Three Goblin Art
No title available
Not today Justin
Game of Thrones Daily
trying on a metaphor

⁂

No title available
AnasAbdin

izzy's playlists!
No title available

pixel skylines
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
i don't do bad sauce passes

★

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

Kaledo Art
DEAR READER
Cosimo Galluzzi

roma★
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

seen from Bangladesh

seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from China
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Canada
seen from T1
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Sweden
seen from Mexico
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Lithuania

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
@brandosando
‘Storms. She was perfect. A curvaceous figure, tan Alethi skin,light violet eyes, and not a hint of aberrant color to her jet-black hair. Making Jasnah Kholin as beautiful as she was brilliant was one of the most unfair things the Almighty had ever done.‘
Shallan, ur gay is massively showing.
My artwork for the Legend of Korra concert!
Minneapolis-Honeywell's First Computer (1947) via Hennepin County Library
The other night husband and I were watching a documentary about the yeti where they were doing DNA analysis of samples of supposed yeti fur, and every one of them came back as bears.
Anyway, the next night we watched a thing about some pig man who is supposed to live in Vermont. People said it had claws and a pig nose but walked upright like a man. Now, I happen to know that sideshows used to shave bears and present them as pig men. So every piece of evidence they gave of this monster sounds to me like a bear with mange.
So now the running joke in our house is that everything is bears. Aliens? Bears. Loch Ness monster? Bear. Every cryptozoological mystery is just a very crafty bear.
Bears. They’re everywhere. Be wary. Anyone or anything could be a bear.
oh shit
As the OP of this post, I’m going to threaten that if this gets to one million notes by the 10 year anniversary on 1 June 2026, one year from today, I will get a lower back tattoo of the loch ness bear monster.
Y'all know what to do Tumblr.
Life is beach
Oh, this definitely belongs on Tumblr.
From the Nib, by Mattie Lubchansky
There should be a napoleon in every generation. Like the dalai lama. French revolutionary monks searching the countryside with a group of artillerymen which each candidate child must attempt to command
1973 NASA art by Rick Guidice visualizes the idea of a Pioneer probe using Jupiter’s gravity to slingshot itself toward the outer planets and beyond.
I laughed to hard at this fucking thing.
dont say that ur awesome sauce
This is Tie, she is going to eat all of the notes
reblog to feed her notes
How is she doing this
my issue with polyamory is not with the basic fact of dating multiple people, that’s whatever. its with the fact that the community explicit prizes autonomy over care, and the fact that people are routinely told to gaslight themselves into being ok with things they’re not under the guise of “doing the work.”
and also the way there’s so little space for “in doing the work, i discovered poly is not for me.” not only are those discussions rare in poly spaces, but soooooo many times i’ve seen people who are seriously struggling and they keep being told to work through it and sometimes it’s clear this person is really being mentally and emotionally harmed by polyamory and the right choice is to quit.
and also the way so many of the feelings people have are chalked up to “monogamous conditioning.” sure, maybe at first but after five or ten years if it hasn’t gotten better maybe it’s not conditioning anymore, maybe it’s actually coming from within you. sometimes the negative feelings are actually your body and mind telling you “hey, this really is not working for me,” and it’s ok to say “yeah, it’s not, and actually the benefits are not outweighing the struggles at this point.”
also the way people speak about hierarchy… yes, you should be aware of couple’s privilege, but if a couple has been married for 15 years then no a new relationship one of them has should not hold the same significance as their marriage. that doesn’t make sense.
and also relational care, to me, is more important than autonomy. you should gaf if your actions affect your partner. you should understand when they feel cast aside. if your relationship can’t weather polyamory, either be honest and break up or stop being poly. instead of just expecting your partner to be quietly miserable. but there’s an expectation that a distressed partner should wait at home doing self-care alone trying to regulate while their partner is out on a date. and like… sure, i guess if it’s your first foray into polyamory and still getting used to it i get it, but if that’s where you’re holding then it sounds like that person isn’t ready. or never will be. and that’s ok. being able to self-regulate is important but if you’re constantly having to self-regulate because of the actions of a person who’s supposed to be caring for you… i don’t know, man.
there were many things that made me leave polyamory, a combo of personal experiences and what i witnssed in online polyamory spaces, but a couple of interactions were the tipping point for me.
one was that in a group i was in, someone was mentioning how they have a long-term partner who does not want to escalate their relationship to engagement or marriage, and they were fine with that until the partner proposed to a new partner. and now they’ve been struggling with jealousy. which… of fucking course!!!! they’d taken it as a given that the partner just wasn’t interested in marriage and then it had turned out they were, but not to them! that’s heartbreaking! it is!! frankly it’s a slap in the face (unless you’re also on board with the non-escalation). and they were coming for help working through that and that’s when it clicked for me… there’s no real stability. in at least the standard modern of relationship that poly communities embrace, autonomy means that at any point you can be shifted or downgraded or deprioritized and you’re expected to just “do the work” to make yourself ok with it. and what it looked like to me is that a huge percentage of poly advice is “do the work to make yourself okay with it.”
another thing was talking to someone who’d been poly for 10 years and was still struggling with things like sadness over having less time with a partner who didn’t live full-time with them bc of the time the partner was spending at another person’s house, and realizing that oh, time spent doing the work doesn’t make this better. discomfort with a setup like that is not “monogamous conditioning.” it’s someone not getting their relationship needs met. and that’s what it is for me, the idea that you cannot hold expectations of another person to meet those needs.
i do want to say that there are i’m sure many poly folks and polycules who do prize relational care and who do meet one another’s relationship needs. i’m sure there are many stable poly relationships and folks who are genuinely fulfilled and happy in them. this is not me saying “polyamory is bad and no one should do it,” it’s me naming some strains of toxicity i’ve identified in the community and its norms. i also acknowledge that i’m getting a lot of this from online polyamory groups (mostly support groups) where almost all of the posts are by people who are struggling while the people who aren’t, aren’t posting.
but with that being said, i’m not basing these opinions on the volume of individuals struggling but rather the way they’re encouraged to think and the way things are framed. for example, so many shitty and disrespectful things that people would post about would receive “you can’t tell them not to do that, it violates their autonomy.”
case in point, what inspired this rant, years after i left the community? a discussion i’ve been seeing. i didn’t see the original post but here’s what i’ve gathered: a pregnant woman found out her partner had also impregnated his other girlfriend, whose due date is a few months later, and she’s upset about it. she’s building a family with him and this throws a wrench into everything. and, someone respected in the community is saying that she doesn’t have a right to have asked him not to impregnate someone else, because that would violate his and the gf’s reproductive autonomy.
and i understand where that perspective is coming from. but essentially that is a framework that denies someone the right to stability, and right to have expectations of a partner about their future, the right to a certain family setup. if you want to impregnate multiple women then don’t date a woman who doesn’t want that! it’s fuckboy behavior. i guess at its most stripped down level you don’t have a “right” to tell someone else they can’t conceive a child but you can absolutely feel hurt and betrayed. and frankly yes you should be able to be in relationships where you can expect your partner not to intentionally do this to you.
polyamory will have you excusing all kinds of fuckboy behaviors under the guise of autonomy. it will have you thinking that expectations to the contrary are derived from control. but they’re not, they’re derived from the desire for safety and stability. the difference between a postpartum woman caring for a child who has her partner’s full support and time vs. a postpartum woman caring for a child whose partner is splitting his time with another household and baby is huge! him having a baby with someone else is a life-altering choice. it’s a choice that affects her and their child. and that’s the thing about the standard narratives of polyamory — a refusal to accept that one’s actions affect others. and that those effects can’t be washed away just by “doing the work.” no amount of inner work will make up for the fact that he will have another baby he has to split his time with.
this is just the most dramatic example but it highlights for me just how often micro versions of this dynamic are presented and folks are expected to just be fine with it. it’s a question of whether you take responsibility for how your choices affect your partners, or not. again i am sure there are plenty of polyamorous people who absolutely do take that responsibility, but i think also it’s given a free pass quite a lot.
i also think relationship anarchy is a practice which really can only be done with detachment. for example, and this is a bit different because i understand RA and solo poly are not synonyms (but philosophically they’re very similar), there were some solo poly folks responding to the above situation with “I simply set a boundary that I will not co-parent, but I don’t control my partner’s reproductive choices with others,” which sure, great, but that’s not the situation. the person who’s now left pregnant with a partner who won’t be able to fully support her can’t just boundary-set her way out of it. it only works if you choose not to entangle yourself with others physically, logistically, emotionally. which yeah, that’s solo poly, and that’s great if that’s what you want. but there have to be better frameworks for the people who don’t want to be that disengaged.
my theory is that a lot of these frameworks and narratives are downstream effects of the book more than two, which did massive harm to the community and its lessons have not been unlearned. it was co-authored by an abusive man and the woman he was abusing, and contained lots of advice that amounted to letting the people you’re in relationship with do the work on their own to be okay with whatever you’re doing polyamorously that’s causing distress. i could be wrong, maybe these toxic ideas were already part of the community, but i can’t imagine this helped.
and another thing. the way de-escalation, non-escalation, and breakups are framed. often breakups are reframed as conscious uncoupling, a process in which the couple works together to break up in a way that shifts rather than ending a relationship, generally shifting it from romantic to it platonic and/or from committed to uncommitted. and sure that sounds wonderful in theory. but it doesn’t leave room, i think, for genuine pain and anger that often surround breakups. those emotions aren’t bad, they’re real, and there are real reasons to feel them. it doesn’t leave space for the fact that sometimes the healthiest option after a breakup is to cut contact, not to remain friends or to process or to run a podcast together or teach classes together or what have you. sometimes breakups are hard breaks because that’s actually the best choice.
and even worse is the framing around de-escalation and non-escalation and the relationship escalator. if you want to marry your partner and they don’t want to marry you, that hurts! that is a rejection! if you’re living together and they decide they want to live separately, that’s also a rejection and it’s kind of a mini-breakup. i am not advocating that people consider themselves obligated to escalate or not to change the terms of a relationship when it’s not working for them. you are allowed to say no i don’t want to marry you. you are allowed to say no i don’t want to live together anymore. BUT! the person on the receiving end of this rejection is allowed to see it as a rejection, they’re allowed to be hurt, they’re allowed to reevaluate the relationship, theyre allowed to take a break to reassess. and hot take but they are even allowed to feel lead on, angry, or resentful, as long as they do not harm the other person in the process, ie don’t start screaming at your partner.
what i’ve seen several times are reels popping up in my feed of people talking about their deescalations (sometimes full deescalations that are effectively breakups) and how they may have been a little sad at first but quickly moved on into accepting the new setup and how actually this process was so good healing and etc etc and like. look if that’s your real genuine experience, great! but it does not and should not have to look like that. you are actually allowed to grieve losses, and yes losing a relationship is a loss. you are allowed to be sad for more than a moment. you’re allowed to feel empty, or miserable, or confused, or any of a range of emotions. so much of this is toxic positivity and trying to spin things that are painful into something happy and fluffy. not everything is happy and fluffy. you are allowed to take time to process a de-escalation, or even a no to an escalation request, and don’t just have to go “thank you for telling me” and seamlessly move on in joy to the new paradigm.
this for me is the core of the issue. self-gaslighting, blaming people for struggling, toxic positivity, detachment, and the assumption that everyone is cut out for all of this if only they do the inner work.
again i have no issue with the concept in itself of being in multiple relationships. or with reimagining relationships. my issues are:
- ignoring the very real friction points that polyamory causes
- reimagining relationships in ways that don’t make space for genuine reactions and emotions
- valuing autonomy for its own sake so highly that you leave behind relational care
- not understanding that one person’s actions affect other people and that the more people involved, the more true that becomes
- situations where the only successful emotional strategies are detachment or self-negation
- the expectation to make yourself feel okay with things you genuinely don’t feel okay with
so yeah. i’m sure a healthy polyamory could exist but right now this is what I’ve observed of polyamorous communities and norms and i haven’t seen much evidence these issues are being meaningfully addressed.
fin.
I'm polyamorous. I've always been polyamorous, and I almost certainly will always be polyamorous. I have never been in a monogamous relationship. I've never understood the appeal of monogamy, and I doubt I ever will.
But yes, the community toxicity you're talking about is very real. I was once bullied out of a poly group for saying that it's natural to prioritize a longstanding relationship over a new one by default, and that that's not the same as imposing an artificial hierarchy.
Healthy polyamory requires treating all of your partners with respect, taking their needs seriously, and being willing to compromise. It also requires being open about your own needs, and expecting respect, consideration, and compromise from your own partners. It cannot be one partner's sole responsibility to "do the work". You need to work together.
And it can absolutely be done! I've been in a healthy, stable, loving open/poly relationship for about 14 years now. When one of us has concerns about the other's other relationships, we talk about it, and we work through it together. Sometimes just talking about it resolves the issue, and sometimes it requires a compromise (so we compromise).
That's something that I really want to emphasize - you are absolutely allowed to have concerns about your partners' other relationships, and you are absolutely allowed to talk to them about it. You should talk to them about it. You don't have to suffer in silence.
You are allowed to get upset, or angry, or even jealous, and you are allowed to express those feelings, and so are your partners. Having those feelings doesn't mean you're doing polyamory wrong; it means you're human.
Unfortunately, yes, there are a lot of fuckboys (of all genders) in the community who do expect their partners to suffer in silence, to bottle up their feelings and "do the work" on their own. Those people suck, and the rest of us hate them. But as is so often the case, the assholes tend to be the loudest voices in the room.
Polyamory is not for everyone. If it doesn't appeal to you, or you don't think you could handle it, then don't do it. But it can absolutely work. And when it does, it's wonderful.
(Btw, I'd like to point out that most of what I've said in this post applies to monogamous relationships as well.)
Just so you all know, my tumblr glitched egregiously so now every time someone reblogs this from me, tumblr takes me off of my dashboard or search results and forces me to see this post again
WHY DID SOMEONE ADD AN INCINERATOR ????
I STILL HAVE TO SEE THIS BTW. ITS BEEN YEARS.
And you will see it again.
the suffer brothers