In my freak era
Educate yourselves
No title available

No title available

roma★
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

No title available
h
d e v o n

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Misplaced Lens Cap
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
Keni
The Stonewall Inn

izzy's playlists!
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Interview Vampire Daily
Sweet Seals For You, Always

No title available

bliss lane
untitled
seen from Thailand
seen from Türkiye
seen from Germany

seen from Germany
seen from Venezuela

seen from Türkiye

seen from Germany

seen from Canada
seen from Italy

seen from Colombia
seen from Hungary

seen from Italy
seen from Greece

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States
@bakerstreetdoctor
In my freak era
Educate yourselves
Kitty and his best friend
I've been writing a fanfic for a while but I started rereading moby dick recently and upon rereading my fic u can tell exactly when I did
yeah ok bro
The fantastically etched and silvered Sallet of Philip the Handsome, attributed to Domenico Negroli,
Length: 16 in/40.7 cm
Width: 9.8 in/25 cm
Height: 8.3 in/21 cm
Weight: 5.9 lbs/2680 g
Milan, Italy, ca. 1496, housed at the Real Armería, Madrid.
Hmong Village, 2012-03-15
people hemming and hawing about whether or not JKR taking a nonconsensual photo of another woman's lower body specifically to mock her counts as "upskirting" or not are really overlooking the fact that it's sexualized harassment regardless of pedantic semantics. JKR is a sex pest who harasses women and uses the marginalized status of those women - namely, transhood - to justify her harassment and mistreatment.
like not to be too personal about this but every single person who has ever taken a photo of me without my consent was harassing me. it doesn't matter that they weren't getting photos of my genitals. harassment doesn't need to involve genitals to be a bad thing. jsyk!
She didn’t get his genitals. She got his thigh. The only one involved that was a sex pest was the ugly incel in a skirt.
Fuck off and stop defending predators.
that’s literally how he looked to every single member of the audience. that’s just how he was sitting. a man in a skirt sitting in a way that makes his upper thigh visible to the entire audience he’s speaking to, at a public photographed event, and then being seen by the public and photographed, is not a case of upskirting or any sex pestery. like please join us in the real world. he’s fine.
this does make me wonder how backwards these people would make things. i’ve seen women raise concerns about being flashed with penises in locker rooms labeled “women’s” and not being able to choose when and where they consent to seeing penises, and have trans activists respond as if THEY are the sex pest, saying “ew why are you even looking at other women in the locker room?” “why are you looking at people’s genitals in the locker room?”. these people are so back asswards I feel like a trans woman could actually walk around in a trench coat and flash unsuspecting strangers and if a woman took a photo or happened to misgender her flasher, the trans activists would manage to flip it around to make the trans woman the victim of having involuntary nude images taken by a transphobic cis woman.
An ultra extended flowchart for identifying dynasties! Even identifying sub-periods of each dynasty. As always, this is a general guide ther
does the makeup look sad or happy? >>> goth & sad >>> middle tang dynasty [lmao]
@heartofrazz have you seen this?
Prosthetic hands that reside at the Dittrick Medical Musem. (Via)
Royal funeral rites from medieval manuscripts
As a former librarian I'm actually required to remind you that many libraries that subscribe to Libby are opted into a program that lets you subscribe and access magazines for free with no wait
And that this is actually a really fun, low cost way to not only access news and larger cultural magazines, but also to get free patterns for many different crafts that you can screenshot if need be and that lower the financial barriers to entry for trying new things
From my experience working in both academic and public libraries, many libraries are use it or lose it funding-- I have to say this because a lot of patrons feel guilty for how much they use the library and how often they're using it funny enough, but the worst thing you can do for libraries is not try out new features and not use what's already given to you as much as possible.
The numbers that come as a result of your patronage are how most libraries justify their continued existence in times of financial hardship, which sucks but, go check out some magazines on Libby!
Nuke canada now
Did y'all know that 70% of all mining operations in latin america and the caribbean involve a canadian transnational mining corporation?
Anyway, when I was in college I was constantly going to marches and protests against canadian and saudi mining projects in the Santurbán páramo, one of the most important ecosystems in Colombia in terms of biodiversity, and the source of drinking water of 30+ municipalities in my state, including the city I live in. Ultimately these mining proposals lost their license due to environmental regulations.
But now that our new far-right president elect is looking to suck up to imperial core powers once again, canadian mining corporation Aris mining is interested in re-starting mining projects in Santurbán. Which, would inevitably give cyanide poisoning not only to my city's drinking water, but 30+ other municipalities and indigenous communities.
The imperial core will see one of latin america's veins and go "is anyone gonna cut that open?" and not wait for an answer
Thank you so much to all the smart first-worlders who came here to helpfully inform me that literally nuking an entire country would be bad and have negative consequences for people and the environment. I am but a stupid little foreigner with no capacity for abstract thought or figurative language, I will now abandon my plans to literally nuke the entire country of canada, thank you so much smart first-worlders for educating the ignorant little foreigner about "nuking bad", I have so much to learn from you.
"I am perfectly aware that when you said nuke canada you were figuratively wishing for the destruction of canada as a geopolitical entity, and not for the territory said geopolitical entity occupies to literally be nuked, but I'm still going to lecture you about how literally nuking that territory wouldn't be very #Landback of you to satisfy a strange compulsion to feel morally superior to you as a person on the receiving end of economic imperialism who decided to express anger about it"
One time I was at a pub trivia night with some writer friends and we almost won but there was a tie. As a tiebreaker they asked us and the other team to write down as many moons of Jupiter as we could in two minutes.
None of us are very into astronomy so at first everyone was like oh we’re gonna lose but there were three of us at the table that night who were either former classics majors or otherwise super well read on Roman mythology and the three of us were like give us that paper right now and we just took turns writing down all of the lovers of Jupiter from mythology that we could.
So of course we won lol
Totally normal for a legitimate for-profit company to refuse to reclaim or stop running their products even after they're no longer being paid to do so. I'm sure it's very normal to just keep running your service for free when your contract's been terminated. Spending money to continue running cameras that supposedly no one is looking at is definitely not an indicator they are just run by the federal government to spy on everyone and only a wacko conspiracy theorist would think so.
The chances of your fish committing credit card fraud is low, but never 0
These two fire extinguishers at my work
Had to draw them
They share the highs and the lows.
That's pretty much the long and the short of it.
I’ve been listening to Dr. Campbell Price talk about what we know and don’t know about Tutankhamun. I realize this must be old news for you, but as a layperson, I had no idea that Tutankhamun had been erased from records or pharaohs quickly after his death. Like, I knew his reign was short and therefore likely not impactful, but I didn’t know he’d been erased from the record. Just had to share because I was very surprised by this.
Ah Campbell! I'm very familiar with him! And yeah, it's what I'd call the basic information about Tutankhamun. That information has been known for quite a long time. But we all start somewhere! You're one of today's lucky 10,000!
He was a child king, who barely made it into adulthood, and happened to come at the end of a terrible period in Egypt's history. He was the relative** of a king his advisors despised, a king whose reign ripped up the foundation of how Egyptian political culture functioned (I think this is more relevant than the change in religion ever was, yet people always say 'well it's because Akhenaten changed the religion'), and then, despite being controlled by viziers from a young age, and following the religion of Egypt as it had been before, upon his untimely death, they took the chance to bury the legacy of Akhenaten once and for all.
The Egyptians did this a lot, especially when something was aberrant to the balance of Ma'at. Akhenaten uprooted so many things about Egyptian life. This would have pissed off a good many people who were suddenly removed from power, and they bade their time until he died, until the 2(?) kings between him and Tutankhamun failed (we don't know what happened to them), and then started regrouping as Tutankhamun reigned. They used Tutankhamun to reset a lot of things, the Restoration stele resetting the religion to being under Amun as one of them, but when he died, they used it as an excuse to reset everything in accordance with Ma'at. Ma'at was cosmic balance and the king was supposed to keep cosmic balance for Egypt to be prosperous. Balance had to be achieved in all things and this didn't mean 'things could only be good' there had to be both good and bad in balance. The issue was, reigns like Akhenaten's disrupted this 'balance'; they were aberant, and so, to keep Ma'at, those aberrations had to be erased. Culturally, the way to do this was to remove the name of that person, denying them an afterlife, and essentially destroy all images of them. Akhenaten was all but obliterated from the historical record by the Egyptians, even his coffin didn't bear his name, but Tutankhamun was different. While his name was removed publicly, it was still on his tomb goods, which tells you how they viewed him.
Had he lived much longer, it's possible Tutankhamun wouldn't have suffered the fate he did. After all, a 40 year reign would be much harder to hide than a 9 year reign. But because he was young, because he came from the family he did, and because of the legacy that it would leave on Egypt, they simply erased them and pretended it never happened.
** I say 'male relative' because the DNA Hawass announced as 'definitively' saying Akhenaten was Tutankhamun's father doesn't say that. It says they're close male relatives, but the DNA is too old and too corrupted to say for sure. We know they're family, and close family, but this could be a nephew or even a brother, so I tend to hold off saying 'father' when that's not fully supported by the record. If an ostracon, stele, tomb scene pops up saying 'Tutankhamun son of Akhenaten' or analysis of very old DNA gets way better, then I'll believe it.
I’ve been learning a lot! I had to go look up your reference to the two kings between Akhenaten and Tutankhamun (is that taking into account the possible regencies, or am I off the mark there?). I also learned from listening to Campbell the degree to which the version of Tutenkhamun’s medical history I learned early on (possible club foot, possible injury to the head, possible scoliosis) is all in doubt today. So yeah, it’s been a lot of learning 😂
There are two possible reigns between Akhenaten and Tutankhamun, Neferneferuaten and Smenkhkare. We have next to no information on these two. We don't know how long they reigned (not very long), nor who they even were. We're not sure whether there were any regencies, because that all depends on who these two are, and how close they were to Akhenaten. They certainly had no regency with Tutankhamun. Anything else I can say here is pure speculation.
Yeah, the documentary that made him out to be a man with a severe overbite, cleft palette, club foot, and severely disabled is one of the worst documentaries that has ever been produced. They never had any access to the body, they never ran any tests, they simply ran off old photographs and gave out pure conjecture, labelling it as fact. Overbite/buck teeth? He was mummified poorly, so his jaw has slipped backwards. When in a normal position, this issue isn't present. The claim relies on the jaw being in the post-mortem, unnatural position for its evidence. Club foot and Scoliosis? Archaeologists specialising in Osteology have examined this body time and time again and even again after this documentary. They have found no evidence of severity that would be visible/cause him pain. The clubfoot is so slight that the whole 'ankle fully rotated' image of him makes me angry. He does have a cleft palate but it's in the hard palate and would not have been an issue for him. Wide hips? The documentary makers simply took the cue from Amarna art and just slapped wide hips on him. His skeleton shows width in the average parameters.
I distinctly remember the anger amongst Egyptologists when that documentary came out, and I remember discussing it with Campbell and others at a pub one night after a seminar. People were pissed because it threw out a bunch of easily disproven fallacies about a dead man who can't speak for himself, turned him into a caricature of himself, and because it was so widely spread by the media it's become the thing people think about when he's mentioned. They turned him from 'man who died in a chariot accident' into 'hey guys look this! he's a cripple! Doesn't he look funny and gross now?!' and it's sickening. None of it is true! It's done so much damage we're still trying to undo over a decade later!
It's why when people say 'what's the harm in just making stuff up for fun about historical figures? I should be allowed to have fun!' I want to scream. If you're putting that out in the public sphere, you have a duty to make it clear it's not real or we'll end up with another 'hatshepsut is trans' scenario.
Yeah and the twist on that whole "reconstruction" with the narrative of the perceived disabilities were due to the Amarna kings doing incest is sickening to another level (for me personally).
Also we have the most popcorn worthy gossip case ever with his widow Ankhesenamun asking for a foreign prince from Hatti to marry because "she will not marry a servant" (it's been a while since I heard that, might not be exact quote) then disappearing from the record after the prince dies on the way - we have reality to speculate on if we want to, no need to invent bullshit.
Tutankhamun's parents were cousins at best, and at least one set of grandparents weren't related to each other because his grandmother was from Nubia. The 'Egyptian Kings are incestuous' is a myth I'd love to die in a ditch.
The quote, from her letter to the Hittite king, Suppiluliuma I, is as follows: 'My husband has died and I have no son. They say about you that you have many sons. You might give me one of your sons to become my husband. I would not wish to take one of my subjects** as a husband…' then she ends the letter with 'I am afraid.'
**some scholars translate this as 'servants' but, given that rulers in this time period often use terms like 'servant' to refer to anyone under them, it is better to render it as 'subjects' and treat it as the court around Ankhesenamun, all of whom would have been vying for power.
I'm not sure you could say it's popcorn worthy though. This is a 21 year old woman, the daughter of a hated king, widow of the last in that line, and mother to two daughters who died at birth.** She was under threat and terrified. The Hittite prince does die on the way. Early researchers, more focused on spectacle than fact, speculated that he'd been murdered along the way, and the Hittite records do show them accusing the Egyptians of his murder. However, this doesn't mean it actually happened. All we know is that he never made it to Egypt. He could have been murdered, or he could have died in an ambush by some other group, or simply died of dysentery (it's a long way to travel) and his father flew off the handle and accused the Egyptians of murder instead. We simply don't know. What we do know is that based on an engraved ring bezel, we know Ankhesenamun married Ay. Ay only reigned for about 4 years, and Ankhesenamun died very soon after his reign began as there is no mention of her in his tomb and she disappears from the record entirely, as is the case with many from the Amanra period.
So her dad, the king, dies, her husband dies, her children are dead, she tries to reach out to a foreign land for help and it fails, she's forced to marry her much older uncle, and then she abruptly disappears. Odds are she either died in childbirth (considering she'd already had two difficult pregnancies this is a possibility), she died of an illness and because she's no one of note they just didn't mention her, or she was murdered. Either way, that's a terrible fate for someone so young.
**there's an ivory box found in Tutankhamun's tomb that depicts him and Ankhesenamun standing together, but beneath them are a boy and a girl hiding in the rushes. No one knows who they are. They could be unknown children (doubtful) or childhood depictions of the pair.
*rolls up late to the party and wheels out soap box*
You know who did practice incest almost exclusively but cops zero shit for it in the public consciousness? The Ptolemies. There's so many of them and almost all of them did it. The Old Kingdom was doing it more than say your average New Kingdom pharaoh but no one was doing it like the Ptolemies
Even if Tutankhamun's parents were closely related such as *spins wheel* full siblings *throws dart* cousins, Amenhotep and Tiye were sooooo unrelated. Tiyes dad Yuya is some random minor nobleman and they are from Akhmim of all places. (We have the most attestations of them from their burial which calls them iry-pat hereditary noble among other things which is a rank you can just be elevated to btw despite what the translation implies ergo at their highest status at the end of their lives because their daughter is the king's chief wife and has been for some time). Some researchers try to suggest weeeeelll maybe Yuyas sister was Amenhotep's mother Mutemwiya to try and explain how they were connected to the royal family but literally we do not know we have no filiation for any of these people we do not know who their parents are so how can we know if they are related! Amenhotep III was the son of a minor wife who we know nothing about because she wasn't important and we only know about her because her son became king and elevated her status and erected statues of her and included her on his
You get actual confirmed incest marriages every generation or so but in the 18th Dynasty they rarely result in the heir who inherits the throne. For example, Amenhotep III's dad, Thutmose IV married his sister Iaret (full or half is unknown, we don't know who her mother is). She may be the mother of some of his attested children but their mothers are not specified in the surviving inscriptions so, dunno
Thutmose IV's dad Amenhotep II just, refused to name any of his wives on monuments (presumably nuked in response to the threat any royal women might conceivably pose a la Hatshepsut), so his only know wife is Tiaa, mother of TIV and a minor wife, unrelated, before her son elevated her to chief wife status when he took the throne
Amenhotep II's dad Thutmose III didn't marry a sister as far as we can tell. He was also a son of Iset, an unrelated minor wife of his father, Thutmose II. It's sometimes suggested he married his half sister/cousin Neferure to explain the parentage of a prince called Amenemhat but she's never called Kings Wife anywhere so, dubious. Neferure WAS a product of incest, her parents being half-siblings. Her father Thutmose II was a half brother by, you guessed it, a minor wife, Mutneferet, and her mother Hatshepsut was herself a child of Thutmose I by his chief wife Ahmose
Now, here, finally, with Thutmose II, we hit some incest that results in the heir to the throne. Thutmose II's mother was Mutneferet, a minor wife, possibly a cousin of her husband Thutmose I (we're unsure exactly who her dad is, maybe Ahmose I. She's a Kings Mother, Kings Wife, Kings Sister, Kings Daughter). Ahmose, mother of Hatshepsut, was probably Thutmose I's sister.
Going back beyond this to the first couple of kings of the 18th Dynasty is more incesty, as are the last few of the 17th Dynasty. Maybe 3 generations of brother-sister marriage going on but that's the longest span you get for the entire 18th Dynasty. Thutmose I's parents are siblings, and maaaaybe Amenhotep I's are cousins but he comes kind of out of nowhere and doesn't leave a male heir. Seqenenre Tao married his sister, but his parents Tao I and Tetisheri are unrelated
So like, if Inbreeding For One (1) Generation Made Tutankhamun Die Young, uhhhh why don't we think that about the early Thutmosids who by all accounts Did Shit and Lived A Bit Longer. Caveat, Thutmose II died kind of young, but it's Ancient Egypt anything could be fatal, kings aren't immune. Thutmose IV died youngish too but it's not The Incest
I think we see a few Uncle/Niece marriages or brother/sister (half or not) ceremonial marriages (i.e. not for sex or romance) too. But like, it’s not as common as people think it is and honestly guys you’ve been conditioned to think that this is a purely ancient world thing and it’s not. You can look at the history of any monarchy in any country (especially Europe) and see cousins, uncle/niece, even half siblings marrying each other all the time.
Like you can’t trade on the fact that Ancient Egypt had a few close relation marriages therefore they’re tainted by incest and that’s what killed them all when you have the Habsburgs right fucking there doing it so much worse with lasting impact.
Ominous dog posting