On this account I will post:
• Queer theory
• transgynephobia (of which is a term I coined)

★
taylor price

#extradirty
Claire Keane
we're not kids anymore.
KIROKAZE
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"

No title available
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸
Sweet Seals For You, Always
will byers stan first human second
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Misplaced Lens Cap
Jules of Nature
No title available

⁂

Discoholic 🪩
🩵 avery cochrane 🩵
Peter Solarz

Andulka
seen from Sweden

seen from Venezuela
seen from Malaysia

seen from Brazil
seen from Argentina

seen from Jordan

seen from Portugal

seen from Singapore
seen from Pakistan
seen from Jordan

seen from Germany

seen from Jordan
seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Syria

seen from India

seen from Ireland
seen from Greece

seen from China

seen from Morocco
@canis-letrans
On this account I will post:
• Queer theory
• transgynephobia (of which is a term I coined)
Honestly? I rather a radqueer (big scary i know) use my word and use it correctly - as it IS a word with a purpose ; tools should not have DNIs - than have some non-transfeminized bigger bloggers than me who spread around the transmisogynistic, racist, & etc smear campaign against me, use it wrong on their blog constantly.
Unfortunately, my opinion on either of these things do not matter! Because at the end of the day, there is no DNI to words. I cannot control any of it. So, it does not matter.
So many people heard baby's first feminism of "the patriarchy benefits men and harms women" and fully locked in their opinion for life, never bothering to wonder if there is more nuance to it than that simple oppositional binary and throw a fit if anyone suggests maybe it's not that simple.
It's like all those conservatives that heard "there are two genders" in preschool and throw a fit if someone tries to suggest maybe there is more to gender than that.
wow i wrote a pinned post and queued 6 posts in several hours. i may be a loser
how did it take so long. why am i. so tired
wa
Also - fuck you to whoever said using transmasculinized was wrong because "nobody [as in transmascs who are on here posting about their shit] uses that"
Anyone educated on these issues understands that your labels =/= your experiences. Literally everyone who understands the shit uses that?
"TRFs" are not the only fake transfeminists out there and honestly? I hate them all equally.
and a free PSA while I load up the queue:
If you're gunna post lies about me - don't use my term?? Why are you hoes always trying to water down MY shit and take it for your dumb bs and claim it as you own while at the same time committing acts of harm against me?
You should be able to look up a queer identity on a queer persons blog safely.
A lot of you are willing to ignore blatant bigotry because it's tagged with a word that you associate with your discourse side.
Some of y'all genuinely act like "so what this whole persons blog is explicitly hating trans women! It is tagged with transandrophobia and ATM??" and that just is not the opinion you should be having.
I miss back when we all would actually use these tags for discussion, because now it just feels like every other post is discourse about how Evil trans women are.
Y'all are ruining the term transandrophobia I hope you know. In a similar way transmisogyny as a word has almost entirely lost it's initial meaning and nobody is having the conversations the word was made to facilitate (it's all discourse and hating other trans people now.) That's what y'all are turning transandrophobia into.
A lot of you are willing to ignore blatant bigotry because it's tagged with a word that you associate with your discourse side.
Some of y'all genuinely act like "so what this whole persons blog is explicitly hating trans women! It is tagged with transandrophobia and ATM??" and that just is not the opinion you should be having.
I miss back when we all would actually use these tags for discussion, because now it just feels like every other post is discourse about how Evil trans women are.
every day I become more and more convinced that calling oneself 'TME' is just an excuse to be horrifically transphobic (and intersexist) to everybody. think about it, they're absolutely vile to other transmascs, trans men, etc. and gleefully dogpile the nearest transfems/women who are vocally in support of these groups discussing their oppression.
the average TME crusader the moment a transfem says they don't have a problem with the word transandrophobia: you're an evil zoopedophile predator!! what do you mean I'm being transmisogynistic? I have TME in bio and think trans men are privileged! surely that absolves me of all transmisogyny that I've openly mentioned dealing with in the past and haven't really bothered to unpack!
and it's always so pathetic, because it's also one of the most obvious brownie-point grabs that I've ever seen.
In other news, sex bots are tagging my term. Truly famous.
Me when accountability is scary or something (can't reply so ima just post what I wrote here.)
Transfems will acknowledge how society will treat them as a man or woman conditional on whatever will hurt them most at that moment, then do the same thing to transmascs
Ohhh TMEs are such whiny hysterical zippertit afab-privleged softboys who don't understand their own experiences and can't speak for themselves, if they speak one syllable I'm going to feel like they're dominating the conversation like how men overestimate women's participation in group conversations, and I'm gonna use more re-heated mra talking points. But I don't have to unlearn misogyny, they're MEN!
Yea. Transfems do this. Not a small shitty group on tumblr who are addicted to discourse and hating other trans people. Transfems!
This is transgynephobia.
Do you see someone complain about white people being racist and say "not all whites" too, or men or cis people or hets or gringos or ableds or whatever. Is me being transfem not enough to imply that I don't literally mean all transfems
Being an oppressed minority and demanding respect is the same as white fragility now.. according to tumblr user 5000.
I suppose every post about ~the tmes~ or trans guys or whatever word theyre using for them should also be called okay then? Same principle. Some tguys are bad people, so when you generalize them it isn't bad?
Genuinely grasping at straws to excuse bigotry.
my main issue with the majority of mainstream transfeminist analytic re: transmasculinity, is the fact that it cannot be extrapolated to any cultural sphere outside of the west. which is... most places in the world.
even if i conceded to the idea that transmascs within the western world have power over transfems(/structurally opress transfems), this does not extend to any place outside of the western world.
take, for example, places where transfeminine identities receive more legal, cultural, and historical recognition than transmasculine ones. transfeminine people have a capacity for legal protections that transmasculine people do not.
a lot of the time, these are also places where transmasculine people are at a high risk of being forced into arranged marriages.
another example, a country where all people designated to be "female" regardless of their actual sex (i.e., their transsexuality) are legally forced to wear a hijab in public, or travel with a mahram, or discontinue education beyond middle school... et cetera.
an analytic that asserts that transmasculine people benefit from (trans)misogyny, or oppress cis women cannot be utilized to narrate the experiences of these people. an analytic that asserts that transmasculine people have access to patriarchal power or that transmasculinity is encouraged cannot be utilized to narrate the experiences of these people.
if transfeminism as a movement will prevail, we must theorize on the material conditions of transgender people in the third world, not just white women in seattle.
honestly, in a world where a family could realistically murder their transmasculine son for the transgression of transmasculinity, we shouldn't be arguing about whether or not transmascs experience oppression. mais, c'est la vie.
Op blocked me but I could still see it because it came on my dash from a reblog.. But I read this and think it's a pretty good read, was written a few years ago.
A satirical guidebook on how best to drive the most vulnerable from your communities.
Im having some health issues lately. I will be MIA on the TIT blog most likely.