YES to all but the last sentence of that.
Loki is part of the colonialist/imperialist Asgardian history as well - he is the last thing Odin stole in his quest for dominance over Jotunheim.
My dad is Native American, and my dad loves to talk about how Loki reminds him of the tradition of colonizers taking indigenous children from their families and sending them to boarding schools or putting them in white foster families.
Think about it - first, we have no evidence that Loki was unwanted except for what Odin, the colonizer, tells us: that Loki was Laufeyâs child, abandoned in the temple. ButâŠif he was a newborn abandoned in a temple, how does Odin know who his father was? Given what we know about Odinâs history now, doesnât it make more sense that Laufey placed his very much wanted newborn son in the temple in the hopes that it or the gods or the Casket of Ancient Winters would keep him safe while he and every warrior in the entire country apparently went to battle that night? That Odin, the colonizer, went to that temple to take the casket and the newborn prince so that Laufey, with no heir and no source of power, could never rebuild what was damaged that night? That Laufey grieved the loss of his son but had no power to take him back, compared to the strength of Asgard?
Thatâs what happened to indigenous children perfectly legally in the U.S. all the way up to the 1970s. Canadaâs last boarding school wasnât closed until the 1990s.
At the Carlisle school, a boarding school that Native American children were shipped to in Pennsylvania, they acted according to the motto âKill the Indian, Save the Man,â and that is exactly the approach Odin took with Loki. Loki is not told about his heritage. He is not taught anything about Jotun language, art, food, gender roles, family or political structure, or culture of any kind. He - along with Thor and every other Asgardian child - is taught only that Frost Giants are the monsters and that Asgardians - imperialist colonizers - are the peacekeepers. Asgardian culture is the only culture and is good; Jotun culture is savage and not worth talking about, let alone learning.
Lokiâs internalized issues surrounding this carry him through the plot of the first Thor film, in which he attempts to prove that he is a true Asgardian - which heâs been brainwashed for fifteen hundred years, a truly unfathomable lifetime, to believe is the best thing you can be - and not a Jotun monster by setting up a scenario in which he is literally killing the Indian (Laufey) to save the man (Odin). That Odin does not value this action doesnât diminish his responsibility for the centuries of work he did to turn Loki into a young man with no emotional framework for being able to accept himself for who and what he is and his subsequent spiral into this plan.
Loki is so emotionally damaged that when he thinks his Asgardian colonizer-father can only see him as a savage, he attempts suicide. This type of damage, too, was not uncommon for indigenous youth who were stripped of their culture and felt as though they were ultimately not capable of being either white or indigenous.
Loki later struggles with being manipulated by Thanos and the Mind Stone, and while this is presented as having started as some mad thirst for power on Lokiâs part, itâs worth examining closer. Itâs entirely plausible that what ruling Midgard meant to Loki was not infinite power (especially given the apparent benevolence he shows in Ragnarok when he is actually ruling - the Asgardians are neither overly surprised that Odin was actually Loki nor thanking Thor for relieving them of Lokiâs rule, and they look as prosperous and happy as the ever have when Thor arrives), but rather a way to prove to Odin that Loki was like him: not a savage, but a colonizer in his own right.
The Dark World contains its own take on colonizers - Frigga is the center of that film even after her death, and nobody talks about how she embodies kind-hearted white feminist colonizer bullshit. She is sweet and strong-willed and a good mother andâŠand she kept Lokiâs heritage from him as well. She teaches him her magic but never tells him that she isnât the source of his. She doesnât speak up when her Jotun (indigenous) son is sentenced to prison for actions contributed to by her Aesir (white) husband, who is both judge and jury. She visits him in secret, because she loves him but doesnât love him quite enough to publicly act against her (white) husband. Sheâs the lady down the street whose foster children of color all loved her growing up but are now certain she would have voted for Trump, because she loved them as individuals but not enough to overcome her racism. And she did love Loki. Thatâs the hard part, and we can see Loki struggle with the emotions around that over the course of the film.
Lokiâs actions at the end of that film come back to killing the Indian and saving the man - he fakes his death, and it looks like heâs setting himself free from the responsibilities of trying to navigate who and what he is, but he doesnât actually choose freedom. Heâs still so sure that being a Jotun is unacceptable that he has been walking through worlds as an Aesir - as Friggaâs son, if not quite Odinâs - and thereâs nowhere for him to go emotionally or physically but back to Asgard. Weâre initially led to believe he has killed Odin and is on the throne because he craves power, but the truth is that Odin is living out his days wistfully in New York and not even trying to return to Asgard, becauseâŠwell, that part is a mystery. Does he think Loki will be a good king? It seems that way, given that Odin had not hesitated to prevent Thor from being the king when he wasnât ready, but we can only speculate.
Loki rules Asgard for four years, which isnât long compared Odinâs reign, which stretched across millenia, or even his own life, as heâs nearly Thorâs age (approx. 1500), but the people seem happy, healthy, and as well-off as ever when Thor returns. The only things about Lokiâs rule that are relevant to this are that the Asgardians (aside from Thor) havenât been engaging in inter-realm stuff at all as far as we can tell, because Loki is not the colonizer he tried to be under the Mind Stoneâs influence, andâŠthe play.
That play that was seemingly just in there for laughs. Watch it again, and youâll notice that itâs not just Loki being, as Tony pointed out that he can be, a full-tilt diva. The play dramatizes his false sacrifice, yes, but it also contains a fictional retelling of his relationship with Odin. Any good therapist would have a field day with this line:
âLoki, my boy⊠âTwas many moons ago I found you on a frost-bitten battlefield. On that day, I did not yet see in you Asgardâs savior. No. You were merely a little blue baby icicle that melted this old foolâs heart.â
Loki tries to paint himself in a positive and tragic light, sure, but he does the same for Odin. He wants so badly to be able to believe that Odin raised him because he loved him that he rewrites what Odin himself gave as the reason for taking him.
âI thought we could unite our kingdoms one day. Bring about an alliance, bring about permanent peace⊠through you.â
Loki was intended to sit on Jotunheimâs throne as Thorâs counterpart, an Asgardian figurehead under Odinâs guidance, with no understanding of his own culture or the people he ruled. This is what was done to the sons of indigenous chiefs across the world through the boarding schools of the 18- and 19-00s. This is peak colonialism.
At the end of his life, Loki is able to start to move past his issues. He comes to save the Asgardians, because he knows that they are not Odin, though they benefited from his actions. Set free from the expectation that he return to Thorâs side just because they were raised as brothers, he returns to him anyway because he loves him and because he has learned to separate who both of them actually are as people from what Odin wanted them to be. In a moment of obvious symbolism if you think of him as a victim of Odinâs colonization of the realms, he carries out the resurrection of Surtur and helps his brother of choice destroy Asgard and the legacy of colonization that it was built on.
As he dies, he articulates all of the complicated things that he is - âLoki, Prince of Asgard, Odinson, the Rightful King of Jotunheim, God of Mischiefâ - but before that, before he calls for the Hulk, he starts with âWell, for one thing, Iâm not Asgardian,â and in that moment, for the very first time in his entire life, Loki says that like heâs proud of it.
Loki is not the one part of the story of Odin, Hela, and Thor that isnât about colonization and its evils - he is the direct victim of it. He is the colonized.
