Awful Fantasy’s Awfulest Tweets of 2015
okay, but between this and that i always wanted there to be a non-magical Magician (or “Charlatan”) class, now i really want to see a fantasy story about a stage magician.
Color Me Curious

Origami Around
macklin celebrini has autism

Love Begins

oozey mess

ellievsbear
Claire Keane

@theartofmadeline
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
taylor price

blake kathryn
art blog(derogatory)

titsay
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Game of Thrones Daily
official daine visual archive
ojovivo
No title available
Phantogram Three
Monterey Bay Aquarium
seen from Switzerland

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Sweden

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from France

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Uganda

seen from Malaysia
seen from Norway

seen from United States

seen from Morocco

seen from Iraq
seen from Canada
@amateurcrastination
Awful Fantasy’s Awfulest Tweets of 2015
okay, but between this and that i always wanted there to be a non-magical Magician (or “Charlatan”) class, now i really want to see a fantasy story about a stage magician.
One more rejection, but this one was kind of funny. The agency has a “six weeks and no response means no” policy (which to me implies that they don’t send form rejections), but I just received a form rejection. I’d sent that query back at the end of the July. That’s... *counts* 18 weeks.
Oh, well, revising.
its not YA Lit if the protagonist doesn’t ‘let out a breath they didn’t even know they were holding’
David Foster Wallace on how to write a great opener and the measure of good writing.
Another rejection, but Stephanie Meyer still has a career. Ugh, off to the gym with me.
Why a writer will always need another person to look at what they've written...
We’ve all seen it online—typos can be hilarious! But they can also make the writer look very stupid. Especially when they’re trying to get a point across.
Sometimes it can be damaging to the subject.
Sometimes the writer.
If there is anything at stake, even if it’s just reputation, you need a copy editor, or at the very least, a proofreader. It’s not a sign of weakness to hire someone to edit and correct your work; it’s just the opposite actually. It makes your writing stronger and more professional, which is an absolute must in the case of query letters, job applications, or college-entrance essays, where a single mistake can send your hard work straight into the trash bin. At the very least, you may just look like a fool.
It’s a copy editor’s job to look for many things, including errors in spelling, typing, punctuation, grammar, omitted or repeated words or letters, tense shifts; the list goes on. As copy editors are generally very detail-oriented, they will also check for font changes, margin alignment, headings, pagination, and other formatting issues, though these are issues taken up with the designer.
A content editor is one who makes changes to the, you guessed, the content to help the story flow better. They may cut out large parts of the story or rearrange it to be more engaging. A copy editor will correct what is written. No alterations to the story are made unless it is to correct poor grammar. A good copy editor will point out and recommend structural changes for the author to make themselves so as the voice of the author is not lost.
Copy editing is the very last step before publication or assessment. Revisions are made to the final draft by the content or developmental editors, and then the copy editor double checks everything, looking for any little mistake or omission and for aesthetics and linguistics.
Even established authors need their work copy edited. It’s not a good idea for the writer to try and edit it themselves. The writer cannot get enough distance from his own work to see what may have been missed. The writer can also be too attached to be able to make any hard changes. Having someone else read an unfinished manuscript or essay is a better idea. Even a friend or family member may be able to spot what’s been missed. The best plan is to hire a professional who has no emotional attachment and no bias to the writing.
A writer can pour an awful lot of himself into a story or book and can place the value on the story itself and come to the conclusion that it does not need editing. While good content is indeed a very important, if not the most important, part, if a reader is not able to get past typos and poor grammar, its purpose will never be realized. Some people don’t mind typos and spelling mistakes, but it comes down to professionalism. If the writer doesn’t really mind who reads his work or what people think of it, then write on. However, if the writer is interested in getting published, picking up an agent, getting into college, getting publicity, or being taken seriously as a writer, a copy editor will make that more possible and ensure that the reader will be able to be fully immersed in what they’re reading.
A copy editor no longer needs to have a physical manuscript in front of them and mark it up with a red pen. It’s a simple process to receive a digital copy of a manuscript and make the corrections using Track Changes in a Word program. The writer can then choose to accept or reject the changes, which is both a good thing and a bad thing. It is good in that the author has a choice in the changes. It is bad in that the author can possibly reject credible changes simply because they don’t like them without much thought if the edit is technically correct. It’s a good idea for the author to stay in touch with the copy editor about any changes, as there may be a rule being applied that the author may not know about.
It is always best for the writer to do what is best for the manuscript and vision, but I highly recommend paying a copy editor to make it the very best it can be to ensure success.
The best of luck and, as always, happy writing!
Got a personalized rejection today... yee haw, movin’ up in the world!
(And not to be petty, but the agency’s website has their own name misspelled in the title bar... maybe check with your web developer on that...)
Meet the new mods!
Hello all,
Writing With Color would like to give a big welcome to our new mods, Lesya and Nikhil! They’d also like to introduce themselves:
Lesya
Hello and welcome! I’m Lesya of the Wyandot (Huron) in Canada who only discovered my roots/got adopted back into the tribe in my very early 20s thanks to generations-old assimilation. A 22 year old white passing individual who’s spent her whole life navigating a world of in betweens and wants to see more queer PoC on bookshelves. Best described as “spiritual”. I took a year of anthropology for the sole purpose of learning more effective researching, which was the main catalyst for connecting with the Native community.
I write primarily non-European fantasy and I spend far too much time analyzing everything literary, with a tendency to speak in TV Tropes. My specialty is breaking apart real world cultures and adapting them to fantasy worlds, along with researching to get society right. I’m still learning about my own culture but have a general knowledge about Canadian Natives, especially around the Great Lakes/Quebec region, with a touch of knowledge about Plains and costal Natives. Firm believer in Idle No More.
Nikhil
Greetings, humans of the internets! I’m Nikhil, aka science-of-noise, a 28-year-old Indian-American linguist and grad student who puts off writing his dissertation by writing all kinds of speculative fiction instead, usually with a heavy dose of philosophy or satire disguised as a good romp. I have a knack for dark humor, carnage, poetic language, and sneaking in heavy metal references where they don’t belong. I’m also currently entering the dark and fraught world of querying manuscripts to literary agents.
As a nontheistic Hindu (who spends plenty of time explaining that this is, in fact, a thing), I’m here to help you not mess up your representation of Indian experiences, Hinduism, and South Asian themes. I’m in an interracial marriage with a part-Jewish historian and fellow cat enthusiast, and I like to play loud songs on the guitar, cook spicy food, and run long distances on hot days.
Cheers, Nikhil
As for our other applicants: note that we are still contacting folks and making decisions on new team members, so you might see a small trickle of new mods joining the team over the next few weeks - months.
And for those wondering, yes the ask box will be opening up soon! We’ll give you a heads-up closer to that time, as well as information on the upcoming patreon.
Have a great writing week!
–WWC
It’s-a me!
Moonlight Announcement
Greetings, Earth Humans. As of… like, yesterday, or something, I’m taking up a role as a guest mod over at writingwithcolor, where you can watch me try not to become grumpy as I answer aspiring authors’ questions about Hinduism, Indian/South Asian identity stuff, and whatever comes up. Not to worry, this blog and the others (cookingwithwhatever, amateurcrastination) will maintain their usual mediocre quality, because that’s what I do—work hard barely, if at all, for you folks.
writing tip #1306:
want to avoid plagiarism? burn every other copy of the book, quietly murder the original author, erase the existence of the book from every file on the planet. if anyone says they’ve read the book before politely tell them the government disagrees
It’s okay to write crap. Just don’t try publishing it while it’s still crap.
S.M. Blooding (via psliterary)
When any form of narration reveals the unique personality and voice of the viewpoint characters, it becomes characterization.
Elizabeth Lyon (via psliterary)
Another form rejection today. I’m feeling strangely energized, though, because so far the two rejections (also the only two responses) are from people who I thought might be a bit of a stretch, so maybe I was right on that.
At this point my strategy is, for each rejection, write another query to a different agent and queue it to send the following Monday.
like tbh i feel like my problem with the “dark and gritty!!” trend in modern stories is this
there’s this idea in our culture that cynicism is realistic? that only children believe in happy endings, that people are ultimately selfish and greedy and seeing with clear eyes means seeing the world as an awful place
that idealism is– easy, i guess. butterflies and sunshine and love are easy things to have in your head.
but i’ve known since i was fifteen that idealism– faith in humanity– optimism– is the most difficult thing in the entire world.
i constantly struggle to have faith in humanity, because it’s really, really easy to lose it. it’s easy to look at the news and go “what were you expecting? of course humans behave this way.” it’s easy to see the world and go “ugh, there’s no hope there.” and the years when i believed that were easy. miserable– but easy.
it is hard work to see the good in people. it is hard work to hope. it is hard work to keep faith and love and joy and appreciation for beauty in my daily life.
and when moviemakers and tv producers and writers go “omg!!! all characters are selfish and act poorly and don’t love each other, nothing ever happens that is happy or good, that’s so much more realistic, that’s so much more adult”
no, it’s not
it’s childish.
it’s the most childish thing i can imagine.
So much this.
Reposted for truth.
You know, the struggle to have/keep faith in humanity is a pretty dark and gritty struggle, sometimes. Endless cynicism is kind of a cheap way out, but on the other hand, by refusing to engage with how difficult it is to maintain your idealism you never even get into what makes a good story worth telling. You can have your happy ending, but it will probably take a lot of hard work to get there. And that is realistic. Just as it’s realistic to not get everything you might want, even if there is reason for hope and happiness at the end. For this reason, “Earn Your Happy Ending” continues to be one of my favorite tropes.
It just kills me when writers create franchises where like 95% of the speaking roles are male, then get morally offended that all of the popular ships are gay. It’s like, what did they expect?
#friendly reminder that I once put my statistics degree to good use and did some calculations about ship ratios#and yes considering the gender ratios of characters#the prevalence of gay ships is completely predictable (via sarahtonin42)
I feel this is something that does often get overlooked in slash shipping, especially in articles that try to ‘explain’ the phenomena. No matter the show, movie or book, people are going to ship. When everyone is a dude and the well written relationships are all dudes, of course we’re gonna go for romance among the dudes because we have no other options.
Totally.
A lot of analyses propose that the overwhelming predominance of male/male ships over female/female and female/male ships in fandom reflects an unhealthy fetishisation of male homosexuality and a deep-seated self-hatred on the part of women in fandom. While it’s true that many fandoms certainly have issues gender-wise, that sort of analysis willfully overlooks a rather more obvious culprit.
Suppose, for the sake of argument, that we have a hypothetical media franchise with twelve recurring speaking roles, nine of which are male and three of which are female.
(Note that this is actually a bit better than average representaton-wise - female representation in popular media franchises is typicaly well below the 25% contemplated here.)
Assuming that any character can be shipped with any other without regard for age, gender, social position or prior relationship - and for simplicity excluding cloning, time travel and other “selfcest”-enabling scenarios - this yields the following (non-polyamorous) possibilities:
Possible F/F ships: 3 Possible F/M ships: 27 Possible M/M ships: 36
TOTAL POSSIBLE SHIPS: 66
Thus, assuming - again, for the sake of simplicity - that every possible ship is about equally likely to appeal to any given fan, we’d reasonably expect about (36/66) = 55% of all shipping-related media to feature M/M pairings. No particular prejudice in favour of male characters and/or against female characters is necessary for us to get there.
The point is this: before we can conclude that representation in shipping is being skewed by fan prejudice, we have to ask how skewed it would be even in the absence of any particular prejudice on the part of the fans. Or, to put it another way, we have to ask ourselves: are we criticising women in fandom - and let’s be honest here, this type of criticism is almost exclusively directed at women - for creating a representation problem, or are we merely criticising them for failing to correct an existing one?
I don’t give a shit about shipping, but I like writing and I like statistics, so here.