Mary Oliver in āDog Songsā

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
I'd rather be in outer space šø

bliss lane
Show & Tell
ojovivo
Mike Driver

@theartofmadeline
Today's Document
Cosimo Galluzzi

oozey mess
untitled
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Sade Olutola
Stranger Things
will byers stan first human second
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Jules of Nature
Monterey Bay Aquarium

shark vs the universe

tannertan36
seen from Colombia
seen from India
seen from United States
seen from Venezuela
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Iraq
seen from Ukraine

seen from United States

seen from Argentina

seen from France

seen from Russia

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from New Zealand
seen from United States
seen from Ecuador
@assassin-swede
Mary Oliver in āDog Songsā
IKEA Rival MĆBELFIENDE To Discontinue Iconic "Litenfotstƶd"
FIJMU News 7-26-26 by FƶrlƄt Fƶrde SvenskaskƤmten
Bad news has hit the Kit-Furniture sales world as MĆBELFIENDE, the second largest manufacturer and seller of ready-to-assemble home furnishings has announced the end of production for its most famous and once best selling product, the Litenfotstƶd.
According to MĆBELFIENDE president Emanuel Soffaborg, "People just don't want to use any kind of fotstƶd anymore. Not only has the Litenfotstƶd undersold in recent years, but the TĆ„kudde, the HƤlpolerare, and even the NĆ„gotdukansƤttafƶtternapĆ„ as well."
Others are aghast at the decision. According to poet DylƄn Thƶmas, "They are wrong wrong wrong to end the Litenfotstƶd. They should not go gentle into that good mƶrknatt. Furniture should be made and sat upon until the sluttid of the dag. Rage, rage against the dying of the solskensomƤrenmetaforfƶrlivet!"
one of my worst writing sins is abusing my power to create compound words. i cannot write the sentence "The sun shone as bright as honey that afternoon." no. that's boring. "The sun was honey-bright that afternoon" however? yes. that sentence is dope as fuck. i do not care if "honey-bright" is a word in the english dictionary. i do not care if the sentence is grammatically correct. i will not change. i will not correct my erred ways. the laws of the english language are mine.
Not a sin at all!
This is what's called a poetic epithet, and it happens all the time in writing. Consider, for example, Homer and his wine-dark sea, or Shakespeare and his death-mark'd love.
If you were then to start using them instead of the word they're describing, you'd be making a kenning. For example, if instead of describing the sun as honey-bright, you said "the honey-drop in the sky". Kennings are best known from Norse writings, like "the path of serpents" for gold, or "GrĆmnir's lip-streams" for poetry itself.
So you're not sinning, you're participating in an ancient literary tradition!
Scansion:
ā” ā / ā” ā / ā” ā / ā” ā / ā” ā The sun / was ho/ney-bright / that af/ternoon
Metrical form: iambic pentameter
I cannot tell you how many poems about the Duchess were required for her to consider me "Quite exceptional" rather than "Quite charming" but it was a LOT. Kind of curious what 200 will get me.
update: No it's the same
Wow, are you sure that adds anything useful?
Iām not here to be useful, Iām here for my own entertainment. Part of that is thinking about furry porn.
Art school is so funny
Letsgooo
The social forces that prevent you from being able to admit to your own desires in the safety of your own mind are far more evil than any desire you could have.
Unacted desires are fundamentally neutral, and you can't decide what to do about the things you want unless you can admit to yourself what they are in the first place. Everyone has desires that would hurt other people if they acted on them, but most people would not actually go out and do anything they know would cause harm. Far more harm is done in this world by people who are trying to pretend they can't possibly want anything they think is bad than people running around going "ehehehe I love hurting people!"
Providing people with a way of exploring the dark parts of ourselves in a way that cannot hurt anyone is one of the purposes of both fiction and kink.
All of us have a hungry, horny, angry, scared animal inside ourselves. You do not need to excuse or justify what that animal wants, it simply is. You cannot escape it. Lying to yourself about the animal that you are will only give you less control over it, not more.
Tags by @sybaritick
Yeah almost everyone is interpreting this as being exclusively about sex and, while that is obviously included in this post, I do mean something broader than that. These tags are a good example.
āØSpeedpaint ko-fi commission āØ
Ngl I totally forgot fandom discourse was a thing. I donāt care man, I have car payments
starting a collection
If I may submit:
you need to be more normal about fwb. no, fwb donāt strip you of your dignity. they are not unhealthy. sexual relationships are not bad. itās not weird to want them and not romance. friends can fuck. you donāt have to be involved romantically to be intimate with someone. that includes all sorts of physical touch because you are also not normal about platonic non-sexual touch. itās not weird if friends cuddle, sleep in one bed, hold hands or kiss. friends can be affectionate with each other. it doesnāt mean they are romantically attracted to each other. nor does it mean they will ever be in a romantic relationship. you need to be more normal about touch and sex in general.
Hanahaki disease is a psychosomatic illness. It's a thing that your body does in response to stress over constantly repressing/concealing your feelings in settings with high background magic. It's like you've been ignoring pain for a long time and suddenly your vision starts going dark, because your affected body is just YANKING on random alerts trying to get you to PAY ATTENTION there is a PROBLEM. Yes the flowers do really exist. So do non-magical psychosomatic symptoms. The flowers aren't special.
This does of course open up the trope to options for non-romantic concealed feelings. Which I think is great. There is something viscerally satisfying about the person who seems so outwardly chipper coughing and hacking and spitting up Depression Flowers so now everyone has to know they're hurting. Isn't there?
at some point during high school i drew a centaur girl with large breasts because i wanted to draw a character that looked like me, and my biofamily got real upset about it. "why are they so large" because mine are that large. "wouldn't that make it hard for her to run" interesting that you think that but keep trying to make me run. "don't draw things like this, it's morally bad" ok i and my apparently inherently pornographic body will just be over here trying to avoid being looked at
this is not to say porn is bad, tbc. i just wasn't a fan as a teenager of being treated like it was impossible to look at bodies like mine non-sexually. frankly i'm not a fan of it now either lmao. i keep kind of thinking about how so many female protagonists are canonically flat or small-chested girls/women who textually wish they had larger breasts, but i can't remember the last time i encountered a protagonist with large breasts where that fact wasn't meant to be sexual. what is up with that dynamic and how do i destroy it
it's like... in order to be accepted as a woman, the character has to desire the idealized form of The Perfect Woman (or if she's a #feminist, reject and detest that same idealized form, but the focus on it is often still there). but in order to be a non-pornographic protagonist, she can't attain it. the moment you have a large enough chest you don't really get to be a normal character anymore, you have to go to sex world. idk. probably someone better read than me has written some sort of papers on this. idk what search terms to use though
Iāve been meaning to draw a companion piece to my Fire Nation train print for AGES, and this year was the perfect year to revisit the Gaang! āŗļø Debuting at my SDCC artist alley table HH-24!
Had to come back to post the side-by-side because Iām obsessed. (I did that first one in 2019! The fulfillment of a seven year prophecy. š±)
This comment was left on a post about making the most of the Libby app. "Excessive use of generous lending policies" is the most absurd phrase I've ever seen anyone use to discuss libraries.
evergreen
Having seen some births now i can say that dog birth is amazing cos they just slip n slide out one after the other like a little conveyor belt. And theyre so little and unformed. And then UNGULATE BIRTHS ... are amazing for the opposite reason which is that 10mins after being born they are filing their taxes. Unless they are goats, in which case they are committing tax fraud instead
Goats are what is called a precocial species, which means that shortly after birth they are able to do many thimgs on their own, such as standing, walking, eating, and embezzlement
Duck Amuck | Director: Chuck Jones | Studio: Warner Bros. | USA, 1953
NOT ME YOU SLOP ARTIST
This is a close up? A CLOSE UP YA JERK! A CLOSEUP!
Alright, letās get this picture started! (The End) NO NOOOOO!
One of the defining moments of animation history.
āAināt I a stinker?ā
In Babylon 5, didnāt one of the non-humans think Daffy was the god of frustration?
Holy shit, this is nearly 70 years old. This would have been right on the heels of color television being commercially available to the public.
@amayatepes look at this
LMAO
Huh. Thatās just a whole ass Daffy Duck cartoon.
Everything about this cartoon is top-notch. The timing, the animation (watch Daffyās different walks) the art; this is a treasure