Essay In Lieu Of Examination
Intro
The development of the first commercial photographic camera in 1839, and the establishment of YouTube, a revolutionary way to broadcast visual material in 2005, are two turning points in the history of publishing technologies and have altered the creative industries completely. Through this essay, the impact of these two technologies will be explored, a relation between the two will be recognized and it will be seen that nomatter the point in history, steps such as these in publishing can have a butterfly effects way into the future. Beginning with Louis Daguerreâs âdaguerreotypeâ camera, developed in Paris by Joseph NiĂŠpce, it can be seen how the ability to freeze a single frame of reality for unlimited viewing can have a range of social and artistic impacts (Gustavson 2009). Advancing to the modern age, and the ability to reproduce moving images again and again for an unlimited audience to view simultaneously, it can be seen how a relatively simple progression in technology can one day lead to a platform considered to be ârevolutionaryâ (Gehl 2009).
The Giroux Daguerreotype Camera (1839)
Changing of the concept of âlookingâ.
âEver since the birth of the camera it has been accused of upsetting the divide between public worlds and private selves, transforming the very act of looking and giving rise to a whole series of characterizations of this condition: the society of spectacle, the politics of representation, the gendered gaze and so forth, are among the more well knownâ (Carrabine 2014). With the ability to hold a single perspective from a single moment in time in your hands comes a different way of seeing the world. As Carrabine says, a number of factors come into play, not only in the eyes of the beholder of a photograph, but also in the way the photographer wished the photograph to be seen. With the commercialization of the Daguerreotype camera, one could now freeze a moment unlike anything possible through a painting or drawing or any other previous form of publication. It was in the freezing of this moment that one could now stop and examine the world exactly how it is seen to the human eye, only frozen forever, open to the scrutiny of the viewer. The concept of âlookingâ at the world changed then, as it was now possible to see a frame at a time, as opposed to an infinite number of âframesâ simultaneously flashing before our eyes, gone as quickly as they came. In the artistic world, an artists impression of a subject was in many cases now dictated by the âlookingâ ability of a camera, as opposed to their flawed and affected âlookingâ as a human being. For example, it became practice to use a photograph to âtraceâ a landscape scene instead of reproduce it from memory or from real-time vision.
Creation of an archive.
Only in retrospect could we see âthe importance of photography as a record of historically-specific ways of seeing the worldâ (Rose 2000). As time has gone on and the use of archives as a base of knowledge has become so important, the value of a visual representation of events has become apparent making the development of the first camera a turning point. As Rose points out, it is the âways of seeing the worldâ or perspectives given through the record of events which can be valuable, and many of the most famous images in history are results of the perspective from which they were created.
This famous photograph taken during the Vietnam War is one such âhistorically specificâ image, and is a strong example of the photographer using their own creative perspective to create a single image, freezing a single message in time as an archive. It could be argued that the creative industries are an amalgamation of past influences, regurgitated into new works, and it is this visual record which is turned to over and over again for inspiration. With the ability to build a history of art and a visual history of events comes the ability to drastically change the future. The act of capturing a single moment in time itself is the act of creating an archive, producing a spark of knowledge of that exact moment which can be referenced and drawn upon countless times as long as the image remains intact.
âThe birth of realismâ.
Up until the mid 19th century, artistic representation of the world had greatly relied on paintings, drawings and sculpture, forms of craft which all carried their own artistic conventions. Art movements reining at the time of development of the Daguerreotype Camera were Romanticism and the Hudson River movement. The ability of an artist to pick the very shapes, colours and state of the subject of their work was a stark contrast to the introduction of the photograph, a format which collected all these things in the time of a single exposure. The resulting image was not a picture of the world according to the whims of the artist, but a relatively sterile, absolute representation of what is in front of the camera. With this ability to represent the world so similarly to how it actually appeared came an entire new wave of artistic convention, leading academics to suggest that â1839 marks the birth of realismâ (Posner 2013). Further evidence of the social impacts of photography on art comes in form of modern articles âarguing that the invention of photography in 1839 ushered in an era of unprecedented literary realismâ (Posner 2013). It could be suggested then that the now relatively simple idea of displaying an unaltered image of the world on paper for all to see drastically altered the way humans think about the world and affected our artistic pursuits across a range of visual and textual artistic platforms.
YouTube (2005)
The impact of creative works on society.
The ability of a person to pick up any camera in our modern world and use their artistic vision to present an opinionated, artistic view of any topic by publishing the footage online for all to see is a power no human has had in history before now. As the average user logs onto their YouTube homepage, they are immediately confronted with the creative works of dozens, hundreds or even thousands of people. Every one of these clips has been tailored by those people to give a certain message, convey some sort of information or produce some sort of reaction.
âYouTubeâs ability to share (extra)ordinary peopleâs insights into otherwise unseeable shocking events is testament to its capacity for changing the media landscapeâ (Drew 2013). It is this platform which has changed the way we think about cameras and the images they produce, and advanced the idea developed by Daguerre in 1839 to the point where the archived image is a power which influences not only the individual holding it in their hands but all with access to the Internet. A popular example today is online news vendor âVICE Newsâ which operates a channel on the YouTube website, creating content from around the world, specifically to have an impact on the politically aware or create audience.
The sites latest video at the publishing of the essay has over 60â000 views and has been online for 48 hours only.
Creation of another archive.
With the creation of YouTube, we can see the supercharged archive of the future to the original idea of the photographic archive from 1839. As the Daguerreotype photographers of the 19th century produced images to represent parts of their world, so too do we now publish our visual works online to form an archive of material from all around the world. With the existence of a publishing platform with such a huge expanse of information comes the practice of fishing for content with no end goal, but an urge to browse, be entertained and be inspired. âYouTube has a mythical âcenter,â and web users go to that centre to get contentâ (Couldry 2003). In an artistic pursuit, users will access this technology and search for content which has come before them, and this is the power of a device which will freeze content in time. âWhat is stored in the archive is not facts, but disaggregated classifications that can at will be reassembled to take the form of facts about the worldâ (Bowker 2005).
The establishment of an artistic platform.
âYouTube fosters community and acts as an agent for self-expression: the site makes possible new identities, sexualities, and modes of interactionâ (Vernallis 2013). YouTube presents artists and non-artists alike with the opportunity to use relatively simple technology to produce something unique and post it online for the world to see. The ability of a 9 year old to take a video on their iPad and share it to a linked YouTube account has become so seamless now that artistic expression has become less about years of technical training and more about the ability to translate a message in as short a time as possible to a wide audience. As this publication technology changed, so too did our modern society, altering our expectations of online video content until most of what we expect is 15-minute âvineâ clips designed purely to entertain. Why would one buy a documentary on DVD or watch âFunniest Home Videosâ on television when we can access an unlimited amount of both these things in an instant online? The artistic world has adapted to the new form of publication too, one of the products being channels such âtriple-jâ who publish video footage from their Friday morning radio programs, in an effort to engage an online platform. One could argue that the creative world has been further commercialized with the introduction of this publishing technology, with companies such as âVevoâ partnering with Google to optimize advertising across the YouTube platform.
Conclusion:
Beginning with the invention of the Daguerreotype camera in 1839, the human population (artistic and otherwise) has been fascinated with the reproduced image and has sought to shape it in many different ways. The product of this original invention can be seen everywhere in the daily life of the modern person, and it is platforms like YouTube which make this especially true. Throughout history it can be seen that the introduction of technologies such as the printing press and the Internet have changed how we publish and how we interact as humans, and the camera is no exception. Every day, artists, developers, thinkers and many other types of people are finding new ways to use the captured image to send messages, promote ideas and to interact with others, and this is something which will continue long into the future.
 Word Count: 1771
Reference List:
Bowker, G. C. (2005). Memory practices in the sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. 18.
Carrabine, E. (2014). Seeing things: violence, voyeurism and the camera. Theoretical Criminology. 18(2), 134-158
Couldry, N. (2003). Media rituals : a critical approach. London ; New York: Routledge.
Drew, C. (2013) Reading YouTube: the critical viewers guide, Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 27:5, 757-759
Frizot, M. (1999). "Light machines: On the threshold of invention". In Michel Frizot. A New History of Photography. Koln, Germany: Konemann.
Gehl, R. (2009). YouTube as archive Who will curate this digital Wunderkammer?. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(1), 43-60.
Gustavson, T. (2009). Camera: a history of photography from daguerreotype to digital. New York, New York: Sterling Publishing Co., Inc.
Posner, A. (2013). The Camera and the Press: American Visual and Print Culture in the Age of the Daguerreotype, History of Photography, 37:4, 462-464
Rose, G. (2000). Practising photography: an archive, a study, some photographs and a researcher. Journal of Historical Geography 26(4), 555-571
Vernallis, C. (2013). YouTube Aesthetics. In Unruly Media: YouTube, Music Video, and the New Digital Cinema. Oxford University Press. Retrieved 6 Nov. 2014, from http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199766994.001.0001/acprof-9780199766994-chapter-7.
Wenczel, N. (2007). The Optical Camera Obscura II Images and Texts. Inside the Camera Obscura â Optics and Art under the Spell of the Projected Image. Wolfgang Lefèvre (Max Planck Institute for the History of Science). pp. 13â30










