Dear ‘genderless unisex non-binary clothing companies’
you cant just sell cis people shaped clothing and remove the gendered pronouns then tell us its genderless.
first off its pretty problematic in itself that trans people cant buy underwear without completely discarding their gender but thats another convo for another day.
you cannot take ‘mens boxers’ and ‘womens panties’, make them beige, rip off the tag, and say its ‘genderless for everyone now.’
if trans people wanted 40 pairs of beige ‘boy short’ style elastic cotton blend underwear we would go to walmart and buy some.
Make a pair of boxers that can hold a trans mans packer and another option that fits tight to his body without a ill-fitting gap of fabric where your ‘genderless’ underwear leave room for a penis; because like i said, its just cis mens underwear that you tried to tell us is now GENDERLESS and FOR US SPECIFICALLY. bull crap.
Make panty style underwear that can hold and KEEP A PENIS AND BALLS inside without it falling out the thin strip of fabric between the legs.
You arent reinventing the wheel by giving us what already exists, and youre too busy putting money in your own pockets from people who are desperate for inclusivity to even realize how fucked up it is that you are selling binary underwear and telling us ‘no its not because anyone can wear it now’
A good money making scheme is to get rid of gender binary so that all people can buy even more of your products. You dont fool us.
If you want to make money from lgbtq people desperate for genderless clothing that TRULY has their needs as a priority then you better not repackage gendered binary clothing and think we are so stupid that we cant see what youre doing.
jacobvanloon
vaporwave
turnnoffyourmind
andulkaphoto
izzy806
jbbartram-illu
