
#extradirty

No title available

@theartofmadeline
KIROKAZE
sheepfilms

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
almost home
Cosimo Galluzzi
styofa doing anything
art blog(derogatory)
ojovivo
h
RMH

roma★
No title available
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
occasionally subtle
Stranger Things
noise dept.

seen from Colombia

seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from Türkiye

seen from Brazil
seen from Brazil

seen from Malaysia
@whoopitsklaroline
the signs and their special colors
aries // red the color of fire and excitement
taurus // pale blue, mauve the soft colors of refinement and gentleness
gemini // yellow bright and luminous, the color of novelty
cancer // sea green, silver the shimmering colors of the water and the moon
leo // gold, orange the magnetic colors of the sun
virgo // navy blue, gray classic colors of refinement and taste
libra // blue, lavender the colors of romance, harmony, and refinement
scorpio // crimson, burgundy, maroon the glowing colors of passion
sagittarius // purple uncommon color of royalty and the artistic
capricorn // dark green, brown classic, comforting colors of nature and the earth
aquarius // electric blue the clear color of the sky
pisces // pale green, turquoise the dreamy colors of the sea
Caroline mentions in The Originals
Nicki Minaj is offering to pay tuition for dozens of her followers on Twitter right now, as long as they have good grades.
GOD I Love Black Celebrities making real shit like this
#NickiMinaj #BlackPride
BITCH YESSS
Actual angel Nicki Minaj. God she’s such a good role model!
Reasons I’m working on pulling my grades up
Rosario Dawson about receiving compliments when she lost weight to play a drug addict in the film “Rent”.
A few things you need to know about this hot coffee case:
It wasn’t an issue of the coffee being because no fucking shit coffee is hot, but McDonald’s had over heated their water to 250 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s 121C. Not just hot, but really FUCKING hot. Your fancy Starbucks lattes are brewed to 150 degrees.
The 79 year old woman had this cup of 250F (121C) coffee between her legs when it spilled so 250F (121C) coffee spilled on her genitals
She got third degree burns…on her genitals. THIRD DEGREE.
She had to have skin grafts to repair the damage
When she sued McDonald’s, it wasn’t for millions of dollars, it was for $20,000 to cover hospital costs and court fees. 20-fucking-thousand.
It was the courts that awarded her the amount of money she got. Again, she only wanted hospital bills and court costs
McDonald’s changed their heating policy, but not before making her sign a gag order keeping her from talking about this case
So she had to live on hearing little shits like you call her stupid and money-grubbing, and other horrendous stuff because she dared ask the company in the wrong to fix what they fucked up.
MORE FUN FACTS:
9. The woman who was burned was not driving the car, she was a passenger.
10. The car was not in motion when she was burned. The car was parked so she could add cream and sugar.
The coffee case is one of the biggest examples of a carefully-crafted smear campaign by a company that is in the wrong trying to hide that.
Additionally, several people had been badly burned by McDonald’s coffee prior to that case, both employees and customers, and McDonald’s had been fined and told to lower the heat of their coffee. They refused to lower the coffee’s heat, continuing to serve a product they KNEW from EXPERIENCE was dangerous, because they could.
When she was burned, she reached out to McDonald’s for them to cover her medical expenses. They sent her a coupon booklet as a big eff yuu.
She required skin grafts not just on her genitals but on her thighs, buttocks, and I think stomach. Like, it was a lot of skin grafts! And did you know that skin grafts don’t always take? She was very severely hurt by a product that McDonald’s knew for a FACT was dangerous.
But nah, go on talking about how she was just foolish and greedy, that’s obviously the case, big corporations have all of our best interest in heart, really they do.
Her name was Stella Liebeck. She has since passed away but I think it’s important to name the victim in this story. Her name was Stella Liebeck and the coffee was so hot that it fused her labia together. It melted her genitals closed. But it’s all just a giant joke, huh?
By the way?
Liebeck, who also underwent debridement treatments, sought to settle her claim for $20,000, but McDonalds refused.
At that point, she had medical bills of over $11,000. She was anticipating more. She didn’t have much money.She just wanted McDonald’s to pay for the damage their coffee had done so that she could get medical treatment. Seems reasonable, right?
McDonald’s countered with an offer of $800, then turned down repeated requests to settle.
And there weren’t several people who were burned before Liebeck. It was a LOT worse than that.
During discovery, McDonalds produced documents showing more than 700 claims by people burned by its coffee between 1982 and 1992. Some claims involved third-degree burns substantially similar to Liebeck[’]s. This history documented McDonalds’ knowledge about the extent and nature of this hazard.
So McDonald’s knew that their coffee was burning people–in some cases, causing third-degree burns. They knew it for TEN YEARS. And they did nothing about it.
Oh, and the jury award?
The jury awarded Liebeck $200,000 in compensatory damages. This amount was reduced to $160,000 because the jury found Liebeck 20 percent at fault in the spill. The jury also awarded Liebeck $2.7 million in punitive damages, which equals about two days of McDonalds’ coffee sales.
:::
The trial court subsequently reduced the punitive award to $480,000 – or three times compensatory damages – even though the judge called McDonalds’ conduct reckless, callous and willful.
So all of the jokes about how rich Liebeck got off the settlement? Nope. McDonald’s ended up not even haping to pay most of it.
Nancy Tiano says her mother was “never happy about the incident” and that “the burns and court proceedings took their toll.” During her final years, Tiano says, her mother had no quality of life. The good news is that the settlement helped to ease the end of her life by paying for a live-in nurse.
That’s where the money went. For medical care.
Don’t forget that the REASON that they serve their coffee at DANGEROUSLY high temperatures (Injuring literally thousands of customers) is because coffee brewed and kept at those DANGEROUSLY HIGH temperatures tastes fresher longer, so less undrunk coffee has to be thrown out throughout the day, so McDonalds can MAKE MORE PROFIT on their damn coffee sales.
a series of unlikely crossovers
Every fangirl in every fandom ever.
Why are you dedicating so much of your life to bashing the women you hate. You don't have to like all women to be a feminist. But spending all your time criticizing them isnt doing any good. Why not make a website dedicated to the females you LOVE! Praise them for their work! There are so many awesome ladies out there! The world has enough hate and negativity. Especially toward women. You seem like a smart girl with a pretty cool brain. You could use it for positivity. Just think about it... -LP
The thing of it is, I actually don’t dedicate much of my life at all to bashing anyone that I hate. For the past few months I have been dialing way back on answering any TVD and TO questions, there have been considerable stretches where I wasn’t discussing the shows at all, but things like this have drawn me back into this bizarre situation and I’m sorry, but of course people are going to talk to me about this and of course what they say is more likely to be negative towards what you’re doing. But to me, being critical is not equal to being negative. TO is a show that I tried very hard to like, but it’s content wasn’t for me. However, that is a separate issue from the fact that there are also things that are massively problematic about the show, and that a lot of people on the show try to misconstrue into something that it’s not. I’ve said this a lot before, but one of the reasons I come at TO so hard is because the show specifically markets itself towards women and because a lot of people working on the show try to promote things that are very violent and hateful towards women as feminist content. That is simply false information, and if someone who is confused asks me for clarification on that I will absolutely tell them. I praise shows, actors, and writers I love all the time. I root for plenty of people. Hell, as more than a few people have already pointed out, I spent pretty much the entire existence of your character rooting FOR YOU and your character despite the fact that Cami’s characterization was a huge problem. But I also criticize those same shows, actors, and writers because thinking critically is good. Have I said things that are not particularly nice? For sure. But again, I am not the one who created this environment around the show.
I think Phoebe said something like you can only take so much, and I think it would be great if everyone realized that it goes both ways. I have never sent hate towards anyone because I think that’s wrong, but I’m not here to dismiss or support what is essentially the tacit endorsement of bullying of others. I would not say that I am being bullied through this because I know what I’ve said and it’s well within your right to disagree. But that doesn’t mean that you and someone else who have a much higher profile than I do basically put me in a position to be harassed by a whole mess of people who know nothing about me other than that you and PT really dislike me. That alone is pretty fucked up, and it’s even more fucked up given that this has been going on basically since TO started, it only happens to be directed at me now instead of others. And again, you can have your opinion and that’s fine, but I honestly do think that I’m a positive person. Like, there’s a reason that so many people have sent me messages of support, and that’s because I really do try to support and encourage a lot of people that I’ve met on here, and frankly that’s a big reason why I just don’t feel that upset about all of this stuff. I don’t know what it’s like to be in your position and I’m sure you’ve dealt with a massive amount of shit that was completely undeserved, but you are ultimately in a position of power when a lot of people are not. And, a lot of those people who don’t have the power that you do have had to deal with a lot of really unpleasant things because of what the TO cast and crew has done. And, a lot of those people are people I have gotten to know, or people who have just asked me for whatever kind of help and support when they needed it. And you know, sometimes that help and support just meant validating that they’re actually not terrible people who deserve to be ostracized for thinking what they think. So, in that sense my blog is almost entirely dedicated to females and all people that I love, they’re just don’t work on TV shows.
What? How do you even excuse this kind of behavior? Why would you try to? I understand being upset that your job and prospects have an expiration date. But this behavior isn't petty. It's irresponsible. For people to suggest that Hillary is negative and spews hate is freaking ridiculous. She's is a fan. A smart, educated fan who looks at TV Shows and storylines with an understanding of characterization and writing, who grasps how the industry works, in a way that I can only wish I could.
She’s the type of viewer cultivate, because she can disseminate information clearly. She isn’t petty or attack people personally. She goes after the writing. The acting. The parts of your job that are subject to opinion. People who blame a fandom, an individual for their troubles lack personal responsibility. When you spend all your time blaming others for your problems, you’re setting yourself up for a life full of misery because you deny yourself the ability to grow. Being stagnant sucks.
BOOM. I LOVE THIS.
My God clearly LP doesn't even know what feminism is, certainly not intersectional feminism. Bc it's not blindly supporting every woman in sight or every female character on ur screen if those women are saying or doing racist, misogynistic, sexist things. You know those posts you see that call dudes out if they claim to be feminists but don't call their boys out when they do sexist shit? Yeah, it's the same for women. Women can be misogynistic and sexist, I'm not gonna support them if they are.
I just wish they realized that “feminism” isn’t about supporting all women blindly, but about equality between men and women
Since when women are above criticism solely on the fact they are women? Sistah this is NOT what feminism IS!
Oh sweet Leah Pipes. Maybe I could take her seriously if she acknowledged problematic behavior that wasn’t directed at or impacted her & her cronies. Apparently, it’s only bullying if directed at her; she has continued to engage in her 3 stans who send hate to JM and she never had a word to say about the one who wished CA miscarry. And killing women on tv was only troubling and misogyny when it happened to her character. She may not know what feminism is but she has hypocrisy down to a science.
Jesus Christ it must be such a toxic environment working on that show, I can’t even imagine. No wonder someone was upset enough to send spoilers to you guys! And LP implying that you somehow aren’t a feminist because you criticize an actress’s performance? Please. Does she know what show her character just got fridged on?
The last time I checked feminism is all about equality. Equal chances, equal criticism. It is not about favoritism over people simply because they have a vagina. If an actress is bad and publishes her acting criticism will come as it would for a man. Her professional worth is dependent on what she produces as a professional and not on her being a female. If this is what they think feminism is then boy no wonder they can’t differentiate why TO is so offensive and they think it is a feminist show.
but why are you so agressive again women? why you hate your own gender, Hillary? It not like you have 100000+ posts about femnism, fuckboys…. no an uneducated fool is trying to teach you about femnism using ‘its soooo hard’ so let her teach you
apparently feminism means women should never be critiqued, questioned, or held accountable for their own actions and should only be praised, exulted, worshiped and then recognized into sainthood. funny I thought it was about treated women how you’d treat anyone else. equal pay but not equal scrutiny, right?
Feminism is about equality and yes, a lot of that deal w/ imbalances that do not favor women. Empower women, support women, yes, but she should NOT act as though holding women accountable for their actions and the misogyny they engage in (in this instance through the show) is somehow anti-feminist. If she wants to talk about misogyny, how about she takes a look at the show she’s defended for the past 3 years. The one that fridged her char not once but TWICE.
That feminist tweets is biting in the ass right now. Her anti feminist tweets have blessed my timeline.
I think she has a limited understanding of what feminism is, but I also think she’s trying to pull that card to prove that she’s somehow objectively right. If I’m saying shitty things about women then you could possibly argue that I’m an asshole, but if I’m saying misogynistic things about women it objectively means I’m an asshole. And the fact that after I replied to her she just basically reiterated what she had already said even though I posted a ridiculously long explanation that contradicted that makes me think that may have been her real intention.
Color me surprised that moron had to weigh in on this. She is a slut-shaming, hypocritical asshole who has no room to speak.
What do you think about this 'Camille is the only one who understands Klaus' thing?
I think that’s hot shit. It’s very typical and expected of their writing that they would try to insinuate this (plus it’s a sleep-inducing trope of the genre in general). But I know if they go that way with the narrative things will be turning out very sour for them very quickly, and they will see it in the morning like a black eye.
I’m seeing it more as Camille is firstly, human, from a different world. Deserving of a different world. Will be crushed like a bug on a windshield by Klaus accidentally, or turned, or tormented into madness by his inexplicable darkness that she will try to unravel — it will only drive her insane, not alleviate Klaus. It will cause her to face her own raving fears, it will drive her into utter blackness and her mind will be destroyed. Her wishes and hopes for her brother shattered. Her illusions erased. She will be dead inside.
She will either die in actuality or die mentally, if she is lucky, if she sticks with the crowd of maniacs she unknowingly is mingling with. If she is “darker, intuitive, understanding” she is only what Klaus wishes Caroline could be. He doesn’t want it in Camille. I doubt he cares about it romantically in regards to her. He wants Caroline to get there, and it makes him grieve and want. He longs for that day. He is angry (because he is a self-involved baby twat) that it isn’t here already. He is patient - “I intend to be your last” - has committed himself to an eternity of Caroline, but he is still Klaus. Always hungry, self-serving, needy. It’s no surprise he would be crazy enough to talk to this girl, this walking piece of art that will remind him of Caroline. She will be a thing in his gallery.
As for Caroline and her distance from Camille-like “understanding” of Klaus? Thank god she isn’t there yet. Thank god she will never get there.
He is a creature, not a man. And no man will understand him. No man will solve the riddles of his lunacy, no man will pump his dead heart to living with their mortal instruments.
Caroline had better not be giving Klaus a break for a long time.
That is the difference between Camille and Caroline. Camille will try to understand Klaus - Caroline knows she doesn’t have to. He doesn’t deserve it. Not yet. And anyone who thinks so is fooling themselves. Caroline doesn’t have to understand anything Klaus does, or forgive anything, she doesn’t have to learn where his madness began, because madness he is. Is what makes a man more important than the man himself?
Klaus doesn’t need someone who understands him. He needs someone who refuses to, and who he refuses to understand in return. They need to destroy and uplift one another. They need to incite the end of days with their wrath, their intolerance, but know, deep down, they are the same. That there is something more to it all, and they can love, understand, long for… but nothing will ever be the same as that person who will look at you, not trying to do anything with you, and still saying Okay.
I accept.
You are not my savior, and that is why I love you. You would let me die, over and over again until I can understand myself. And until then you would not touch me.
Give a man a fish, feed him for a day (Camille)
Teach him how to fish, feed him for a lifetime (Caroline)
Camille and Klaus is a delusion on both ends, from both parties. They are destined for doom, like Caroline and her guy-of-choice. It is an illusion. Klaus and Caroline are the same - both mad in their own ways, both needing to accept that is all they are going to get. They are bound to their reflection, the highest order of marriage. Klaus knows that, but he is impatient. Caroline knows that, but she is stubborn.
They would kill for each other.
Watch: Michelle Obama delivers incredibly empowering speech to girls in Argentina
When women are given advice about sex and clothing, when we’re advised to be chaste and modest, a striking amount of that advice compares us to consumer goods. We’re told that we’re chewing gum, and nobody wants gum other people have chewed. We’re told that we’re candy, and nobody wants candy without the wrapper. We’re told that we’re iPads, so our manufacturer recommends using covers which protect us and make us more beautiful. We’re told that we’re diamonds or pearls, buried deep in the ground or the ocean, valuable because we’re hard to reach. We’re told that we’re shoes, and nobody wants used, smelly, second-hand shoes. We’re told that we’re apples: the best are the hard-to-reach ones at the top of the tree, the worst are the rotten ones that fall off the tree and can be picked up by anyone, and only the best of men will go to the trouble of climbing the tree for the apples that are hard to get. We’re told that we’re cars or expensive watches or wads of cash, and if we’re left unlocked, or are flashed in dangerous neighborhoods, we should expect to be stolen. We’re told that we’re meat, and if we’re dangled in front of hungry dogs we should expect to get eaten. We’re told that we’re cows and that sex with us is milk, and we’re asked why anyone would buy the cow if they could get the milk for free. And somehow, all of this is supposed to make us feel valued, and is supposed to teach us to value ourselves. I have some important information: Women are human beings. We are not gum or candy; we are not diamonds or iPads; we are not watches or wads of cash; we are not cows or milk. Women are human beings — and when you treat us like consumer goods, you are not treating us as valuable. It doesn’t matter whether you’re treating us like expensive goods or cheap ones, whether you’re calling us diamonds or gum. When you treat us like consumer goods, you’re treating us as less than human. You’re teaching others to treat us as less than human. And you’re teaching us to think of ourselves as less than human.
Women Are Not Consumer Goods: Lessons on Modesty and Chastity - Greta Christina’s Blog (via brutereason)
a series of unlikely crossovers
Cami, Davina, and the Problem With Women on The Originals
The Originals is a television show that has always had profound issues with it’s treatment of and representation of women. It’s a topic that I and many other people who have critically examined the show have discussed in many different instances and in many different ways, and the sheer volume of criticism that has been levied against the show’s portrayal of women speaks to what an enormous issue it is. But, regardless of your opinion on the show, it’s characters, and what it’s done in the past it seems like everyone can and is agreeing that they’ve taken these issues to an astoundingly unacceptable level. In this past episode they killed two women. Two women who have been main characters on the show since the show began, who were killed violently, who’s deaths exist now solely to serve as plot devices for the love interests they left behind, and who are only the latest and most high profile in a list of dead female characters that is just about as long as the list of female characters that have ever existed on The Originals. And that’s not okay.
This entire episode is, on it’s surface, meant to be an ode to Cami as a character. But, what is readily apparent from everything that actually happened on the show, it’s really an ode to Cami’s role in changing Klaus as a character. And while my opinion on Klamille has always been clear, I don’t want to make it sound as if it’s wrong to acknowledge the impact that one character has had on another, especially if that character or relationship arc is coming to an end. But it’s extremely problematic when the impact of a relationship eclipses the character itself, and it’s even more problematic in an instance like this because it fundamentally alters the weight given to Cami’s death and how the audience is meant to see it. The problem here isn’t just that Cami is dying, it’s that she’s dying because of Klaus, and that we’re all supposed to think that it’s relatively okay because Cami has somehow “fulfilled her purpose” in the story line. It equates the importance of Klaus’ progression as a character with Cami’s LIFE. It tells the audience that Cami, a character who has essentially become the female lead of the show in this past season, has as much value to the story as something that will motivate the male lead’s story line for the next three or four episodes. Regardless of how you feel about Cami as a character, I think the problem is obvious.
But beyond that, what I find even more disturbing is everything that has happened before Cami’s death. Cami was made the lead during this season and given the arc that was supposed to define her as a character, only for her to be fridged twice. Cami has been a supporting character who was tangentially involved in a few plots in the first two seasons, and then in the third season she was pushed to the forefront and her character arc WAS the plot, and somehow the writers managed to make BOTH climaxes of that plot into CAMI’S DEATH. And just… why?! Why leave your female characters by the wayside and give them no significant development until you decide to kill them? She has been the primary love interest of the male lead for the entire run of the show, so why did she only become worthy of this level of attention when violence committed against her was going to become one of Klaus’ primary motivations going forward? Hurting female characters is bad enough, but The Originals went out of it’s way to relish in Cami’s destruction as much as it possibly could, and still somehow ensured that the major impact of her loss would be Klaus’ pain instead of her loss.
And as if this wasn’t bad enough, Davina’s death is almost worse to me because it was so dismissive and cheap. Davina has been a main character since the start of the show, she’s arguably the most powerful person on the show entirely, and her murder is just a footnote of the episode tacked on at the end of Cami’s obituary. Not only that, but it’s actually really violent. I think the writers were aiming for a really big shock moment with that, but I simply CANNOT believe that none of them for one second thought, “hey, maybe writing a death where a teenage girl is violently murdered by her out-of-control boyfriend is a pretty disturbing image to present to a mostly female and fairly young audience”. And just… why in the world would you ever do that? The writers had to go very far out of their way to create a scenario in which Kol would believably kill Davina (hell, it’s barely believable that he even COULD kill Davina given the fact that she’s always held her own against an Original before) and there were dozens of other characters who logically would have and could have killed her instead of him, and yet Kol is the one pulling the metaphorical trigger. Why?
Well, the obvious reason is the exact same that it was for Cami. Because making Kol the one to do it ensures that they’ll be able to maximize his manpain. And I have to say, while the issues with Cami’s death are difficult to top, I think they actually did manage to top it with Davina’s death in a few ways. One, which is the most obvious to me, is the one I just mentioned. Presenting a scenario where a woman is violently killed by her love interest is a profoundly disturbing image to present to an audience, regardless of the context. But also something I find really bothersome is how the characters are weighted against one another. Remember how I made the comparison between Klaus and Cami, and how the death of the pseudo female lead is being treated as if it matters as much as the character arc for the male lead for a few episodes’ time? Well when it comes to Davina and Kol that chasm is even more extreme. Now, I am a huge Kol fan, I lobbied for his presence on the show from the minute the show was announced, however in the context of the actual show itself he is not a hugely important character at this time. He’s only become a significant presence this season, and Davina has appeared in FIFTY more episodes of The Originals than he has. And yet… Davina’s death is worth whatever angst the writers will squeeze out of this for Kol. So much of her characterization had to be erased, so much of the story line had to be altered, all so Kol can feel sad about being the unwilling puppet in his girlfriend’s death. And we have no legitimate explanation why.
Something else I find very interesting about both of these deaths is the way that the characters were treated in the context of the story, and how common this pattern seems to be on The Originals in terms of how the show frames victims and victimization. What I find very curious about the hows and whys of Cami and Davina’s deaths is that their deaths really fall under the umbrella of that old fiction writing stereotype of “if you want to hurt a woman hurt a woman, and if you want to hurt a man hurt a woman”. I mean, Cami isn’t killed because she’s Cami, she’s killed because Klaus likes her and Lucien knows that. She as a person is irrelevant to the scenario, she’s just an object that the writers are putting in between Klaus and Lucien to make their grudge have some kind of weight. But then contrast that with Davina’s death. Davina is the target of the ancestors, and Kol is almost the “Cami” of the scenario, he’s just the object that exists between Davina and the ancestors. But despite the similar setup and dynamic the female characters are the characters that are actually dying, and the male characters are the characters we’re meant to sympathize with most and view as the victims.
And this kind of leads me to some of the broader problems that The Originals has with the way it treats women. Because Cami and Davina’s deaths are probably the most extreme examples of this “hurting a woman to hurt a man” issue that the show has had, but they’re certainly not the only examples. The number of women on the show who have been harmed or even killed as a direct result of their relationship to a love interest is staggering. By my count there are 10 female characters who have died on The Originals who’s deaths have been directly related to the characters they were in relationships with. And, even more disturbingly, THREE female characters on The Originals have been murdered BY THEIR LOVE INTERESTS. And not only do the women vastly outnumber the men when it comes to these issues (as far as I’m aware, no male character has been killed by their love interest, and two male character’s deaths were directly related to their love interests), but the women who are affected by these prejudices are far more important characters than the male characters affected. For instance, the top three female characters on the show in terms of episode count have ALL been killed at some point as a direct result of their relationship with a love interest (Hayley’s death may not have stuck, but were it not for her relationships with Klaus or Elijah she never would have been killed), and ALL of their deaths were used to fuel angst for the male characters. In contrast, the only male characters who’s relationships contributed to their deaths are Jackson and Tim.
And this is something that applies nearly across the board, both in terms of the volume of characters killed and the importance of the characters who have been killed. I always knew that The Originals was unfairly skewed in favor of their male characters, but until I actually looked at the numbers I had no idea how skewed it really was. At first glance it might have actually been encouraging, the gender makeup of the cast of characters who have appeared for more than one episode is actually 32 women and 28 men. But, of those 28 men, 13 of the characters have died. Do you know how many of the women have died? 28. That’s right, The Originals has as many dead recurring female characters as they do recurring male characters, period. And as I said before, the three female characters who have appeared the most in the show have all been killed (although frankly the distinction isn’t even that necessary given that nearly EVERY WOMAN on the show has died, period). And the “most important” male character that has ever been killed off? Jackson. Hayley, Cami, and Davina have all died, and the “top three” male characters who have bitten the dust are Jackson, Diego, and Aiden. Does something seem a little askew there?
And the thing of it is, the writers spend an inordinate amount of time trying to defend their writing failings with all manner of excuses, and frankly there are a lot of fans who back them up on that. The show is about the supernatural, the show is very violent, the show is about violent characters, the show has to have real stakes so people have to die, etc. However, there is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING IN THIS WORLD THAT CAN EXCUSE OR EXPLAIN THIS KIND OF GAP. The number of women on the show who die is more than double the men. The number of women who are killed because of their romantic relationships is FIVE TIMES AS MANY as the men. And this is something that has been going on for the ENTIRE run of the show with no sign of improvement. I mean Jesus, if anything I think we can all agree that it’s actually getting WORSE.
Regardless of how anyone feels about Cami and Davina as characters, about their relationships, or about the show itself, I think there are certain things that are completely undeniable at this point. The writers constantly defend themselves on the grounds of creating the art that they need to create, but they’re creating a television show that is meant to entertain it’s audience. And what couldn’t be clearer is that murdering women is a vital part of this creation. These writers need to understand that murdering women is not art, murdering women is not entertainment, and quite frankly anyone who believes that it is should not be creating art or entertainment. I have no doubt that this trend will continue and I have no doubt that one of the few women who have escaped death in this show so far will be killed before the show ends, if not before the season ends, and I have no doubt that my complaints or the complaints of others will have no effect on the eternally deaf ears of the writers. However, what they’re doing is not okay. I am not okay with it, many other people are not okay with it, and the writers need to know that we’re not okay with it.
What do you think about this 'Camille is the only one who understands Klaus' thing?
I think that’s hot shit. It’s very typical and expected of their writing that they would try to insinuate this (plus it’s a sleep-inducing trope of the genre in general). But I know if they go that way with the narrative things will be turning out very sour for them very quickly, and they will see it in the morning like a black eye.
I’m seeing it more as Camille is firstly, human, from a different world. Deserving of a different world. Will be crushed like a bug on a windshield by Klaus accidentally, or turned, or tormented into madness by his inexplicable darkness that she will try to unravel — it will only drive her insane, not alleviate Klaus. It will cause her to face her own raving fears, it will drive her into utter blackness and her mind will be destroyed. Her wishes and hopes for her brother shattered. Her illusions erased. She will be dead inside.
She will either die in actuality or die mentally, if she is lucky, if she sticks with the crowd of maniacs she unknowingly is mingling with. If she is “darker, intuitive, understanding” she is only what Klaus wishes Caroline could be. He doesn’t want it in Camille. I doubt he cares about it romantically in regards to her. He wants Caroline to get there, and it makes him grieve and want. He longs for that day. He is angry (because he is a self-involved baby twat) that it isn’t here already. He is patient - “I intend to be your last” - has committed himself to an eternity of Caroline, but he is still Klaus. Always hungry, self-serving, needy. It’s no surprise he would be crazy enough to talk to this girl, this walking piece of art that will remind him of Caroline. She will be a thing in his gallery.
As for Caroline and her distance from Camille-like “understanding” of Klaus? Thank god she isn’t there yet. Thank god she will never get there.
He is a creature, not a man. And no man will understand him. No man will solve the riddles of his lunacy, no man will pump his dead heart to living with their mortal instruments.
Caroline had better not be giving Klaus a break for a long time.
That is the difference between Camille and Caroline. Camille will try to understand Klaus - Caroline knows she doesn’t have to. He doesn’t deserve it. Not yet. And anyone who thinks so is fooling themselves. Caroline doesn’t have to understand anything Klaus does, or forgive anything, she doesn’t have to learn where his madness began, because madness he is. Is what makes a man more important than the man himself?
Klaus doesn’t need someone who understands him. He needs someone who refuses to, and who he refuses to understand in return. They need to destroy and uplift one another. They need to incite the end of days with their wrath, their intolerance, but know, deep down, they are the same. That there is something more to it all, and they can love, understand, long for… but nothing will ever be the same as that person who will look at you, not trying to do anything with you, and still saying Okay.
I accept.
You are not my savior, and that is why I love you. You would let me die, over and over again until I can understand myself. And until then you would not touch me.
Give a man a fish, feed him for a day (Camille)
Teach him how to fish, feed him for a lifetime (Caroline)
Camille and Klaus is a delusion on both ends, from both parties. They are destined for doom, like Caroline and her guy-of-choice. It is an illusion. Klaus and Caroline are the same - both mad in their own ways, both needing to accept that is all they are going to get. They are bound to their reflection, the highest order of marriage. Klaus knows that, but he is impatient. Caroline knows that, but she is stubborn.
They would kill for each other.