AnasAbdin
Cosmic Funnies
d e v o n

No title available
Acquired Stardust
almost home
RMH
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Peter Solarz
🪼
DEAR READER

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
ojovivo
Alisa U Zemlji Chuda
art blog(derogatory)

roma★
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
dirt enthusiast
No title available
seen from Croatia

seen from Croatia

seen from France

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Germany
seen from Türkiye

seen from South Korea

seen from Malaysia

seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany

seen from India
@al10nsy
Possibly in Michigan (1983) Cecelia Condit
EVERY YEAR
wmwm - fw26
surely treating suicide as the most horrible forbidden thing possible and making it difficult to discuss candidly not only through social stigma but also the threat of kidnapping and forced drugging will prevent people from doing something that makes me personally uncomfortable
the slow casual creep of misogyny back into every point of our lives both digital and physical is making me feel fucking insane
2010s feminism was extremely flawed and deserved to be criticized but do you remember when most people at least pretended to like women
i told my dad the joke “dad jokes are just mom jokes that a man repeated louder” and he thought it was hilarious. he turned to my mother, intending to relay the joke to her, and a bare second after he opened his mouth i watched it dawn on his face that he was about to become the subject of the joke. when i tell you that man was slackjawed as he turned back to me, like he had an entire life altering realization in the span of about 20 seconds.
kinda crazy how like every cult documentary is like "here's the survivors we spoke to who all have a range of different experiences, beliefs, talents, skills and stories" and all the survivors of the cult are like "i consider myself a rational person and this initially gave me a sense of community and was offering me the one thing i needed, it was a wonderful experience at first and i was surrounded by people i loved and who loved me, and by the time i realised how bad things had gotten i was in too deep and had alienated all my friends and family outside of the group and had been brainwashed over a period of time to think that any suffering was deserved and that by leaving i would be causing harm to myself and everyone i knew, and if things had been good once then maybe they would be again, and i had to believe that because i had nothing else left" and then half the reviews are people talking about how stupid cult survivors are and how they would NEVER be so dumb to join a group like this, clearly these idiots KNOWINGLY joined a cult and therefore deserved everything that happened to them, maybe if they had tried been as smart and rational as me,
I genuinely believe that the colonization of North America is one of the greatest calamities ever to take place in human history, and I say this as someone who wouldn't exist without it.
The public is being shown just enough to know the truth, and to understand that nothing is going to happen.
Do Y’all remember the Pentagon Papers? When Daniel Ellsberg leaked them in 1971, the government panicked precisely because they all came out at once. The documents landed as a single, overwhelming moral event. They collapsed official narratives about Vietnam in one blow and ignited public outrage that couldn’t be staggered or softened. The lesson power learned from that moment was not “don’t lie,” but “never let the truth arrive whole again.” Since then, exposure has been redesigned to arrive in pieces that are manageable, deniable, and endlessly debatable. Do Y’all remember MKUltra? When details of the CIA’s human experimentation program began leaking in the 1970s, they didn’t surface as a single reckoning. They emerged through hearings, partial disclosures, missing files, and official shrugs. By the time the public understood the scale, which involved drugging civilians, experimenting on prisoners, and destroying records, the moment for accountability had already passed. The psychological effect was profound because people learned that even when the state admits to grotesque abuse, nothing necessarily follows. Remember Edward Snowden and the NSA surveillance revelations? This is one of the clearest modern parallels to the Epstein files debacle. At first, the disclosures were shocking. We saw mass data collection, warrantless surveillance, and the scope of the security state laid bare. But instead of a single, sustained confrontation, the information also arrived in waves. Each revelation triggered a brief spike of concern then followed by normalization. Over time, the public absorbed the idea that privacy was already gone and resistance was futile. Surveillance didn’t end. Folks simply adapted their expectations downward. The system didn’t change, but the public psyche did. You can also look at how the Catholic Church handled its abuse revelations. For decades, cases surfaced one diocese at a time, one report at a time, and one country at a time. The incremental exposure delayed full institutional reckoning and allowed the Church to posture as “addressing the issue” while continuing to protect itself. By the time the pattern was undeniable, many people were already exhausted, cynical, or resigned. Again, horror became procedural. What all these cases share is the same psychological outcome. When wrongdoing is revealed slowly, the public never experiences a unified moral demand moment. Instead, people are trained to live alongside the knowledge. To scroll past it. To argue about details. To accept that “this is just how it is” and nothing happens to powerful rich men.
20 December 2025
I think I cracked the code on why current fashion is all atheleisure, body con, lingerie outside the bedroom, tight polyester material and how it coincides with the rise of eating disorders/diet culture and heroin chic. the clothes are no longer fashion, the body is the fashion. rather than wearing something as an expression of yourself you wear to show of your body. that's not even me being on some slut shaming shit, but I think about most often when you see the comments on a person ootd unless they're somebody known for a alternative or maximalist style it's always the emphasis of the body. Body tea, body tea, snatched, snatched, ate no crumbs. That whole waistline trend. Just imagine how if fat people started a belly band trend or something similar how people would jump to decry it as fetish material. Yet the obsession with thinness is never seen as perverse, rather something that should be regarded as inspo or hell even promoting a healthy lifestyle.
I am an amateur designer and I fully agree, having arrived at this conclusion from a slightly different angle.
Non poly fabric has slowly disappeared from both the consumer and creator markets. It's just harder and harder to find.
One of the issues is that almost ALL clothing is expected to be stretchy and light. Historically this would have just been regarded as 'flimsy', which it is-- poly and poly blend fabrics degrade rapidly, fueling the fast fashion buy cycle.
But nowadays that kind of unfinished cheapness is a 'plus' because it helps clothes do what the market wants--- which is cling to the body in order to reveal it.
In order to have maximum cling, especially at a 'marketable' price, you HAVE to use synthetics like polyamide, spandex etc. Knits stretch, but do not cling and 'spring back' in a way that will allow for skintight clothes without excessive custom tailoring.
I note that specifically because tailored clothing can *also* cling to the body, but it's a) way more quality and expensive and b) rarely used to reveal the ENTIRE body, rather used to exaggerate certain areas. A gown may have a fitted bodice, for example, but then expand again at the shoulders or hem in order to create an interesting silhouette.
Currently, the average clothing-- especially for women, the prime market-- is fully meant to show off a BODY more than perform ANY other function-- the clothes are not warm, they're not that breathable, they're not durable, they're not structured, they don't signal quality and thus class, they don't have cultural identity.
They DO show off whether or not you have rolls and the exact dimensions of your form, and that is the ultimate goal.
What stands out to me about this is that by putting the onus of value on the physical form, clothing companies can sell you next to fucking NOTHING because all they're being asked to do is help you show it off. Nothing more.
daddy wants to see yall on yall baddest behavior. lend me some sugar. I AM your neighbor.
I genuinely cannot tell if this is supposed to be a horny post or House of Leaves inspo. Great job, op.
secret third option actually. now, don't have me break this thing down for nothing
it blew my vagina clean off its hinges
-the reviews on the side of dr. bronner’s peppermint castile soap
"I don't like the Jack Harkness test because it means it's okay to fuck Scooby Doo"
yes that's the entire damn point of the Harkness test. The Harkness Test doesn't exist to say you have to fuck Scooby Doo. The Harkness Test exists to say that it is morally/ethically fine for someone to want to fuck Scooby Doo, because Scooby Doo can give informed consent and communicate as such.
the reason you don't like it is because none of you are self-aware enough to realize how incredibly fucking puritan all of you are when it comes to fucking
Tumblr being free is humanity's greatest error.
Then pay me 20$ if you feel so strongly about it
Tumblr is a free website where I am paid $20
Hey tagger are you aware of the existence of any IRL dogs who speak fluent English and solve mysteries? Just curious.
I love this. I was just talking about the Harkness test the other day. But like, not only does it mean it's ethical for us to fuck Scooby-Doo, but it also means it's morally okay for Shaggy to fuck Scooby in universe. Though let's be real, Scooby is the top. Shaggy is a power bottom.
It is not morally okay for Shaggy to fuck Scooby Doo because Shaggy is Scooby Doo's owner.
Isn't Scooby canonically the heir to the entire fortune of a wealthy talking dog family? He grew up in like a mansion according to several continuities. Wouldn't this mean he chose to run off with penniless hippies and live as a pet because he's just a bored, freak rich boy?
The fundraiser to help Adriana's family.