Arya Stark in every episode (1/59)
↳ 1.01 Winter Is Coming
★
noise dept.
𓃗
Color Me Curious
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

#extradirty

Origami Around
Not today Justin
NASA
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵

shark vs the universe
occasionally subtle

Love Begins
d e v o n

Discoholic 🪩

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Monterey Bay Aquarium
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
The Stonewall Inn
Doug Jones
seen from France
seen from Argentina
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from T1
seen from Iraq
seen from Canada

seen from Yemen
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from Austria
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Russia

seen from Bangladesh

seen from Türkiye

seen from Brazil
@yeniayofnymeria
Arya Stark in every episode (1/59)
↳ 1.01 Winter Is Coming
Did Bran Stark Discover the Truth About the North’s Ancient Powers? (+ English Subtitles)
What if the weirwood trees don’t just remember the past? What if the people who entered them never truly left?
When the ancient greenseers died, did they simply disappear—or have their minds, memories, and powers been gathering inside the weirwoods for thousands of years? If so, the blood spilled before these trees in the ancient North may have been far more than ritual sacrifice.
As Bran Stark looks deeper into the past, he moves closer to something older and darker than House Stark itself: the truth about what the Old Gods may really be. But is Bran only watching the past… or is he slowly becoming part of it?
And which moment from his visions could be foreshadowing a major event we may still see in *The Winds of Winter* or *A Dream of Spring*?
The reason why people in the fandom think Arya is ugly is because they listened to an 11 year old and her friend being mean to her instead of the multiple adults in the books telling her she is pretty.
Aryᥲ ⲙy sɦᥲyᥣᥲ 🥀🥀
The Mad King Isn’t CANON! What Information Comes from GRRM? (+ English - Germany Subtitles)
The story of Harrenhal is being told once again. But the question is: How much can we trust it? The Mad King stage play brings the Tourney at Harrenhal and the era of Robert’s Rebellion to the stage. Rhaegar. Aerys. Lyanna. Elia. Wrong choices. A crown spiraling toward ruin. But is this new version of events truly canon? In this video, we discuss The Mad King play and what it means for ASOIAF.
We should talk more about how Arya is a polyglot in this fandom. It is such an impressive achievement, and still so underrated.
“But when he closed his eyes it was Aerys Targaryen he saw pacing his throne room, alone in his red robes, picking at the scabs on his bleeding hands. The fool was always cutting himself on the blades and barbs of the Iron Throne. Jaime had entered through the king’s door in his golden armor, sword in hand. Gold armor, not white, but no one ever remembered that. I should have taken off that damned cloak too.
When Aerys saw the blood on his blade, he demanded to know if it was Lord Tywin’s. ‘I want him dead,’ the king had screamed. ‘I want that traitor’s head, you will bring me his head or you will burn with all the rest. All the traitors. Rossart says the traitors are within the walls! He will have a warm welcome ready for them. Whose blood is that? Whose?’
‘Rossart’s,’ Jaime said.
Those purple eyes grew huge then, and the royal mouth drooped open in shock. He lost control of his bowels, turned, and ran for the Iron Throne. Jaime dragged him off the steps, squealing like a pig and smelling like a privy, the last dragon king, beneath the hollow eyes of the skulls upon the walls.
A single slash across his throat had been enough to end it. So easy, Jaime remembered thinking. A king should be harder to kill than that. Rossart had at least tried to fight, though to be truth told he fought more like an alchemist than a knight.
It was queer how no one ever asked who killed Rossart . . . but then, he was no one, lowborn, Hand for a fortnight, another of the Mad King’s mad whims.”
Jon Snow Fulfilled the Pact of Ice and Fire! (+ English and Germany subtitles)
A pact was left unfinished. A prince died. The promised marriage never took place.
But centuries later, Stark and Targaryen blood were united once more in a child no one had planned for: Jon Snow.
Aegon the Conqueror foresaw the darkness coming from the North. Rhaegar searched for the Prince That Was Promised.
But what if they had each understood only one part of the same truth? What if ice is not merely an enemy to be defeated? What if fire alone is not enough?
In this video, we explore the true meaning behind the Pact of Ice and Fire, Rhaegar’s interpretation of the prophecy, and whether Jon Snow ultimately fulfilled an unfinished union between two ancient dynasties.
House of the Dragon: How Cregan Stark Ended the War (+ English and German Subtitles)
Did Cregan Stark come to King’s Landing to bring peace, or to settle the final score of the war?
The Dance of the Dragons seemed to be over. Rhaenyra was dead, Aegon II had been poisoned, and the young Aegon III now sat the Iron Throne.
But for Cregan Stark, the war could not truly end until those responsible had been brought to justice.
In this video, we explore the Hour of the Wolf through Fire & Blood. Was what Cregan did an act of justice? Or was it the cold vengeance of the North?
jon and arya during the long night
🎨 done by bloodshot_hare on twt
That moment when you ragebait yourself after checking if the general opinion on Daenerys and Arya has changed and it didn't.
No Arya is not a feral out of control psychopath with zero political acumen and plot and Dany is not a mad queen aho will end up dead.
Stop it. It's mysoginistic..
Hi, selam!
As a fan of Arya and Jon Snow, and also someone who loves the character of Dany, I have something to say. Actually, it's not so much about the characters themselves, but rather about the fans' "labeling/accusing" approach.
The reason I'm writing this now is because it's been coming up so often over the years, and I can't help but react.
First of all, the ASOIAF universe is definitely not suitable for the new generation because it's both quite a dark universe and very much against the populist values of the new generation. Therefore, the new generation tends to be unable to evaluate everything they encounter without approaching it in this way; that's why I think they have difficulty understanding the unfolding story in the ASOIAF universe.
In this universe, fans can have various reasons for liking or disliking a character; they might find their personality similar to their own or very different; they might find their actions sympathetic or the opposite; they might find a character harming the character(s) they like, or yes, they might dislike them because it's very contrary to their personal worldview, and all this and more… etc. All of this is very natural and acceptable; nobody should criticize anyone for these kinds of things, IN MY OPINION.
I find ASOIAF discussions among fans very entertaining, as long as they are civilized. I spent many long days clashing our differing opinions with a Dany fan friend, and both we enjoyed it, as did our forum friends who read those discussions. The key was to treat each other with respect and never to label or accuse each other with phrases like, "You think this way because you are like this." In this respectful and sincere environment, we sometimes convinced each other or improved our perspectives…
However, in recent years – especially after GoT ended – I've seen some stans become aggressive. Actually, my friend became aggressive too. It's understandable considering the show's ending didn't please anyone except a limited number of viewers, but I see groups who have made it a habit to bully others for years.
I've also experienced this bullying. I'll never forget a group on X criticizing the drawings of a fan who drew art; the main criticism was why the Martellers were drawn with dark skin (ridiculous, since they're a dark Mediterranean family, whatever). The artist was a JonArya fan, and they started insulting her using that aspect. When I defended her, I was insulted and attacked for this and a few other opinions I had. I see other arguments too; accusing people of misogyny… which I want to focus on because it was the last straw that prompted me to write this.
Criticizing or disliking Daenerys, Arya, or any other female character for any reason, or predicting and expressing a "mad queen/princess" ending and saying they will die, is not misogyny.
There are also male characters who are hated, even beyond analysis and predictions, and whose death is openly wished for because they are disliked for a certain reason… I have almost never heard male fans who like them say, "You're doing this because you're a man-hater." Unfortunately, I have often heard/read my own gender accusing the other side of misogyny.
The culture of online mobbing is at a terrifying point, and much of it revolves around populism; I've seen topics on the Reddit ASOIAF subreddit that started with "Don't mob me, but…" just to express a different opinion. The fact that someone simply wants to express their own opinion but fears being mobbed for expressing a view contrary to the general consensus shows the presence of social pressure. This is terrifying.
The system works like this: first, populist values/concepts are produced, then these are frequently presented to social media users, taught to them, and everyone starts using them. But most importantly, because herd mentality kicks in, a fixed opinion is formed, not even questioned. When dissenting opinions are expressed, accusatory concepts/labels are used to suppress and silence the opposing side. We're talking about an anti-democratic, anti-freedom approach. In short, the labeling is a "weapon" used to suppress and silence opinions you don't like.
Let me give you a simple example: Antisemitism.
In the West, for over 70 years, Zionists have silenced and suppressed anyone who criticized the genocide they perpetrated against Palestine by accusing them of antisemitism. Now that their influence on the internet is waning, and people are slowly seeing some truths, accusations of antisemitism seem like a huge joke in the West. They're furious because the weapon system they created is now turning against them, that's a separate issue, but unfortunately, the lynching/suppression culture continues in other areas.
I know I've written a long piece, but this isn't something that can be dismissed in two sentences. To be honest, I don't think what I've written will change anything, but at least I think I've found the right time and place to express myself, so I've taken this opportunity.
Nevertheless, I hope/inşallah my words will raise awareness, even for just one person.
Thank you for reading. Remember that accusations and labeling are the weapons of the pathetic/criminals who are unable to defend their views/actions. Just like the Zionists. Therefore, let different opinions clash, and don't feel bad when you receive criticism; see it as an opportunity to improve yourself and your views.
Regards.
Part of her wanted to be a swan. The other part wanted to eat one. / "I used to be someone, but now I'm not. You can call me Cat, if you like. Who are you?" / I am a direwolf, and done with wooden teeth.
A Clash of Kings - Arya V / A Feast for Crows - Samwell III / A Clash of Kings - Arya X
c0mm done by by mick_memo on twt
Why Did Rhaenyra Start Out as a Loser?
When Viserys died, Rhaenyra was at Dragonstone. Aegon was in King's Landing. This simple geographical difference determined the first major outcome of the war, because the Iron Throne isn't taken by right alone.
Sometimes, the throne is taken by who is in the palace, who holds the seals, who sends the ravens, and who closes the gates.
This is where the importance of the Green Council comes into play. Viserys' death was concealed. The palace was brought under control. The news of the king's death was delayed from reaching Rhaenyra. Most of the small council, the treasury officials, the Kingsguard, and the power centers in the city were under the Greens' reach.
Rhaenyra held her father's choice and ancient oaths. Aegon held the capital, the possibility of being crowned, and the order of the state.
Therefore, the Greens didn't start the war with just a claim. They started by seizing control of the heart of the state.
Realistically, claiming a right to the Iron Throne without actually sitting on it doesn't have much effect; Stannis, as head of his house, also has a right to the throne, but he lacks the things I've mentioned. Therefore, he had no chance of ascending the throne from the beginning.
In short, Rhaenyra had a strong legal claim, but the center of power wasn't in her hands.
Could the war have unfolded differently here?
If Viserys had kept Rhaenyra in King's Landing before his death and made her de facto co-ruler, the Green Council's influence would have been significantly reduced. If Rhaenyra had been in the capital at the time of her death, Aegon's coronation might not have been so easy.
This is where Viserys' mistake, had its consequences. An heir was chosen, but the succession to the throne wasn't secured. Rhaenyra had a right, but the Greens held the gates, the seals, and the crown.
The Video: https://youtu.be/MCSgU2Cpjgw?si=Svk8axfCxjkxXZ0B
House of the Dragon: How Team Green Won and Team Black Lost? (+ English / German Subtitles)
Who truly won the Dance of the Dragons?
Rhaenyra sat the Iron Throne, but she could not keep it. Aegon II turned the war in his favor, but lost his future. The bloodline of the Blacks eventually returned to the throne, while the Greens, despite defeating Rhaenyra, lost the very source of Targaryen power: the dragons.
In this video, through House of the Dragon and Fire & Blood, we break down the greatest turning points of the Dance of the Dragons: from the Green Council to Storm’s End, from Blood and Cheese to Rook’s Rest, from the Dragonseeds to the fall of King’s Landing, and finally to the end of Rhaenyra herself.
Who do you think won the war?
The Greens? The Blacks? Or did House Targaryen lose everything in this war?
Let’s discuss it in the comments.
Why Was Rhaenyra Wrong in the Matter of the Strong Bastards?
Rhaenyra's sons were to inherit the throne after her. If the legitimacy of these children was questioned, Rhaenyra's future would also be questioned.
Viserys didn't resolve the rumors. He suppressed them. Dragon eggs were placed in the children's cradles. Dragons hatched from the eggs. This was a very powerful sign. It was as if even the dragons were confirming the children's Targaryen blood… BUT…
Politics doesn't work with magical signs alone. Even dragon eggs might not convince people when they don't want to believe.
Could the Dance have been prevented here? No. It was difficult. Nothing the King could do could cover up the truth about these Strong bastards. He knew this, so he tried to silence people by suppressing them, but it should not be forgotten that Rhaenyra's illegitimate children are a crime of treason according to the laws and traditions of Westeros.
If Rhaenyra had given birth to her children knowing full well that they were "bastards," and hadn't claimed their legitimacy, the Greens would have had a weaker argument. At most, rumors would have spread about "a queen who fathers bastards," and they would have tried to disqualify her from the throne.
But Aegon also had bastards, and the lords of Westeros were no different. So, clinging to such a claim would have been a weak point for the Greens. Ultimately, any criticism leveled against Rhaenyra regarding bastards would have been directed at them as well.
The important thing was that Rhaenyra had given birth to legitimate children, and that this was undeniable. Frankly, in my opinion, even her marriage to Laenor was flawed from the start for this very reason. It was an open secret that he was indifferent to women. It was obvious he couldn't father children.
Therefore, Rhaenyra's giving birth to bastards is not surprising; it may even have been inevitable. Furthermore, even if she hadn't made this choice, the problem of "Rhaenyra has no heir" would have arisen. The Velaryons, too, succumbed to their greed, as you can see. They knowingly married off their sons.
So, at this point, I think there was no turning back for the Dance, but ultimately, if the Strong issue hadn't arisen, Rhaenyra might have had a stronger hand, at least the Greens wouldn't have been able to push back on the "bastard" issue, since "bastards inheriting" is a sensitive issue for the houses of Westeros.
Imagine, after a while, another bastard might act, thinking, "I can inherit my house's fortune too," and cause further internal house wars by using this as a precedent. It's not something that would benefit the lords, and it's unacceptable, especially for the ladies, as they would worry about their children's inheritance.
The Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQdxG6SOVSw
House of the Dragon: Viserys Started the War Like This! (+ With English and German Subtitle)
Viserys never wanted war. But sometimes, a king who does not want war does not stop it. He only delays it.
There was Rhaenyra. There was Alicent. Aegon was born. The Greens and the Blacks grew stronger. And the greatest question surrounding the Iron Throne remained unanswered: Who should inherit the throne?
In this episode of our House of the Dragon and Fire & Blood series, we explore how the Dance of the Dragons slowly took shape during the reign of Viserys Targaryen.
From the Great Council of 101 AC to the birth of Aegon, from the rise of Alicent Hightower to the Strong rumors, from Aemond’s eye to the Green Council, we ask the same question at every breaking point: Could the Dance have been stopped here?
What do you think was Viserys’ greatest mistake?
When you've survived a war… you don't care about death anymore. It feels like you've dodged the Angel of Death. It feels like you have many years ahead of you, but… it’s been 50 years. We could’ve died, Nimet. But I made a promise. I don't want to die without keeping my promise.
AYLA: the Daughter of War ✧ dir. Can Ulkay — 2017