Since she/xe love to take someone out of context, this person is lying to you, and this is the same woman who views butches as invalid and never understand the concept of gender expression just throwing the word "transmisogyny" out of her mouth. In context, this woman is trying to paint me as someone who doesn't understand the history behind about feminine men and trans women being lumped in together, when I acknowledge that Trans women and effeminate cis men are interconnected, when I cite Japanese history, and she started making discourse about how fandoms treat femboys and how the feminine :
https://www.tumblr.com/clementine-kesh/758606328817172480/not-all-character-interpretations-are-valid-some/replies/819406166699507712
About how fandom sees "Femboy/Feminine presentation", and the entire post is about how feminine presentation in men are often seen as a bad thing, has a huge pressure in both cis feminine men being ridiculed, and trans men who don't often pass, xe's dismissing my points, and when the entire time, this woman tries playing against effeminate men. So if you think excluding men who loves feminine presentation, is still a trap to excluding people in a space that's meant to open for everyone, then it shows how men can't express themselves openly and only manly man are only allowed to exist, while gender expression varies in different genders, just as how much gender it has.
You acknowledged that "trans men often experience oppression", yet you speak so ill will in why some trans men are upset with how "trans women music are better", remember some cis men often use this talking point and how "Trans men make bad media, trans women don't" is how often feminine trans men are seen as cringe. Just because trans women faces oppression in a lot of terrible ways, and how cis men paint them as predators for the sake of conservative talking points, that doesn't trans men aren't experiencing oppression, this mostly happens in cis men's/queer men's spaces. Queer gay/hetero men uses that talking point, as the way of putting cis women and trans men as the same thing, that they're bad at media, less intellegent, terrible at inventing than cis men and trans women, and therefore cringe (implying that trans men are cis women, trans women are implied to be cis men, y'know, internalized transphobia?), you know the "Trans men are cringe in their media" and often compared to trans women has negative connotations, always has been, that those men think that they're similar with cis women and that cis women are cringe, and they treat trans men/afabs enbies the same? This reaction isn't the same with cis men, because cis men don't get that much backlash.
Remember that more popular transgender/enby men and cis women, whenever they accuse someone falsely= worse backlash and hated on in edgy YouTube/man sphere, although for enbies, and being hated on, conservatives hate trans women who don't pass or more masculine presenting often get hated and their presentation isn't even transphobic, butch lesbians exist, whether you like your bigoted ass or not.
It's always a theme that trans men are often shitted on, on what they produce, to which most cis men think it's embarrassing, that's just called Transandrophobia, and you think it doesn't exist, it says more about you.
In the cases of a backlash, people jokingly talk about trans women and say "Says, the she/her in the bio" (implying trans people are predators and grooming them) to calling them a lying bitch, this is the same with trans men "Oh look transgender, is this a theme with LGBTQ and loving kids?" (Also implying that everyone in LGBTQ are groomers), and ended up misgendering trans men, or calling him a lot of nasty stuff. And just you and me, the way you say that masc trans women and feminine trans men aren't valid, I genuinely think you should re-evaluate yourself, you sounded more of a truscum than that of a progressive.