Mike Driver
Keni
Three Goblin Art
NASA
noise dept.
hello vonnie
Jules of Nature

@theartofmadeline
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ

Kaledo Art
Sade Olutola

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣

PR's Tumblrdome
YOU ARE THE REASON
𓃗
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

izzy's playlists!
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
cherry valley forever
Today's Document

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Norway
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Saudi Arabia

seen from Portugal

seen from United States

seen from Portugal

seen from Indonesia
seen from Italy

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
@casino-morale
I redownload this app for one day once every maybe two months and unfortunately I’m rewarded every time
“On the use of the phrase ‘on the’ and the colon-delimited subtitle in academic papers: A meta-analysis”
When Izzy first walked out I was worried that he would be made into a joke that the crew would laugh at
but then he started singing and the dancing began and I realized that he wasn’t meant to be a joke at all. This is the most open and happy we’ve ever seen Izzy and the show treated it that way. Not mocking him but instead celebrating this moment.
When we talk about queer representation it’s usually just focused on queer relationships, but what I love about this episode is it shows other sides of being queer. That moment where Izzy saw Wee John doing his makeup and had a realization that he wanted that too? That is what being queer means to me. The crew singing along and cheering for him? That is what being apart of the queer community means to me.
What i love about this show is that it shows queer joy, not in a sanitized way, but in away that is messy, beautiful, and without any mockery or shame.
SO SEASON TWO HUH HOW YALL DOING
✨here be memes✨
Why does this have "- Freeform" at the end? and other questions about AO3 tag suffixes
Have you ever tagged something only for it to get a suffix like Character, Relationship or Freeform stuck on the end when you hit save? Do you think it's ugly and want it to go away, but don't know how? You probably can't, unfortunately, but there are a few situations where you can.
A tag suffix is a hyphen followed by the name of a tag category. Tags are either Fandom, Character, Relationship or Freeform tags. The reason that a suffix gets put on a tag is that the wrangulator (the part of AO3's backend that deals with tags) can't have tags with the same name, even if they're in different categories. As a solution, it puts the category at the end of tags that have first been tagged in some other category. For example: let's say that someone tags Evil Mark Donk in the characters field because that's where they want it to appear on their work (which is a perfectly valid choice to make!). Then someone else comes along and tries to tag Evil Mark Donk in the additional tags/freeforms field. (That field is shown as "additional tags" on the posting form, but the wrangulator and tag wranglers call it the "freeforms" because that's what it was originally called.) When the second person hits save, it will appear as Evil Mark Donk - Freeform on their fic. This will also happen if someone tags Evil Mark Donk in the relationships field, but there it would appear as Evil Mark Donk - Relationship. It's ugly and it's annoying, but the wrangulator is trying its best.
So how do you get rid of it? Sometimes it turns up because you've accidentally put your tags in the wrong field. Maybe you wrote a fic where you tagged Evil Mark Donk in the additional tags field, and no one else had tagged for it before you, which means it doesn't have a suffix and everything's right! But then you write a second fic, forgot to select the "additional tags" field when posting and now suddenly you've got Evil Mark Donk - Character on your fic. If that's the case, all you have to do is move it. But what if the first person to tag it wasn't you, and they put it in the character field, so you're stuck with Evil Mark Donk - Freeform? You can choose a different phrasing for the tag that wasn't initially tagged in a different field, e.g. Evil!Mark Donk or Mark Donk is Evil.
You may also have the problem that on the first use of a particular tag, you accidentally put it in a field you don't want it to be in, and now even when you put it in the right one, it still comes up as Evil Mark Donk - Freeform! The wrangulator has betrayed you, and you will be stuck with the ugly suffix forever! Not so, my friend. The problem is that even though you deleted the character tag Evil Mark Donk, it's still floating around in the wrangulator, which hasn't noticed that you deleted it. What you have to do is wait for 24 hours (give it a few for leeway) and a part of the wrangulator called "the rake" will delete it. After it's been raked, you can go forth and post it in the additional tags field, and no suffix will appear!
Unfortunately, most of the time it's going to be that someone else tagged it in a category you don't want to tag it first, and you can't change it without changing the phrasing of your tag. Sorry!
Sometimes, taggers will add their own suffixes, and tag wranglers are extremely curious about why. If you've done this, or something similar like put (freeform) in brackets after a tag, please let us know why! What does freeform mean to you? You are of course free to put suffixes on manually if you want -- it's a valid way to tag! We are just fascinated by this practice and don't really understand it. Please enlighten us!
For more information about tags, I've written some other explanations about how tags work, such as how to tell what type of tag something is and tag capitalisation.
In the library I have been reading lots of books about pesticides and related topics. The library's physical print collection skews toward older books, so there are lots of books over 50 years old.
I will share the findings in subsequent reblogs, but for now I'll say this: Filmmakers and novelists working in the most gory, nauseating crevices of the horror genre could never dream something more twisted, disgusting and absolutely blood-curdling as a book about Turfgrass Lawns from the 1960's.
So I read quite a bit of this book from 2020 called "The Chemical Age" by Frank A. Von Hippel straight through, and the whole time I wanted to scream at the nightmare unfolding upon the page before me!
I had read this essay once called "Living Lawns, Dying Waters" about how chemical fertilizers on lawns were first marketed because chemical companies after WW2 had a bunch of extra nitrogen for making bombs and they wanted to profit off it.
But the full story of how American Lawns, Agriculture and Horticulture are part of the Military-Industrial Complex is much worse.
So long story short, around the time of World War 1, scientists (particularly, German chemists) developed chemical weapons that could be released on the battlefield in toxic clouds. These poison gases were used in World War 1, and in the USA, chemical companies made big bucks creating chemical weapons that killed people horribly. However, at the end of World War 1, the chemical companies saw that they couldn't make profits anymore if nobody was killing people anymore, so they decided to market the chemical weapons as insecticides.
To keep making their big bucks, they had to have a war, so they "declared war" on insects. Boldly stating that insects were nothing but evil agents of disease, and this "war" would determine whether arthropods or humans would rule the Earth.
Basically the modern business of killing bugs with chemicals emerged from the modern business of killing humans with chemicals.
However, early chemicals were so deadly that a lot of people died accidentally, so there was need to develop better chemicals. One of the better chemicals was DDT.
DDT was considered to be a miracle and people dusted the whole countryside, indoor and outdoor, agricultural and wild environments, with DDT like powdered sugar on a donut. People celebrated how it was going to make flies go extinct and end malaria forever. Pretty soon all Americans had a measurable amount of DDT in their bodies and it was in breast milk and everything.
(Most mosquitoes and houseflies evolved resistance to DDT within 1-2 years of spraying starting.)
Of course it turned out that DDT poisons mass numbers of wildlife, so birds started dying in droves. Almost all the bald eagles died. A lady named Rachel Carson (This part is familiar to many of us) wrote a book called Silent Spring describing how the highly toxic chemicals were sterilizing the planet of all life, and what really got me about this part of the story was that it was VERY CONTROVERSIAL.
The chemical companies were PISSED.
But it wasn't just the companies. The idea of not sterilizing the whole planet with toxic chemicals was perceived by many as radical and insane. A lot of major publications were like, "What does she expect us to do??? GET RID of DDT?? That crazy bitch wants us all to GO BACK TO THE DARK AGES and DIE OF BUBONIC PLAGUE."
I'm not exaggerating one bit:
Countless people have insisted to me that getting rid of lawns means returning to a state where the world is uninhabitable and children can't play safely and ticks and snake bites sicken and kill indiscriminately. Mind which side of history you are on!
The above book was a new source looking back on the past. I think it is even more informative to look at old sources talking about their present. I was definitely much more horrified.
The thing is, as terrible as DDT was, it was far from the worst, and especially many of its predecessors were much, much worse, but in the 50's and 60's, putting those chemicals on your lawn was just as ordinary as using the chemicals we use now. It was just what you were supposed to do.
There were several of the 1960's lawn books, and I didn't write down their titles sadly, they were all something very generic like "Lawns." But here's some of what was in them:
Many of these chemicals are now illegal or highly restricted because many are very dangerous to humans when acute exposure occurs and cause cancer and other disease, and many last a very, very long time in the environment as well as building up and being stored in the body. For example Chlordane causes cancer and persists in the environment 10-20 years, while Methoxychlor is an endocrine disruptor. I think Malathion and possibly Carbaryl are the only ones you can still buy as a homeowner in the USA, and the USA is incredibly loose on regulations, with many countries worldwide being far more restrictive. Trichlorofon is still used by lawn care companies and on golf courses even though it causes cholinesterase inhibition in humans.
Lead arsenate is what it sounds like. This book tells readers that earthworms (yes, EARTHWORMS) can be killed with lead arsenate on golf courses.
The amount of highly toxic heavy metals recommended in these books was insane. For killing fungi, this same book recommended cadmium and mercury.
These books of course had zero concept of the mycorrhizal network or that fungi might be important, and had recommended treatments even for destroying fairy rings.
This is from a different book.
Even after reading the recommendations of mercury and cadmium application, does the phrase "soil sterilant" not send shivers of terror through you?
Same book as above recommended destroying many completely harmless creatures with DDT:
KILLING ISOPODS WITH DDT.
It's a miracle any of our grandparents lived long enough to reproduce!
I can only wonder how contaminated many former lawns and golf courses must be with dangerous substances that would make gardening or letting children play in them unadvisable.
This was a book from the 1970's that was critical of pesticide use, though the author seemed glumly unable to imagine better alternatives. It's not entirely relevant to the lawn thing, but I'm including it here because I read the phrase "1400 pounds of arsenic trioxide per acre" and briefly lost the ability to have thoughts with my brain.
colorized photograph of American apple farmers
This book talked a lot about how pest-control applications for insects regularly killed mass numbers of birds and small animals and everyone was just like "meh, that happens"
And also children were dying all the time from things like "accidentally spilled pesticide on themselves" or "player with a container that had pesticide in it"
michael as crowley appreciation post, because reasons 👀
loudly going "YOU'RE GOOD YOU'RE GOOD" to myself to ward off the memory of every embarrassing thing i've ever done
The good omens oxrib scene
Sexual
Totally innocent
Is it selfish and entitled to be optimistic? I know a lot of shit is happening but a lot of good stuff is happening to and I just feel like their are people who are not right wing who just want the rest of us to give up.
Er..... no????
Sorry, this is just the exact kind of question that, when I see it, makes me wonder what sort of insane terminally online brainworms are invading the Discourse (tm) now and both be surprised and not at all surprised that you feel the need to ask. So much of online culture is about nihilism, especially in social media: everything's terrible, everyone's doomed, if you don't recognize that it's Doomed then you're either delusional or "lol neurotypical," and any attempts to change that narrative, push back on it, point out the good things, or insist that meaningful action is both necessary and able to make a difference are somehow Morally Wrong. It's tied into the entire idea that doing nothing is the best course of (non) action, we're all doomed anyway, and that it's better to accept that and aggressively insist that others agree, because conveniently, if everything's terrible and past hope anyway, there's no obligation to try to fix it. It's the real-world corollary of the grimdark fiction insistence that only evil, depression, death, and cruelty are "real," and everything else is naive, stupid, simplistic, saccharine, or otherwise unrepresentative of the "reality" of the Big Mean World. And just like... come on. That's not true. We all know it's not true. Shut up.
It's the same kind of culture that glamorizes depression and poor mental health, insists that any basic steps to help yourself are "ableist," or otherwise does its best to cling to its negative and disempowered mindset, rather than taking any responsibility for either an individual or collective situation and attempting, however small, to make a difference. I'm not surprised that therapy-speak has been yet again weaponized to insist that anyone who has any amount of hope or positive outlook is "selfish and entitled," but as your Local Wise Tumblr Elder, I can safely assure you that it's bullshit and you're under absolutely no obligation to believe it, listen to it, or incorporate it into your worldview or actions. Giving up and throwing up your hands is easy. The hard part is actually trying to change things, accepting that we live in a flawed world, and that it nonetheless does not need to be unmitigated misery at all times. It will not be everything, but it will be something, and it will matter. It will also make you feel better, and very probably, other people as well.
Anyway: you're right. There ARE good things happening. They don't get nearly as much press or play as the bad things, but they still exist, and they should be pointed out. If you're participating in discussions or groups that are pushing the idea that only the bad things are valid, and you're "selfish" for insisting otherwise, I suggest that you drop them or otherwise cut way back or set healthy boundaries. Because, it's just not true, it deliberately disheartens and demoralizes you from trying, and the only people who benefit from that are the fuckwits who are largely responsible for ruining shit in the first place. So don't let them get away with it even more and automatically apply this mindset to yourself before you even try. Etc. etc. you are not obliged to complete the work, but nor are you free to abandon it. So yeah.
romance dawn trio
"The "generation gap" is an important social tool for any repressive society." - Audre Lorde
so since OFMD paid and committed voter fraud, are you going to disqualify their results?
Voter fraud, as we have stated many times before, is allowed. Blackbonnet will advance until they're beaten.
Tired of the angst, now manifesting this attitude from Crowley when Aziraphale shows up next in S3:
"SuPrEmE aRcHaNgeL AzIRaPhAle"