[aquahater]

micha (he/she), bug(she/her) + the others. Aqua hoshino loving collective hivemind (>؂ •́)ᕗ⊹ ࣪ ˖⭑

✶ RULES! ↓

— every tongue that will rise against hoshino aqua will fall .

— 1st thing about me and aqua is that she is my wife. please keep this in mind

— 2nd thing about me and aqua is that i love making fun of her. Hating her harmlessly. One might even call me...an aquahate— (i get shot and i die)

— no girl slander allowed. get the fuck out of my house if you hate kana or akane !!!!!!! I am an aquaka shipper mainly. But i do not tolerate kana hatred. That's literally my fucking wife's wife

— aquaka and aqukanakane main . But I am a lover of all aqua ships with maybe the exception of aquruby bcs it's literally a nothingburger

— firm believer of aquaka yuri and kanakane yaoi (its the truth)

[aquahater]

TRANS RIGHTS!

[no-oxygen-in-my-bl00d]

[aquahater]

no more sadness. Only caked up plushie aqua

[sycamorality]

op disabled reblogs but i really wanted this post on my blog again

[ni-ien]

pmmm taught me that not even a god could save you from being human and also that drawing girls is a ton of fun 😳

[vampirefutanari]

people will want huge tits but hate fat girls. thats like loving oranges and hating orange trees. fuck you.

[mobietin]

Posting my references for Sandra together on new account! Featuring her emotional support cat, Bella.

Sandra is a grounded social butterfly, thriving in a web of creative friendships while she toils away at her graphic design day job and aspirations in the local fine arts scene.

Bonus: listen to the five albums featured on her character sheet here

[honeyscomet]

how it feels when someone compliments my characterization

[billiamdoor]

I can be trusted with the fictional character. I Promise.

[billiamdoor]

I lied. Fuck it’s dire y’all. It’s Bad.

[toonzreblogs]

[swagophile]

yandere gf: yeah you shouldnt like see anyone else idk. like idk. you should just like be mine and whatever but its like fine. i mean i just think were really compatible. like its fine

tsundere gf: ok i mean i guess thats fine. like sure. whatever. im not like that crazy about you. like whatever. i guess i can make that work. even if youre kind of annoying sometimes

yandere gf: [digging her nails into her palm] yeah that sounds fine with me

[ot3]

lowkey why should i or anyone else care if someone who is "actually" bisexual but chooses to conduct her romantic and sexual endeavors in a way indistinguishable from lesbianism calls herself a lesbian. if a woman feels something she considers to be "real" attraction to men but for whatever reasons does not want to ever act on those feelings or pursue those relationships in favor of exclusively being with other women, what makes that meaningfully different than "actual" lesbianism. imo there's no way to believe that's somehow an Unacceptable version of lesbianism that doesn't take a huge amount of agency away from people in how they choose to conduct and describe their intimate relationships.

like something i think we need to accept is that mainstream contemporary queer discourse does not have actual functionally consistent definitions of sexual and romantic attraction. which makes perfect sense because those are extremely subjective, complicated, multifaceted, nebulous, and deeply personal kinds of feelings. but people toss these terms out as if everyone is already on the same page about what they actually entail and so they can then be used to come to some sort of universal understanding of what feelings are then deviant from the implicit "normal" sexual and romantic attraction. and i just simply don't think that's the case. norms around romance and sex are so so so much more about policing the way people behave than the way they feel because we do not have the privilege of experiencing anyone else's emotional landscape first hand, or interfacing it at all without it needing to first be externalized through some form of speech or action.

there are people who consider themselves asexual and still willingly have and enjoy sex with a partner. there are people who willingly have and enjoy sex with their partner who consider that willingness and enjoyment to be sexual attraction in its own right and don't find the asexual label to be applicable or helpful for them even if their sexual feelings are nonstandard. there are people who have chosen to spend their lives with each other and never fuck once who consider their relationship to be queerplatonic. there are people in the exact same circumstances who consider themselves to be a romantic couple. and none of these people are somehow wrong about themselves, or invalidating each other by their use of terminology that contradicts one another, they just have different ways of conceptualizing their feelings.

with lesbianism in particular mediating "attraction" is such a fucking quagmire because of how overexposed we all are to hypersexual depictions of women throughout the course of our daily lives, and how much pressure there is to prioritize and center men in patriarchal societies. among plenty of other things. i'm not going to harp on explaining this too much further because like anyone who has actually ever listened to anyone talk about being a lesbian understands the difficulty in untangling the nature and legitimacy of sexual feelings that comes with. there could be a woman out there who considers herself bisexual and has only been with women because she finds that although she may be open to a hypothetical relationship with a man she hasn't found any real men who are up to snuff yet. there could be another woman out there with identical levels of "attraction" to men who considers herself to be a lesbian because in her eyes never having desired a relationship with a real man is evidence that that attraction is not as "real" as her attraction to women. like. come on. does having had any kind of sexual feelings for men somehow ~taint~ women so much that using the word "lesbian" to describe exclusively having romantic and sexual relationships with other women somehow becomes inaccurate just because they are describing a lived reality they've chosen via self-reflection instead of describing some hypothetically innate and immutable sexual feelings they were born with.

[brawlite]

honestly sometimes there's no better feeling than rereading a fic you've written and coming out of it going, "yeah that actually this DOES slap. exactly what i wanted to read. fucking nailed it."

[we-have-black-marble-at-home]

my final act of love will have casualties

[nonlynear]

i’m haunted i’m unfuckable and i love you

[rouge-the-bat]

personality test

what do u first think when u see this shape

[official-boob-posts]

official boob post

[nonbinary-wrath-month]

The reason why so many of y'all's feminism sucks is because you still believe deep down in your hearts that there are only two kinds of people in the world: precious, ethereal, fragile dollthings called "women", and violent, lustful, rage-fueled apes called "men". Until you throw that idea away, 3rd-grade-tier "girls rule boys drool, girls are princesses and boys are stinky :(" is as feminist as we'll ever get-- and I hope it's obvious that that's lightyears away from the bare minimum of where we need to be.

[nonbinary-wrath-month]

I don't know how I'm supposed to explain to ostensibly trans-friendly feminists that "women are beautiful soft things made of glass, men are obsessed with violence and sex" is exactly what the patriarchy wants you to believe. Patriarchy wants you to believe that being a woman and/or having a vagina (patriarchy generally believes those two things are synonymous) makes one shatter on impact with reality. It makes you easier to control if you are scared shitless of the other half of the population, and it makes you more compliant with your lot in life if you believe it is in the nature of the other half of the population to rape and kill rather than realise those were choices those individual rapists and murderers made. There is no way to make gender essentialism progressive and feminist, because it is one of patriarchy's tools of subjugation. Stop trying to make it progressive.

And I can scream all of that from the rooftops over and over again, and what I hear in reply is "Trans men really are men because no woman would ever decide to become an inherently evil repugnant rapist ape", and "You're so right. Trans women are women because they too are pretty delicate little objects I can fuck", and "You're non-binary? So are you fucktoy non-binary or sexpest non-binary?", and my patience runs ever thinner.