Abstractlime @abstractlime - Tumblr Blog

in front of you there are two bottles of poison. one of them is green and is labeled "green poison" and the other is purple and labeled "purple poison".

which bottle of poison will you drink?

the green poison

the purple poison

I will not be drinking either bottle of poison

Remaining time: 23 hours 15 minutes

jeekoftheweek

hungwy

Disney deleting baba Yaga

In recent turn of events Disney has reacted to copyright violations by removing baba Yaga, popularized by the film star wars. Beloved by all, baba Yaga had taken the world by storm. It had trended Twitter’s top tags for many weeks. Yet Disney is deleting baba Yaga. What will become of it? Once beloved by all, recent turn of events has seen Twitter’s once top trender get removed due to copyright. Savor baba Yaga while you can!

ceferix

I’m no longer sure we’re talking about the same thing

hungwy

Who is bab Yaga?

Who’s baba Yaga?

baba Yaga (not Yaga as a baba, but a baba version of Yaga) which is probably very important. She served the forest, and died due to Disney deleting baba Yaga. We know virtually nothing about the baba Yaga.

We do know that baba Yaga possessed powers. We’ll get to that later.

In the forest, we were on a mission to find our target, only knowing her location and that her is 50 years old. We came across our target only to realize that it’s a baba: the baba Yaga. Most likely baba Yaga is rare and special, since we kills in order to save her.

If baba Yaga is strong, then she could maybe that’s why the Disney scientist is so interested in destroying baba Yaga (does he want to experiment on her?). We must! Keep! baba Yaga! Safe!

You know this.

smoqueen-deactivated20251108

Hey,.. if you were thinking about having sex today, I'm nonbinary fortnite.

vedurnan

human and bug relations will change by the end of the century

yaldabaothadeez

(source - liminA on Pixiv (comission))

rebecca black was right. It’s Friday

thediaryofhenry

Give him a minute he's running a software update

kristina100000

if you got a problem with me its your probble

imparcana

i get to be a woman. I get to be an adult and a woman!!

imparcana

I'm alive. I'm alive I am alive! I'm alive and I'm a woman!!!

ape-of-naples

lmao

ape-of-naples

come on

maxknightley

"of course this is a valid historical source. it says 'this happened' right there at the top of the page."

pixiecatsupreme

This is really funny considering the bible was retranslated multiple times before being translated to English

jingerpi

well many modern translations use much earlier versions to source their translation - it's not exactly a game of telephone once we have the written record, though the written record we do have starts some time after the actual events depicted so yeah there is a decent gap. still though, it's funny for a lot of reasons

1. it's just not true, there's other more reliable accounts from the time period

2. the Bible is written by a lot of different people with different levels of credibility. a lot of the attributed authors are also wrong, and many are written by someone other than the claimed author

3. some of the books that claim to be written by different authors as evidence to multiple eyewitness testimonies (the gospels), are actually so similar in account, scholars generally agree that there was another single source (called Q) which they all drew from instead

4. entirely ignores that the Bible claims dead people can come back to life and that divine beings are real, among other things. if even a modern text claimed this we would probably dismiss it because of how absurd and unlikely it is. even if the Bible were relatively reliable otherwise, the claims it makes are not remotely comparable to other historical accounts which recount you know, normal stuff that we see happen regularly