agender’ and another portion of people are going ‘this is how the majority of cis ppl feel and it’s NOT agender’ and personally I feel like both of them are missing the point here. Yes a lot of people identify as agender because of this feeling. Yes a lot of people with this same feeling still identify as cis. These are not mutually exclusive experiences and it doesn’t mean the agender people are secretly cis or the cis people are secretly agender. It just means they have very similar experiences of gender that they choose to conceptualize and label differently, and neither of them are mistaken or wrong to do so.
New York
Amazing photos of Janis Joplin performing with Big Brother & the Holding Company. See more here...
Altered book art journaling, circa 2018