Untitled

[ascendient]

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Joseph Palmer (@josephdagreat)

[liberaljane]

may you heal from the things you don't talk about 🦋

Digital illustration of a brown fem wearing a dress strappy dress with high cut slits on the skirt. She has body hair, long blueish hair and morpho butterfly wing earrings. Text reads, 'may you heal from the things you don't talk about.'

[ghost-37]

[toxicrocket]

All Hail "The Queen of Rock & Roll"! 👑🕊️

[ascendient]

Tell me you have unresolved trauma without telling me you have unresolved trauma.

[toxicrocket]

“I ______ in #mymelanin” — Part 2  //  ToxicRocket | Tumblr

I always like taking photos with some sort of concept in mind. Much of what I’ve been doing lately is finding ways to celebrate the body I’m in encourage others to do the same. Lately, I’ve stumbled on the popular Calvin Klein ad and thought I’d try out my version of it.

#mymelanin // tag it // share it

[ascendient]

So someone clarify this for me. In the third grade my teacher went away for a while. When they came back, we were all sat down and she explained to us her different pronouns and her new name. We were all specifically told to only refer to her by these from now on, and not the old ones. There were times when students either didn't remember and accidentally referred to her by the wrong pronoun or name, but they were gently corrected and told her appropriate name and title. After a while it became the new normal. Does that mean I was I really indoctrinated??

If you said "no" congrats, you have more than two brain cells.

If you said "yes", thank you for saving me the time to out you as the dumb fuck that you are.

In the situation I was describing, my teacher had gone away to get MARRIED. Therefore she was no longer MS Sheehy, but MRS Riley. It was a relatively smooth transition. This concept is nothing new to students or society. So why is this considered "grooming" if it's an LGBT issue? Seriously asking. Because either they're both indoctrination, or neither are.

[ascendient]

[left-reminders]

[armedjoy]

[atheistforhumanity]

[shleepy-girl]

“Capitalism breeds mass production, innovation is rare and immediately copied/exploited.”

There I fixed the quote.

[cheekybug1]

[cheekybug1]

[whitepeopletwitter]

[fkanigg]

gf.me/u/zpj2q7

Help Joshua move out of homophobic and toxic house, organized by Ctrl Clip

I’m a 19 year old boy who currently lives with homophobic grandparent/mom… Ctrl Clip needs your support for Help Joshua move out of homophob

[fkanigg]

Can my tumblr friends and mutuals keep boosting plz

[whitepeopletwitter]

[falsedetective]

[shinobicyrus]

Basically, yeah.

[adotcorbin]

Hi please dont hide these in the tags

[sephezade]

[t4tbruharvey]

[ID: tiktok by @fizzylifting drinker. the first few seconds are an excerpt from another user’s tikok, in which he (a white man) says “I’m saying white women are the only group of women that can sit there and weaponize their oppression.”

the video then cuts to @fizzylifting drinker (a Black woman) who says:

So he’s getting a lot of flak for this and one of his videos was even taken down but he’s not wrong. We have seen throughout the centuries that white women have used their womanhood to benefit them in terms of white supremacy. We’ve seen Emmet Till and the burning of Black Wall Street. In 2020, we’ve seen blank while black {captions onscreen here say #_WhileBlack}, with many of those calls being white women. We’ve even seen the phrase “support all women” which is used to fight against misogyny, as a tool for white women to avoid accountability when they’re called out for their racism. It’s not that women are not oppressed under the patriarchy. But they weaponize the oppression they have as a white person and a woman to their benefit. Intentionally or not, white women have used this to avoid accountability and benefit from white privilege. But some people aren’t ready for that conversation. /end ID]

[sereminar]

The video gave us a couple examples of context, here's one more.

In her book, “They Were Her Property: White Women as Slave Owners in the American South,” author Stephanie E. Jones-Rogers reveals, as a result of her research, that 40% of slave owners between the period of 1850 and 1860 were White women.

(Article: https://news.amomama.com/153467-black-female-professors-research-reveals.html

Black Female Professor's Research Reveals 40% of White Women Were Slave Owners in the US

A recent study reveals a startling revelation about the involvement of a great number of White women during the period of slavery. According

[mjalti]

[ascendient]