AU/OC friendly.
Independent Mark Jefferson
Ask/Art/Aesthetic/Roleplay
18+
https://twitter.com/xDesaturate

Origami Around
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Not today Justin
$LAYYYTER
Jules of Nature
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

if i look back, i am lost
almost home

Love Begins
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Peter Solarz
NASA

blake kathryn

No title available
art blog(derogatory)
🪼

titsay
Cosmic Funnies
No title available

seen from Bangladesh
seen from China

seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Iraq
@xdesaturate
AU/OC friendly.
Independent Mark Jefferson
Ask/Art/Aesthetic/Roleplay
18+
https://twitter.com/xDesaturate
I have a confession, Mr. Jefferson. Ever since I met you I found you intriguing in a way I probably shouldn’t. Sitting in your class, I can’t help but want your attention. Your approval. You sometimes come off condescending, but you have a right to be, and somehow it just adds to your charm. It also makes the times you give praise feel that much more special. And I adore praise…especially from you.
I want to impress you.
I’m glad they hired you at Blackwell. It wouldn’t be the same without you. And I certainly wouldn’t be either.
"You know, most people spend so much time trying to be noticed that they never stop to ask themselves why they want someone's attention in the first place."
Dark brown eyes linger in a way that is interested, rather than dismissive in any way. "I've had students want my approval before. That's not exactly rare. What is rare is someone willing to admit it out loud."
A quiet chuckle. "And for the record, I don't think you're giving yourself enough credit. You act as though my opinion created something in you that wasn't already there. It didn't. At most, I recognized it."
He leans back slightly, chair creaking. "You're right. I can be condescending. Impatient, too. Most people either resent it or mistake it for confidence. You seem to understand it for what it is: high standards. I don't waste praise. That's why it means something when I give it."
The expression softens almost imperceptibly. "You want to impress me? Then stop chasing my approval long enough to trust your own instincts. The artists who spend their lives looking over their shoulder for validation never create anything worth remembering."
For a moment, his usual polished persona slips, revealing something more sincere beneath it. "And Blackwell would have survived without me. Institutions always do."
His eyes narrow slightly, studying her. "But I suppose I can admit that my time here would have been considerably less interesting without you."
To the toxic, purity-obsessed part of the Life is Strange fandom: I'm fucking exhausted. Not just from drawing Mark Jefferson- I write him, roleplay him, and yes, he's one of my autistic special interests. The way some of you harass, call out, and bully people like me over a fictional character is vile, ableist, and hypocritical as hell. You are the ones who can't separate fiction from reality.
Jefferson is a predator. A manipulative, charismatic psychopath who exploits and harms girls. I know that. Everyone who engages with him as a villain knows that. Enjoying his writing, voice, psychology, aesthetics, or using him in dark fiction/roleplay is not "supporting grooming." It's engaging with the antagonist the game deliberately made compelling at first. The devs admitted fans loved him early on- that was the point.
You twist fan creations into proof of real-world danger. That's the actual failure of media literacy. Fiction is where we explore monsters safely. Turning someone's writing or RP into "you're literally an abuser" is unhinged thought policing. This is purity culture at its worst- weaponized against neurodivergent people. You've created an environment where any positive or deep engagement with a "problematic" character makes you morally contaminated. One person starts the outrage, and the herd follows: mass blocking, dogpiling, accusations, harassment campaigns. No critical thinking. No "live and let live." Just the herd mentality and bullying disguised as protecting victims.
This isn't unique to every fandom, but it's rampant in LIS. Other communities let people dissect Hannibal, Joker, Walter White, or countless anime villains without this level of mob justice. Here? Selective outrage hits Jefferson hardest while ignoring similar darkness elsewhere. Attacking someone's autistic special interest is especially cruel.
For many autistic people, deep fixation on a character - even a villain - is how we engage with the world, regulate, and find joy. It's not a casual "I think he's hot." It's intense, immersive, and meaningful. Bullying people out of their special interests because your purity feelings got hurt is ableist garbage. You're not "punching up" at a predator. You're punching down at real people who aren't harming anyone.
Your callouts and pile ons don't protect victims. They drive fans away, kill creativity, and turn fandom into a paranoid echo chamber. Real abuse prevention happens in reality- not by terrorizing people over art, RP and fanfic.
Your callouts and pile-ons don't stop real abuse. They drive people away, stifle creativity, and turn fandom into a paranoid fear chamber. Real support for victims happens offline, not by terrorizing creators over pixels and words. This behavior is deeply anti-art. Fiction and fan creation exist to explore the full spectrum of human experience- including monsters like Jefferson. The game uses his charisma and artistic obsession to make its horror more impactful. By demanding we only hate him in the most simplistic way and harassing anyone who engages deeper (writing, RP, detailed art), you're not 'protecting' anything- you're rejecting the power of storytelling itself. Art isn't supposed to be safe and sanitized; it's supposed to challenge, provoke, and let us confront darkness safely. Forcing purity flattens complex characters, stifles creativity, and turns a vibrant fandom into a fearful, echo-chamber creative desert. You're not moral guardians. You lack nuance.
stuff like this is why it’s important to recognize that don’t nod’s canon differs from deck nine’s interpretation of the story/characters. people aren’t just whining or “not accepting canon” when they say that bts, de, and re are not part of the actual intended canon. and you still can enjoy d9’s interpretation while recognizing that! i’ve never understood why it needs to be one or the other, or why people feel the need to get so defensive when it gets pointed out, especially when the material already has canon inconsistencies, and therefore it should be obvious that it’s basically an alternate universe separate from how the story and characters were actually intended. michel’s comments also reinforce my opinions on before the storm; i’ve always thought that they should have never given rachel a new backstory. had they made the game with the og canon in mind, they could’ve just shown rachel through chloe’s eyes, which would’ve naturally explained the romanticized portrayal given it’s chloe’s perspective, while still keeping the mystery around her character since we’d still be seeing a somewhat limited, subjective version of her. instead, they gave her a full familial backstory that directly contrasts with canon and doesn’t really go anywhere in the context of lis1. it’s unfortunate. bts def has other problems too (like the, imo, censoring of chloe’s character and other canon inconsistencies) but that direction has always been what mostly bothered me about it.
also re: complex characters and morally grey ones. what michel explained is why a lot of discourse among lis fans around the more prominent and generally loved characters feels silly to me. they are not supposed to be depictions of perfect people, and not recognizing their complexities feels like a disservice to the story and characters themselves. the tendency to either vilify or completely sanctify a character in order to justify disliking or loving them reflects a kind of moral puritanism that’s increasingly common in fandom spaces, and it’s unfortunate to see people engage with media in this way.
Would you kill, kill, kill for me? I love you enough to ask you again Would you kill, kill, kill for me? You won't be kissing me unless you kill for me.
What if your favourite Jefferson fanfiction? Is there anything you can recommend?
I don't actually read fanfiction a lot, I write a bit here and there myself. But I haven't really anything to recommend you. Folks you can post your recs in replies.
I love your takes on Jefferson and Nathan's relationship. I wonder what do you think about Jefferson and Rachel? Why they ended up together (kind of) in your opinion?
I love these two, they're actually my OTP and I won't let the fandom come for me about it anymore. I believe their connection began with Rachel deliberately seeking to use Mark Jefferson for her own ambitious ends and it certainly didn't hurt that he is attractive, it never does. She saw in him a powerful opportunity: a gateway to status with the validation and a genuine foothold she needed in the modeling world. He saw it coming..
Of course Mark had already noticed her lingering in the margins of his students' photographs and sketches. In Rachel, he perceived something rare: a presence that felt almost infinitely malleable, a raw material he could shape into something extraordinary. Where others had failed to capture her essence petulant teenagers fumbling with light, field of view and shitty trendy angles with poor vision he believed he alone understood how to make her truly beautiful. After one or two carefully orchestrated meetings, their private photography sessions began.
What followed was inevitable for the both of them lol. Rachel Amber possessed an electric intensity that few could resist and Mark Jefferson carried the dangerous allure of a man who had "seen and experienced everything." Under the guise of sharing his worldly wisdom he likely offered her fragments of false vulnerability manufactured confessions laced with just enough truth to feel authentic and disarming. In his own twisted anf narcissistic way… he did care for her. Psychopathy does not preclude emotion; it merely distorts it. Perhaps in Rachel he saw an echo of the girls he had longed for as an awkward, overlooked high-school boy now finally within his grasp, but on his terms as a charismatic vicious shark of an adult.
She in turn viewed him as the perfect stepping stone toward the life she desperately craved. Yet beneath the mutual manipulation an obvious real chemistry undeniably sparked. Her fierce, untamed intensity found its match in a man who not only understood it, but knew precisely how to channel provoke, and control it in a way that likely made her feel seen. For a time they fed each other's deepest desires: her hunger for escape and greatness, his hunger for absolute creative and emotional dominion.
What do you think you see about Mark Jefferson that no one else does?
What do you think Mark Jefferson would see about you that no one else does?
I see: Jefferson's isolation is one of the most quietly devastating undercurrents of Life is Strange, and the more you sit with it and think about it the more it feels like the true engine of his monstrosity. He isn't simply alone- he is structurally alone, in a way that feels almost architectural as the game keeps showing us the polished surface (the celebrated artist, the magnetic teacher, the man whose work hangs in galleries and whose lectures leave students breathless) and then it happens to peel that surface back to reveal the absolute fuckin void underneath. No one ever truly reaches him, and he never lets them because he can't…
Think about how the story frames him from the very beginning. In the classroom, he's surrounded by adoration-students hanging on his every word with girls blushing when he calls their photos "raw" or "honest." Yet that admiration is purely transactional. It's based on the idea of him: the cool, visionary mentor who "gets" art and darkness and vulnerability. They project onto him what they want a teacher to be, and he performs that role flawlessly because it keeps them at a safe, worshipful distance. He feeds on their awe the way a black hole feeds on light-pulling everything in and sadly he isn't capable of reflecting nothing back in any way that is genuine or meaningful. I wonder if he ever gets impostor syndrome about it. (Doubtful)
That same pattern repeats in his celebrity status. The game drops little details about his exhibitions, his books, his reputation in the photography world. He's known, but never known by anyone. The people who celebrate him see the curated persona-the brooding genius, the sensitive artist who captures the "moment before the moment." They don't see the man who needs to manufacture those moments through coercion, drugs, and violence. The isolation isn't accidental; it's self-imposed by design. Genuine intimacy would require vulnerability, and vulnerability would crack the mask he's spent his life perfecting.
Nathan is the singular flickering exception- the one person who came closest to piercing that isolation- and that's exactly why their relationship is so corrosively intimate seeming to me, and interesting as fuck. Nathan didn't just admire Jefferson; he mirrored him. He understood the obsession, the need for control, the aestheticization of suffering. (Not fetishization) In Jefferson's warped worldview, Nathan was the only other soul who spoke the same language. But even that "connection" was poisoned by the very isolation it was meant to soothe. Jefferson didn't love Nathan as a person; he loved him as an extension of himself. A protégé, a witness, a mirror. When Max throws "I cared more about Nathan than you did" in his face, it's not just an insult to his ego-it's an accusation that the one relationship he allowed himself to believe was real was, in fact, counterfeit. That flash of rage you mentioned? It's the sound of his last illusion shattering.
There's a heartbreaking headcanon I keep returning to: Jefferson probably spent years cultivating Nathan precisely because he recognized in the boy the same hollow ache he carried. He saw a younger version of himself in a lot of ways unstable, desperate for someone to validate the darkness instead of pathologizing it. So he stepped into the "father figure" role not out of care, but out of a desperate, possessive need to finally not be alone in it.and so he could shape Nathan, control him, make him complicit, and in doing so convince himself that he wasn't the only monster in the room. When Nathan dies, that fragile illusion dies with him. Jefferson is left with nothing but the echo chamber of his own mind again-only now it's louder, because the one person who ever came close is gone.
And then there's the final tragedy: even when he's caught, even when Max rewinds time and undoes his entire empire, Jefferson remains alone. The game never gives him a moment of genuine remorse or connection. He's still the same island, just smaller and more desperate. That's what makes his brand of evil so insidious-it doesn't come from rage or trauma in the simple way we might expect. It comes from a lifetime of being surrounded by people who loved the idea of him while the real him starved in plain sight.
The isolation isn't just a character flaw; it's the quiet horror at the center of everything he does. He built a life designed to keep everyone at arm's length, and then spent the rest of it punishing the world for obeying that design. He sees: My latent vulnerability wrapped in intellectual armor. He would see me and know that I carry my own quiet voids. Moments of fragility or hidden desperation that I intellectualize rather than display. My willingness to engage with his nihilism might make him perceive me unusually durable. Someone's whose empathy doesn't collapse into fear or judgement. He might toy with the idea that we are "kindered", though for him that always loops back to control and extraction of value. I know his game and I'd still fall for it, I fear.
Would you as a person (ooc) get along with Mark Jefferson if he was real?
My empathy for him would cause me to ignore all of the red flags and he would exploit that leaving me emotionally drained. He would consume, control and use until I no longer served a purpose for him.
Nah. We would not get along. I don't trust his particular demographic to begin with.
Hmm... For some reason I have doubts about the lack of hidden agenda, but whatever you say, mr. Jefferson.
Jefferson's smile didn't waver. If anything, it deepened, amused.
"Doubts are healthy, my friend. They keep us sharp." He tilted his head slightly, eyes glinting with quiet confidence. "But in this case… they're misplaced. I've never hidden my admiration for Max's talent. Some people simply prefer to see shadows where there is only light."
A soft chuckle escaped him as he leaned back again. "Still, I appreciate the skepticism. It shows you're paying attention. Most don't."
I loved your analysis on why Mark shouted when Max said she cared more about Nathan than him. Do you have more opinions/headcanons about their relationship? I think its one of the most interesting parts of the game and its sad they dont even have scenes together that we can base anything from.
Thank you- that means a lot coming from someone who clearly feels the layers of these characters as deeply as I do, it's an honor to answer your asks. I really like to frame Jefferson's reaction not as simple irritation, but as a flash of something rawer: a defensive wound to the one of the only bonds he seems to have ever valued, however poisoned it was.
I've always imagined their dynamic had this strange, almost symbiotic intensity. Jefferson likely saw Nathan as both an extension of himself and a project- someone he could shape into a "worthy" successor while also using him to keep his own darkness fed and hidden. There's a twisted mentorship there: praise mixed with manipulation, genuine acknowledgment of Nathan's talent laced with cruel tests of loyalty. Nathan, for his part, probably craved that validation more than anything, even as it destroyed him. It's almost like a dark father-son relationship where love is expressed through shared monstrosity rather than protection.
One headcanon I keep coming back to is that Jefferson did feel a flicker of something like grief when Nathan died (he had to kill him)- not the selfless sorrow most people would feel, but a selfish, furious sense of loss. Like part of him had been taken away. He'd never admit it, of course. Instead, he'd channel it into colder calculation and rage at Max for disrupting his carefully constructed world.
It really is tragic how little we see of them together. The absence of direct scenes makes their relationship feel almost mythic in its ambiguity- we're left piecing together fragments, much like the characters themselves. That unspoken space is what makes it so endlessly fascinating (and heartbreaking).
In my view, Jefferson didn't just groom Nathan for access to the Prescott money and drugs (though that was obviously a massive part of it). He saw a younger, messier reflection of himself: someone drowning in privilege and instability, craving validation for the "dark" parts most people recoil from. Nathan's own father was cold, domineering, and absent in any meaningful way Jefferson stepped into that void with surgical precision. He praised Nathan's talent genuinely (he repeats it even after everything falls apart), called himself a father figure, and fed the boy's obsessions instead of challenging them. To Nathan, it must have felt like the first time someone saw him not as a Prescott heir or a liability, but as an artist with vision, someone worth mentoring in the shadows.
It's tragic on every level: Nathan loses the only "father" who seemed to believe in him, Jefferson loses the only person who mirrored his worldview, and neither of them ever escapes the cycle. No winners, just two broken people feeding off each other's darkness until it consumes them.
One headcanon I keep returning to is that Jefferson always knew, on some level, that this entire project the Dark Room, the girls, the "art" would eventually destroy both him and Nathan. Not in the dramatic, cinematic way we see in the game, but in a slower, more inevitable corrosion. His dreams died years ago, long before Blackwell. He's mentioned in passing how jaded the photography world made him how the industry chews up anything authentic and spits out hollow spectacle. He learned that "genius" is just another commodity, praise is fleeting, and no one truly sees the work (or the man) behind the curated image. So he stopped chasing validation from the outside world and started manufacturing his own truth in the shadows.
In this darker "what if they got away with it" timeline, I imagine Jefferson quietly steering everything toward a final, grand completion. Once he has enough material enough perfect moments captured he pulls every string he has. Calls in decades of favors, leverages his reputation, his wealth, his connections. He opens a massive gallery under his own name, the kind of event the entire art world shows up for. The invitations are exclusive, the buzz is electric. Critics, collectors, former students, celebrities they all file in expecting another elegant Jefferson retrospective: tasteful black-and-white prints, profound statements about time and vulnerability.
Instead, they're confronted with the truth.
The walls are lined with his "masterpieces" the drugged girls, the bound poses, the frozen expressions of terror and confusion transformed into high-art photographs. Beautifully printed, impeccably lit, presented with the same clinical detachment he always used in class. No explanations, no apologies. Just the work. And standing there in the center of it all, calm and composed, are Jefferson and Nathan. Side by side. Not hiding. Not performing for the crowd, but quietly basking in the collective horror and confusion: the gasps, the murmurs, the slow realization that this isn't satire or conceptual performance it's real.
In Jefferson's mind, this is the only honest exhibition he's ever done. The one where he finally stops pretending the world deserves his "safe" art. Nathan is there because he helped build it the only other person who was inside the machine with him. For one fleeting night, they're not alone in their darkness. The mortified silence of the crowd becomes their validation: proof that they created something no one else had the courage (or sickness) to create. Jefferson might even allow himself the smallest, coldest smile the closest he ever comes to peace. Not because he expects applause, but because, for once, the world is forced to look directly at what he is… and he no longer has to hide it.
Of course, it would all come crashing down eventually arrests, scandal, ruin but in that single crystallized moment, the project reaches its "completion." The dreams may have died long ago, but the final statement still gets made.
It's equal parts triumphant and pathetic in Jefferson's twisted logic: the ultimate fuck-you to an industry that betrayed him, delivered with Nathan as his only witness and co-conspirator.
Mr. Jefferson , why did you want Max to enter a photo for the contest so badly?
Behind his desk the well dressed photographer leaned back and allowed for a knowing smile to play on his lips as he addressed the person asking the question his voice calm, articulate, and laced with that signature mix of mentorship and that signature intensity some absolutely found captivating.
"Ah, you want to know why I pushed Max Caulfield so hard to enter her photo in the Everyday Heroes contest? Fair question. Let me put it this way…"
A moment of pause was given, in no way was it for him to take time thinking so much as it was for dramatic effect.
"Max has something most students her age only dream of possessing: a genuine gift. She doesn't just snap pictures she captures moments with an honesty and raw vision that's incredibly rare. While the others were busy with filtered selfies and safe, obvious shots, Max was framing the world in ways that felt… pure. Innocent, even. I saw that potential in her from the very first class."
He gestured lightly with one hand, his tone turning almost professorial.
"The contest wasn't some trivial school exercise. It was a real opportunity exposure at the Zeitgeist Gallery in San Francisco, national recognition, a chance to step out of the shadows and into the spotlight. I wasn't about to let talent like hers go to waste, hiding away in a journal or a phone. The first real step for any artist is to put themselves out there without fear, without that safety net of 'I'm not ready yet.' I kept encouraging her because I believed in her more than she believed in herself at the time. She needed that push."
Jefferson's eyes narrowed slightly, a subtle edge creeping into his expression.
"And yes, between us… I was looking forward to the possibility of the two of us heading to San Francisco together. A teacher mentoring his most promising student on a trip like that? Anything can happen in a week. It would have been the perfect chance to show her what real photography the kind that matters could become."
He chuckled softly, almost to himself.
"So no grand conspiracy or hidden agenda in the way some might spin it. It was simple, really: I saw greatness in Max, and I refused to let her waste it. That's what good teachers do. They push. They insist. Even when the student hesitates."
He leaned forward again, locking eyes with the listener.
"Does that answer your question? Or did you expect something more… dramatic?"
Playing in VR chat with a friend.
I don’t ask this with disgust but rather interest, because I also find Mr.Jefferson to be an amazing character (even If others disagree with me.)
What makes him so dark yet appealing in your opinion?
I'm glad to hear you preface the fact that your question was not in disgust or this might have gone a completely different direction. (Typically I'd answer: Oh, he's a well written character who makes for interesting dynamic exploration through my own art and writing.)
And that's the short answer.
But who am I to not go on an wax adoringly about my comfort character for the last decade? Especially when prompted so politely. Thank you for asking!
First off, he's designed to be magnetic. Charismatic, sophisticated photographer-teacher with that calm, intellectual vibe, glasses, artistic vision thing. The game presents him as this cool mentor figure for like 4 episodes, so when the twist hits, it's a gut punch betrayal. That contrast polite/artistic exterior hiding extreme control, manipulation, and darkness is super compelling to a certain type of person. It's like classic forbidden power-imbalance villain energy. Think Hannibal Lecter lite but with film cameras and drugs instead of cannibalism. A lot of fans (even ones who despise him) admit he's hot in that 'dangerous older man who knows exactly what he's doing' way.
But the thing that really cements it for me, and that I think gets missed a lot, is the subtext in his dynamics with Nathan and Rachel. It's not just 'evil teacher drugs girls' there's this whole web of manipulation, dependency, and twisted intimacy that makes him feel more psychologically complex.
With Nathan: It's this fucked-up faux father-son/mentor thing. Nathan's got daddy issues with Sean Prescott, so he latches onto Jefferson as the one adult who 'gets' his dark art, validates his talent, calls him special. Jefferson exploits that vulnerability completely uses Nathan's money, his emotional neediness to keep the operation going. But there's subtext that Jefferson might actually see some twisted 'potential' in Nathan (he says he cares, calls him talented), while still planning to frame/kill him. It's grooming + emotional manipulation + replacement-son vibes. That dependency dynamic is heartbreaking and hot in a dark way if you're into power imbalances.
For me, it's gone way deeper. I project a ton of explicit fantasies onto him his control freak nature, the way he frames everything as 'art,' the idea that he's insanely skilled and dominant in bed
And yeah, part of the obsession is how ride or die I've been since the game came out; most of the fandom moved on or hates him, so it feels like 'my' character.
My special little meow meow.
My pookie.
My booboo.
He is babygirl.
@thaismarendaz
Because I couldn't post all I have to say in a singular reply!
Your take is so valid and I really appreciate how nuanced it is. I'm talkin about the contrast you draw between Max's broad empathy (without deep personal closeness) and Jefferson's intense, controlling investment (without real empathy) is spot-on and one of the most painful parts of the whole story… seriously though- Multiple truths can exist here canonically there's room for so many different interpretations and that's what makes these characters so layered and tragic. No one's interpretation cancels the other out. That said, I do see a slightly different angle on that specific moment when Max says "I care more about Nathan than you did" and Jefferson snaps. To me, it's not just exhaustion at her moral speeches or pure dismissal of her as ignorant (though those are definitely part of it). I think there's a flash of genuine hurt/anger there because, in his warped way, Jefferson did care about Nathan and he knows it's not the healthy, empathetic care Max is claiming, but it's real to him.
Jefferson is a psychopath. so his emotions don't look like what you or I would expect. He doesn't do selfless love guilt or compassion the way most people do. However, he seems to want connection understanding, and someone who "gets" him on his level. Being this celebrated photographer/teacher/celebrity figure isolates him even more most people see the polished surface, the status, the talent, but nobody truly relates to the darkness underneath like Nathan did. Nathan wasn't just a tool or a convenience. he was someone who mirrored parts of Jefferson's own obsession, his vulnerabilities, and his fucked up worldview.
Jefferson calls himself a "father figure" to Nathan, acknowledges his talent repeatedly and genuinely, he then proceeds to gets defensive when it's suggested he didn't care at all. When Max claims superior care, it probably feels like an invalidation of the only real (if deeply toxic) bond Jefferson had. It's easy for outsiders (and us as players) to write him off as completely unemotional and incapable of any care because his version doesn't look "normal" no protection, no warmth, just possession, control, and twisted investment.
But that doesn't make it completely invalid or nonexistent in his mind. It's like… he wants to be seen as the one who truly understood and "had" Nathan in a way no one else could have especially not this girl who barely knew him and mostly saw him as a threat or a victim. So… I read the anger as partly jealousy/possessiveness (wanting to stay the most important person in Nathan's life), but also a defensive reaction to having his one distorted form of human connection dismissed as worthless. It's heartbreaking in its own awful way nobody "wins" the "who cared more" contest, and Nathan loses either way.
10 minutes into dark room and chill and I give you this look.
The choice of music is largely inspired by the talented @artioptera - which made me realize just how well Billie Eilish fits with the LIS universe, with this beautiful GMV 💕 Song : Everything I wanted - Billie Eilish