SEX AND THE CITY — 3.13
No title available
almost home
No title available

if i look back, i am lost

shark vs the universe
KIROKAZE
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
TVSTRANGERTHINGS

No title available
occasionally subtle
Monterey Bay Aquarium

@theartofmadeline

Kaledo Art

Andulka
Jules of Nature

Product Placement
trying on a metaphor
No title available

#extradirty
Cosimo Galluzzi

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from India

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Belgium
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Austria
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United Arab Emirates

seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States
seen from United States
@calvins-dad
SEX AND THE CITY — 3.13
a car you used to drive can also be a kind of dead wife
a selection of dead wives from the tags
sophie edell
by Enoki Toshiyuki
snoopy of the day
weird animal flipbooks i made
how it feels to not gives a fuck or shit
Discussed I love boosters over mimosas and I stand by my original take which I didn’t feel like posting last night…. Really excellent movie in terms of story etc BUT when it takes that didactic turn at the end it falls flat because it gets on a soap box about dialectical materialism and then doesn’t make a materialist movie. You can’t talk about contradictions and this and that and then think that turning up the contradictions on something magically creates a general strike. This is what Lenin was always writing about, it’s not enough for contradictions to sharpen there need to be people who see what’s happening and do something with those contradictions. Spontaneity and organization are in a dialectic with eachother.
And so it’s a little silly for there to be this long drawn out focus on dialectical materialism, and then introduce the deus ex machina contradiction/spontaneity device. Which I really wouldn’t care about EXCEPT you did a whole turn-to-camera-to-explain-dialectics bit. And had Eiza Gonzalez try to convince the main characters to unionize multiple times and they turn her down over and over (very weird to me that wasn’t ever fully addressed, came off a little off putting in the context of the political message tbh)? And the workers in china kind of give up unionizing in order to do adventurism (another Lenin moment)?
Also I’m more pro china than the average Joe so I get why china didn’t get the most flattering portrayal in this movie, but we had time for the sex pest plot line but not even a passing mention for any kind of nuance around how workers might be treated in the us by the biggest socialist state in the world?? Everyone remember rn that the vast majority of people in China own their homes?
Again really excellent movie and I wouldn’t normally care that much about it being kind of radlib EXCEPT it went out of its way to paint itself as a Communist™️ movie and then kind of dismisses the actual work of unionizing in favor of left accelerationist theories of change?
bagel 🥯 btw. just think ab it
BOOSTERS GET BUSTED!
hi hi hey ho hi hi hey hi hey ho
I Love Boosters (2026) dir. Boots Riley TEASER TRAILER | IN THEATERS MAY 22
Poppy Liu, Taylour Paige, Eiza González, Kasmere Trice Stanfield, Keke Palmer and Naomi Ackie at the "I Love Boosters" Los Angeles Premiere
moodboard of me in the cinema when whey said “dialectical materialism” in I Love Boosters
Ending of I love boosters x left accelerationist v mass organizing discourse x general strike discourse