Could this (presumed) human, "Lila Rossi" / "Cerise Bianca" / Whatever the heck her actual name is (a.k.a Chrysalis), survive the Shibuya Reaper's Game?
The results are in, the numbers have been crunched. This two-faced liar could NOT survive the Reaper's Game! In order to properly grow and develop as a person one must be honest with oneself about their current circumstances (or so I've heard, growing and developing is something for people OTHER than me, obviously) so this girl, the embodiment of a lie, truly stands no chance. When all the masks are torn away, all that is left is cold, dead, heartless void. The world cannot begin with her.
"Literally begs men to impregnate him. He will not get married until someone gets him pregnant. Also he deserves a second chance."
"OK so aside from the fact that he canonically asks for it sooooo many times. HE. IS. SO. BREEDABLE. HE WOULD LOOK SO GOOD PREGNANT. OK. He needs it, I need it, we need it. ALSO, he got so close last year and I think he deserves a win."
"The show uses children and family as a symbol of stability, both directly and as an explicit absence (the orphans they take care of, Peg and Erin back home, etc). That stability is something that Hawkeye desperately needs and wants. Plus, he constantly talks about being pregnant in a way that implies he's actually thought through it more than most cis guys would."
"He NEEDS it okay! Man canonically wants to be pregnant! I swear he makes at Least one "joke" about it a season, if not more! He wants it so bad I truly think being pregnant could fix him! He made it so close last year and frankly it's a Travesty he didn't win in my opinion, so I'm hoping we can get the rest of tumblr to fully agree this time around!"
"He is a trailblazer in the field of men desperately wanting to be pregnant. He's begging for it. No man has wanted to be pregnant as much as Hawkeye has, and no man has begged for it openly on TV in the 70's as Hawkeye did. No one deserves to be pregnant more than him. Though there may be new contenders, we must honour our roots. The OG. Some of these contenders will have never made a comment about their bunkmate and best friend getting him pregnant, but Hawkeye has. More than once."
"He's the one asking for it, not me (constantly. he is constantly asking for it)."
"There are numerous moments throughout where he references being pregnant/impregnated, including: “you realize if my father sees this, you'll have to marry me,” “frankly, I think I'm pregnant,” “I could have had a third of a baby by now,” “sit down, your father and I will tell you what we did to have you,” and many more. He's begged a general to impregnate him. (“I know that you're a general and I'm just a captain, but I want to have your baby. I mean it, I want your baby! I'll kiss all your stars!”) One of the first things that he says in response to encountering a new character on the show, when asked if married, is “someone's gonna have to get me pregnant first.”
Children, especially to the characters in MASH, are the representation of life and innocence. Hawkeye, as a character, is defined by his love for life. He is a doctor with a vested interest in humanity, thrust into a war against his will, who does everything he can to preserve that life. Pregnancy is not only a joke to Hawkeye, or something said in passing as a quip or subversive statement, but a concept he treats with respect and dignity, and in the midst of such great injustice and cruelty to human life, carrying life into the world would help him fight just that little more against the war. In the words of BJ Hunnicutt, “All we see around here is death and destruction. Now, in the middle of an inferno that even Dante wouldn't buy tickets to, there's a little glimmer of life, thanks to you. That's not wonderful; that's a miracle.”"
"Just look at him."
"dude is BEGGING for it."
"It's what he would want."
"pregnancy is the opposite of war to him. It’s his escape that eliminates his usual coping mechanism of alcohol, his fantasy being so detached from his trauma that he won’t need it anymore. Instead of narrowly saving lives or failing to save lives, he’s creating it."
Hawkeye propaganda from last season
[Gilgamesh]
(Concept Art: Me)
""how a beast and a god together learned to be human". Wrong! Should have been mpreg to make them learn how to be human."
"Enkidu and Gilgamesh, the original yaoi. Hear me out.
Gilgamesh is a great and terrible warrior king. As punishment for raping brides on their wedding night, the gods create Enkidu, to be his equal in battle and punish him for his cruelty. How poetic then, for Enkidu to leave him with child as part of his punishment. Gilgamesh has to endure the pain of childbirth over and over until it is equal to the suffering he inflicted upon the brides.
Then Gilgamesh becomes friends with Enkidu and they travel together. Even gravid, he is still fierce. Together they vanquish Humbaba, the guardian of the Cedar forest.
His growing belly reflects his growing devotion to Enkidu. He daydreams about how the two of them will teach their children to be fierce warriors with no equal.
So when the goddess Ishtar propositions him, of course he turns her down. In her anger, she asks her father to send the Bull of Heaven after him.
Gilgamesh and Enkidu manage to vanquish the bull without supernatural assistance. However in doing so, they incur the wrath of all the gods. The gods strike down Enkidu with illness. Gilgamesh is by his side as he does.
The extra twist of the knife is that Gilgamesh will never get to raise his children with Enkidu. He goes into labour alone.
And he endures suffering equal to that he'd caused."
If Dr Wu wants to play god so bad, he should suffer the consequences. Also, he already has experience with cloning and I fully support whatever lab accident befalls him.
The Bite Of 83 Was Not Caused By An Accidental Springlock Failure
I was reading the Fnaf wiki last night and I noticed something
The wiki seems to attribute the Crying Child's death to an accidental springlock failure caused by his tears loosening the mechanisms.
This is something that I've often seen used in theories and retellings of the bite, but this would not be feasibly possible.
This is due to one simple fact,
The springlock suits were in animatronic mode.
For a springlock failure to occur, the suits would need to be in suit mode, because, while in animatronic mode, all of the springlocks would be disengaged.
We know that the suits were in animatronic mode, because:
1. We have seen what a person wearing the Fredbear suit looks like, and the suit on stage is notably empty.
2. If someone was in the suit, you'd think they'd have the common sense to, at the very least, move away from the child being stuffed in their suit's mouth? Or stop the kids from doing it at all?
3. The bullies would probably have the basic knowledge to not try and pull a 'prank' right in front of an adult, and since we've established that you can see when someone is performing in Fredbear, the bullies probably wouldn't take that kind of risk.
4. We've seen what happens when springlocks fail with someone inside.
If there was somehow someone performing inside of Fredbear, the Crying Child's blood wouldn't be the only one that stained the suit.
With all this evidence, I believe I can safely say that the bite of 83 was not caused by an accidental springlock failure.
However there is still one more thing I'd like to discuss.
If the bite wasn't caused by an accidental springlock failure, how did the suit generate enough force to kill the Crying Child?
The way the springlocks work is that they push the various electronics aside, and lock them in place to make room for the wearer. The wearer is able to move around in the suit, despite all of the technology, meaning has to at least be light enough for your average adult the lift and move around in.
How does this relate?
If the suit is light enough to be worn, the weight of the upper head coming down would not be able to generate enough force to crush the Crying Child's skull like a potato chip.
It might hurt, or give him a concussion, but kiddo would not be cosplaying a pancake.
Therefore, in this scenario, there are only three feasible ways that the bite of 83 could have occurred:
A. William Afton and Henry Emily are idiots who decided it was a good idea to give their animatronics the bite force to crush skulls.
B. Someone tampered with the animatronic to give it the bite force to crush skulls.
Or C. Someone deliberately rewound the head springlocks (at the least) so it would have the bite force to crush skulls. (Though this is unlikely, as the suit probably wouldn't be able to perform in suit mode without a wearer)
While I am unsure of the motives to do so, (As the Fnaf timeline is a mess) I believe that the culprit was likely Afton, as he would have been one of the only ones at the time who knew how to work the springlock suits (Being one of the two designers).
I say Afton, because depending on where the events of Fnaf 4 take place, he could have multiple reasons.
He could have wanted to kill a child using it, or it could be a sort of test run for the funtimes, to see how effective murder via animatronic was.
The above is all speculation however, and is not based in facts. These are merely my musings and hold no merit to the theory. As of now, there is no substantial evidence to confirm or deny Afton's involvement in the bite.
Overall, the bite of 83 could not be caused by an accidental springlock failure, meaning either Afton and Emily were really stupid when designing the suits, or someone tampered with the Fredbear suit to make it deadly.
If I have missed any evidence, feel free to correct me!
Thank you for reading this theory, I hope you have a wonderful day.
Battington actually made a better idea for how the bite could've happened. Fredbear's jaw might have been too heavy for just the endo to move them, so hydraulics were added to make the jaw move correctly.
I feel like the main problem with that theory is the fact that the springlock suits were light enough for someone to wear them as costumes. It wouldn't make sense to add extra machinery for no reason.
Another thing I've noticed about the sprite for Fredbear is that the top half of the head is only held up by two metal pole pieces.
So the top half would almost definitely be fairly light, since if it was heavier, there would likely be more support for the head.
Overall, I hope this doesn't come off as rude, and I apologise if it does, I only wish to work with people to help discover the different aspects of lore surrounding these games.
The Bite Of 83 Was Not Caused By An Accidental Springlock Failure
I was reading the Fnaf wiki last night and I noticed something
The wiki seems to attribute the Crying Child's death to an accidental springlock failure caused by his tears loosening the mechanisms.
This is something that I've often seen used in theories and retellings of the bite, but this would not be feasibly possible.
This is due to one simple fact,
The springlock suits were in animatronic mode.
For a springlock failure to occur, the suits would need to be in suit mode, because, while in animatronic mode, all of the springlocks would be disengaged.
We know that the suits were in animatronic mode, because:
1. We have seen what a person wearing the Fredbear suit looks like, and the suit on stage is notably empty.
2. If someone was in the suit, you'd think they'd have the common sense to, at the very least, move away from the child being stuffed in their suit's mouth? Or stop the kids from doing it at all?
3. The bullies would probably have the basic knowledge to not try and pull a 'prank' right in front of an adult, and since we've established that you can see when someone is performing in Fredbear, the bullies probably wouldn't take that kind of risk.
4. We've seen what happens when springlocks fail with someone inside.
If there was somehow someone performing inside of Fredbear, the Crying Child's blood wouldn't be the only one that stained the suit.
With all this evidence, I believe I can safely say that the bite of 83 was not caused by an accidental springlock failure.
However there is still one more thing I'd like to discuss.
If the bite wasn't caused by an accidental springlock failure, how did the suit generate enough force to kill the Crying Child?
The way the springlocks work is that they push the various electronics aside, and lock them in place to make room for the wearer. The wearer is able to move around in the suit, despite all of the technology, meaning has to at least be light enough for your average adult the lift and move around in.
How does this relate?
If the suit is light enough to be worn, the weight of the upper head coming down would not be able to generate enough force to crush the Crying Child's skull like a potato chip.
It might hurt, or give him a concussion, but kiddo would not be cosplaying a pancake.
Therefore, in this scenario, there are only three feasible ways that the bite of 83 could have occurred:
A. William Afton and Henry Emily are idiots who decided it was a good idea to give their animatronics the bite force to crush skulls.
B. Someone tampered with the animatronic to give it the bite force to crush skulls.
Or C. Someone deliberately rewound the head springlocks (at the least) so it would have the bite force to crush skulls. (Though this is unlikely, as the suit probably wouldn't be able to perform in suit mode without a wearer)
While I am unsure of the motives to do so, (As the Fnaf timeline is a mess) I believe that the culprit was likely Afton, as he would have been one of the only ones at the time who knew how to work the springlock suits (Being one of the two designers).
I say Afton, because depending on where the events of Fnaf 4 take place, he could have multiple reasons.
He could have wanted to kill a child using it, or it could be a sort of test run for the funtimes, to see how effective murder via animatronic was.
The above is all speculation however, and is not based in facts. These are merely my musings and hold no merit to the theory. As of now, there is no substantial evidence to confirm or deny Afton's involvement in the bite.
Overall, the bite of 83 could not be caused by an accidental springlock failure, meaning either Afton and Emily were really stupid when designing the suits, or someone tampered with the Fredbear suit to make it deadly.
If I have missed any evidence, feel free to correct me!
Thank you for reading this theory, I hope you have a wonderful day.
