happy last fingers in his ass sunday everyone its been an honor serving w you

tannertan36
No title available
TMBGareOK. The Official They Might Be Giants tumblr

Love Begins
Interview Vampire Daily
🪼
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
Mike Driver
Sweet Seals For You, Always
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
The Stonewall Inn
Doug Jones
Keni
macklin celebrini has autism

oozey mess

PR's Tumblrdome
almost home
Color Me Curious
$LAYYYTER

seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Namibia
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany

seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil
seen from Ecuador
seen from Brazil

seen from Colombia

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Germany
seen from Ireland
seen from Pakistan
seen from Uzbekistan

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
@another-brick-in-the-stall
happy last fingers in his ass sunday everyone its been an honor serving w you
it was an honor being horny with you all
im confused as to how there isnt any perceived accountability for the hosting service to allow those people to host from that system at all. am i to understand the mastadon system itself has no control over any of the servers? if so thats not really a system i like for this exact reason. and why is the server hosting service at the higher level not accountable for allowing those things to continue to exist
Because Mastodon doesn’t host anything. Every instance is hosted by individuals, and no instance has any control over other instances. There is an instance called mastodon.social, and it has its own rules for which instances it allows itself to federate with. (It bans other instances that support the kind of stuff we all hate here.) But it’s still just one instance.
Think of Mastodon like a really fancy tumblr theme. It is a set of tools that allow a person to easily set up and host a social media platform that is easily integrated with other websites that use the same tools. Every instance and its servers is owned and paid for by a person, not a corporation. This means that, just like any other website, people can use the tools for hosting illegal and immoral content. It also means that owners of those instances have a lot of control over which other instances they allow themselves to be federated with. Most instances have a list of instances they’ve blocked with the reasons why. I can assure you that most of the mastodon instances have their own rules that disallow illegal content and block instances that allow any kind of hate speech or child pornography.
What you’re asking is that the creators of an open source set of web development tools exhibit total control over its users… kind of like what tumblr is doing to us right now, and has the power to do because it’s privately owned.
Please reblog this to fix some of the damage. “Don’t use mastodon because there are bad people there” is like saying “Don’t use the internet because there are bad people there.” There isn’t a Mastodon Entity that has control over its users, and the reason y’all are having such a hard time grasping this is because not enough truly decentralized platforms exist and we’re all content surrendering our social media experience to a for-profit corporation that doesn’t have our best interests in mind.
we all know what tumblr’s going to look like after december 17th
homophobia is stupid. who the hell is afraid of homes
AHGDGHDFJHKHFGGF????
If anyone’s wondering how well the nsfw filters are going to work once tumblr outlaws horny people…..
me: soft, full of love, forgiving, kind, bright also me: can hold grudges for years, bitter as hell, already cried twice today
@staff deleting all porn while ignoring blogs promoting violence, bigotry, and hate speech
ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ
So Long Gay Bowser………..
You know who this one is! (art by @iamprikle)
In-home listening devices 'can identify optimal ways to discuss common problems and alleviate misunderstandings', says report author
Virtual assistants such as Amazon’s Alexa and Google Home have the capacity to analyse how happy and healthy a couple’s relationship is, research has found.
In-home listening devices will soon be able to judge how functional relationships are as well as interrupt an argument with an idea for how to resolve it, the study said.
The research, by Imperial College Business School, stated that within the next two to three years, digital assistants could predict with 75 per cent accuracy the likelihood of a relationship or marriage being a success.
The technology would reach a verdict through acoustic analysis of communication between couples – examining everything from everyday encounters to arguments.
The virtual assistants would then be able to provide relationship advice and what researchers refer to as democratising counselling.
I LOVE HAVING AN ALWAYS-ON WIRETAP THAT CAN ASCERTAIN THE STATE OF MY INTERPERSONAL RELATIONSHIPS AND GIVE JUDGEMENT THEREUPON
Remember, kids: just say “no” to smart devices.
*tent reznor voice* i want to hug you like an animal
i want to feel you from the outside
my whole existence is fun
@trans-mom
@satanic-girls-gone-wild
people are fucking laying into the mods and im living for it