For those who canât tell Alphie and Sirius apart:
No title available
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸

izzy's playlists!
Mike Driver
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Claire Keane

if i look back, i am lost
Xuebing Du

Origami Around

PR's Tumblrdome
Noah Kahan

JVL

â
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Peter Solarz
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ

Product Placement

Kiana Khansmith

#extradirty
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from T1
seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from Germany

seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from Argentina
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Finland

seen from Singapore
@unfinishedquestions
For those who canât tell Alphie and Sirius apart:
ai could simply never create a body of fanfictional work that is so revealing about the author that it borders on humiliating.
If you're writing anything involving cons, scams, heists, or morally questionable characters who are very good at lying, here are some free resources I've been using for research. Saving you the "why is this in my search history" anxiety.
1. The FBI's Famous Cases & Criminals archive (fbi.gov/history/famous-cases) has detailed breakdowns of real fraud cases, Ponzi schemes, and confidence operations. The language they use is clinical and precise, which is perfect for getting the procedural details right.
2. The FTC Consumer Sentinel Network publishes annual reports on the most common fraud tactics in the US. Great for understanding how modern scams actually work and what makes people fall for them.
3. The Smithsonian's American Art Museum has a free digital collection of forgery case studies. If your character forges documents or art, this is gold.
4. Court Listener (courtlistener.com) is a free legal database where you can read actual court transcripts from fraud trials. Want to know how a real con artist talks under oath? This is where you find out.
5. The Internet Archive's collection of old newspaper crime sections. Search for "confidence man" or "swindle" in papers from the 1920s through 1960s and you'll find incredible real stories that would feel too dramatic for fiction.
Bonus: The Psychology of Fraud section on the Association for Psychological Science website has accessible articles about why people trust, how deception works cognitively, and what makes someone a convincing liar. Essential reading if you want your con artist characters to feel psychologically real.
Reblog to save for later. Your WIP will thank you.
I think you can humanize a villain in a way that makes you hate them more and thatâs delicious, actually.
barty: does something stupid
evan, shaking his head: i canât believe iâm going to sleep with him
regulus: you know you donât have to
evan: no Iâm gonna
i got the zukka virus i fear.....
THE COOL KIDS
evan mc dreamy rosier and barty i-want-to-look-dangerous-but-i-have-freckles-so-i-look-like-babygirl crouch đĽ
Follow me on Instagram: @legalisecrying đ
Barty, climbing through Evan's window at 3am: Is four followers a lot?
Evan, locking the window and shutting his blinds: Depends on the context. Online? No. In a dark alley? Kind of.
Louvre heist got me returning to my roots
leigh bardugo has massively edited and rewritten the six of crows books and no one has noticed
or has for some reason decided not to mention it at all or let anyone else know.
I just found out something insane today. in the new dregs editions that came out for the 10th anniversary, leigh bardugo has removed any and all mention of the crows being teenagers, cut out whole sentences and completely changed quotes that are classic and very well known by fans of the six of crows duology. sheâs replaced any mention of words like âchildrenâ âboyâ âgirlâ and âkidsâ with âmanâ âwomanâ âgrownâ etc
this is concerning, bewildering and just feels wrong for so many reasons. but besides the obvious âwhich is that the six protagonists of the duology being young is essential to many aspects of the plot, seeing as their world weariness and competence is a result of their experiences as children and survivors who are victims of their environmentâbesides even that, editing a piece of literature thatâs been published and on shelves for 10 years is objectively not a good idea at all, and doesnât at all take into account the new contexts and connotations the new wording brings.
above is an example of the original scene we know verses the new version. lots of it has changed, namely their ages, but the sentence at the end in matthas' pov doesn't even sound like him at all. her writing quality has declined noticeably and she sounds like she wrote that sentence in a rush. it makes no sense, and it's not something matthias, who knows practically nothing about the barrel, would be thinking.
and not to mention the famous line 'brekker's eyes were ancient, but he couldn't be any older then matthias' â cut out of the book completely. I do wonder what impact, effect and influence these changes will have on new readers.
this is another example. such a classic line and they cut it completely.
the entire books are like this. inej saying kaz looking seventeen is changed to kaz looking like someone's apprentice. the boy of the barrel changed to man. criminal prodigy changed to just mastermind. inej described as a woman in place of a sixteen year old girl. wylan changed from boy to young man. full scenes cut. 'jesper is zemeni but don't hold it against him' changed to âdonât let him wax sentimental about itâ which sounds way worse then the original.
and I don't actually own the new copies of these books, my best friend was looking at them in a bookstore and that's when we first noticed all of the changes. so I truly have no idea what else could possibly be changed besides the things I noticed as I cannot look at them for reference - the crow's physical appearance, more of the plot, other famous scenes just being cut completely, etc. if nothing else has changed, then itâs still way too much and massively changes core aspects of the books. but I do wonder. if you own the dregs special editions, I suggest looking for similar differences. I might have to write examples to express how messed up the new connotations are.
leigh now implies that jesper, an adult black man, made the right choice by handing over his share from his job to his white father to keep for you, as he cannot control himself and isn't ready to receive his own funds, as he is a mindless gambler. this is extremely different to a reckless irresponsible teenager grieving his mother and making stupid mistakes, and then deciding to make better decisions in the future with help from his parent. I'm sure you can see without me spelling it out how awful, racist and problematic the new context of jesper being a grown man makes this situation sound.
another example is matthias' childhood centrally seeing him be groomed, manipulated and indoctrinated by a nazi coded witch hunting organisation that targets grisha, an oppressed community, with the intention of torturing, burning, hanging, raping and eradicating them from the world
matthias is just turning 18 when he meets nina. he has not yet done any of these terrible things himself. he is fresh out of training and still basically a child. his views are first challenged, and he eventually breaks out of the brainwashing and mental manipulation that has been taught and instilled in him with repetition. it's not an excuse, but it's more understandable. matthias, now a grown man apparently way older then 18, has no excuse for these bigoted views as he is way more mature, has way more experience, and would have had to have done these horrific things to grisha at some point.
it feels like some sort of fever dream that six of crows was edited and re published so that these famous teenage characters (who were first written so obviouslyâ in dialogue, actions, pov, - as teenagers) and their criminal prodigy leader were made into poorly written adults. I can put into words how much this has deeply bothered and distressed me and many other readers I've spoken to.
it's such an odd choice and makes me think it was done to soften the backlash the shadow and bone adaption received from some fans for aging up the characters in the first place.
I cannot stress this enough- leigh bardugo would edit iconic lines and change core aspects of her characters that have been around for 10 years to justify a cancelled netflix adaption of these incredibly popular and well loved books. it's odd and uncomfortable.
now, these books mean the world to me, they have quite literally got me through physical, mental and emotional childhood abuse, suicide ideation and self harm, the everyday ableism and oppression, chronic pain and disability experience, severe depression and anxiety, absolute hopelessness, work and life, etc) but the sheer absurdity of this all just outmatches my distress that it happened. it feels like some sort of hallucination becasue it's lowkey just insane. she never even mentioned she was going to do something like this?
there is just no conceivable reason for leigh bardugo to have done this secretly and quietly other then to have stopped people negatively critiquing the show or some other deeply odd notion. and with all of these changes, the new books absolutely are not the 'dregs' editionsâ the heart of the dregs is the young blood, 'the kids like kaz who he had brought in a organised, who worked the hardest and took the worst jobs'
they are the bad netflix adaption editions. the sympathy for terrible adult cast editions. it's troubling, clearly not a well thought out decision, and deeply bizarre. tell me others agree.
magnet - jegulus - @jeggyverses-jegulus-microfic - word count: 416
âReg! Reg, I have to show you something!â James hissed desperately as soon as Regulus arrived at Sirius and Remusâs flat, grabbing the shorter manâs hand and dragging him into the kitchen.Â
âBloody hell, Potter, what happened to being a secret?â Regulus snapped, looking around to make sure Sirius wasnât around. âI get youâre happy to see me, butââ
âNo, Iâm not!â James interrupted, too focused on the object of his distress to realize what heâd said.
Regulus stopped short, sending his boyfriend a death glare.
âNo! No, Iâobviously, Iâm not not happy to see you! Iâm always happy to see you! Sâjustââ James took a deep breath, trying to calm himself. âI have to show you something, look!â
He pointed a slightly-shaking hand to the refrigerator.
The shorter man sighed, clearly not seeing what James saw. âJames, you donât need me to get food for you, youâre an adult. Now, if youâre using this as an excuse for a snog, then thatâs fine, butââ
Trying not to get distracted by the offer of a snog, James shook his head vehemently. âLook!â he whisper-yelled again, stepping closer to the shiny metal appliance and slamming a palm on a picture held up by a magnet there.
Regulus looked closer and immediately recoiled. âWhatâŚis that?â he demanded, eyes wide and horrified.
It was obvious what it was. It was a polaroid picture of the two of them kissing. Kissing rather passionately, really. And it was on Siriusâs refrigerator. Sirius, who was not supposed to have any idea about what was going on between them. âIâm guessing you didnât put it there?â James asked timidly, knowing the truth but wanting to be sure.
âLike hell I did!â Regulus snapped. âAnd if you did, Iâllââ
âMânot that stupid! But who do you thinkâ?â
They were interrupted by Sirius, who waltzed into the kitchen with a grin on his face, his expression not changing a bit, even as he looked over his brother and his best friend standing with their heads together, staring at the damning picture.Â
ââLo, Reg. Hey, Prongs! Oh, you found that old thing? Yeah, itâs been up for days. I was wondering when youâd see it,â he said casually, grabbing a bag of crisps from a cabinet and heading back to the door. âI call it: âObvious Idiots.ââ He walked out without another word.
James and Regulus stared at each other with open mouths, heat flooding both of their faces.Â
âWell. Shit.â James muttered. Regulus nodded mutely.
When you google animating a wheelchair, thereâs a lot of emphasis only on animating the wheelchair itself, not the animation of the person propelling the wheelchair. Of course this is great for people who have an attendant-propelled animation, but when it comes to characters who self propel, itâs less helpful. Iâm surprised thereâs not much to find on research other than physics and medical related studies, Iâve seen animated wheelchair users, though Iâve never looked at how theyâre animated. If anyone has any sources Iâd be gassed to see them
scars and all
I understand staunchly anti-spoiler people, I do, but I canât count the amount of times Iâve been inspired to read/watch something from hearing a spoiler
this includes tumblr gifsets
Stefano Baghino