No title available
Sweet Seals For You, Always

ellievsbear
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

Discoholic 🪩

No title available

No title available
will byers stan first human second
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

if i look back, i am lost
Monterey Bay Aquarium

tannertan36
Mike Driver
KIROKAZE
No title available
Not today Justin

Andulka
h

Kiana Khansmith
RMH

seen from Poland

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Canada
seen from Finland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from Israel
seen from United States
seen from Chile

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from India
seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
@4ll7he4lternate4rtists
Something I learned is if you don't step out of your artistic comfort zone a little, you're gonna be even more exhausted with making art. Your mind is a caged tiger and it needs to attack something new from time to time. Your mind is pacing in its enclosure 🐅
If you don't like drawing figures and poses because they're frustrating, draw figures and poses and get frustrated! Draw them! With anger! Swear and curse at them!
If you don't like drawing traditionally because there's too much room to make mistakes, draw traditionally and make mistakes! Scream while doing it! Put on scary music! Make it silly!
This goes for any kind of craft or skill
You stand to lose nothing in the end (Except maybe your own patience and sanity but that's temporary). But you do gain at least a little bit more knowledge and skill to feed your mind tiger
some sketches drawn from an armchair in wales, 2025.
people are soooo mean to the color yellow and it hurts my heart like u mean the color of the sun!?!? daffodils and buttercups and dandelions!? canary feathers and fresh butter and the warm glow of light and the trees in autumn???? for shame. joyless.
I've always kind of wondered how this might correlate to the colors the cones in your eyes can actually see. A typical full-color vision human has three cones that see long, medium, and short wavelengths, in other words red, green, and blue.
Coincidentally (or not) blue, green, and red are consistently the top three favorite colors (sometimes it's purple) across the world.
Perhaps there are literally colors the human brain tends to dislike specifically because they're a product of our brain attempting to interpret wavelengths we can't actually see....
IDK, every color has its time and place.
in 2015 we didn’t have AI psychosis so people had to make do by believing a dress was white and gold
Because it was
Is the gold in the room with us right now?
yes. the dress is gold.
...
the dress has always been gold
r u saying this doesn't look white and gold to u???
...
what.
it's a white and gold dress in cool blue dim lighting w/ bright warm light behind it, making an optical illusion. we're not fucking doing this again
oh god fucking damn it
I know tumblr likes to exclusively make it about bloody hospitals but this is what Color Theory is about
Beautiful!
It's giving...
Love both :D
Hamlet adaptation where Hamlet is a vlogger and all his soliloquies are breakdowns he uploads to YouTube
… I am unironically here for this
this is the funniest thing I’ve ever seen in my life
This is - legitimately - my favourite delivery of Shakespeare I have EVER seen (and I have seen some good-ass productions yo, in the Globe Theatre itself even). Like seriously, even though the words are unchanged, he’s stripped away ALL of the archaic pretense and assumed grandeur of ~presenting the bard~ that makes even the most wildly talented of actors and innovative of productions inherently inaccessible to a modern audience. Like, they’re still great, they can still communicate the message and (some) of the nuance, but they’re still always a step removed from being identifiable to any viewer’s lived experience. They’re still always reciting 15th century poetry. But this guy? This guy is like, screw iambic pentameter, to hell with being precious about the material, HOW WOULD AN ACTUAL PERSON SAY THIS SHIT?
Like this. And it’s beautiful. It’s beautiful to hear a soliloquy I loved so much already, and have it come to life in a way it never, ever, did before. I feel like I grasp his motivations, his twists and turns, no longer on an academic level but on a visceral, instinctive one. Because he’s presenting his mental and emotional journey in a way that speaks honestly, like a real person.
So yeah, this shit post? I love it. Deeply and sincerely.
an absolutely stunning interpretation
Given how much of the play’s themes are based on miscommunication and wrongful communication, I legitimately want to see a version now where we have multiple screens above the stage and explore the story through media.
Consider, for example:
TMZ airing live from Gertrude and Claudius’ wedding. Of course we see all the pomp and circumstance, but they just can’t help themselves, they have to point out and mock Hamlet in his mourning clothes.
The ghost of Hamlet, Sr. (which, textually, could be either a hallucination or real) as an AI conversation
Hamlet’s soliloquies and monologues as above, and we watch them on his YouTube channel
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern installing tracker software on Hamlet’s phone and being stunned when he discovers it
And also.
Finally.
Ophelia.
The Problem Of Ophelia gets solved through this lens.
For those who never studied Hamlet in a class: The Problem of Ophelia is the way she died. Gertrude has this entire extremely detailed monologue about it, from the songs Ophelia is singing as she drowns to what her clothes looked like in the water. She indicates that Ophelia’s clothes, “mermaid-like,” kept her afloat for at least several minutes. And yet there’s zero indication Gertrude tried to help her, to seek assistance from anyone else, or even to call out to Ophelia and be like “girl what the fuck are you doing?!” Which raises the question: why? Why did Gertrude just…watch this young girl die? Metatextually, it’s because Shakespeare was drawing on the tradition of the Greek Tragedy Death (in which showing the death onstage was extremely gauche–not to mention sometimes logistically impossible–but the death itself was the point of the piece, so the chorus would give a big long speech about how the death occurred), but because that is a device designed for a different kind of theatre, it now creates this ambiguity where Gertrude might or might not have committed negligent manslaughter.
You could literally solve the problem one of two ways using this multimedia approach. If you want a sympathetic Gertrude, then I’d go with Ophelia drowning on a security camera. Gertrude can be shown frantically sending the security guard to retrieve Ophelia, watching the screen anxiously for his arrival…but it’s too late. If you want a self-absorbed fuck for Gertrude, I’d straight up go with her filming something for the royal TikTok on a balcony with the stream showing in the background below her. She doesn’t even realize Ophelia was in distress until she’s editing.
This would provide SO MANY interesting ways to interpret the play. I want to do it now.
Scott Prior (American, b. 1949)
Valley in Winter, 2014
Oil on linen
SCROLL BACK UP
NOT A PHOTO
Mrs. Claus opens "The Year Without a Santa Claus" by claiming the eponymous year took place "before you were born". Seeing as the movie was released in 1974, this means the year must have been before then.
Bounding this on the lower end is the presence of ice hockey - mentioned by Heat Miser - and the use of telephones. Ice hockey was invented in 1875, while Alexander Graham Bell built the telephone in 1876, meaning the year must post-date these. These figures give a range of approximately 100 years during which Santa may have taken his holiday.
Yet, narrowing this further is the presence of a December calendar counting the 1st to a Wednesday. Between 1876 and 1974, only the Decembers of 1880, 1886, 1897, 1909, 1915, 1920, 1926, 1937, 1943, 1948, 1954, 1965, and 1971 started on a Wednesday.
But still this can be narrowed further.
When Santa set out that Christmas Eve, we see what appears to be an almost full Moon in the sky. Within the years listed, only 1920 had a full Moon on Christmas.
Ergo, 1920 was the year without a Santa Claus.
One of those things that makes me think someone at Rankin-Bass was actually doing their research, because:
Rounded collar on the man at left, both boys (white coat in front and pink shirt in back right) are wearing knickerbockers.
Santa, dressed but not in his suit, has pinstriped pants, spats, and a watch chain. We can assume he probably dresses a bit older than those around him because he's elderly and doesn't necessarily care about trends, and--what? What's this? A fashion plate from the Edwardian era?
No spats on this guy, but they were common at the time--it might be because spats were practical and the drawing is intended to be fashionable.
Now let's look at some of the parents. Once again, we can expect both that they're going to be dressed ever so slightly older, and also decades don't have hard start/stop lines in fashion and culture like they do on a calendar.
The dove-breasted dress front isn't present in AYEASC, but the length and collar are perfect compared to this photo from 1910, and if we assume the mom is wearing something just a couple of years out of date, the bodice shape lines up very neatly with the end of WWI.
Likewise, look at her hair and how loose it is around her face in spite of being in a bun, and then check out this photo of a Gibson girl:
And then we've got the dad, with his hair parted straight down the middle, his large shirt cuffs, and vest. Check it out:
Also please note Dad is in plaid and as you may see in this ad, that was A Thing in the time period. He's not the only one, either--several of the kids wear it.
Other than Santa's outdated Edwardian attire (which makes sense for his character as an old man), all of these styles date within five years of 1920. Most date to ever so slightly before. These are middle-class people, so we'd expect them to not look like the latest fashion plates. Not only does their clothing make sense for a 1920 date, it actually makes sense for real people of their socioeconomic class in 1920.
Like damn, I know Rankin-Bass looks kind of hokey these days because stop-motion has evolved a lot and their teeth decisions were...interesting, but fuck, I think they may deserve more respect than we're accustomed to giving them.
Two identical infants lay in the cradle. “One you bore, the other is a Changeling. Choose wisely,” the Fae’s voice echoed from the shadows. “I’m taking both my children,” the mother said defiantly.
Once upon a time there was a peasant woman who was unhappy because she had no children. She was happy in all other things – her husband was kind and loving, and they owned their farm and had food and money enough. But she longed for children.
She went to church and prayed for a child every Sunday, but no child came. She went to every midwife and wise woman for miles around, and followed all their advice, but no child came.
So at last, though she knew of the dangers, she drew her brown woolen shawl over her head and on Midsummer’s Eve she went out to the forest, to a certain clearing, and dropped a copper penny and a lock of her hair into the old well there, and she wished for a child.
“You know,” a voice said behind her, a low and cunning voice, a voice that had a coax and a wheedle and a sly laugh all mixed up in it together, “that there will be a price to pay later.”
She did not turn to look at the creature. She knew better. “I know it,” she said, still staring into the well. “And I also know that I may set conditions.”
“That is true,” the creature said, after a moment, and there was less laugh in its voice now. It wasn’t pleased that she knew that. “What condition do you set? A boy child? A lucky one?”
“That the child will come to no harm,” she said, lifting her head to stare into the woods. “Whether I succeed in paying your price, or passing your test, or not, the child will not suffer. It will not die, or be hurt, or cursed with ill luck or any other thing. No harm of any kind.”
“Ahhhhh.” The sound was long and low, between a sigh and a hum. “Yes. That is a fair condition. Whatever price there is, whatever test there is, it will be for you and you alone.” A long, slender hand extended into her sight, almost human save for the skin, as pale a green as a new leaf. The hand held a pear, ripe and sweet, though the pears were nowhere ripe yet. “Eat this,” the voice said, and she trembled with the effort of keeping her eyes straight ahead. “All of it, on your way home. Before you enter your own gate, plant the core of it beside the gate, where the ground is soft and rich. You will have what you ask for.”
Keep reading
Technically true.
He got the job.
He takes his job seriously.
Prof Rad over on youtube dubbed the Wolf Hunter comic (click here)!
Go check it out and give them some support! :) (also the end killed me haha) ₍ᐢ•ﻌ•ᐢ₎
The farmer sheared the sheep, and it was used to make a gift for Wolf Hunter, so…
Wolf Hunter goes to the village markets.
Wolf Hunter and his conga line of sheep.
Wolf Hunter was looking for them for a while.
Not a werewolf.
The disappearance. 🐑
The worst snowman.
audio On 😂😂😂
Too bad the prophet Cassandra never met Odysseus
They say if she made a prophecy Nobody would believe her
I’ve gotta say, that is exactly the kind of stupid thing that probably would circumvent a curse.
Cassandra: YOU ARE ALL GOING TO REGRET THIS SO MUCH YOU DON’T EVEN KNOW.
Odysseus: Regret it why?
Cassandra: You won’t believe me if I tell you. If I prophecy, nobody believes me. That is my curse.
Odysseus: … I’m Nobody. Fill me in.
*A couple of months later*
Odysseus: HELLO PENELOPE, I AM HERE PRECISELY ON TIME AND NOT YEARS LATE incidentally I rescued and adopted a Trojan seer while I was away, she’s great, got me home really fast, Cassandra this is your new mother who’s not going to treat you like shit.
Penelope: … I’m going to need more details, but okay, sure.
Cassandra: *in tears* I love you, new family.
Cassandra: Penelope, I’ve had another vision.
Penelope, sighs: Go tell your father.
the original? on my dash?
My mother makes and sells beautiful handfelted woolen animals, but AI-generated listings have clogged Etsy’s feed and destroyed her business. For the first time approaching the holidays she has zero orders.
Please take a look if you need a gift idea. They are truly extraordinary pieces.
The BramblyWoods
Please, tell your mom that her creations are absolutely beautiful. It may be a good idea to move anywhere away from etsy, it seems that marketplace is just dead.
Wish i didn't live on another side if the world :/
Sadly there aren’t great alternatives to Etsy right now. She needs a good social media presence so she can run an independent shop but she’s not social media savvy. She does, however, ship anywhere in the world!
I saw on another Tumblr post a while back that go imagine is trying to be what Etsy was supposed to be originally. I don't know how much it a user base they've actually cultivated though. Maybe something to look into?
Shop Handmade | Shop Local | Shop with Purpose
Well, they can't have a user base if nobody knows about them, so let's get it out there!
Zoom in on every page of this legendary illuminated manuscript.
BOOK OF KELLS BOOK OF KELLS BOOK OF KELLS BOOK OF KELLS
I talked with someone who works in book publishing, and they mentioned they get a lot of AI slop these days. I asked how they know what's human-written, and they said that there's one thing that will reveal AI slop without error, and that's the author not knowing their own creation.
A real author can talk about their story for hours. They love to elaborate every character, every twist, every detail. Because those existed in their head long before they ever made it to the paper. They were loved before they were written.
AI slop wasn't. It was just vomited into existence.
Someone who generates their story with AI will never bond with their story the way real writers do. That's why they may not know what to say when they're asked why did the character do this, or even remember the scene in the first place. It's something they read, not something they wrote. And to a writer, those are not the same.
There's a unique bond between the creator and the creation. If your writing doesn't come of you, you'll always lack that.
I keep hearing soon we won't be able to tell. And perhaps, in a superficial sense, that's true. But there is a difference. It's not em dashes or repeated words. It's whether the story was made by someone who loves it and cares about it.
If the writer's eyes light up when asked why did the character do that? and they start their very own Ted Talk about that specific scene...
then it's real.
optical lissuion #vangogh #art #illusion #marriageproposals #nfl