One thing that I find interesting is how when people talk about nuance it’s only really given when people can identify with a character or a cause that is being represented in the media they consume.
I want to use my Modern Drama class as an example because I feel like people are less emotional in classroom settings in comparison to fandoms, and also because I just liked the play that I’m going to discuss.
Last semester I read the A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen with my class and we discussed the character of Nora Helmer. When we started the class the teacher said that the stuff we’d read wouldn’t always meet modern sensibilities and said that this play in particular led to a huge uproar when it debuted. Based on the description and what our teacher said I had a feeling that that wouldn’t be true, but I was wrong.
When it was time to talk about Nora two of my classmates expressed how upset they were that Nora left her children with her husband when she decided that she needed to leave her family in order to grow as a person; one even said it was wrong because if she ever returned her children may not want to reconnect with her. I understand exploring hypotheticals but I thought it was an interesting perspective since a man leaving his family for a period of time wasn’t too strange back then, even when I was younger I was left with my grandmother for a year when my mother returned to the military. My interpretation was actually more in line with a male classmate. The way I saw it Nora was leaving her children with a well off father and a nanny, and in the story we don’t really see Torvald interact with his kids, something my classmates didn’t seem to mind. In fact the thing that Nora did prior to the play which led to the main conflict of the story was something that my classmates didn’t even seem to care about.
Nora was judged based on the perceived role a woman should have, despite the fact that she was naive and infantilized by her husband she is still seen as responsible enough to raise three children. Her naivety was something my classmates also discussed so it wasn’t even something they didn’t consider. During my modern drama class I would get frustrated when reading, especially if I had trouble making out the themes, but I made an effort to remain numb while reading and taking notes so emotions didn’t cloud my interpretation of the text. The only time I had trouble maintains this numbness was when I read Blasted by Sarah Kane. The protagonist was very difficult and it didn’t feel like the protagonist had much to say, it felt like it was meant to be shocking but it just left me bored and frustrated since I had trouble answering any of the discussion questions we were assigned. I cared more about my grade than interpreting the text, but that wasn’t really exclusive to Blasted writing about required reading that I don’t find interesting can be difficult. My classmates didn’t have much to say about the play either, all it really did was make me worry about my mental health a little bit since I wasn’t too upset when the protagonist was assaulted by the soldier near the end. Me not looking at Blasted through a nuanced lens wasn’t because it made me angry it was just because I couldn’t understand what the author wanted to say so I just didn’t have an opinion on it. Maybe it was about the way people isolate themselves from the world in order to ignore hardships until it’s right in front of their face? Since the protagonist lock themselves in a hotel for the entirety of the play until a hole is blown through their room and they have to acknowledge the war outside.











