I translated the Ea-Nasir complaint into vulcan and engraved it in on a cooper plate
The tumblrest sentence I have ever seen
Claire Keane
Jules of Nature
sheepfilms

roma★

⁂

oozey mess

ellievsbear
No title available
cherry valley forever
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
Cosmic Funnies
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Stranger Things
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
𓃗
occasionally subtle
🪼

Discoholic 🪩

tannertan36

Janaina Medeiros

seen from Switzerland

seen from T1
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Belgium
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Japan
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Morocco
seen from United States

seen from T1

seen from United States
@a-random-fandom-friend
I translated the Ea-Nasir complaint into vulcan and engraved it in on a cooper plate
The tumblrest sentence I have ever seen
you would think, like, "oh, we've already thought of all the metaphorical ways we can say penis/vagina. we've already come up with the full list of nicknames. we have exhausted the list of innuendos. there is nothing else new to be said about this" and then you'll open a random explicit fic and make the most improbable linguistic discovery of all time
would you like to share with the class 🤔
saw the term "gummy walls" last night and had to sit alone with god for a minute
would you like to unshare with the class
Nick Valentine
Concept art for Fallout 4
Art by Ray Lederer
Nick Valentine
Concept art for Fallout 4
Art by Ray Lederer
House of Leaves really made a comparison between Karen Green and Navidson's (lack of) sex and Navidson's compulsion to enter that hallway and I'm expected to be NORMAL about that.
I keep seeing every one talking about The “Scorsese- directed” Goncharov, but it was only produced by Martin Scorsese. It was directed by Mateo JWHJ0715: curious name on it’s own, but the fact that no one has ever actually laid claim to the directors credit is it’s own baffling puzzle.
If it’s a pseudonym for Scorsese himself, why would he attach his name as a presenter but not the director? I think Mateo JWHJ0715 may actually be an “Alan Smithee” for the underappreciated Will Navidson, best known for his work, The Navidson Record. My argument is this: 1. Most of Navidson’s work was documentary, and the camera work in Goncharov has a very documentary style, particularly “Ice Pick” Joe’s first on screen kill, and the infamous cigar scene. 2. Karen Green had a quiet yet deep friendship with Marisa Mell before her tumultuous marriage to Will Navidson. This isn’t really evidence, but it is very coincidental.
3. It seems unlikely that Navidson would never explore fiction, but if he lacked confidence in his work, it does seem likely he would try to use a pseudonym on his first attempt.
4.The use of space and time. One of Navidson’s hallmarks was his use of space and time as themes throughout his entire oeuvre. The still shots of clocks in Goncharov are almost completely mirrored in the first half of the Navidson Record. And in fact, in the Navidson record, the space seems to embiggen as we approach the end of the film, which is completely reversed from Goncharov’s ending. The third act feels compressed and claustrophobic, taking place almost exclusively indoors. Even the few outdoor scenes are so close to the actors, it feels intrusive. The end shot closes from Goncharov’s office up on Goncharov himself, until the camera pans to the knife and lingers leaves the audience with the feeling of also being caught up in the Italian/Russian mafia drama.
I realize most of this is circumstantial and assumptive, but until Mateo JWHJ0715 steps forward and claims the credit due, I will believe this was directed by the great, missing Will Navidson.
House of Leaves muppet musical adaptation
Kermit the Frog as Will “Navy” Navidson
Fozzie Bear as Tom Navidson
Miss Piggy as Karen Green
Sam the Eagle as Holloway
Wax and Jed are fused into a single character played by Rizzo the Rat
Chad and Daisy are fused into a single character played by Robin
Bunsen and Beaker as Billy Reston
Gonzo the Great as Johnny Truant
Pepe the King Prawn as Lude
Waldorf and Statler as Zampanò (providing a sarcastic narration to Will’s misadventures)
The Swedish Chef as that one guy that beats the shit out of Lude.
Johnny’s many love interests are played by chickens.
Thumper is played by Animal in drag. Everyone just rolls with it.
Dr Teeth as Johnny’s boss, with the other members of the Electric Mayhem being the different customers of the tattoo studio.
Sweetums as that one big custodian at the beginning.
Scooter is there. I don’t know what he does but he’s there. Crazy Harry blows something up also.
The one human actor is Willem Dafoe, who plays the Minotaur. He wears a black bodysuit that only leaves his face visible and all he does is perform a horrible little dance every time a character alludes to the Minotaur. He never interacts with anyone or says anything at all.
Many critics of The Navidson Record have humorously added lines in their reviews about the comparative youth of the so-called characters depicted within. A line that is quoted consistently throughout papers is David Kahn's iconic phrase: "Karen Green, a 37 year old woman, should not have been within the depths of that house. Being youthful, she should have instead been at the club."⁶⁹ Several responses to this paper have pointed out that just prior to the filming of The Navidson Record, Karen Green had been attending numerous clubs.⁷¹
⁶⁹ See David Kahn's Ramblings and Blatherings about Ash Tree Lane, Tumbler Magazine, August 8th, 1994, reprinted December 16th, 2022⁷⁰
⁷⁰ Club, my ass. Lude tried to take me there last night. He called me and said something along the lines of "we should go out tonight, Hoss--coke'll be cheap." I can't remember now. I just thought about the club, and it made me think about the poles there, pillars, like Greek architecture, monster and mansion combined. I didn't sleep. I told him I'd be there, but I didn't show up. He didn't call back when I didn't show. Something's tearing apart my seams. Unraveling me like a ball of thread. I'm tired of this cat that's playing with me. The claws are sinking in, tearing neon markers... Five more minutes.
And I'll be there.
⁷¹ Expanded on further in Chapter IX.
like karen green and will navidson are like zampano's blorbos from his movie. And johnny truant inherited them
2026 book bingo is here!
join @madame-ellunas-moonlit-readings book bingo discord server here!
and play along on storygraph here, thanks to @obi-wann-cannoli!
helpful tips:
Only books finished in 2026 count for the sheet. You can start planning in December of 2025 and even start reading if you want but you better wait until January to finish that book before you cross it off your sheet.
The bingo is designed to be played in such a way that every book you read will only be counted for one square. Even if you read a great science fiction manga with a bright pink cover that’s twice your age and comes highly recommended by your librarian, the idea is to pick just one square to cross off, not all five. The goal of this game isn't to fill the board with as few books as possible; it's to expand your reading habits with lots of unique books.
In general, there are two guiding principles behind these prompts: having fun and trying new things. Hopefully those can go together as much as possible!
If you're stressing about whether something does it doesn't qualify, or worrying about how fast you read, or sad that you might not clear the whole board or get a bingo, remember #1: this is for fun.
If you're finding yourself reluctant to look too much outside of your usual kind of reading and try something new, remember #2: this is a good opportunity to read some stuff you might not ever read otherwise. Even if you don't find a brand new fave, at least give it a chance.
Rereading books is fine, but I would personally recommend that rereads are not the majority of your squares in order to follow guiding principle #2.
Fanfic does not qualify, sorry.
Novellas are fine.
Audiobooks are fine.
Reading comics/graphic novels/manga for any of the prompts is fine. Please don't feel you can only count them for the square that's dedicated to them.
This applies to almost every square. There's no limit on how many translated books, banned books, pink-covered books, etc, that you can read. (Frankly I would love to see an all-pink board.)
The only exception is the TTRPG space. Feel free to try out more games, because there are a lot of great ones, but please don't use them for more than the designated space.
I don't use prompts like “queer author,” “disabled author,” “author of color,” etc, because I find it can quickly become rather tokenizing. However, I do strongly encourage participants to be mindful of whose perspectives they are reading, and be cognizant of who’s underrepresented in their literary life. With all the love in my heart, there were a lot of extremely white boards last year. When’s the last time you read a book by a Black woman? A nonbinary author? An author who lives and writes in the Global South? The point of these questions isn’t to make you feel shame over your current reading habits, but to encourage awareness of the way that prevalent societal prejudices may shape your reading without you consciously noticing.
Feel free to incorporate your own extra goals to help structure any efforts to read more diversely. For instance, BookTuber thisstoryaintover set up a 2026 reading challenge that includes reading at least one book by an author of color for every book by a white author. This may be a helpful idea for you to keep in mind if you're hoping to have a diverse book bingo, or you could go all out and try to fill the sheet with only books by authors of color (or queer authors, non-American authors, etc).
Also: you can stack any other reading bingos or challenges with this! I know that I couldn’t stop you anyway, but I just want to be clear that that’s fine with me! I'd love to see any other bingo sheets or challenges you take part in this year so I can steal ideas lmao.
If you have any questions about how to classify a book and the explanations below aren't helping, feel free to check in! My inbox is open for bingo questions all year!
And as always, please please please tag this blog with any progress you're making, pictures of your sheets, or miscellaneous thoughts about your reading. I'd love to see :)
prompt explainers:
1. Short Story Collection: A collection of stories, which are short! They can be any genre you can think of, and many authors will in fact play with a number of different genres in the course of a single collection. Or, if you’d rather sample work from many authors, you can pick up a short story anthology. Some collections I’d recommend are Carmen Maria Machado’s Her Body and Other Parties, ZZ Packer’s Drinking Coffee Elsewhere, Kim Fu’s Lesser Known Monsters of the 21st Century, and Julia Armfield’s salt slow.
2. Microhistory: As a literary term, “microhistory” is used to refer to a nonfiction book that zooms in on the history of a single thing. A good example would be Jamie Loftus’ book Raw Dog: The Naked Truth About Hot Dogs, which traces the evolution of the hot dog as a staple of American culture. if you don’t like hot dogs then there are also microhistories of butter, hair removal, vibrators, candy, jewelry, cleanliness, colors, cannibalism, salt, and almost anything else that you can think of. if it exists, there’s a historian who’s obsessed with it! You can find lists of suggestions here, here, and here, but don’t overthink it too hard. as long as you’re looking at a surprisingly specific history, you’re on the right track.
3. Librarian/Bookseller Recommendation: Why not ask for a recommendation from the people who think about books for a living? One of my favorite ways to discover new books is by asking an employee what book they’ve enjoyed lately every time I visit a new indie bookstore while traveling. Personally I strongly recommend striking up a conversation in person, but if that’s a big nope for you, then many libraries and bookstores also list staff picks on their website. You can also try the Indie Next List, a list of recommendations from indie booksellers across the US.
4. Non-European Fantasy: Any fantasy book you like, so long as it’s explicitly modeled on a non-European culture. That could be an alternate world fantasy, such as Tomi Adeyemi’s Yorbua-inspired Children of Blood and Bone, Tasha Suri’s Jasmine Throne, based on ancient India, or Fonda Lee’s Jade City, inspired by post-WW2 China. You could also look for a fantasy set in the modern world, like Darcie Little Badger’s A Snake Falls to Earth, which is steeped in Apache culture, or Zen Cho’s Black Water Sister, which is full of ghosts and spirits in modern Malaysia.
5. Main Character Isn’t Human: This book could be any genre, as long as it meets that one requirement. The MC could be a robot, a dog, an alien, or an elf, so long as they aren’t human. Maybe you’ll check out Martha Wells’ much-loved Murderbot Diaries, or take a walk through LA with the mountain lion star of Henry Hoke’s Open Throat. For the nonfiction enjoyers out there, you could check out Dr. Moiya McTier’s The Milky Way, which is narrated from the perspective of the galaxy itself.
6. 2025 Award Winner: You know, any book that won an award in 2025. It doesn’t matter what award; any prize will qualify! You can see recipients of some major awards here, or check out some others: the Lambda Literary Awards for LGBTQ+ works, the Ignyte Awards for speculative work by authors of color, the Romance Novelists’ Association’s awards for the best romance novels of the year, or the Transfeminine Review’s Reader’s Choice Awards for books by and about transfemmes. Hell, if you really need to scrape the bottom of the barrel, even Goodreads has awards. Go find yourself a winner!
7. Independently Published or Self Published: Did you guys know that just five publishing companies (Penguin Random House, HarperCollins Publishers, Macmillan Publishers, Simon & Schuster, and Hachette Book Group) are responsible for 80% of books published in the US each year, and 25% of books globally? Check out their many, many publishing imprints here to see just how much of the market they have cornered. For 2026, I encourage everyone to break away from the Big Five and see what some small presses and independent authors are putting out! If you need some ideas about where to start, check out this list of over 250 independent publishers, complete with notes on what kind of books they put out!
8. College or University Setting: A book set (primarily) at a college or a university! That’s the only rule! Institutions of higher learning, dramatic as they are, span every genre, leaving you endless options: check out Ali Hazelwood’s collegiate athlete romance The Deep End, Tracy Deonn’s Arthurian urban fantasy Legendborn, Elaine Hsieh Chou’s grad school satire Disorientation, the magical 1830s Oxford of R.F. Kuang’s Babel, or the OG of dark academia herself, Donna Tartt’s The Secret History.
9. Literary Fiction: At Writer’s Digest, Michael Woodson describes literary fiction as “less of a genre than a category,” which “focuses on style, character, and theme over plot.” My recommendations include Raven Leilani’s Luster, The Death of Vivek Oji by Akwaeke Emezi, and Melissa Broder’s Milk Fed, and Martyr! by Kaveh Akbar. You can catch some more recommendations in these linked videos from thisstoryaintover and What Rae Reads.
10. Blurb Buddies: This is one of my favorite additions to this year's book bingo, because it’s totally impossible to plan for. To find your blurb buddy, pick any other book you're reading for 2026 Book Bingo and find a blurb on the cover. (For those who may be unfamiliar, blurbs are those little quotes that hype the book up, often written by people whose books that are vaguely similar.) Find a blurb from an author you've never read, and go read one of their books. That's your blurb buddy!
11. A Book About Music: There are countless ways for a book to be about music. Maybe you want to read the biography of your favorite messy band, or the history of a particular genre. Or maybe you would prefer a magical, musical mystery set in New Orleans, like in Alex Jennings’ The Ballad of Perilous Graves, or country singers falling in love, as in Regina Black’s August Lane. Heck, maybe you actually want to read a giant coffee table book with the lyrics to every Beyoncé song cover to cover. What counts as “about” music is up to you; all I’m asking is that it plays some kind of central role in whatever you read. Find the song in your bookish heart!
12. Not Originally Published in English: I really hope it goes without saying that great books are published in every language. It’s totally fine to fulfill this prompt by reading a book that has since been translated into English–I know that’s what I’ll be doing, since that’s the only language I can read–as long as it was originally published in any other language on Earth. A couple of my favorite authors in translation are Mariana Enriquez (translated from Spanish by Megan McDowell) and Sayaka Murata (translated from Japanese by Ginny Tapley Takemori). You can get more ideas from the International Booker Prize, which is awarded annually to books translated into English.
13. Pink Cover: The cover has to be pink. Or at least mostly pink. That’s it!
14. Read + Play a TTRPG: You know what takes a hell of a lot of skill to write? Tabletop roleplaying games. You should read one–and, even better, you should play one. And don’t feel restrained to the most well-known games, either–Monster of the Week, Vampire: The Masquerade, and Call of Cthulhu are cool, but they’re hardly the only games out there. If you’re not in the mood to learn a lot of rules, why not check out a game like Lasers and Feelings or Time To Drop, or the many hacks of both games? You could play Dread, which uses a Jenga tower in place of dice or any other tools, or Let These Mermaids Touch Your Dick Maybe, which requires sticky hands and a dildo to play. No friends? No problem! Try a journaling game like Who Killed God?, Apothecaria, or Thousand Year Old Vampire. You could even give some fellow Tumblrinas a little love by playing games like @that-house’s Oh Fuck, The Killer! or @takataapui’s it is a beautiful day on the marae and you are a baby pūkeko. Hell, if you really want to be a suckup you could even buy Imagine Queer Worlds, the game I co-authored, which uses a deck of cards to help you brainstorm news norms for sexuality and gender in fictional settings.
15. Twice Your Age (At Least): This one will be a little bit personalized to every person who participates, since I’m making the very bold assumption that we’re not all the same age. I will personally need to find a book that’s (at least) 58 years old, which means that the MOST RECENTLY it can be published is 1968, but your cutoff date will likely be different. If you want to go way into the past and play it safe with something like Shakespeare or the Odyssey, that’s absolutely fine, or you could challenge yourself to find something from your exact cutoff year. Either is great, and that’s why the “at least” is there.
16. Historical Fantasy: For our purposes, this is going to be fantasy that takes place in the real world, during real historical events, with a dash of the fantastical mixed in. Think of Leslyle Penelope’s The Monsters We Defy, which brings spirits and curses to 1920s Washington, D.C.; Shannon Chakraborty’s Adventures of Amina al-Sirafi, where 12th century pirates clash with monsters and magic; or Naomi Novik’s His Majesty’s Dragon, which adds (get this) dragons to the Napoleonic Wars. Once again: real history, fake magic. You got this!
17. 2026 Debut Author: You know, an author who’s publishing their first book ever in 2026. Show them some support! No idea how to go about finding debut authors? 2026debuts.com has you covered.
18. Challenged or Banned: If you care enough about books to participate in this bingo and you happen to live in the US, you probably know that we’re still mired by attempts to ban or restrict access to books from school and public libraries across the country. Some of the most frequently targeted books are those that deal heavily with trans and gay identities, racial inequality, and depictions of sexuality. In recent years, the three most challenged books in the United States were George M. Johnson’s All Boys Aren’t Blue, Mariam Kobabe’s Gender Queer, and Toni Morrison’s The Bluest Eye. I recommend learning a little about what’s being challenged in your area, especially since book bans don’t only happen in America, but if you’re unable to find anything specific to where you live, this list of books banned in Texas schools will give you over 2000 options to pick from.
19. Cultural Nonfiction: This isn’t strictly an existing genre name, so I’ve kind of invented it for the sake of this bingo. Basically, here’s what I want you to do: find a work of nonfiction about a culture that you’re not part of–it could be folks of a different nationality, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation or gender identity, you name it. Any group that’s different from you in some way! If you, like me, are not a gay man, you might enjoy Jeremy Atherton Lin’s Gay Bar: Why We Went Out, following the history and significance of gay bars. Or, if you happen not to be Black and disabled, you may want to check out Sami Schalk’s Black Disability Politics, a history of ways that Black activists have incorporated rights for disabled people into the fight for racial justice. If you aren’t Filipino, I can recommend Anthony Christian Ocampo’s The Latinos of Asia: How Filipino Americans Break the Rules of Race. I’m trying not to predict my own bingo reading too much this year, but I think I’ll probably be checking out Gregory D. Smithers’ Reclaiming Two-Spirits: Sexuality, Spiritual Renewal & Sovereignty in Native America.
20: Gothic Fiction: This is self-indulgent, because I’m getting waaaay into Gothic fiction right now and I want to bring you with me. Gothic fiction is distinct from horror but has a lot in common with it–some of the earliest examples are Frankenstein, Dracula, and Carmilla, after all. This is a genre that doesn’t necessarily need real monsters, but is still obsessed with haunting, fear, and, often, the secret horrors hidden in very specific locations: think of Emily Brontë Wuthering Heights, Shirley Jackson’s The Haunting of Hill House, the beautiful Manderly from Daphne du Maurier’s Rebecca, or the grief-filled 124 Bluestone Road in Toni Morrison’s Beloved. Contemporary Gothic novels are also alive and well, including Silvia Moreno-Garcia’s Mexican Gothic, Isabel Cañas’ The Possession of Alba Díaz, and M.M. Olivas’ Sundown in San Ojuela.
21. Read It + Do It: Have you ever been so inspired by reading about someone else describing an activity they love that you decided to try it yourself? The goal of this space is exactly what it sounds like: read about something in someone else’s words, then do it. It could be as straightforward as following the instructions for a recipe or a crochet project; that’s totally allowed! Or you could, say, start walking more after reading Rebecca Solnit’s Wanderlust, get inspired by Jamaica Kincaid’s My Garden (Book) to grow your own plants, or let Christian Cooper’s Better Living Through Birding get you in the habit of identifying birds you see. You don’t need to be good at the thing or make it a lifelong habit, but at least try it once!
22. Science Fiction: For anyone brand new here, allow me to offer you a Wikipedia definition of science fiction: “Science fiction (often shortened to sci-fi or abbreviated SF) is the genre of speculative fiction that imagines advanced and futuristic scientific or technological progress. The elements of science fiction have evolved over time: from space exploration, extraterrestrial life, time travel, and robotics; to parallel universes, dystopian societies, and biological manipulations; and, most lately, to information technology, transhumanism (and posthumanism), and environmental challenges. Science fiction often specifically explores human responses to the consequences of these types of projected or imagined scientific advances.” For your own reading, you could check out anything from the low-tech dystopia of Octavia E. Butler’s Parable of the Sower to the high-tech near-utopia of Becky Chambers’ The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet, from the political sci-fi/fantasy blending epic of Xiran Jay Zhao’s Iron Widow to the contemporary horrors of Jessamine Chan’s The School for Good Mothers.
23. Manga, Comic, or Graphic Novel: The world is your oyster here, kiddo. There’s a big, big world out there outside of superhero comics (although Cliff Chiang’s Catwoman: Lonely City is great), so if that doesn’t float your boat then let’s get looking elsewhere! There’s a manga, comic, or graphic novel out there to suit every possible taste. As always, I heartily recommend Ryoko Kui’s Dungeon Meshi–all fourteen volumes.
24. Romance: Per the Romance Writers of America, a book has two central requirements to qualify it as a romance novel: a main plot that involves characters falling in love and figuring out how to make their relationship work, and an ending that is “emotionally satisfying and optimistic”--that is, a happily ever after (HEA). A book that just happens to contain a romance subplot won’t do, and neither will one where the characters are torn apart at the last minute for a tragic ending. ROMANCE. Some widely-loved titles from the last few years are Akwaeke Emezi’s You Made a Fool of Death With Your Beauty, Tia Williams’ A Love Song for Ricki Wilde, and Emily Henry’s Funny Story. You might also have fun browsing the micro collections curated by the romance podcast Fated Mates, which includes collections of books basketball romances, books with heroes who have spectacular mustaches, and one simply titled “Asian Romances That Fuck.”
25. Writer Bio/Memoir: Listen, I know what you’re going to say: “Obviously if someone’s written a memoir, then they’re a writer.” So let me clarify that this is specifically about people who are (or were) known for writing, who then wrote a memoir or had a biography written about them. They don’t need to be famous, but they do need to be some kind of writer–an author, an essayist, a poet, a journalist, a playwright, a ghostwriter–by trade. Think of bios like Susana M. Morris’ Positive Obsession: The Life and Times of Octavia E. Butler and Caroline Fraser’s Prairie Fires: The American Dreams of Laura Ingalls Wilder, or memoirs like Jesmyn Ward’s The Men We Reaped and Arundhati Roy’s Mother Mary Comes to Me.
House of Leaves except Will is incapacitated at the end of the story and Karen finished the "Navidson" records, publishing them to little acclaim until she attaches Will's name to the project as his "final" project before incapacitation and only then is the project is critically academically received
Karen Green from House of Leaves i would kill for you
Backrooms movie spoilers! And probably also House of Leaves spoilers too. Big long analysis post under the cut.
I thought for that whole movie about the parallels between Clark and Will Navidson. Both escaping their problems in the tangible reality by throwing themselves into the nebulous unknown of a construct of their own minds. Both stepping on everyone around them as if people are nothing but tools to further their own goals. Both driven deeper and deeper into the labyrinth, pursued by the dark manifestation of their deepest repressions. They are one and the same.
But it only just now clicked for me. The memory in the wheelchair is Reston. Maybe not him as his role was in HOL. But it's a reference to him.
Bobby and Kat are Wax and Jed, the hesitant documenters.
Barbara is Karen Green, the strained relationship who got left behind amidst the chaos of Clark's/Navidson's self-righteousness.
The twisted backrooms version of Clark is, of course, the Minotaur: the self-imposed manifestation of paranoia and guilt and fear.
The entrance to the backrooms is bordered in blue, much like how the house is outlined in the book.
The psychologist who narrates passages from her book is Zampanô, the lens through which to analyze the nature of the space itself.
And all of that leaves Mary, as an outsider looking in, trying to understand through Clark's words alone, and twisted unrecognizably through time and space amidst intersplices of her own troubled past. It didn't hit me until later.
Mary is Johnny Truant. Her mother, Pelafina. She has trauma of her own that haunts her like a vulture. The memories we see of her childhood home are eerily similar to the apartment Johnny caged himself in while trying to analyze Zampanô's manuscript. The pages taped to the windows are rather on the nose, a metaphorical thing for Johnny becoming a physical thing for Mary.
We don't see much of Mary beyond these sparse intersplices. It's a far cry from Johnny's role in House of Leaves. But perhaps Backrooms needed to place itself primarily in Clark's perspective in order to give us the ending it did. An ending that is reminiscent of HOL's, with the house simply dissolving into nothing, and Navidson's strained relationships magically resolving. It's an ending that he would have liked to have happen, but one that likely didn't, if Johnny's paralleled admission of a lie is to be believed. Backrooms' is far less ambiguous, placing itself firmly in the stance of 'Navidson is an unreliable narrator who tried to lie to you'.
Mary never entered the backrooms. Clark only imagined she did. She existed as a memory, a twisted reflection of what he wanted from her: a therapist who would ease his guilt and tell him he was right. Clark never even managed to leave the backrooms to call her. And nobody defeated his Minotaur.
There is no sense to be had in the backrooms. There is no resolution to be found. There's not even a monster to slay. Everyone's deaths and everyone's misfortune was at the hands of Clark alone, blinded by his own fantasies and hubris.
There are gaps missing. There is no Holloway (even if you could argue Clark embodies some of his traits), no Tom, no Thumper (though perhaps she exists in some form offscreen. After all, we didn't get to see much of Mary). Backrooms isn't all-encompassing. But enough is there to make it something to talk about.
"if x-rays are safe why do technicians run and hide behind a shield" well if you ate one banana you would be fine. if you had to eat a banana for every single person who came through your practice every day for your entire career, you would probably not feel too good. kinda wild that many people are hung up on this.
to be fair the difference between "should you eat one (1) banana" vs "should you eat one banana every 10-15 minutes for 8 hours straight" is how you get studies like "aspartame causes cancer" so maybe we're kind of fuzzy on this sort of thing in general