Your Local Borough Witch

Secular urban witchcraft side blog that's curated better than the main blog. Hash dash of aesthetic/secular/witchy/small joy posts.

[vizuart]

Loneliness is Dangerous, Ed Vebell, 1955

[geopsych]

Grasses in the wind.

[bear-disguised-as-a-human]

dried waves

[flyingpurplepizzaeater]

You don’t have to be grateful that it isn’t worse.

[voidbat]

read that. read it again, and again, and again. somebody, somewhere, always has it worse than you. there is one person on this planet that has it the worst of all, and that person is NOT the only person allowed to be unhappy with their lot. if things are bad for you, they are bad for you. period.

[o-okr]

angels

[stereofeathers]

I still think the little girl who is the world's most skilled at summoning earthworms has to be, like.. that's the most interesting person alive. I wake up at night and remember that this fucking 6-or-whatever-year-old can just. Do that. That's terrifying. I hate knowing this. But again, at the same time, I wonder about it constantly. The whole thing is supposedly a skill passed down through families. People have been honing this ability for fucking CENTURIES. But this little tiny child absolutely blows everyone else out of the water just by summoning HUNDREDS OF EARTHWORMS

[stereofeathers]

Oh context would probably help here huh

Sophie Smith isnt fucking human and I fear her

[bumblebeebats]

I looked up footage of this event and i was NOT disappointed

[mannlibrary]

American toadstool

Chanterelles, King Boletes, Waxcaps, Cauliflower Corals, and Destroying Angels, oh my! 

In the rain-logged woods around the Finger Lakes a mesmerizing viewscape has unfolded before our eyes over the past couple of weeks: A bloom of fantastically shaped and richly hued (from alabaster white to deep purple, with various shades of orange, yellow & red in between) fungi. The conditions — hot, humid late summer weather and a prolonged (almost) daily dowsing of heavy rain in the early part of the month — have been perfect for a spectacular, if ephemeral, show put on by subjects of the fungi kingdom in the hills and valleys around the Cornell University campus. We’re hoping that many of you are able to get out and take in this remarkable performance of nature sometime this fall—either here in upstate/south central NY or in your own corner of the woods — before colder, mushroom-killing temperatures, dry spells,  and overly busy schedules get in the way. And by way of incentive—if you need it—we recommend a browse through a classic of American mycology, Toadstools, Mushrooms, Fungi, Edible and Poisonous: One Thousand American Fungi,  by American mycology maverick Charles McIlvaine. First published in 1900 (with a 2nd to follow in 1902), this 700+ page volume provided the United States with its first comprehensive textbook on the mushrooms found in American forests and fields. Mann is fortunate to own two copies of the 1900 edition, on of a signed author’s edition–the 194th of 300 printed. 

A veteran of the Civil War, Charles McIlvaine found his calling as a self-taught mycologist passing through the woods near his West Virginia home one day. Intrigued by a fascinating bloom of fungi found on a horseback ride through a patch of recently burned Appalachian forest, McIlvaine stuffed his saddle bags full with samples to take home for some adventurous home cooking. Thrilled by the experience, McIlvaine was, from then on, hooked. As an avid mushroom taster he took on on the goal of meeting “[t]he need of the mycologists, mycophagist, and amateur toadstool students” for “a book giving the genus , names and descrriptions of  the prominent American toadstools, whose edibility has been tested, or whose poisonous qualities have been discovered.” By the time his tome was published in 1900, he had recorded tasting over 600 mushrooms himself–where only a few years earlier the USDA had a mere 15 species to recommend as safely edible. McIlvaine relished the quest of introducing new forest delicacies to a wider public–but in the process also happened across many a species poisonous enough to produce, in his words, “unpleasant results.”   

Modern mycology certainly cautions against McIlvaine’s “try it and see” zeal (there are, after all, mushroom species so toxic that hapless consumers face a 50 to 80% chance of death from failing organs within 24 hours of ingestion). For his undaunted daring-do style, McIlvaine earned himself the nickname Old Ironguts. Yet  his passion for mushroom discovery and the care with which he took to compile a remarkably comprehensive tome also earned the man a more venerable distinction too:  the honor of having the North American Mycological Association’s journal, McIlvania, bear his name.

McIvaine credits a number of contributors to his chef d'oeuvre, some eminent leaders in the botany field such as Missouri Botanical Museum Director William Trelease, others fellow amateur naturalists, such as Lawrence William Nuttall, who, like McIlvaine himself, helped make important contributions towards a better understanding of the natural world around us despite little formal training in science. In keeping with McIlvaine’s own personal interest in the fungi kingdom, Toadstools also provides a 15 page section featuring tried and true mushroom recipes recommended by number of cooks familiar with the culinary possibilities to be found in the fungi kingdom. Among that contributor line-up: celebrity cookbook author and 19th century American home economist Emma P. Ewing–who in the 1890’s served as Dean of the famed Chatauqua Assembly (later renamed the Chatauqua Institution) in western New York., where McIlvaine himself was, for a time, also an honored member–until personal scandals involving alcohol and unorthodox romantic relationships led to his expulsion.

McIlvaine’s eccentricities aside, his remarkable book — replete with carefully collected observations, information on scientific nomenclature, fun prose, line drawn sketches, and some rather lovely full color plates (illustrators for the book included McIlvaine himself, along with Val Starnes and Frank D. Briscoe)—does much to convey not only a store of hard facts about mushrooms found across the American countryside, but also the anticipation of weird and wonderful things to be discovered with any good mushroom hunt. Mycology is known to be one of those fields of modern science where dedicated amateurs — today known as citizen scientists — have and continue to play an important role in advancing the frontiers of knowledge. Certainly this side of the Atlantic, the late 19th century contributions of Charles McIlvaine and his collaborators, played an important part in shaping this lively, promising legacy.

[cosmos-one-deactivated20190305]

[akdjchcusaocicucy23232223]

do tumbleweeds actually blow around in the southwest or is that a myth…?

[lithicc]

!!! They do!!!

Tumbleweed is actually an invasive species from Siberia. What happens is when the soil gets too dry the roots come out of the ground and the plant curls up into a ball so that it can blow to a new spot. When it comes into contact with wet soil its roots will unfold and it will settle down. 

[laundryandtaxes]

That is ten times more fucked up than I thought. They plant themselves again? That’s neat. I always thought they were just dead leaves and twigs in a bunch.

[azzandra]

I like this. Tumbleweeds just fuck off when they don’t like a place, they are not like other plants who have to respect your plant rules, they are rebels.

[thouartless]

[rabbitrah]

Details from Sacha Goldenberg’s “Flemish Painting” series. 

[thewoodbetween]

‘The Nearly Home Trees’ by Catherine Hyde

[thewoodbetween]

Hello Darkness - David Álvarez

[catghibli-deactivated20210917]

my mind says college but my heart says isolated sheep herder in Iceland

[nourrice]

me when someone asks what’s wrong with me: are u ready

[deerhoofandrabbitsfoot-deactiva]

Why Yule Needs to Stay Creepy

“…There’ll be scary ghost stories and tales of the glories of Christmases long, long ago…”

So I have been thinking about our Contemporary conceptualization of the Christmas season a lot lately and it’s kind of interesting. So many things we associate with Christmas – Christmas trees, greeting cards, Santa Claus, his reindeer and elves, gift-giving in general – all of these things came into vogue in the 19th Century and are very sticky-sweet, in my opinion. They’re lovely, but not filling. If we just scratch the surface of the Christmas we know and love and peek back into its history, we find something much meatier.

Before the cheerful Christmas tree, a number of other plants were associated with Christmas. The holly, associated with sacrifice and the blood of Christ, and the parasitic mistletoe, associated with the death of Baldur in Norse mythology – these were the plants associated with Christmas before the Christmas tree became the standard.

Also, the Yule log. The Yule log, meant to provide light on the darkest night of the year, was a magic charm in and of itself. If it did not burn through the night, it would be a terrible omen. By watching the fire and coals of the Yule log, one could also predict who would give birth and who would die in the coming year.  

When our simple Santa Claus is reduced to his predecessors, one is left with Odin, ancient Norse God of battle, Saint Nicholas, the canonized former bishop of Turkey, and Father Christmas, the hard-drinking gluttonous representation of holiday merriment. And all of them brought ghastly friends – Odin, the spirits of the Wild Hunt and Saint Nicholas, his helpers (including Knecht Rupert, Krampus, etc.). Father Christmas, more of a personification of the season than a night visitor, undoubtedly brought many hangovers.

Before stories about reindeer, snowmen, or things of that ilk, there were ghost stories. Charles Dickens did not invent the Christmas ghost story in “A Christmas Carol,” but popularized an already-existing folkloric trend. If we look to the old tales of Christmas, we find stories about witches that rode the night air, cursing the birth of the Savior. There are stories about fairies, ghosts, and Devils that wreak havoc, frightening livestock and damaging property. In an era before television or radio, homemade storytelling was one of the primary forms of entertainment. And winter was the storytelling season.

You also have mumming, wassailing, and caroling – dressing up in colorful costumes and (sometimes drunkenly) begging for money door-to-door. As John Grossman notes in his book “Christmas Curiosities,” Christmas before the Contemporary Period resembles our Halloween more than it resembles the Christmas we know now.

Let us not forget, those of us who acknowledge the Wheel of the Year, that the season of darkness extends from Halloween to Christmas. This darkness only begins to fade when we gain back the Sun at the Winter Solstice. From Halloween to Christmas, the dead may roam the Earth and weird things may happen. In his classic “Mastering Witchcraft,” Paul Huson notes that Yule is not a time for pleasant spell work, but cursing! It is a time of dark magic and mystery. And we need this time. To understand the light, we must understand the darkness – the witches, ghosts, and Devils of the old Yuletide. Like the trees that go dormant, we must embrace the darkness of winter to grow and thrive.

[jumpingjacktrash]

becoming vegan because factory farming is unethical is like deciding that since walmart and amazon mistreat their employees you are now going to get everything you need out of dumpsters

[jumpingjacktrash]

in a nutshell, instead of reforming the bad parts of your society, you try to opt out of it in a way that has really no effect, and wouldn’t work at all if the majority of people weren’t still part of the industry you dislike.

there was, for a while, a real movement of people who tried to get everything out of dumpsters, as a way of opting out of capitalism. but the problem was that you couldn’t get what you need when you need it, leading to you being kind of a drain on your community, and someone had to buy that stuff in the first place for it to end up in that dumpster anyway. it was Fundamentally Silly.

going vegan to opt out of farming practices has similar problems. for instance: you (hypothetical vegan you) won’t buy honey, but the bees are being used to fertilize the vegetables and fruit you eat, they’re making the honey anyway, all you’ve done is – well, nothing, because you’re not a big enough demographic to make an impact, but even if you were, honey sales are a much smaller part of beekeepers’ income than crop pollination. and beekeeping is not a big faceless corporate interest. it’s not monsanto. it’s a bunch of single-family or partnership business with a truck or two and a couple hundred hives. the bees make honey after a pollinating run, and the beekeepers sell it for a little extra income. if you made a dent in that, you’d be achieving nothing but making joe beekeeper buy his kids’ t-shirts at k-mart instead of target.

animal farming and plant farming are deeply interconnected. plant farmers grow animal feed; animal farmers sell manure for fertilizer. most non-corporate farmers raise both plants and animals. it’s more economic and gives them more resilience.

if you were a big enough demographic to hit ‘the farming industry’ in its wallet. you would be making things MUCH harder for small farmers than for factory farms. you would be making it easier and easier for factory farms to crowd family farmers out of business. so that’s pretty much achieving the opposite of what you want, right there.

and then there’s the fact that plant farming is just as rife with gruesome factory farm conditions as animal farming, but it’s humans who are exploited in those. i’m not going to level accusations of racism here, but it really is unfortunate how little the vocal internet vegan contingent seems to know or care about the exploitation of the mostly nonwhite workers in the industry. it makes y’all look racist, whether you are or not.

look, i keep saying this, even though folks never seem to hear me: i don’t hate vegans, i’m not trying to stop you being vegan, i do not care what you eat.

my problem is with defensive internet vegans trying to promote their dietary restriction lifestyle as a solution to problems in the real world. it is not. it may create more problems than it solves, or maybe it breaks even, i don’t know. it certainly doesn’t solve anything that can’t be solved just as well without it. it can only look reasonable from a perspective of deep ignorance about where food comes from and how the farm economy works. you basically have to be young, urban, and somewhat privileged to embrace it. and it is, fundamentally, very silly.

[questionablemotivations]

Furthermore I’d like you to look at a sheep farm. Actually look at it.

You CANNOT grow crops there. That’s WHY there are sheep on it.

You refuse to use wool, well aside from.the fact that it’s a fantastic fiber and how polluting polyester and other plastic fibers are, it doesn’t harm the animal to remove and in fact is done for their benefit.

Above - a sheep farm (note steep and craggy hills), an uncompressed bale of freshly shorn wool and some sheep being shorn.

It’s not stressful for the sheep. Sheep are dumb. Be confident, dont hurt them and they’re good. Wool is a good fiber - strong, warm - even when wet - renewable and biodegradable.

My issue with Veganism-As-A-Cult is the lack of critical thinking. By all means eat what you want, wear what you want to wear but a blanket ban on all animal products because they’re HARMFUL is in itself an extremely harmful philosophy.

Do you refuse to eat plants that were pollinated by bees or fertilized by manure since they’re a product of animal labour?

Honey doesn’t hurt bees. Wool doesn’t hurt sheep.

What about animals that are going to die anyway? We are currently in the process of exterminating possums in our country as they are a pest and destroyer of our native species. We kill them humanely but they’re still going to die because its them (introduced pest) or our endemic endangered species. We use the meat for pet food and the fur for a lot of things now - in making yarns or fur items - because the alternative is to let it rot. Which is just bloody wasteful tbh.

What would (generic) you prefer we do here? Let sheep die of over heating or the weight of wet wool? Force bees into swarming (90% casualty rate) so we can avoid taking their honey? Leave pest animals to rot and encourage the use of set-and-forget traps since there’s no incentive to check them?

What’s the humane option?

[house-of-crows]

see: why I hate militant veganism

[msaprildaniels]

Veganism, as I have encountered it, tends to be a thing that morally smug white people try to spring on others as a quick fix solution for the world, and I resent it more every day.

[frogribbit]

i wish people would stop romanticizing not eating breakfast and not getting enough sleep and being dependent on coffee to function and always being in a bad mood and treating yourself poorly because that behavior is very unhealthy for you