THE 10 MOST INTERESTING INDIAN FILMS RELEASED IN THE YEAR OF 2015
Oh, Indian cinema. It is so fascinating to watch you evolve. Perhaps the only popular cinema on Earth that still rebels against the narrative vocabulary so aggressively imposed as “good” by Hollywood and the West, yet now confident enough to constantly dismantle both those ideas and formulas along with its own, creating something new in the process every time.
As much as the World’s media would like you to believe, our film culture is not defined by Bollywood and Shahrukh Khan. I saw more than 100 Indian films over the last 12 months, many good and many awful, but the social and political climate in which movies are being made, a world in transit pushing against the force of globalisation, makes pretty much all of them a thrilling and challenging watch. These ten films listed below are those which assessed the language of storytelling, whether embracing or dismantling the “rules”, and really managed to say something. Enjoy!
Modern Punjabi cinema is a movement in itself just by existing, but this little film represents more than just a growth spurt in a once-dormant regional industry. The true spirit of independent cinema is alive in Judge Singh LLB; charmingly scrappy production values and an earnest creativity that rises above technical and budgetary restrictions. This is the same energy we saw in the sudden flurry of new-age Tamil comedies a few years ago (Naduvula Konjam Pakkatha Kaanom, Soodhu Kavvum etc.) where a filmmaker can be felt simultaneously satisfying their own creative impulses while tirelessly serving the audience something entertaining. Every over-exposure, every shaky GoPro shot, every slightly awkward cut, is easily forgiven when intentions are this good. And with a script so insanely fun, that seamlessly fulfills being both a gripping thriller and a slapstick comedy, (a bumbling work-shy law grad is forced to fight a controversial murder case to win over his bride – tell me you don’t wanna see this!), you may not even notice anyway.
9. Su Su Sudhi Vathmeekam
Malayalam cinema is officially in a league of its own, and I could have easily written a top 10 list of films from Kerala, with this one being the summation of everything that’s making it great at the moment. While visually unassuming, this tale has one of the largest ensemble casts seen in a film this year, and beautifully manages to make every character a complete person. With a different director or writer, this could have been a confusing and directionless mess of subplots and narrative dead-ends, but in these capable hands it becomes a tapestry of human life, with this colourful array of people weaving their way in and out of our hero’s journey in a way all of us experience in our realities. Another brilliantly character-centric Malayalam film this year, Amar Akbar Anthony, imploded in on itself when it frantically tried to be about something in its last 20 minutes. Here, we are spared a similar fate, quite miraculously when considering the moralistic ‘feel-good’ (ugh) potential of the story of a simple man overcoming his speech impediment. His disability doesn’t define his character. Sure, it means that themes of self- confidence, societal attitudes to the “other” and the power of determination are all tackled, but the main triumph is that this is just a film about humans, and everything that comes with being one.
After the last few years of commercial Hindi cinema, it seems repetitive and patronising to talk about “women-centric films” in the same way we did when Vidya Balan was the biggest name in Mumbai. Yet this is not a film about being a woman, or how hard it is to be a woman, or how women can smoke and drink and fuck and no-one should judge them. In fact, it’s a film about family, old-age, and our attachment to the idea of home. The fact that the our main character happens to be woman, a complex bundle of charm and erratic mood-swings and wonderfully polished grey-areas, as far from being two dimensional and as close to being a living breathing human as is possible on screen, is simultaneously inconsequential and revolutionary. The heroines of Tanu Weds Manu Returns and Queen, lauded for their feminist subtext and superbly performed by the face of new “women-centric Bollywood” Kangna Ranaut, are essentially caricatures. They are types. Piku is not a type. Sometimes she’s a bit of a grumpy asshole. And then sometimes you’ll wish she was your best friend. She’s totally unpredictable, yet will remind you of yourself and everyone you have ever met. This detailed dialogue-heavy character study of a frustrated single woman and her relationship with her needy father became one of the biggest hits of the Hindi box office this year. Don’t confuse corporate figure-mongering with genuine audience approval – Piku was a triumphant and unexpected phenomenon, and this is something to celebrate.
We have a problem with comedy in mainstream Indian cinema. The genre is defined by broad, unfunny slapstick outings (personified by the films of Sajid Khan and his Housefull series) or crude sexual innuendo (Grand Masti, Kya Kool Hain Hum), and in the South, comedy is usually relegated to a “track” in a film with a simultaneous, much more serious story-line, or simply diluted with jarring and unnecessary melodrama and emotion. So we return to the Malayalam screen, which has now given us the Perfect Indian Comedy Film™. Doused in local flavour and a beautiful sense of time and place, the humour of the film (lightheartedly satirising small-town India’s obsession with ritual and superstition) is purely situational, which means that the huge cast of characters are allowed to become really lovable, and feel like close friends by the time the credits roll. The film is so funny, and so untarnished with anything other than actual comedy, that you may actually miss how well written some of the relationships are, and the cinematic and visual finesse with which it has been shot. However first and foremost, this is a stupid film about stupid people, and simply one of the finest ones India has ever produced.
Placing this film in any canon or cultural trajectory is difficult. It’s too much fun to be considered “parallel cinema” (the tag given to mostly joyless and dour “realist” Arthouse Indian film), yet too genre-less, too obviously crafted from the mind of an auteur, to be placed into any other box. This is cinema about cinema, and not in the way you’re thinking. It is cinema about the craft of cinema, using image and sound (not words) to create meaning. Four stories, including one about a tree in love with a woman and another about a coroner in love with a corpse, communicate some really damn deep questions about the nature of human emotion. Is it possible to be in love with yourself? Can attachments to inanimate objects ever been considered as love? Is jealousy a form of love? There is hardly any dialogue, just brilliantly composed images, wonderful visual storytelling and some powerful sound design (struggling to remember another instance this year where I even noticed sound design in an Indian film), yet we are forced to think about the very feeling that defines every member of our species. A work of genius and poetry.
I love it when a recognisable Western genre is perfectly Indianised. I find it a fascinating process, seeing what needed to be added, subtracted and adapted in a formula to allow it to sit comfortably in an Indian movie theatre. Here we have the horror-thriller genre, I’m thinking of films like Donkey Punch and Eden Lake, that start off as normal dramas before slowly descending into terrifying disaster, horrifying because “It Could Happen to You”. There are homages played to various western genres (most obviously Anushka Sharma’s Kill Bill yellow-esque jacket she dons while literally slashing the patriarchy), but the film plays on very Indian fears and themes. A middle-class metropolitan couple find themselves violently embroiled in an honour-killing in a rural wasteland while on their way to a luxurious retreat, and in one short, economically taught thriller, the uncomfortable gaps between India’s rich and poor, cities and countryside, even men and women, are exploited to brilliant effect. Taken at its most rebellious, the film is a warning to the new designer handbag-wearing class of Indians that they are not safe in their high-rise towers from the lawless madness of “Real India”, or perhaps an aggressive call to arms to women either side of the class divide, united by the sexism, though various in its forms and degrees, that unfortunately defines their existence in modern India. The most valuable lesson of NH10 though, is that much more than monsters or ghouls, it is human beings that are the most horrifying.
For each film in this countdown, I’m attempting to assess a film’s cultural impact, its cinematic value and also what it is actually about, but I can’t do any of this for Masaan. It is a gorgeous slice of poetry that will wash over you like ocean waves, affecting you deeply in ways you are unable to explain. Two simple stories of life and death, told with a remarkable flair, remarkable in the fact that it immerses you into a trance-like state, forgetful of the fact you are even watching a film. It has the ethereal pace of a dream, visually and sonically intense, reminiscent of reality but somehow detached from it. The narrative threads are simple and don’t require description, yet it is also impossible to tell you what this film is trying to say. People talk of caste, of religion, of values, yet this is not a film with a message. It is about everything and nothing. About life and death and rebirth and love and desperation. It uses modern India as a palette of colours with which to paint a mural of the giant shitstorm that is humanity. How can one film do so much? I really have no idea, but it did.
Is Premam a film about the male gaze? Let’s look at the character of Malar. She is the second of three love stories that we witness in our hero's life, and she became nothing short of a real life Kerala-wide phenomenon. It’s hard to think of the last time that a fictional character dominated popular culture in such a way. She’s gorgeous of course, but not perfect (her pocked face was a major talking point). Does this satisfy some male desire for imperfection, damage limitation for potential jealousy and heartbreak and insecurity? She is unphased (though not accepting) of inappropriate, sometimes sexually aggressive behavior, and holds no qualms regarding close social interaction with males. Does she represent some deep fantasy of the repressed Indian man, constantly teased with the idea of the sexually liberated Western female? And is there anything wrong with this? The female characters are well-rounded and three dimensional and treated with dignity and respect (by the writers, not always by the male characters). For the most part, their lives do not revolve around solely men. Is it sexist that this a film about male desire, their attitudes to women and relationships? I think it’s actually mighty interesting, and it doesn’t hurt that it has some of the best casting of the year, a thrillingly uncontrollable visual force, and a tumbling free-form structure that reflects the pace of life in a way so many other Malayalam films have been nailing recently.
Gautam Menon, master of the meta-romance, decided to dismantle the masala genre and its defining characteristic of the superhuman alpha-male, using one of Tamil Nadu’s biggest superhuman alpha-males Ajith Kumar, and in the process created one of the most sensitive, socially forward-thinking action movies I’ve ever seen. Yes, this is a crowd-pleasing blockbuster about a tough policeman taking down a criminal gang of organ smugglers, but more importantly it has an important subtext about male responsibility. The hero’s motivations revolve entirely around his daughter, but not in a mawkish melodramatic way. She is not his biological daughter. His wife had a life before him, that he completely accepts and takes with him after their marriage and never makes her feel guilty about. He is a role-model for the disgusting main characters we usually see in masala films, treating all the women in his life with unpatronising respect. At one of his first meetings with his future wife, after she has performed a dance recital, he doesn’t flirt or badger, he engages with her in conversation about her art, her interests, her passions. He wants to know her. And when he later becomes a father to her child, he does so in a beautiful way. I cried, not because these were intense emotional scenes, but because they were not. To see the most mainstream of cinema embracing single-parenthood and remarriage in such subtle, mature ways, nonchalantly embedding them into rip-roaring violent revenge thrillers with twinkling nighttime highway colour pallets and joyous song sequences and “punch dialogues”, is truly a beautiful thing.
Am I giving this film more credit than it deserves because it came from the Punjabi film industry, a regional cinema that prior to this year either produced crude political propaganda or painful slapstick comedies? Perhaps. But the Punjabi-ness of Angrej is everything that makes it special. Most similar in cinematic style to the frantic rural Madurai films in Tamil from the 2000’s (Paruthiveeran, Aadukalam, Subramaniapuram, Kaadhal), with this energetic French nouvelle-vague-esque pacing, jump cut to jump cut polishing every nook and cranny of these worlds and their people, places that we aren’t used to seeing in cinema but which become effortlessly cinematic in the hands of these directors. The sheer volume of evocative images in these films makes you wonder how the hell they had enough time to shoot, but they are far from showy and gimmicky. Every scene in Angrej is beautiful, not in the way they contribute to an overriding narrative (as this is not the type of film where a story is in the least bit important), but because of the tone they establish, the hyper-specific time and place that we feel through the images, the dialogue, the music. The barely-there plot consists of a low-stakes love triangle, but through the characters and their village, their day to day lives as farmers, we think about rural India as never before. Imperialism is addressed via its absence. The story takes place during the fight for independence, but the British have no interest in this tiny community. It is of no use to them. Social norms and values are humourously satirised, a husband ashamed when his wife dares to walk so close as five paces behind him. The glorious folk culture of Punjab is documented stunningly through song sequences that melt into the very fabric of the film in a way only Indian cinema can achieve (this is not a musical), two jealous men hilariously warring through the tradition of boliyaan, melodic rhyming couplets. More than any of that, this is a film about time and society, how much yet how little we change over the years. This is cinema of the highest order. Punjabi movies have found a voice, somehow oddly close yet so thankfully far from Naughty Jatts 2.
I still feel emotional that a Punjabi movie stunned me into a wordless artistic coma. This is the thrill of being an Indian film nerd, with its boundless regional pockets, never knowing when a language or culture and its people will start a movement. I thought about movies and this list with every second my brain had to spare, and these are the ten films that lingered the longest. I really hope you enjoyed reading this, and have a wonderful 2016 where you continue to be engaged, critical and consuming plenty of art! Please let me know your thoughts, that’s what makes all this worthwhile.
Love to all xx :)