With what's going on I'm just Gonna Link my Dreamwidth post where I link all my accounts.
EXPECTATIONS

★
Claire Keane
YOU ARE THE REASON
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Today's Document
we're not kids anymore.
Misplaced Lens Cap

PR's Tumblrdome
𓃗
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Cosmic Funnies

blake kathryn

gracie abrams
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me
taylor price

Kiana Khansmith
The Bowery Presents
No title available
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

seen from Italy
seen from France

seen from Indonesia

seen from United States
seen from France
seen from Bangladesh
seen from United States
seen from Vietnam
seen from Bolivia
seen from Vietnam
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
@asexual-thot
With what's going on I'm just Gonna Link my Dreamwidth post where I link all my accounts.
imo the term "walkable" in "walkable cities" should be understood to mean "wheelchair accessible" as well, not just literally "possible to walk in". the act of walking in a city doesn't automatically make it walkable
I love the implication that, as Larry is an "unpaid trainee", the dog is paid.
It's fine to disagree with the IAU about the definition of "planet"; however, if your definition includes Pluto but not Ceres, Orcus, Haumea, Quaoar, Makemake, Gonggong, Eris or Sedna, you don't actually care what a planet is – you just want the exact list of nine planets you learned in primary school back. Your cute little Pluto-including orbital distance mnemonic ought to be at least seventeen words long, and good fucking luck with the Q!
My Very Exciting Magic Carpet Just Sailed Under Nine Orphic Palaces, Slandering Hungry Quaker Matrons Going Erotically Southward.
I appreciate that you included Salacia but not Charon – really threading the needle pedantry-wise there.
reading a negative review of something you love written by a person who very clearly didn’t understand it at all
reading a positive review of something you love written by a person who very clearly didn’t understand it at all
Reading a negative review of something you hate by someone who very clearly didn't understand it at all and hates it for the wrong reasons
The Chinese shoe manufacturer decided to demonstrate the indestructibility of their shoes
Good evening friends and enemies, it's time to learn how to source unsourced videos instead of perpetuating the chain of missing attributions that progressively obscure the original source with each repost. 😃
STEP 1: Take a screencap of the video, preferably while it's playing so that the PLAY button isn't blocking the image.
STEP 2: Reverse image search of choice. To my chagrin, I tend to end up resorting to Google's Search by image because Tineye keeps failing me and I haven't gotten around to doing a deep dive into currently available reverse image search services.
If you use the Firefox desktop web browser (untested: other desktop web browsers, Firefox mobile web browser) you can combine STEP 1 & STEP 2: Feel free to repost the video to Tumblr first, preferably as a draft or private post to prevent people from reblogging the uncredited vid, because this method doesn't work as well on Reddit videos.
Right-Click on the video. In the right-click menu, look for "Image Search Options" and hover over it to bring up a list of search options. I'll have to try out some of the other options later, but for this demonstration I used Google.
The search engine should open in another tab.
STEP 3: The Search. This part will be a mix of luck, tenaciousness, and deductive skills.
For Google, I recommend going to the "Exact matches" tab because it presents matches and their information in a much more condensed format than the other tabs. "Exact matches" is a misnomer, as is apparent in the screencap below. This search actually pulled up images from at least two separate videos by the same woman hanging from the same tree: one where she's wearing a slate grey pencil skirt and blazer (as in the video reposted by OP) and one where she's wearing a pale grey long-sleeved dress.
Ideally, a functional search engine would let you sort results by useful variables such as "date posted". Google is not such a search engine, and with its progressive enshittification you may or may not be able to bully Search by image into limiting results to certain date ranges. Luckily, these videos have been less flagrantly reposted than some, so I didn't have to scroll through too many.
When searching for a source, one of the primary things to pay attention to is date. Obviously, the original source has to be older than any of the reports. Unfortunately, not all the Google results have dates, so the earliest dated video isn't guaranteed to be the original.
In this case, the earliest result was of the grey dress video variant posted on Instagram on Jan 17, 2026. However, upon checking the link it became apparently that the Instagram account was not the originator of the video and their repost was unsourced.
If the date check fails you, keep an eye out for any undated results that clearly stand out from the rest. In this case, I picked up on the following:
Which has the following unique traits:
A new outfit! This is the only result that features the woman in a pale brown blazer and pencil skirt.
Dimensions. This result is 1080 x 1920, while the majority of results were smaller in size. Reposts are more likely to be downscaled from the original than upscaled, so if the initial date-check fails you, you're better off checking the largest undated results first.
Specific username (Liang Li (@liangli521)). A lot of the other results just have captions or titles in various languages. Depending on the website, these are usually either captioned reposts or random search terms that don't even link to the actual video. Results with specific usernames are rarer and thus worth checking out, though some of them may turn out to be reposters.
In this case, I hit the jackpot! There they all were: OP's video, the grey dress video, the brown blazer & skirt video, and many, many more!
Legitimately, Liang Li's whole thing seems to be going ham in skirts, dresses, and frequently heels. Possibly for advertising purposes? Very beautiful. Very powerful.
Bonus videos:
Cool lights!
Obstacle courses and playgrounds with friend!
H-hot damn, ma'am...
The Chinese shoe manufacturer decided to demonstrate the indestructibility of their shoes
And also the indestructibility of that woman's ankles
saying shit like "you don't have to dress masculine/feminine if you don't want to" and "you're still valid if you don't want HRT" are good things to say in theory if you're talking to like, a GNC trans person who is expressing discomfort with binary gendered norms.
but it is very fucking annoying how certain people who may or may not be aware of their own transphobia have been deploying these platitudes toward trans people who aren't super GNC and want to dress more in alignment with their gender or pursue hormone therapy, in a way that comes across as attempting to prevent transition.
like okay here. let me make a convenient guide:
ACCEPTABLE USE OF THOSE PHRASES:
gnc trans man: i wish i could wear dresses and makeup and still be seen as a man, i love feminine gender expression
other person: you don't have to dress masculine if you don't want to! you're still a man no matter what!
-
gnc trans woman: i wish i could still be seen as a woman without needing to be on HRT. i can't take estrogen due to [medical problem] but everyone makes it sound like i'm not a real woman if i don't go on E
other person: you don't need to take HRT for your gender as a woman to be valid! you're still a real woman no matter
UNACCEPTABLE USE OF THOSE PHRASES:
trans woman: i really wish i could wear skirts and dresses and makeup, i know i'd feel more comfortable if i could be more feminine without too many social consequences
other person: you don't need to dress feminine to be valid as a woman!
-
trans man: i really want to go on HRT so i can stop menstruating and start looking more masculine, my hormonal dysphoria is really bad
other person: you don't need HRT to be valid as a man!
hopefully these illustrate what i mean really well!
I would actually go as far as to say that MOST abuse is unintentional. I think most people will go through their lives without ever experiencing intentional abuse. People are abusive because they're selfish, because they're stressed, because they care more about what society thinks they should do than the impacts of their actions on their children and partners, because they think what they're doing is correct, because they've made it make sense in their own heads, because they think they can fix their victims, they think they can fix their relationships, they think they can stop you from leaving, they think they can make you a better partner to them, they think that means you need to do what they want. We've sort of constructed mental illness in a way that doing this shit to other people counts as a form of mental illness because it is anti social behavior in the literal sense— it is behavior that causes social harm.
I don't say any of this to excuse it. I think everyone needs to be more aware of this because if you think abuse has to be intentional you will never realize you are capable of abusive behavior. You will never realize you are being shitty to the people you love, because YOU know what you mean, YOU know you don't mean any harm. But you're doing harm. You need to pay attention to the impact you have on other people, and you need to do it all the time, Especially when you feel least capable of doing so. Sorry! You live in a society. Get your head out of your ass.
I humbly offer this contribution.
i don't really want to weight in on the "using big words in your writing is ableist" discourse happening on tiktok because i'm like 90% certain it's an anti-intellectual psyop to stir up drama in online circles to promote the use of ai to summarize literally everything and thus feeding the LLMs and lowering the populace's mistrust of such tools but i also have to say: dictionaries and thesauruses are the most accessible they've ever been. if you use an e-reader of any kind you can look up a word without leaving the page. there's a plethora of online dictionaries and if you just type a word + "meaning" into google it'll usually give you a definition. we used to have pocket dictionaries we used when reading in class. i have two on my shelf right now that i used in high school. stop letting the fascists purposefully misuse anti-ableism rhetoric to trick you into never thinking again.
Here's the unedited comic for those curious:
The original is from June 18, 1959.
Some have called "they pay me in woims" Sluggo's catch phrase. It's not. He said it once, and folks on Bluesky loved it so much they say it all the time, especially in response to the Nancy Comics by Ernie Bushmiller account. Here's the original "they pay me in woims" from February 22, 1978:
And, another mention of woims from September 13, 1949:
And the Woims Wednesday (aka Woimsday) image that gets posted almost every week because of the popularity of the word:
If your hot take about the movie industry involves the blaming of artists, I am begging you to resist that instinct. Because they are rarely at fault.
I have been working on an essay about subtitles and cinematic audio mixing for probably 6 months. It is about 80% complete. It's a complicated, multifactorial issue.
"Audio guys" are asked to take a cinematic timeline that looks like this...
And then make it sound good on a system like this...
While also making that same mult-track cinematic mix sound good on speakers like this...
And then people hate on these artists because they can't violate the laws of physics.
Could studios invest in a second audio mix that is more suited to tiny speakers?
Absolutely.
They literally did it for years on DVDs and Blu-ray discs. You could select a basic stereo mix or a surround mix.
Why don't they do that anymore?
I'm going to try and dedicate any future writing energy I have to finishing the subtitle essay.
Until then, be nice to the audio guys, okay?
because some folks were curious, here's what my phone's keyboard looks like and how I type on it.
I wasn't expecting this to go anywhere but the keyboard is 8vim! it's not perfect, it notably can't do emojis and obviously typing is gonna be slower than proficient two thumb typing, but for my clumsy self this is largely competing with swipe typing, and I'll always take the speed hit to not deal with autosuggest
this post is awesome because it gets everyone in the world thinking they're the funniest people on the planet into my notifications to be gigantic assholes about the thing I use as an accessibility tool. and yet I can't lock it. because its spreading awareness about an accessibility tool and has already gotten several people to give it a shot and install it. so in unrelated news I think I'm going to start killing people
maybe I’m too old but I’ll never understand “racist dni, transphobe dni, homophobe dni” not because I condone the harmful beliefs these people hold but because I don’t think the majority of people who are racist or transphobic or homophobic identify themselves as those things. like, to them they most certainly genuinely don’t see themselves as those things. so they’re not gonna read your dnis and think “oh dear! I have to click away from this blog immediately! phew 😮💨 almost interact with them accidentally offend the op there!”
on the contrary, you are displaying the things that can hurt or upset or trigger you to strangers on the internet just for what? an extra performative point? obviously I’m not gonna judge people who have these dnis on their blogs because it’s their blogs and what they do is not my business. so I apologize if this post sounds like I am being rude or judgmental or aggressive — sometimes I do have bitchy opinions on the concepts of Things people do, but not about the people who choose to do them. but yeah tbh I really think these dnis are about as useful as putting a “do not rob” sign in front of a bank or a “thief and intruder dni” sign in front of a house.
*I get wanting to take a stand. but I still don’t think it’s gonna achieve anything, which is just my personal opinion. you do you
It's not really about actually stopping those interactions. It's a different flavour of awful.
I've been meaning to get around to this post for a while and have been reminded that it's still relevant.I was always mystified and
"For the kids my friend spoke to, they had no expectation whatsoever that the bad people listed in DNIs would actually listen to them.
Instead, DNIs were intended to be the equivalent of a website saying "only click on this if you're 18," knowing that it'd be ignored.
The goal and purpose of a DNI is a disclaimer that you don't support people in that group and don't want to interact with them, in a desperate attempt to avoid online harassment from your peers if it later turns out you had interacted with (and thus endorsed) someone who was revealed to be Bad. Or, say, a minor."
it's funny how "press F to pay respects" was such a gigantic meme that it seems to have permanently affected the way we talk online. people use it completely genuinely and unironically. had a bad day? F. died in a videogame? F. I see it constantly in Discord, Twitch and ingame chats. like it's actually being used as common shorthand. when it only gained prominence because of how hilariously stupid this screenshot is