The West has more power globally, so they can see non-Western dictators and terrorists as the underdogs, the oppressed, who's actions can be painted as justified self-defence or "resistance."
There is an element of truth to this, but its grossly over-simplified- certainly Russia certainly has less power in various respects than the US, for example (though still a nuclear arsenal potentially sufficient to depopulate most of the Earth, and a propaganda and political subversion apparatus that has frankly run circles around the West), but it's government has far more power than the countries it has invaded, or the people and minority groups within its territory that it oppresses (a Western Tankie may sidestep this by simply treating Ukraine as an extension of NATO/the West/the US, thereby erasing its underdog status- and also dovetailing with Russian propaganda which denies Ukrainian sovereignty).
Likewise, Israel has more power than Gazans- but worldwide Jews are still a tiny, widely-persecuted and highly vulnerable marginalized group (this is erased through the blatant antisemitic canards of portraying Jews as "white European colonizers," and claiming that they secretly control the world).
Another factor is the seemingly common human tendency in conflict to divide the world into a binary of Good Guys, who are justified in everything they do, and Bad Guys, who deserve everything done to them and are subhumans with no rights. And, usually, to draw those distinctions on racial/ethnic/national/other demographic lines. So, if a nonwestern country is oppressed by western corporations and governments, then West=Bad, Nonwestern=Good, and the nonwestern dictator or terrorist can do no wrong.
Then there's the fact that most Western Leftists are, well... raised in the West. It is the West that they have experienced. It is the West, where the Western Establishment (however you define that) holds most of the power, that they are familiar with, and the status quo in the West that they are angry with. They have largely never experienced the oppression of Russia or Iran or China. So they tend to equate power and oppression with The West.
In other words, anti-Western Leftists have an (ironically) Western-centric perspective that they are imposing on the rest of the world.
This is a HUGE fucking issue with Israel and Palestine, because its a situation where you have multiple ethnic and religious groups sharing a homeland, who have been and still are subjected to colonization, expulsion and oppression and have fought to return home, and both have a legitimate claim to be there and deep historical and ongoing trauma. But Western Leftists, by and large, insist on trying to fit it into the mode of oppression and conflict that they are familiar with- one of white European colonizers (how they frame Israel/Zionists/Jews) oppressing and committing genocide against non-white indigenous natives.
So, take an initial Western-centric worldview which they simultaneously hold and are rebelling against, throw in the human tendency to simplify conflict into Our Side (above reproach) and Them (subhumans who deserve whatever is done to them), and you get "The West is the sole source of all evil in the world, anyone opposed to it is completely justified and heroic Resistance who can do no wrong, and anything to the contrary is just another evil Western plot."
I'll also add that for all their hatred for the West, a lot of anti-Western Leftists have still deeply internalized the biases of the West, in ways that they refuse to admit. For example, the basic Marxist accelertionist narrative, that capitalism must get worse and worse until it leads to an inevitable violent revolution followed by a classless utopia rising from the ashes, is textbook apocalyptic thinking. Its basically Revelations with The Communist Manifesto in place of the Bible, The Revolution in place of Armageddon, and the classless post-revolutionary society in place of the Kingdom of Heaven.
Same with antisemitism. Leftist rhetoric about billionaires running the world is often virtually identical to old conspiracy theories about a cabal of rich Jews running the world. Sure, a Leftist may not mean "Jews" when they say "billionaires," but a few euphemisms ("global elites," focussing on AIPAC over other lobbying groups, etc) makes it very easy to make the transition, and for a Leftist to start seeing Israeli/Jewish money as the root of all evil (this, and conspiracy theorism in general, relates to another unfortunate but well-known human tendency- that of seeing patterns that aren't there).
And at that point you're already halfway to saying "Hitler Was Right."
gracieabrams
blakekathryn
sugurugetos
turnnoffyourmind
andulkaphoto
origamiaround
areudirty
gamechangershow
