Sun sets, Scott Naismith

tannertan36
đŞź
Today's Document
One Nice Bug Per Day
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
No title available
KIROKAZE
d e v o n
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
No title available
Interview Vampire Daily
macklin celebrini has autism

ellievsbear
Cosimo Galluzzi

No title available
Color Me Curious
Game of Thrones Daily
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
I'd rather be in outer space đ¸
Sweet Seals For You, Always

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from Philippines
seen from Indonesia
seen from Brazil
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Chile
seen from Costa Rica

seen from France

seen from Mozambique
seen from Indonesia
seen from China

seen from United States
seen from India
seen from United States
@adalhied-prime
Sun sets, Scott Naismith
More Wyllach because there's simply not enough of it.
They're, uh, problem solving until she can get that next tune-up. A preview of sorts for both of them until they can finally touch.
this is going around twitter rn but im also super curious: please tell me your top four comfort movies that youâre always down to watch bc my friend thinks mine are ridiculous and now weâve realised everyoneâs version of âcomfortâ is hilariously different
I mean you've threatened to kill me a bunch of times. You once told me you were gonna drown me in a river like a kangaroo.
[warm laugh of fond reminiscence] I did do that
âHe hated me, and he is dead. He feared me, and he is dead. He hunted me, and he is dead.â
straight white people making a romance movie: haha what if it was illegal to have sex? wait what's lawrence v texas. wait what's mclaughlin v florida. wait what's loving v virginia
As preposterous and stupid as this fucking movie's premise sounded (for a light-hearted rom-com, and not The Handmaid's Tale) I didn't want to think about it too much until the movie actually came out, and then I could see if it was somehow more intelligent and subversive than the trailer let on, but guess what, it's even worse!
If this is what it takes to get a rom-com greenlit these days, maybe we should just let them die.
Sex workers are thrown under the bus, shown only as thieves who fleece men in the woods at night, while queer sexuality is relegated to a few scenes with Allieâs roommate (a woefully underused Quintessa Swindell) and a handful of pans past blurry same-sex extras making out in the background. âThis night is for the straights,â Swindellâs character says to Allie, before saying that queer people have worked around straight laws for centuries. This is supposed to be a nod to queer resilience, but largely comes off as straightwashing the history of anti-LGBTQ legislation in this country that led towards raids of queer clubs and incarceration of queer people in the not-too-distant past (let alone the current barrage of anti-Trans and LGBTQ legislation currently in the works and on the books). Itâs also ignorant of the long and fraught fight for the normalization of age-of-consent laws, which, by the way, did not happen in all states in this very country until 2003. Yes, thatâs not even thirty years ago. By the end, our intrepid protagonists have not had sex with anyone, because this is a film about Romance with a Capital R (and I guess sex is not part of romance!) and for that very same reason they ultimately embrace the fascist state of things. They arenât the only ones who refuse to fight back. No one in this cursed film is protesting this mandate beyond ârepealâ signs in various windows and some creative graffiti (...) (...) If we are supposed to believe that the film is making some subversive statement about the state of sex and bodily autonomy in this country, it cannot end with its leads embracing their chains. Thatâs just warmed-over conservatism running around in sheepâs clothing.
yeah i wrote this post having only seen the trailer, but jesus christ. was this movie a psyop LMAO??
also, for the unaware: mclaughlin v. florida was a 1964 supreme court case that struck down a florida anti-miscegenation law that criminalized cohabitation (and thus, as implied, sex) between white people and people of color of opposite genders. anti-miscegenation laws made marriage and sexual relationships between white people and people of color, most often specifically black people, a FELONY in several states in the united states up until the 1950s and 1960s. though it was already struck down by the supreme court, the state of alabama didn't repeal their law until 2000! there were THREE ATTEMPTS at codifying anti-miscegenation into the us constitution!
like yes, the issue here is partially straight white people's ignorance on the united states's history of homophobic policy, but it's also really important to recognize that arguably the majority of the issue here is straight white people's ignorance of the united states's history of codifying eugenics and antiblack racism.
the premise could have been interesting as a serious dystopian story, especially taking that history into account, but it wasn't written that way at all. this movie should never have been a fucking romcom making light of the violence the united states (and many other countries) has enacted on any kinds of sexual relationships it deems undesirable.
can yâall maybe reblog this version i feel like people are forgetting about the racism and just focusing on the homophobia
meanwhile i made an amell (cosette) and a mahariel (cariad) just to go through the origins and while i doubt iâll complete a playthrough with either of them i do want to give them something of a development so here they are
cosette doesnât realize the paint smear thing is a family tradition, she just got bored one day and liked how it freaked out her teachers
lol. lmao even. happy 11th birthday, girls
for a world where magic is drawn from the land of dreams and powered by imagination, belief, and willpower, dragon ageâs use of magic seems... pretty standard, right? mages arenât just wildly doing whatever they can imagine, theyâre throwing around the same set of elemental spells as every other mage. spells often have the same names and similar effects throughout the series, used by different mages. so we can say this is a failure of imagination from the devs themselves, or we can have fun and work it into the worldbuilding. obviously i want to do the latter.
so what iâd like to establish is that a) mages are really in-world using these common spells and knowing them by their names i.e. they literally think âiâm going to cast winterâs graspâ and not just âiâm going to freeze that guyâ and b) they have very good reasons for doing so. and the main three reasons for using established, known spells would be:
efficacy. spellcasting in dragon age is, as i mentioned, about imagination, belief, and willpower. isnât it much easier to imagine an effect, and to force it into existence with your willpower, if youâve seen it done? i think this is probably one reason why getting a teacher for magic is so important. you want to see a spell done a hundred times before you can replicate it with the kind of confident willpower that makes it enforce itself on the world and do decent damage. (incidentally, i think this is also why elemental damage is popular rather than more inventive obviously magical styles; the elements can be observed and replicated, we know what to expect and to imagine. i think baby mages spend a lot of time looking at candles and mages in icy regions are better at ice and so on.)
predictability. âfriendly fireâ exists as a mechanic in these games to demonstrate that once a spell is cast, it is no longer in the mageâs control, and can cause harm they didnât intend. âfree castingâ instead of using a known spell could lead to even more unintended consequences.
resources. mages are reliant on their own reserves of magic (and occasionally lyrium or blood) to allow them access to the fade. they would know exactly how much a known spell will âcostâ, whereas âfree castingâ could cost anything and immediately exhaust them or push them beyond their reserves.
of course, none of this means that mages canât invent their own spells. after all, someone had to invent them in the first place. itâs likely something that mages often do once theyâve reached a certain level of skill, and i think itâs really fun to imagine. (a circle mage apprentice required to make a small, frivolous spell of their own as a project; a tevinter magister fashioning something new and flashy to impress their rivals; a dalish keeper regularly crafting fresh spells to suit their clanâs new needs.) loving the image of a mage excitedly making a new spell only to dig through the books and then grimace and groan as they realise some enchanter from the towers age already published a better version. i think there are lots of mages who try to branch out from the standard elements and so on, and find that it doesnât âcatch onâ because whatâs familiar becomes efficient becomes familiar and so on. i also think a mage who never invents their own spells could do perfectly fine
all this also doesnât mean that one personâs winterâs grasp is necessarily the same as anotherâs. i think it would be sooo fun if something always slightly changes about a spell as a new mage adapts it for their own, and for spells to become unrecognisable over the centuries as they keep passing between hands. that would also be a neat way to explain differences between versions of spells between games.
this is probably a pretty long-winded way to say "what if the things that mages do in front of us in the games are canon?" but i don't think it's said explicitly, and iirc mages don't use spells by their names in the novels. well, i think they should! and it would account for a lot of the combat mechanics here. and all of the spells could have origins and inventors and favoured practitioners and it would be beautiful. we could have newer spells and older spells... spells taught by some traditions and not others... spells with regional variations... my ideal is for a mage to cast walking bomb and for another mage to say âi do NOT know what that was but it WASNâT walking bombâ
You wake up one day and discover you've lost control over a random action or feeling!
Spin the wheel to find out what!
How bad is it?
Actually way better than before!
Its good
It's alright
It's annoying but I'll be fine
It's pretty bad
IM DEAD
worse than death
Nothing changes/results
This idea was submitted by @dbnekonico!
You know Jones soda cap, as a tumblr user i can actually say i think I have.
If I was immortal, I'd move to a very remote homestead and secretly start selectively breeding and training Sphinx cats to walk upright and have near human vocalizations. And I would name every single one Aman [something] (ie, Aman Goblin or Aman Poultry). And dress them all in specially tailored fancy clothes (cause hairless cats can get cold just like people can). With hats.
Then; when I finally have a handful of upwalking, almost talking, hairless cats; I'd train them to get on my specially retrofitted van when I call Aman and load them up and take them on a field trip to some park in a highly populated city.
We'd get there just before dawn and I'd let them loose and then go find somewhere discrete to watch the show. Then, just when people are starting to notice, take pictures and videos, and maybe consider calling the authorities about my cat faced children â ideally it'll still be very early morning at this point â I'd call them back to the van and we'd disappear without a trace.
We'd go back to the homestead and wait a few weeks before hitting up another city. Then another. And another. Let the story spread far and wide. But after exactly 6 cities, I'd stop. Take all my kitties home and let them live the rest of their lives happy, well cared for, and completely oblivious to what chaos we had wrought together.
I'd keep breeding them though. Who knows. Perhaps eventually I'll be able to breed them to true sapience and eventual self sufficiency and let them build their own civilization out of the homestead. That'd be a fun thing for people to find some day.
Like, little Victorian gentleperson suits? With cravats and bustles and everything?
You paint a glorious mental image, I can't help but see it. It would be glorious.
Iâm glad that Indiana finally has its first national park and that itâs the one mostly known for having sand dunes that eat children.
how, pray tell, does a dune eat A Child
Imagine that youâre a big pile of sand by the shore of Lake Michigan, between Gary and Michigan City. Your name is Mount Baldy, and youâre a popular tourist destination at what is now Indiana Dunes National Park.
For a huge pile of tiny rocks, you live a surprisingly nomadic lifestyle. More than a hundred years of tourism and foot traffic has destroyed much of the native grass that kept you stationary. You are now what they call a âwandering duneâ, as wind off the lake slowly but steadily pushes your tremendous bulk a little further inland every year.
As you move, you gradually engulf everything in your pathâtrees, buildings, rocks, hills, your own parking lotâeverything. You are an unstoppable force, like some kind of gigantic gelatinous cube, but youâre still very popular with visitors.
In 2013, you suddenly eat a child. Itâs a surprising move on your partâdry quicksand isnât supposed to be a real natural phenomenon. I mean, what is this, a 1960âs action movie?
One moment, a family from Illinois is cheerfully climbing your slopes. The next, the 6 year old boy suddenly vanishes without warning, leaving no trace. Would-be rescuers dig in the sand where he disappeared until their hands are bleeding. Geologists insist that he must have wandered off, because enormous piles sand physically cannot form hollows or pockets within themselvesâbut three hours later, he is found, unconscious but alive, buried almost twelve feet deep in the sand.
The current leading geological theory as to how this happened is that the organic material you engulf, like trees, slowly decompose beneath your slopes, leaving behind unstable voids held together only by the fragile remains of the decayed material. When these voids are walked over, they collapse, forming sudden sinkholes that can swallow visitors whole. The rules that typically govern stationary dunes, or wandering dunes in areas that are not forested, no longer apply to you. You are unpredictable and dangerous and have remained closed to visitors except on guided hikes ever since.
Did that really need to be in second person and fuck me up like that? No. But Iâm not mad.
in retrospect I have no idea what possessed me to write this in second person
anyway devilâs stovepipes/decomp chimneys are cool as shit
Gortash Week Day 4 -- Sacred/Blasphemous
Happy There Will Come Soft Rains day everybody!!
If you've never read it, please do:
The voice-clock sang, breakfast was ejected, but no doors slammed. The garage chimed and lifted its door to reveal the waiting car. The hous
It's one of my favs.
If the lord ever got attached to a toy, he would never be able to let it go
You think THATS a denim jacket?
Surely you
Jest
That punchline hit me like a sack of wet mice
Like a sack of what
IVE BEEN LOOKING FOR THIS POST
you just teleported to the last game you played how is it going? {you're plot involved}
good
bad
great
awful
dead
I don't play games/results
Soma đ