Four and a Half Vulkans is my breaking point.
I've been a Star Trek fan for awhile now. I got into it around 2016-2017-ish I think, where I binged every episode in production order up until what was out of New Trek. Since then I have been a fairly avid Trekkie and have followed everything as it released. I've also engaged with a lot of the political aspects of Trek since the beginning, and have admired it a lot for it's progressive, diverse, and radically empathetic ideals. It helped me during the early stages of my transition to accept myself for who I am. I owe it a lot and care about it a lot.
Since 2023, I've been feeling a slipping of those ideals that I think for me has culminated in this new Strange New Worlds season, and this episode especially.
The first slip was Picard Season 2, though I count this less. This feels like it started with good intentions but fumbled in the execution, and isn't consistent with the rest of the examples. Say what you will about the quality, the intention behind this season is to comment directly on the politics of modern day, and what it's trying to say are things like "Ice is fucked up." It just doesn't commit to it's storyline enough due to trying to do too much in 10 episodes, a consistent Kurtzman Trek issue.
Picard Season 3 is the first real slip. The whole season is already against what Picard as a show wanted to be in the first place, it was never suppose to just be TNG seasons 8 or movie 5, it wanted to be something else. Bringing back the whole TNG crew is already an unfortunate, nostalgia bait pull, but the overall plot is even more so. Jack Crusher as a character is stolen directly from Star Trek II and III, which Kirk's son and his and Kirk's relationship. Already annoying, but his position in the story, as Picard's son that he has to recon with, is already filled by Picard characters from seasons 1 and 2, Elnor and Soji. Why do we need blood family here when we already have found family?
Jack isn't the core of my issue with this season, though he does tie in. He has this queer coding to him that I, for most of the season is fine. We still didn't need him for that, we have explicit queer representation (that is broken apart OFF SCREEN) with Seven and Raffi (more sidelining of S1 Picard characters grrr) but whatever. What's problematic is how this ties in to the wider plot.
I liked this season up until the finale, I want to stress. As much as it repeatedly pissed me off with it's sidelining and active antagonism towards previous seasons (reminding me alot of Rise of Skywalker) seeing the changelings done with modern CG was super cool, and made for alot of great tension. The scene with Seven and Tuvok is still burned into my memory, in a good way. the finale however fucks up everything when it sidelines the changelings and folds in the Borg. The plot becomes: We, the Borg, are infecting your children with our mind virus, which doesn't effect older people because reasons. Also, your son is a Borg that's what the Queer coding is. It is up to you, the boomers, to stop us.
So, a completely valid reading of this season after the finale is: The WOKE mind virus is taking our children and it is up to the boomers to stop it.
So. Yikes. Not great, but I moved on. Sorta read it as, they wrote most of the season and got a studio mandate near the end that the changelings weren't a profitable enough villain for the final Picard season, make it the Borg, and that fucked everything up. I don't know if I believe that now.
Next was Strange New Worlds season 2. This season is fine, has some incredible stuff like Ad Astra per Aspera. However, you can see the seeds of the issues with season 3 in certain episodes, most blatantly in the final song of Subspace Rhapsody, with the repeated line "We know our purpose is (We know our purpose is) : To protect the mission : Our Prime Directive" which is just… No. That's not and has never been the purpose of being in Starfleet. At the very least, Spock does disagree with this settlement during the song but the seed is there. The issue is more pertinent to Four and a Half Vulcans in Charades, where the weird conflation of genetics and culture I thought we left behind like 50 years ago comes in. But more on that later.
Another slide was Very Short Treks, which is a series of shorts some of which are entirely focused on conservative comedy. I only thought of this retroactively, because it seems so small, but it's also so blatantly conservative it now feels like an omen.
Section 31 is the way it is because of wider issues with modern Trek that stem from before it, but at least Section 31 we're still depicted as the bad guys in Discovery, even if the writers misread which three letter U.S, agency they were suppose to be a critique of. This movie however, seems to want to say that Section 31 are a necessary evil, which flies in the face of what Deep Space Nine was trying to say with them in it's episodes. Section 31 are not the good guys, we don't need organizations like them, and positioning them in this way sucks.
Now, for full transparency I haven’t watched everything in season 3 of Strange New Worlds, I haven’t even watched the episode Four and a Half Vulkans, which has caused this reaction in the first place. I didn't want to watch this season when the teaser for this episode was released a year ago. I was so grossed out that they had quite literally doubled, tripled, and quadrupled down on the weird biological essentialism of Charades. However, I was having a really bad day around the time mental health wise, saw they basically made a Q episode with Wedding Bell Blues, and gave in. I skipped episode 3, apparently missing the start of Pike's character assassination this season with his flagrant disregard for Betel's medical bodily autonomy, but watched episodes 4-6 as they released. After those three I was feeling okay with the season, a bit over lukewarm, but I decided to watch reviews of episode 7 before watching and kinda tapped out. I had watched Doctor Who's Interstellar Song Contest earlier this year, and while I enjoyed it for it's visual aspects, and didn't mind the episode's plot at first watch just out of pure ignorance on Eurovision and it's current politics, after learning about Eurovision's shit I soured on it greatly, so when I watched reviews and saw people likening episode 7 to that I didn't have any interest.
I think it should maybe be obvious with my tone, but for clarity, Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people, and I am wholeheartedly against that. That's not to say I'm not against Hamas, my opinions on terrorism are actually pretty complicated (which is good, not every opinion has to be simple enough to fit in a headline) but they boil down to: it is always bad to harm civilians and children in conflict. It was bad that Hamas targeted civilians instead of going straight for the Israeli government, their actual long term enemy, just as it is bad that Israel is trying to wipe out all Palestinian civilians and children in the Gaza Strip, and beyond once they have proven they can without proper resistance. Both are bad, but if you claim to care about the Hamas terrorist attack that started this current offensive by Israel, but support or are indifferent to what Israel is doing, your principles are clearly not consistent, and you need to figure out what about Palestinian civilians and children makes you value them less than Israeli civilians and children.
Anyway, tangent on current political issues episode 7 bends over backwards to not comment on, and therefor in the end says nothing of value and betrays Star Trek as a concept (because commenting on current events has always been the point of Star Trek) aside, episode 8, Four and a Half Vulkans came out. I had forgotten about it, so when Jessie Gender's review popped up in my recommendations I got hit with a deep anxiety and dread. Then, after watching the review, I was left with one question: How was it worse than I expected?
From what I can tell, this episode not only doubles, triples, and quadruples down on the biological essentialism, with the idea that Vulkans (and Romulans I guess) cultures' are somehow baked into their DNA, it quintuples on this idea by saying that La'an's reaction to the serum making her more Romulan than Vulkan comes from her heritage being linked to Khan. And this is said by fucking SPOCK.
Seriously, this scene makes me deeply angry.
13 seconds · Clipped by HopeBFull · Original video "Star Trek Strange New Worlds 3.08 "Four and Half Vulcans" REVIEW" by Jessie Gender After
This idea is not in isolation, this is how they have been talking about the Gorn this whole fucking show, as the fundamentally evil creatures. The Rhetoric is clear: La'an is biologically evil, which is apparently a thing we now believe you can be. It's sickening, depersoning, bullshit and has no place in Star Trek.
IF this were just an isolated indecent, one bad episode, this may not have broken me. TNG had Code of Honor, I still watched more Star Trek, Deep Space Nine had Profit and Lace, I still watched more Star Trek, I watched Star Trek Nemisis and kept going. This though, has shaken my trust in the whole brand, because it's not a bad episode in a sea of good, or a bad movie that I know has already had it's comeuppance given it killed the brand for awhile, this is the flagship show, at some of it's highest rating because people are too absorbed in the nostalgia bait see what is right in-front of them. This is being rewarded, and I don't doubt Skydance will dig in.
I'm not planning on finishing this season. I'm not planning on watching Starfleet Academy anymore even with how fucking exited I was for it. I can't trust Star Trek to not, with alarming consistency, hit me with stories fundamentally opposed to mine and it's own ideals. I cannot trust it not to make the world worse, make people worse. And that makes me very sad.
Anyway, sorry. I needed to vent about this and hopefully make one or two people reconsider buying into this brand anymore. I hope I can do just a tiny bit of good by pointing out how systemic this seems to be.