diva down!

my name’s jb | 25 | she/they

[cottoncandylesbo]

uh oh y'all it's gettin kinda hazy

[mindofjson]

we need to stop typing shit and find food

[log6]

my family was rich running our aura farm before castro and the other communists nationalized swag

[hungwy]

Spoiled caterpillars!

[commanderchrist-deactivated2017]

Fuck small talk.  Let’s talk about how your day was, the weather, or the big game last night.

[snarp]

What is the best queer media?

Brooklyn Nine-Nine

One Piece

Good Omens

Homestuck

Remaining time: 4 days 20 hours

[jenny-holzer]

[tboy-trash]

once you realize how much everyone fucking loves age- and incest-play you'll go even more insane when they tell you to join their campaign to run transgender woman #487324 off the internet (where she gets her income) for her incest kink or whatever

[tboy-trash]

it really is Our Righteous "pouting and throwing a cute tantrum at my partner to get what i want", "daddy/mommy", "old man yaoi", and a long etc v. their villainous "calling her partner 'little sis'" to encourage sexual abuse of children or smth

[tboy-trash]

straight people especially LOVE ageplay have you ever seen them interact. it is like their main thing.

[tboy-trash]

and not like it is important but since i sometimes see that thrown around: they love doing it in public too, and i don't mean in an obscure tumblr blog (theyre straight) but at. the store in front of 20 people. again, it is one of their main things.

[tboy-trash]

i'm not saying anything that hasn't been said before but i'm just thinking about how common and rendered-invisible by normalization it is to see a straight couple where the woman playfully acts like a little girl sometimes for whatever reason and it's. fine. and i of course don't mean they should leave it in the bedroom or whatever i'm not christian, i'm saying it's so overt but of course it's fine when non-transmisogynized people do it. they have never harmed children in any way obviously.

[dalekdork]

…people like that shit?

[tboy-trash]

people trying to be cute in the notes of this post (not just in this rb, either) is actually extremely annoying. oh you're a poor wittle baby who couldn't possibly know that "teen" and "(M/D)ILF" porn are some of the most popular things straight people wank to? is it your first time using the internet and/or going outside? like come on, i know i'm being harsh here, but this way of distancing yourself from it (and using a memeified image to show how you find it strange and icky) is just another way of signaling "i'm one of the good ones who would NEVER like such perverted things" which is literally just one step removed from the harassment i'm talking about. for the love of god, grow up.

[pettydemon]

[wajb]

[muntzerism-diggerism]

[sharps-container]

eraserhead baby

[wajb]

[wajb]

pissing feels so good when you’re drunk i moan every time. andYES im also cumming

[p0rcelainghoul]

[wajb]

why are there so many

posts about piss kinks

and how we drink water to pee?

pissing feels so good

when you’ve been drinking

and yes i am also cumming

[contextfreepatentart]

[patent-art-contextualizer]

Application ID 20260135623

Quantum Transceiver Antenna and Method for Construction

Applicant: Q-Net, LLC

Okay so I spent literal hours doing research on this to figure out if it was viable, only to discover that the two listed inventors, Marianne Veronika Sandor and Edward Michael Porrazzo, had their assets frozen by the SEC and were subsequently fined over $1.2 million for fraud related to a similar claimed invention back in 2018. In short, they claimed their “quantum transducer” would serve as a revolutionary 3D technology for tablets, backing their statements with expired patents and technologies that either didn’t exist or were manufactured by unrelated companies. They then funneled over half of the investor funds raised from these fraudulent claims into their own accounts, spending it in comically lavish ways, as shown below.

Moddha is the name of the company they used for this fraud.

With that in mind, let’s look at the paragraph that gave me the greatest pause when looking at this.

All in all, this paragraph seems to misrepresent basic facts about antennas in an effort to further its own claims. For example, as I’m typing this, I’m getting cell phone signal in a closed-off room, which this implies shouldn’t be possible. In the same vein, basic TV antennas have been usable inside for decades, and the same goes for radios. Yes, the reception indoors is going to be worse than outdoors, but in most buildings you’ll still get decent reception unless you’re underground, near the center of a larger building, or in a Faraday Cage.

While I can’t make a definitive claim of fraud with respect to this application, the history of the inventors and the misrepresentation of fact don’t really look great. And that’s just from the stuff I understand; there may very well be fundamental problems with the quantum mechanics as well.

[oolong---latte]

graves!

[wajb]

body rock,

oouhh

i wanna see your body rock

[tropiyas]

explaining the bus schedule to my child "okay so imagine you're speed running Super Mario Bros. on the NES"