After some diving into the abyss of ‘what I have access to’, it seems the corona virus topic may be (as byproduct) somewhat of an insight to the beginnings of a new perspective for many of us - an opening perhaps to clearer thinking or the recognition of impending doom...
Not that this particular dilemma is the, or a, sole turning point (as I am sure there have been and will be others to draw similar conclusions by and from), but purely because the differing dynamics of science and information surrounding the issue, quite obviously demonstrate the current state of affairs:
All types of articles on a spectrum from fully verifiable and scientifically backed papers through to complete naff mumbo-jumbo are floating throughout the interwebs. In this particular instance I’ve come across a seemingly ‘normal’ person putting together her perspective, via her means, on why she thinks this virus is.
I am not an advocate for her or her process or her evidence, as much as I am for the situation she demonstrates.
I am not suggesting 5G testing is or is not responsible for the corona virus, what I’m suggesting is - this is yet but another demonstrative example where levels of information or science that if pursued objectively (ie: papers on exposure of insects to RF electromagnetic fields from 2 to 120 GHz) defines a legitimate level of reasonable sense-making.
Yet simultaneously, immunobiology research would obviously suggest the virus falls into one or more of the pathenogenic groups. And then a third, where political and economic strategies are in play to serve one country over another - one corporation collective over another.
“the coronavirus is the biggest story in the world and is soon going to smash into our electoral politics in unpredictable ways”
What I am alluding to is this;
there’s probably a 4th, 5th and who knows how many perspectives also, where one group of professionals are in opposition to an equally equipped ‘other’ group of professionals. One level of science against another level of science. So anybody with a stitch of reason between their ears, spends a seemingly futile amount of time extrapolating from reality, and when searching for truth, whose truth do you go with?
This is my quandary (and I don’t think I’m alone) - I’m sooo tired of it all and I’m wondering if everyone else is tiring of it as well or does one simply pick a type or side of science, information and sense-making, following or not following it to it’s nth degree and say “well, this is where I stand, I’m not going into the depths of the opposing theory(s), this fills my cup ‘enough’ ’’?
Or perhaps incorporating a similar attitude for reaching a level of solace;
“I don’t have the luxury of access to the plethora of information or actual free time it requires to digest said science / information, so I’ll leave it in the hands of the experts.”
“Peace love and mung beans, it is what it is, meditate more, adopt a yoga pose and understand we are but vessels the multiverse experiences itself through.”
“It’s just another conspiracy theory, geez they’re really getting creative these days - bring on the aliens. An unbiased intervention is the only true option from here on in.”
“These events are simply machinations and necessary junctures the masters of society overlords must implement to transitioning across to the inevitable trans-human outcome.”
“I’ve got to get back to ‘the real reality’ meeting my commitments, my mortgage(s), my kids are a mess, I hate my job, I’m living for the weekend / my next holiday and I’d rather fantasise over what it would be like to have sex with that person if I swipe right.”
It seems we are free to run along any path of our choosing here - at one end of the curve, any imaginings whatsoever or at the other end, explicit scientific rigour underpinned with concise dependable data and /or anywhere else in between.
And perhaps this is the point? Perhaps there’s no point?
How does this rest with people? How can I make it rest with me?
It’s akin to the evolutionary result of my frontal lobes’ development over millennia, being in conflict, contest or melding with the eons of evolutionary track my amygdala has equipped me with. Logic coupled and entwined with intuition. Elements of deep seated fear versing elements of deep seated love, harmony and order verses confusion and chaos.
By all accounts these very real human states are also just as important to us as anything else happening in our lives. Quite testable via scientific method and then again techniques outside of science, seemingly having real-time results - the fruits of which culminate in being actual drivers for our current and future perspectives.
* You’ve got cancer with 3 months to get your affairs in order.
* Your horoscope says you should go with numbers 6, 3 and 9
* Study reviews on placebos found that the placebo had no major clinical effects on illness. Instead, the placebo effect had an influence on patient-reported outcomes.
* God does exist, but not the god you believe in.
* Young’s double-slit experiment is a demonstration that light and matter can display characteristics of both classically defined waves and particles
* Discovery of Akashic records indicate humans are ‘organic’ automatons designed by an advanced race of aliens. The last remaining evidence of our mechanical metal-based origins residing as iron content in our blood.
* New York Times exclusive “Satan states he’s always been an atheist”.
And yet if these processes (by design) continue to evolve (evolve us as a species) via our environment, our access to science and information, disinformation and pap - it stands to reason the average 2.5 petabytes of human brain capacity isn’t enough.
I really dont know how to discover/research the truth anymore.
I legitimately cannot source the bottom line for a myriad of circumstance. So as retort, byproduct or helpless hopelessness, I’m done with this extrapolation; the left right, black white, today no tomorrow - and beneath it all, the ever present premise, ‘wtf is next?’
Or are we supposed to repress these processes or lack of process?
What else will I be left to ruminate over, never knowing, never being able to put to bed and ultimately placed on my growing pile of uncertainty I’ve become accustomed to (nothing more than) accumulate as part of the human condition?
No one can truly answer this call and it seems no one ever will now. Is our information age heading toward overload?
My little China girl says
Oh baby, just you shut your mouth
dailybridgerton
turnnoffyourmind
andulkaphoto
areudirty
vaporwave
titsay
kaledo-art
tangentwithtanner
pixelskylines