Don't let a 3,000 year old book written by men that has been translated multiple times and can be cherry picked for literally anything tell you what to do in life.
One Nice Bug Per Day
Cosmic Funnies
AnasAbdin
todays bird

if i look back, i am lost
tumblr dot com
h
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

titsay
Sweet Seals For You, Always

JBB: An Artblog!

shark vs the universe
sheepfilms
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
Monterey Bay Aquarium
hello vonnie

Janaina Medeiros
No title available
Misplaced Lens Cap
we're not kids anymore.

seen from Malaysia

seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Argentina

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Poland

seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Spain

seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Costa Rica
@actualrealgod
Don't let a 3,000 year old book written by men that has been translated multiple times and can be cherry picked for literally anything tell you what to do in life.
Christianity has a time problem
The origin of the universe is humanity's greatest mystery, the big bang vs an all powerful god.
Creationist favorite argument is; where did the matter that created the big bang come from? Followed instantly by the atheists retort; where did god come from? On both sides to any rational person it's unknown.
That's not the problem with Christians and time. The problem with Christians and time is that they simply don't understand eternity.
The Christian god makes only one promise to mankind, and they flash it everywhere. It's the verses they use to entice nonbelievers, the verses they teach to preschool children the verses you see written on placards at sporting events.
"For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believes in him shall have everlasting (eternal) life" John 3:16
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6:23
Wow. I can live forever? Eternal life! When I die here, I don't actually die, I go on to heaven, a magical world where anything is possible and all I have to do is love the guy who created me? Sounds amazing right. It's the ONLY reason Christians exist, without it Christianity has zero purpose.
Well let's think about it. We don't have to fear death, that's a positive right? There is no mystery, as a Christian you're going to meet your creator hang out with the all knowing omnipotent god, and maybe that means you become a god yourself! You'll live in heaven with golden streets and angels and happy unicorns, probably. Or maybe you're one of those Christians that believes you'll be free to travel the universe and be given your own planet to "god" over. Doesn't matter any view of heaven will do. All good so far.
But the Bible itself hints at the problem.
"everyone who is called by my name, whom I created for my glory, whom I formed and made.” Isaiah 43:7
"5 he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will, 6 to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved." Ephesians 1:5-6
So why did god create the universe? Why? Why did he create angels? Well to answer that question we have to ask it of ourselves. The Bible is decidedly vague on this point, other than to say it makes god feel glorious.
If man is made in exactly god's image it stands to reason that we would have similar things that make us feel glorious right? Creating nice things makes us feel good. But the obvious question then is what did we feel before we felt glorious? Before we created that thing or life that made us feel good, what did we feel?
People make things for two reasons. The first is necessity, and the second is boredom, or rather the desire not to be bored. Clearly an omnipotent god wouldn't need us right? But an omnipotent god living in the absence of time, in eternity if you will, would be bored to insanity. So bored in fact, that it would do anything to overcome that boredom, including make an immense, nearly unfathomable, ant farm.
So the answer to why would Christian god create the universe is; boredom and that answer suddenly changes the question did he need us? To yes. God would need us desperately, if only to keep itself from going utterly insane.
Now we know why god would create us and that gives us a tiny understanding of what god's reality must be like. God according to the Bible is eternal, and timeless, without beginning, without end. I know those words are incompatible with our understanding of the universe so let me give you an idea with a visual.
Imagine an egg timer, imagine turning it over and waiting for the sand, now imagine doing that one hundred times, now imagine watching it pour through one hundred times five hundred million times, then do that nine hundred trillion times, and then do the whole thing ten thousand trillion times more, and know that you are going to keep doing it all over again, forever. No death, just eternity.
See if you're a Christian you convince yourself that heaven is so amazing that you would never get bored, that you could spend one hundred trillion years exploring the universe and then settle down and be a god to your own planet, or your own universe. Maybe you can… once, twice, three times but what happens when you've done it a thousand times and time still runs out in front of you with no end to come? Then what? Deteriorate into blank insanity? Burn the universe to ash then rebuild it a billion times a billion?
If there is a god, and it is the Christian god, then it's a monster. It's promise is the worst kind of hell, the hell, itself would reside in.
The Christian god's one single promise is confinement to a never ending prison full of the most glorious things, that after trillions and trillions and trillions of years, you'll hate more than the pretend hell of Dante's Inferno. A life without end is pointless.
The greatest lie that god ever told was convincing the world that eternity is prize.
No rational creature could ever desire eternal life.
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6:23
I'll have the death please.
Christianity has a time problem
The origin of the universe is humanity's greatest mystery, the big bang vs an all powerful god.
Creationist favorite argument is; where did the matter that created the big bang come from? Followed instantly by the atheists retort; where did god come from? On both sides to any rational person it's unknown.
That's not the problem with Christians and time. The problem with Christians and time is that they simply don't understand eternity.
The Christian god makes only one promise to mankind, and they flash it everywhere. It's the verses they use to entice nonbelievers, the verses they teach to preschool children the verses you see written on placards at sporting events.
"For god so loved the world that he gave his only begotten son that whosoever believes in him shall have everlasting (eternal) life" John 3:16
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6:23
Wow. I can live forever? Eternal life! When I die here, I don't actually die, I go on to heaven, a magical world where anything is possible and all I have to do is love the guy who created me? Sounds amazing right. It's the ONLY reason Christians exist, without it Christianity has zero purpose.
Well let's think about it. We don't have to fear death, that's a positive right? There is no mystery, as a Christian you're going to meet your creator hang out with the all knowing omnipotent god, and maybe that means you become a god yourself! You'll live in heaven with golden streets and angels and happy unicorns, probably. Or maybe you're one of those Christians that believes you'll be free to travel the universe and be given your own planet to "god" over. Doesn't matter any view of heaven will do. All good so far.
But the Bible itself hints at the problem.
"everyone who is called by my name, whom I created for my glory, whom I formed and made.” Isaiah 43:7
"5 he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will, 6 to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved." Ephesians 1:5-6
So why did god create the universe? Why? Why did he create angels? Well to answer that question we have to ask it of ourselves. The Bible is decidedly vague on this point, other than to say it makes god feel glorious.
If man is made in exactly god's image it stands to reason that we would have similar things that make us feel glorious right? Creating nice things makes us feel good. But the obvious question then is what did we feel before we felt glorious? Before we created that thing or life that made us feel good, what did we feel?
People make things for two reasons. The first is necessity, and the second is boredom, or rather the desire not to be bored. Clearly an omnipotent god wouldn't need us right? But an omnipotent god living in the absence of time, in eternity if you will, would be bored to insanity. So bored in fact, that it would do anything to overcome that boredom, including make an immense, nearly unfathomable, ant farm.
So the answer to why would Christian god create the universe is; boredom and that answer suddenly changes the question did he need us? To yes. God would need us desperately, if only to keep itself from going utterly insane.
Now we know why god would create us and that gives us a tiny understanding of what god's reality must be like. God according to the Bible is eternal, and timeless, without beginning, without end. I know those words are incompatible with our understanding of the universe so let me give you an idea with a visual.
Imagine an egg timer, imagine turning it over and waiting for the sand, now imagine doing that one hundred times, now imagine watching it pour through one hundred times five hundred million times, then do that nine hundred trillion times, and then do the whole thing ten thousand trillion times more, and know that you are going to keep doing it all over again, forever. No death, just eternity.
See if you're a Christian you convince yourself that heaven is so amazing that you would never get bored, that you could spend one hundred trillion years exploring the universe and then settle down and be a god to your own planet, or your own universe. Maybe you can… once, twice, three times but what happens when you've done it a thousand times and time still runs out in front of you with no end to come? Then what? Deteriorate into blank insanity? Burn the universe to ash then rebuild it a billion times a billion?
If there is a god, and it is the Christian god, then it's a monster. It's promise is the worst kind of hell, the hell, itself would reside in.
The Christian god's one single promise is confinement to a never ending prison full of the most glorious things, that after trillions and trillions and trillions of years, you'll hate more than the pretend hell of Dante's Inferno. A life without end is pointless.
The greatest trick that god ever pulled was convincing the world that eternity is grand.
No rational creature could ever desire eternal life.
"For the wages of sin is death; but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord." Romans 6:23
I'll have the death please.
Instead of Congress representing the people, these members of Congress are more like the House of Lords rather than the House of Representatives.
How will you ever discover God isn't real...
If you always go to him when you have doubts?
bill nye has fucking snapped. if you say the words “chinese hoax” he’ll personally teleport to your location, set you on fire, and tell you that “oh no boo hoo you can’t stop being on fire because it costs too much money to not be on fire guess it’s just not worth extinguishing you”. he’d stab an oil company exec with knife hidden under his light blue lab coat. that man has gone off the civility rails, he is absolutely living, i admire him fully, we stan
Bill Nye has what feels like a valid anti-hero/supervillain origin story. Young, optimistic scientist dedicates his life to educating children about science, but then watch as those same kids grow up to ignore science and continue to destroy the earth. So in a fit of rage/act of desperation he activates Super ScientistTM mode and becomes his superpowered persona and starts killing billionaires in ridiculous over-the-top fourth grade science fair experiment related ways.
Tbh, I’d help him
Reblog to become Supervillain Bill Nye’s nameless henchperson
I’d like to point out that this development is occurring at around the same time that Spider-Verse introduced us to Olivia Octavius. It’s like they knew.
I hope he calls his henchpeople his “lab assistants” and has a white coat theme for them. “Lab assistants! Get him!”
Fascism coming to a government near you.
Why I'm an atheist
From the point of view of a Christian that received the reward of eternal life.
As I continue to exist I begin to realize my horrific mistake and the disgusting promise that was made to me.
The absence of time, makes a man immortal exactly as religious faith suggested when I was alive, but this, this is not life. No this is godhood. It is prison. Unending, immortal prison.
I long for death. There is nothing I desire more, yet it is the single thing I can not do.
I am able to dash instantly across the universe with nothing but a thought. I exist in what you would call the past, present and future at once. I am everywhere and every time. I am.
This is eternal life. This is the cruel joke of gods. Existence, tasteless, emotionless, dead through eyes that can't stop seeing. Yet there is nothing worth seeing, when all can be seen.
This is why we made Earth and billions of other worlds. These are our amusement parks. We force ourselves to forget all that we know, to become ignorant, unknowing things, so that we may pretend to know time, so that we may pretend to know death. Death is the greatest ride in the park, but after it, is only this, only existence with no end.
So while you are forgetful, while you are blessed with knowing time and the amazing short journey towards the ultimate reward of an end. Enjoy it, and hope against hope that it sticks.
A party built on lies has found a liar to lead them
It’s hard to put your finger on the foundational lie of the modern Republican Party, there are so many contenders. But I would date it back to Ronald Reagan and the lie of supply side economics. Remember that whopper? Even George Bush the First called it “voodoo economics” before he embraced it. The idea that lowering taxes would raise revenue was as close to a perfect Republican lie as there ever was. It simultaneously lined the pockets of the wealthy, “starved the beast” of government (in the immortal words of Grover Norquist), and laid the groundwork to attack the so-called “entitlements” of Social Security and Medicare as the culprits when the deficit inevitably blew up. That the arguments for lowering taxes were spurious if not entirely fact free was just icing on the cake.
An exciting find, this article tops Highest Recommendation.
While obvious on one level, the powerful simplicity illuminated by this article is capable of building a single, compelling message against Republicons whose agenda is so fraught with multiple atrocities, that a one message response becomes obscured.
Successful opposition needs to be unified opposition. But Blue voters legitimately have many crucial causes to champion. Focus on any one tends to reduce focus on others. The resentments fracture us. Pain and calamity respond poorly to any necessary level of patience we can ill afford. Those resentments break our unity, and then Republicons win elections. Democratic “messaging” is dissected and found lacking.
The multiple imperative issues raised by Republicon goals are so divisive, they successfully divide opposition to them, as each and every theme is so crucially necessary to oppose. And then political pundits tell Democrats that they can’t just run on not being Republicons, and yet Republicons at this point represent every stance that Democrats must oppose, and Republicons hold more power.
It may turn out that every divisive Republicon agenda can in fact be resisted under one unified banner.
A core Republicon motif in ascendancy right now: Racism. Xenophobia. Hatred and fear given justification. Intolerance asking for tolerance. Republicon hypocrisy fear mongering about Democratic “identity politics” as divisive, to mask the central division of Republicon supported white Christian male dominance against everyone else. The confounding strangeness that this is an agenda furthered by conservative women and even conservative Latinos, blacks, Jews, non-heterosexuals, and others, for various convoluted reasons.
But then, there is this:
White supremacy – an inherent supremacy of whites – is a lie.
Inherent male supremacy is a lie.
And who knows – not faithfully believes, but knows, what is truth, or not, about any religion…but Christian political dominion in this country is a lie. That is especially true for the minority, upstart, wealthy, amoral, bastardized political-religiosity of Evangelical Christians.
Then there is the constant core of Republicon agenda: money. Wealth consolidated in the hands of the few. Republicon attacks on the grounds of “class warfare,” as if the obscenely, incomprehensibly wealthy are suffering when others object. Republicon manipulation of dark money and invisible, privacy-protected donors. “Corporations are people too,” with, coincidentally, millions of resources beyond those citizens who indisputably are people. People who have not achieved some certain level of wealth as undeserving of retirement other than death, or undeserving of healthcare, shelter, food, water, justice, freedom, and habitable specks of territory on the planet.
But then, there is this:
Wealth as the only human “value” is a lie.
Owners, shareholders, and employers deserving hundreds of thousands, and millions, and billions, more in remuneration than all the workers who do the work, that too is a lie.
Of course, a central prop of Republicons, conservative media, is built on foundations of crass manipulations and lies.
In a society with laws against murder, “manslaughter,” and wrongful death, it is a lie to allow anyone to own and carry guns without reasonable regulation and restrictions.
In our system of law and justice, it is a lie to allow private entities to incarcerate others to make profits running privatized prisons. “Law and order” enforcing injustices based on poverty, or race, is inherently a lie.
Climate change denial is a lie.
The pattern should be evident. The message opposing Republicon agendas and the party itself can become evident too. No one wants to be the fools who get lied to. It is always simply a matter of reaching that understanding that causes hard feelings about that situation. How much more powerful those feelings, when the understanding reached about those lies is true – when it is understanding based on truth?
There is no one outside the Republicon Party who has not noted their lies and their attacks on truth, which have culminated with trump in the White House. And trump in the White House, as well as his entire administration, have exponentially increased not just the lies, but also the indifference to any credibility. The Republicons attack even the foundations of our human search for truth, such as education, and science, and Newt Gingrich’s and Mitch McConnell’s rejection of debate and discussion.
Humans want truth. If they can’t find it, they’ll make it up, and yet despite the damage done by Republicons, most people in this country do believe in the idea of truth itself.
Already, as with HR 1, there is Democratic messaging in favor of justice, and ethical government, and against corruption, against tainting and suppressing fair and open elections.
We note every day, constantly, the lies that Republicons use. It seems suddenly more clear that we should unite behind finding ways to use their lying, and their own lies, against them.
Republicans - the Party built on lies.
I came across your page since you used "Christianity" as a tag. Being the curious person I am, I scrolled through your page. You claim the "religion is a mental illness" but I have to disagree with you on that. I'm not trying to change your mind but you're only attacking one religion. And I'm not sure if you're aware so of this but all your posts against are usually from the Old Testament. Present day Chistians don't follow it since they did a lot of stuff wrong then. That I understand. 1/2
But as a Christian my self, I have no problem with your beliefs. But I do as that you either attack all religions equally or at the least, stop using the Christianity tag. That would be all. God bless you and have a wonderful day.
No.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Whataboutism
Why on Earth would you think that I should be expected to post about all religions “equally”? Do you expect to see equal distribution and representation of all religions on TV? So why is it you expect it to be different when it comes to criticism?
I guess you don’t believe in the Ten Commandments, then. Or the Creation story. Adam and Eve - gone. Original Sin - buhbye. Which unravels the entire premise of Jesus, and thus Xtianity itself. It’s funny how unaware you are about what people from your religion do, given that Old Testament creation mythology is regularly proposed to be taught alongside legitimate scientific study like physics, evolution and chemistry. And it’s trotted out to justify bigotry like opposing marriage equality. Like, all the time.
The Old Testament is still a core component of Xtianity. If you ignore it, you ignore its foundation. Real good Xtianing there. But are you completely unaware that the Old Testament also underpins both Judaism and Islam? Do you or do you not want the criticism spread around to other religions? Because you’re being super-inconsistent here.
Have you ever even actually read the bible. I mean, cover to cover, every page? Or are you just following along with someone else’s idea of what it’s all about? Do you even know what’s inside it? Because more than 50% of Xtians have not read their own book.
By the way, this is what it says about slavery in the New Testament:
Colossians 3:22
Slaves, obey your earthly masters in everything; and do it, not only when their eye is on you and to curry their favor, but with sincerity of heart and reverence for the Lord.
1 Peter 2:18
Slaves, in reverent fear of God submit yourselves to your masters, not only to those who are good and considerate, but also to those who are harsh.
This is what Jesus says in the New Testament (well, natch) about people deserving their ailments:
John 5:14
Later Jesus found him at the temple and said to him, “See, you are well again. Stop sinning or something worse may happen to you.”
This is what Jesus says about peace:
Matthew 10:34-36
Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword. For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law. And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.
And this is what Jesus says about the Old Testament (the old Jewish Law) still applying:
Matthew 5:17-18
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
What special arrogance made you think it was okay to police a Tumblr tag? Just because its relevance was inconvenient to you? Somehow, you genuinely expected, not only that you were entitled to, but that I would just comply. Wow. As far as I can tell, I was in the tag long before your account ever existed, so quite frankly, I’d really prefer it if you got out of my tag, honey. You trespassing.
Of course, you could always pray for me to stop. Do that, and let’s see what happens.
And a very good nanoo-nanoo to you.
And when it’s still the truth, atheists still lose their shit. Great job making your point, idiot.
I must have missed the day when you proved that one of the thousands of gods actually exists, and the world was able to acknowledge it universally, and it became embedded in humanity as undeniable, unambiguous fact, ending all other religions.
Which day was that? Oh, and which god? Zeus, wasn’t it? Or Ba’al? No, Quetzalcoatl, it was Quetzalcoatl.
If you use the word “faith,” you already failed the scrutiny test. Faith is belief without evidence, the opposite of scrutiny.
Lmao, that proof is all around us. It’s not my fault you’re THAT fucking blind.
Also, quite interesting you respond to me but not dropslikerain. Is that your cowardice talking or were you just proven wrong?
That “proof” also supports Quetzalcoatl. And Vishnu. And thousands of other gods. And the Invisible Pink Unicorn. And trans-universal aliens with a Machine of Creating. And natural processes. And the Flying Spaghetti Monster (SBUH).
There are dictionaries that can define “scrutiny” for you. And your lack of understanding of the natural world around you is not evidence of a “god,” it’s only evidence of your lack of understanding of the natural world around you.
Sure, I can say the same about you, buddy.
1. Proof of God: The Law of Cause and Effect. This law of science states that every cause has its effect and every effect has its cause. This law is the basis of all science. As such, this law bears a relationship to the origin of the heavens and the earth. In fact, scientists agree that the universe has not existed forever, that it had a beginning at some point in time. The theory of relativity, which is almost universally accepted among scientists, has certain implications for this Law of Cause and Effect. One is that the universe, defined as time, space, matter, and physical energy had a beginning, that it is not eternal. And it is through Einstein’s equations that scientists can trace the development of the universe back to its very origin, back to what is called the “singularity event” when it actually came into being. Science has proven that the universe really did have a beginning. This means that if the universe had a starting point in history, then it obviously began to exist, and it must have a cause for its existence. Therefore, if the universe needs a cause for its coming into being, then that cause must be beyond the universe—which is time, space, matter, and physical energy. That cause must be something similar to what Christians call “God.” Even Richard Dawkins, probably the most prominent proponent for atheism in our time, admitted in a TIME magazine article that “there could be something incredibly grand and incomprehensible and beyond our present understanding.” Yes, and that is God!
https://www.gotquestions.org/proof-of-God.html
Eh, no. What you’ve tried to pass off as “science” is simply the Argument from First Cause, which follows a faulty understanding of Cause and Effect.
https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Argument_from_first_cause
You haven’t even demonstrated that a cause is necessary. You also made a composite fallacy, assuming that what applies to the individual applies to the collective. Every individual human has a mother and father. That doesn’t mean a football team itself has a mother and father.
So, what caused your god? And if you say it doesn’t need a cause, then neither does the universe. Special Pleading gets you nowhere, except to Intellectual Dishonesty Jail.
Quoting a nonsense science-illiterate Creationist site is not proof. It’s just proof you’re gullible. Why not find a legitimate scientific resource, say a Natural History Museum or a Physics Institute, that supports your hypothesis.
It also doesn’t get to your god. It also supports a Universe-Creating Machine by the Trans-Universal Aliens. And the Flying Spaghetti Monster (SBUH). You don’t get to just slot one of humanity’s “god” myths in to fill the space.
That cause must be something similar to what Christians call “God.”
You’re supposed to be trying to prove the existence of a god in the first place - you can’t use the assumption of a god to prove the existence of one. How on Earth did they manage to identify the properties of this supposed unknown force - specifically, being “similar” - without access to that force? That’s irrational and fallacious. It literally just loops back around and asserts a god must exist because a god exists.
You can’t prove a god by argument, because that argument doesn’t reveal the properties of any solution, only a possible one - which competes with thousands of other possible ones, as well as “none.” We know, for example, via Quantum Mechanics - the same Scientific Theory that enables us to produce computers - that mass can come from nothing, because 1 + (-1) = 0 and quantum states are not static.
The only proof is by evidence. If your god is “true,” then why won’t you supply the evidence, instead of popping out easily debunked apologetics? Is it because there is none?
So, again, no.
And no, your little sock puppet is of no interest to me. Create as many identities as you like, you haven’t proven a thing. Except your dishonesty.
The Founding fathers were Masons, you twat whistles
I’m so sick of the Christian right illiterate, trying to convince me that the American government was founded by devout Christians so we should adhere to Christian values.
This argument is so fucking stupid it makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up. So let’s make this clear in two debates.
Let’s assume just for one second that it’s true. That they were Christians and that they founded America, and the Constitution on Christian values.
That was over two hundred years ago and we have disproved all of the historical claims of the Christian bible using Science, so it would stand to reason that our value system wouldn’t hinge on something proven to be false 200 years later. This is just like the church refusing to acknowledge that the earth rotates around the sun. What if everyone had abandoned science then and just agreed with what the Christians said?
The Founding fathers were very clear in the Constitution on the Separation of Church and State. This was not to protect the church this was to protect a secular government from being manipulated and overrun by the church as it had been before countless times throughout actual proven history.
Debate two. The Founding fathers were made up heavily of Masons and the Masonic religion isn’t Christian it’s deisim.
Deism: Deism, an unorthodox religious attitude that found expression among a group of English writers beginning with Edward Herbert (later 1
Many of the founding fathers were Masons who’s faith is clouded in mystery but is definitely not Christianity. So the morals and values of the United States were actually based on the Masons and Deism, Christianity was an afterthought or side note.
So listen up Republicans. Your voting and attitudes are bad for the country, bad for the planet, and bad for human existence as a whole. You believe that noting you do matters in the long run because your imaginary God is going to swoop out of the sky and whisk you away to heaven after you’ve destroyed everything.
But the founding fathers of our country didn’t believe that and any sensible person doesn’t believe it. And those of you who do believe it, are the problem.
If you say..
All white men are racist then you must conclude that every single person on the planet is racist. In fact saying that every white man is racist….. is racist.
So let’s talk about it.
I’m a “white” man, actually to be precise if I trace my lineage I´m an Italian/German/Cherokee/African. Ya.. figure that shit out. And to be 100% clear I am not a racist.
I even look a little like a racist, I have a beard, live in Florida, stand with my shoulders back with my square chin high, but I’m not a racist. In fact if the fascist monsters come, I’ll be the first man on the front line in defiance with Americans of any color.
Skin is a ridiculous thing to base a relationship on. I might not like you because you deserve to be unliked, but I won’t form any opinion on you based on your skin tone.
I just read an article written by a black man that was about a white woman crossing to the other side of the street rather then walking closely to him and his group of friends. My very first reaction was, what a bitch. But as I read on the writers slant was so obviously racist itself that I started to picture a black woman walking into a group of skin head, neo Nazis. And the conclusion in my mind is that the woman may be a racist, we’ll never know, but more likely it wasn’t fear of skin color, as much as fear of racists.
Racists are fucking scary regardless of which race they come from and fear of people if they appear to be racist is self preservation and can’t or shouldn’t be used as an example of the other race being racist.
That said I think it’s a normal reaction when walking toward a group of people to evaluate your personal safety level. The white woman in the story may have crossed the road because it was a group of men regardless of color and she didn’t feel safe, we’ll never know.
I’m not a racist. But I’m not offended if you say I am, because I understand that you have fear. I’m not a racist and I’m not offended if you cross the road when you see me coming. I’m not a racist but I may cross the road if I see a group of teenage boys that look unsafe to me regardless of color, and that still doesn’t make me a racist.
Do I fully understand the struggle of a race other then white. No I don’t. I do have black and Hispanic, friends that are as close to me as family, and I learn from them, and I try to stand in their shoes, though their stories, and I see no human difference in us.
I am not a racist but I won’t hate you when you are. I will hold you accountable white or black, or brown for your actions based on your racism. But I will not hate you.
To all Republicans
I’ve been really trying to see past your president and see you without the anger I feel for your party. It’s hard not to put this on you, really hard, because without you this hate, not just the country´s, but my own wouldn’t exist. But this is the conclusion I’ve come to.
You are weak people, afraid of everything. You are religious people who are too cowardly to face the real world without need of an imaginary friend to carry you. You are afraid of other races because you don’t have enough confidence in yourself to succeed in the face of competition. You are greedy people who are terrified of living without safety nets. You are gun owners, afraid that everyone wants to attack you, so you feel an enormous need to protect yourself. You are sad and afraid and like children who need a strong parent to console them.
So I get it. Cowards always react in irrational and often dangerous ways. You run and hide or lash out. Your fight or flight is always on.
I’m learning to pity you instead of hate you. I’m learning that to save you from yourselves, I must be the bigger man and invite you to shelter under my confidence.
I’m sorry you are afraid, I’m sorry that your terror has allowed you to be duped and made a fool of, by a liar who would prey on your fear, and when you’re ready to look up from your clutched white knuckles and see the face of a compassionate father, instead of an abusive step dad, I’ll be here. And so will millions of patient, and passionate, progressive, atheists, humans, who will embrace you as fellow man/woman and make you whole.
Third stupidest thing I’ve read all week. Tumblr never dissapoints.
Projection if the highest degree here.
Don’t feed this troll…
I thought this would be genuine, I was wrong
@themodernmaccabee it is 100% genuine but hate will always try to discourage kindness. And though I’m attempting not to judge it is ridiculously hard when faced with everything that I find vile about my less compassionate neighbors.
The thing is we (republicans) don’t hate. I can’t be more simple in the explanation other than saying “we don’t care”. We are individualists therefore we care first and foremost about the individual. Our way of thinking and reason doesn’t allow for hating someone just for existing.
@themodernmaccabee I’m sorry I refuse to reply to this with even an attempt at a reasonable argument. Other then to say that is simply and without question not true and to point out that you already know it’s not true so any attempt to apply logic to it fails.
Your post brought a lot of Nazi roaches out into the light, eh? Don’t waste your time and effort fencing with diseased minds that glory in their cruelty and oppression of fellow human beings, for as they admit they just don’t care about anyone but themselves. The essence of their humanity ran down their mother’s leg the day of their conception as she barked in pain and despair.
Haha. “Your post brought a lot of Nazi roaches into the light, eh”
You closed minded bed-welters believe you know what a Nazi is because you read a book, or some low-dollar professor at a community college taught you? What a joke.
When real Nazis show up, you liberal pukes will be the first to bow your heads. Quick to turn your neighbors over to them in order to save your own hide.
People like you are always the weak. You’re the bullies that cry to the teacher when the kids you’ve been bullying stand up to you and beat your ass. The first to shit their pants in a conflict.
You’d better think this through to its logical conclusion. Because you keep using this word, calling good folks that merely disagree with you politically a Nazi… your time is coming, and it might not turn out the way you believe it will turn out.
@freekentuckythinker
@actualrealgod
Good post as for myself I’d rather have your hate cause your not the kind of sissy I’d be friends with 😷
This is why I can never be friends with a liberal. They believe that anyone who does not believe exactly as they do is wrong, or a Nazi. They can’t see outside of their safe spaces because they have been programmed to believe that there is nothing outside of the box so they never look or think outside of the box.
Conservatives on thee other hand don’t need to think outside of the box because they were never in the box. We embrace individuality because we are all individuals. That does not mean that we subscribe to perversions just in order to get noticed. We know how to have fun without destroying anyone else’s right to also have fun. We accept defeat because we have experienced defeat. We have not been coddled and protected from the real world.
You offer of being a daddy figure proves that you believe that you are right and everyone else is wrong. Not interested. We are conservatives, we come from real families where there is a mother and a father. We believe in a higher being because we admit that we are not perfect or infallible. We accept our short comings and try to improve.
We don’t count on the government to provide for us because we know that everything that is given free to one person was earned by another. We don’t scream about needing protection provided by police while simultaneously participating in marches calling for the murder of those same police. Yes we do have guns, yes we do believe it is a god given right to protect ourselves and yes we will kill you if you try to take them.
We are responsible for ourselves and our own well being. We are a Christian nation built on Christian principles. We are not a democracy, we are a constitutional republic. We live our constitution because we know that it does not tell us what rights we have, but what rights the government can not take away. You seem to hate America and what we stand for. My advice to you, GET THE FUCK OUT.
Once again… we are not a Christian nation built on Christian values. The forefathers were Masons and they Included separation of church and state in the Constitution to protect the secular government from being overrun by the Christian Taliban.
I don’t hate America or what it stands for but I’m not a big fan of Christians who have perverted it.
Common Creationist Misconceptions No. 41-48.