gross @avocadojizz - Tumblr Blog

Libfems twisted what Feminism means so much that you got people genuinely upset at seeing mentions of female anatomy at a womens march and shocked that women don’t want to censor the converstion around our reproductive rights…yikes

“Women of color twisted feminism up so much that now they feel uncomfortable when it’s not an all white march. The conversation for women should only revolve around one type of woman!1!!!1 HMMMPH”

maybe don’t compare women of colour to whole ass fucking males, it’s like one of the oldest racist tactics used

@avacadojizz that comparison makes absolutely no sense

Ffs lib fems stop being fucking racist challenge @avocadojizz

BLACK WOMEN ARE NOT A ’DIFFERENT TYPE’ OF WOMEN - WE ARE WOMEN.

We are not a sub-category or an ’other’.

Stop trivalising race (and racism) by comparing it to gender.

Drawing a parallel between two different issues isn’t trivializing racism. I would say that calling trans women men is transphobia but that would fall on deaf ears. Also not a lib fem 😘

It’s a false equivalent and you know it.

Here’s a fact, segregation is not and will NEVER FUCKING BE the same as denying males into single-sex areas.

Aw how sweet, you’re not a lib fem just a racist. :)

I mean I admitted multiple times it was a messy way to make my point idk what else you want 🤷🏽‍♀️ I also said women of color not black women specifically so I’m kind of confused as to how I was drawing an equivalent to segregation? I mean you’re free to have your views and I’m free to disagree, just be transparent and say it’s that I believe trans women are women that’s getting you and not hide behind racism when I have already admitted it wasn’t the best way to make that point.

First of all, you never admitted to ME that it was a ‘messy way’ to make your point.

Second of all, you still made the equivalent and now you’re back pedalling because you KNOW it’s wrong to trivalise race.

Third of all, I never mentioned anything about trans women in my posts.

Just admit that you were wrong and you’re trying to make me look like an evil 'TERF’ because you messed up 🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️

I mean when you said “men” who were you referring to in a conversation with radical feminists about transphobia? That seems to be backpedaling imo. Can you point to where I have changed what i have said or am backpedaling? I’m not trying to make you look like a TERF I literally don’t care what you believe because we could go back and forth and it would most likely change neither of opinions so that is irrelevant to me. Feel free to read the other reblogs where I have said this over and over again I’m sorry I didn’t say that directly to you and assumed I had so let me say this clearly: I wrote that two years ago and think it was a messy, unclear way to try and get a point across. I was trying to draw a parallel between two different social movements. That is all. The comparison to “men” in this context was my past self attempting to draw a parallel between the plights women of color and trans women. So yes, saying I’m comparing women of color to men is transphobia. I am not painting you in any way, that is the context and content of this thread. Without backpedaling, can you please clarify what you meant by “segregation is not and will never fucking be the same as denying males into single sex areas”? If I misunderstood who you were referring to as males I would love to know what you actually meant. Also, when did segregation come up? Completely lost by that reach

Libfems twisted what Feminism means so much that you got people genuinely upset at seeing mentions of female anatomy at a womens march and shocked that women don’t want to censor the converstion around our reproductive rights…yikes

“Women of color twisted feminism up so much that now they feel uncomfortable when it’s not an all white march. The conversation for women should only revolve around one type of woman!1!!!1 HMMMPH”

maybe don’t compare women of colour to whole ass fucking males, it’s like one of the oldest racist tactics used

@avacadojizz that comparison makes absolutely no sense

Ffs lib fems stop being fucking racist challenge @avocadojizz

BLACK WOMEN ARE NOT A ’DIFFERENT TYPE’ OF WOMEN - WE ARE WOMEN.

We are not a sub-category or an ’other’.

Stop trivalising race (and racism) by comparing it to gender.

Drawing a parallel between two different issues isn’t trivializing racism. I would say that calling trans women men is transphobia but that would fall on deaf ears. Also not a lib fem 😘

It’s a false equivalent and you know it.

Here’s a fact, segregation is not and will NEVER FUCKING BE the same as denying males into single-sex areas.

Aw how sweet, you’re not a lib fem just a racist. :)

I mean I admitted multiple times it was a messy way to make my point idk what else you want 🤷🏽‍♀️ I also said women of color not black women specifically so I’m kind of confused as to how I was drawing an equivalent to segregation? I mean you’re free to have your views and I’m free to disagree, just be transparent and say it’s that I believe trans women are women that’s getting you and not hide behind racism when I have already admitted it wasn’t the best way to make that point.

Libfems twisted what Feminism means so much that you got people genuinely upset at seeing mentions of female anatomy at a womens march and shocked that women don’t want to censor the converstion around our reproductive rights…yikes

“Women of color twisted feminism up so much that now they feel uncomfortable when it’s not an all white march. The conversation for women should only revolve around one type of woman!1!!!1 HMMMPH”

maybe don’t compare women of colour to whole ass fucking males, it’s like one of the oldest racist tactics used

@avacadojizz that comparison makes absolutely no sense

Ffs lib fems stop being fucking racist challenge @avocadojizz

BLACK WOMEN ARE NOT A ’DIFFERENT TYPE’ OF WOMEN - WE ARE WOMEN.

We are not a sub-category or an ’other’.

Stop trivalising race (and racism) by comparing it to gender.

Drawing a parallel between two different issues isn’t trivializing racism. I would say that calling trans women men is transphobia but that would fall on deaf ears. Also not a lib fem 😘

Libfems twisted what Feminism means so much that you got people genuinely upset at seeing mentions of female anatomy at a womens march and shocked that women don’t want to censor the converstion around our reproductive rights…yikes

“Women of color twisted feminism up so much that now they feel uncomfortable when it’s not an all white march. The conversation for women should only revolve around one type of woman!1!!!1 HMMMPH”

maybe don’t compare women of colour to whole ass fucking males, it’s like one of the oldest racist tactics used

WOC are still biologically female you brain dead, racist worm.

Biological males regardless of their identity or the amount of caked makeup, aren’t part of feminism.

@avocadojizz

Do y’all wanna read my response or continue to tag me in something I said 2 years ago lmaoooooo

Your “response” was shit.

“I have a vastly different take now however”

No, you still think males can be female 🥴

You basically said “I’m Latina what I said can’t be racist!!” And then went on to whine about trans women being “excluded”

Trans women, or any AMAB doesn’t belong in a female centric movement. Men don’t get jacks hit from us. Even if they dress like us.

Nah, I clearly said I was attempting to draw a parallel between two social issues and admitted it was messy and unlclear. I also said you could take me being Latina in whatever way you wanted to, just wanted to add that context. Glad to reclarify :)

Libfems twisted what Feminism means so much that you got people genuinely upset at seeing mentions of female anatomy at a womens march and shocked that women don’t want to censor the converstion around our reproductive rights…yikes

“Women of color twisted feminism up so much that now they feel uncomfortable when it’s not an all white march. The conversation for women should only revolve around one type of woman!1!!!1 HMMMPH”

maybe don’t compare women of colour to whole ass fucking males, it’s like one of the oldest racist tactics used

febfeminist-deactivated20230308

@avacadojizz that comparison makes absolutely no sense

By comparing women of colour to men you are saying that they are innately less woman than a white woman.

You are directly questioning the validity of their womanhood because they don’t conform to your idea of what a woman is (a white woman).

Women of colour are women because they are adult human females, something a male will never be. Putting them on the same level as literal men in makeup and pigtails is doing these women a serious disservice and is unbelievably racist (and sexist).

Women of colour are included in feminism because they’re women. Arguing that they shouldn’t be included because men aren’t included is diminishing their importance in the movement and is unacceptable in radical feminism which seeks to support and unite all women.

Good thing I’m not a radical feminist then lmao

Libfems twisted what Feminism means so much that you got people genuinely upset at seeing mentions of female anatomy at a womens march and shocked that women don’t want to censor the converstion around our reproductive rights…yikes

“Women of color twisted feminism up so much that now they feel uncomfortable when it’s not an all white march. The conversation for women should only revolve around one type of woman!1!!!1 HMMMPH”

maybe don’t compare women of colour to whole ass fucking males, it’s like one of the oldest racist tactics used

WOC are still biologically female you brain dead, racist worm.

Biological males regardless of their identity or the amount of caked makeup, aren’t part of feminism.

@avocadojizz

Do y’all wanna read my response or continue to tag me in something I said 2 years ago lmaoooooo

Your “response” was shit.

“I have a vastly different take now however”

No, you still think males can be female 🥴

Nah I just still believe trans women are women. I’ve just also learned to respect and understand why cis women are upset. Honestly a few years ago I would’ve fought with you but I’m too old for that shit. Believe what you want, I don’t care. I understand the hostility towards a differing opinion and you’re allowed to feel that way the only person it impacts is you. I just wanted to address the so called racism because yes I can see how my response could have fairly been interpreted like that and I just wanted to clarify the messy point I was trying to make. Clearly that’s not the issue though and it’s my defense of trans women that ruffles you and to that I have nothing to say. Enjoy the rest of your day.

Libfems twisted what Feminism means so much that you got people genuinely upset at seeing mentions of female anatomy at a womens march and shocked that women don’t want to censor the converstion around our reproductive rights…yikes

“Women of color twisted feminism up so much that now they feel uncomfortable when it’s not an all white march. The conversation for women should only revolve around one type of woman!1!!!1 HMMMPH”

maybe don’t compare women of colour to whole ass fucking males, it’s like one of the oldest racist tactics used

WOC are still biologically female you brain dead, racist worm.

Biological males regardless of their identity or the amount of caked makeup, aren’t part of feminism.

@avocadojizz

Do y’all wanna read my response or continue to tag me in something I said 2 years ago lmaoooooo

Libfems twisted what Feminism means so much that you got people genuinely upset at seeing mentions of female anatomy at a womens march and shocked that women don’t want to censor the converstion around our reproductive rights…yikes

“Women of color twisted feminism up so much that now they feel uncomfortable when it’s not an all white march. The conversation for women should only revolve around one type of woman!1!!!1 HMMMPH”

maybe don’t compare women of colour to whole ass fucking males, it’s like one of the oldest racist tactics used