'cause chaos is how i learn

[brianttran-deactivated20120224]

Reblog or your mom will die in 928 seconds.

[ovod0se]

I love my mom.

I am risking nothing

I AM SORRY FOLLOWERS, I LOVE MY MOMMY

Will not risk.

sorry followers :(

[whatgracelikes-deactivated20190]

omg im so glad to se so many people love their mummy

[ameriagrae]

Why’re you being mean to my mum?

[larryismyhallelujah-blog]

goddamn it

[lollie-pond-deactivated20150728]

Nope. Googled it. 15 minuets. Nope. Not taking any chances

[steampoweredplayer]

Koop

[twirliest]

This has 1.2 million reblogs … Ps not riskin it

[nathanvj]

1.4 almost ps not risking it

[queenprotein-deactivated2016012]

Fuck this post

[irosefromthedead-deactivated201]

I am sorry…

[jessesthoughtsandmore-deactivat]

I fucks with my moms too heavy to be playing games. REBLOG

[yess-dadddy-deactivated20170430]

Hell no.

[alton1991]

I look at this and reblog because I too love my mother. 

Then I think why people scroll past when they see this about the father

But then I remember many dad’s just ain’t shit let alone there (Referreing to the one’s who leave by choice not taken by the system)

Then I count my blessings that my father is not within that category.

But I digress, I love you mom

[rachelmaree]

I swear i hate this post.

[radicalbehavior]

💅🏿

[da-bridges]

well, I guess.

[k-thrin]

Can’t risk it

[adidagucci-deactivated20230228]

it didn’t work

[chaos-dont-look]

I hate the fucking ranged weapons so much. Like. Why?? Who thought they'd be a good idea??? I just wanna talk

[chaos-dont-look]

aaaaand i ended up maining the bow after unlocking its last aspect

[aquilacalvitium]

Okay fuck it if this post reaches 666k notes by the end of 2023 I'll practise basic self care

Why 666k? Because it's funny and impossible so good fucking luck

[lizluvscupcakes]

Well, OP, I’m officially invested in this shit. Your whiny ass is doing self care if I have to drive to your goddamn house and do it for you.

[aquilacalvitium]

By Talos this can't be happening

[oysters-aint-for-me]

reblog this everyone i wanna see what happens when op’s reverse-hubris forces them to practice basic self care.

why? because it’s funny and completely possible actually so good fucking luck op

[tungsten-moon]

I figured out roughly how many notes it's been getting per day and multiplied that by the number of days left until the end of 2023

If we keep it going at this rate we'll be far past 666k

[aquilacalvitium]

IMPORTANT

Okay so clearly I've underestimated y'all

So how about we make this more interesting?

I will practise self care if this post reaches 666k BY THE END OF 2022

[moonlarking]

Op you have fuckethed with the devil this post has gained 30,000 notes since I reblogged it last night

[catgirlcaliphate]

OP I hope you are ready to practice some self care because if there's one thing the gremlins of tumblr love it's a challenge.

[saint-batrick]

i normally hate these "oh noo don't give me a ton of notes" posts but this one? this one i love.

posts that have 666k notes TO ME. and hopefully to you, too, OP. 💜

[solarmama-plantsareneat]

Let's all practice self care if this post hits the magic number…

[purpleblobfrompluto]

Yes

[purpleblobfrompluto]

YALL HELP US

@bigfootshonkers @dollopheadsandclotpoles @gwaine-the-rock-johnson @hannahhook7744 @knightofwoodsbeyond @reality-schmality @thirteenthedoctor @yoursassybookwormfriend if you want to of course @fuckyeahsnackables

[purpleblobfrompluto]

Op telling us we'll never make it to 666k by the end of 2023 (only having to make it 2022 after all):

Us:

[aquilacalvitium]

I was going to wait until y'all hit the mark, But I feel like I should say this now

When I made this post, it was supposed to be a joke

I mean, none of my posts ever get more than 20 notes if I'm lucky, so what are the odds of one reaching 666k? Impossible, haha

But then, something happened, something I didn't expect

People actually began to... like it? And... reblog? And comment?

Before I knew it, my notifications were swarmed with comments after comments after reblogs after comments all on this one post

Then, still in the mindset of this being a joke, I realised I'd made the goal too easy, so I upped the stakes

But... the notes just got more frequent from there

And it started to hit me just what was happening

For a while, I was overwhelmed with a feeling

A feeling I wasn't used to

It was like... all of a sudden... I mattered...

My existance was actually noteworthy

People actually... cared?

It wasn't a game anymore, it was a race to assure a stranger on the Internet that they were actually worth something

Hundreds of people all gathering in one online place to help out

Leaving messages and well wishes

Making me smile

Making me laugh

Funny comments

Jokes

Fun facts

Even simple comments

It all suddenly felt so real

This was never a joke to you

This was important

And I won't let any of that go in vain

So... stay tuned I suppose

I'll look after myself, and I'll post proof of it too

I'll catalogue every time I put my health first

Physical and mental

I'll acknowledge my bad days and celebrate my good days

But most of all

I won't forget this

Any of this

Ever

(Tagging all the people in that screenshot)

@deepsea-bathyna @royalsampaguita @timeturnerturns @twerkyvulture @reblogspamletsgoooo @gender-crisis-time @obsidianstrawberrymilk @shana-rosee @thefandombringer @sunshinedarlingiloveyou @bregee13 @moonlarking-blog @arcan6yo @crazyw3irdo @xinea @ghastmaskzombie @killthestairs @abalidoth @leesbian42

[gothiccharmschool]

You absolutely matter.

All of you people and creatures matter. Yes, even you.

SELF CARE AND KINDNESS FOR EVERYONE, DAMMIT.

[teathattast]

Brave little kitty

[ce1erywheat]

[crash-and-burn-quirk]

[airandangels]

I went and looked at the cat’s twitter and this is what she looks like on a normal day

[jaubaius]

Mood..

Source

[guooey]

If it wasn’t for the existence of the shrimp pose, I think the croissant leap would be my favorite cat form

[guooey]

The ancient Greek clay water pitcher is another close contender..

[godspeedyoublackemperor]

i scrolled down a lot please show us your pink cat again

this is the image some people use as evidence in their claim that my cat is "pink". i assure you these are incorrect assumptions

[pisshandkerchief-deactivated202]

where's the forth horseman

[piedaho]

[the-adventures-of-dave]

May I offer a second, blue Dave?

[piedaho]

[cybergata]

[8bitrevolver]

This is truly one of the greatest photosets on earth

[arirna]

[passionpeachy-deactivated202312]

[passionpeachy-deactivated202312]

excuse me

[chubby-aphrodite]

[passionpeachy-deactivated202312]

OH. can’t believe I forgot about such an important part of art history my apologies

[zookreep]

This is the Jobs Turtle of Good Luck. Reblog to hear back from your dream job

[batmanego]

undergoing a process of embiggening

[batmanego]

good lord

[lynati]

How much water did you ADD?!?

[eggytoast-deactivated20211219]

itachi isn’t an “ends justify the means” character, his “means” are directly contradictory to the ends he hopes to achieve, which is a nonviolent and stable world. not only does he massacre civilians, but he drives the sole survivor besides him to the brink of insanity, and fails to see where he went wrong well into his twenties. his alternative solution is literally that he should’ve made sasuke talk to the uchiha to stop the coup. seven year old sasuke. like come on, it’s ridiculous.

itachi would be best handled as a walter white type character - at some point, someone really needed to directly point out to him that his “this is for sasuke” justification is completely flimsy, just like walt’s “this is for my family” justification was bullshit. you can’t claim to love sasuke more than the village when you attempted to brainwash him to serve said village, knowing it was still partially run by a guy that wanted to kill sasuke as a child lol

[eggytoast-deactivated20211219]

the way all this post says is “itachi’s villainous actions should in fact be regarded as villainous instead of literally being called heroic by naruto, kakashi, hashirama, countless others” and yet there’s been multiple itachi stans on it like how dare you suggest itachi the 21 year old minor has any ability to think for himself

[margretescrimsonatelier-deactiv]

There should definitely be a more proper analysis on it than what I’m writing right now, and perhaps I’ll make it one day, but the phrase the end justifies the means does not mean what many of us think it means

Itachi, by killing his clan members, does not achieve a good goal using dirty methods. His goal is to exterminate the clan and serve the village, but he does not ever achieve anything tangible. Here is a simple quote from Simple English Wikipedia:

The end justifies the means is a phrase of Niccolò Machiavelli. It means that if a goal is morally important enough, any method of getting it is acceptable.

The idea is ancient, but it was not meant to justify unnecessary cruelty. It was part of a political philosophy called consequentialism. The basic idea is that a policy can be judged by its outcome. All modern versions of consequentialism have to deal with the limitations necessary to prevent tyrants abusing this idea.

Calling Itachi a man/child who believes that philosophy implies that he had a more important part in the politics in Konoha and indeed aimed at a goal that can be considered morally good. In his twisted morality, perhaps. But in the end, the genocide that ensued brought no benefits to anyone (Danzo does not count) and was a goal in itself.

If there are characters in Naruto whose actions embody that philosophy, it would be Madara and, to a lesser extent, Tobirama.

Madara sees peace as a morally good goal - as we all do - and while the goal itself is not twisted, his methods become such. Peace becomes so important to Madara that he resorts to immoral means to achieve it: taking freedom away from people through the Infinite Tsukuyomi, his elaborate manipulation of Obito, enslavement of the tailed beasts. He perceives these means are acceptable in the name of the goal that everyone would wish for and that can be considered objectively morally good.

Tobirama’s methods also can be seen as reprehensible, even though his goal was peace as well. And in his mind, the stability of the village meant peace, which remains a morally good goal. The forbidden jutsu he creates, the system he comes up with that becomes more impaired as time passes, the willingness to let other people drain themselves and die for the village that borders exploitation (not only what he did with the Uchiha but also how easily he seemed to throw his own life away) - these are the immoral ways in which he tried to establish peace.

The difference between other characters and these two is that they accept the immoral nature of their methods and do the dirty job, while characters like Itachi or Naruto are guided by their moral compass and see morality in what they do. They introduce their philosophies and justify their actions, while people like Madara and Tobirama may explain, but that’s it - you won’t get a biblical like elaboration of their actions from them

I hope the last paragraph make sense, not sure how to word it

Thanks for listening to my TED Talk

[likorys-shimenawa]

Gotta say I’m always baffled by people going ‘this traumatized child soldier should’ve gave himself therapy at age 12 and just pulled himself by his bootstraps’ and then act surprised when character fans tell them to get bent. xD

Also LMAO at people trying to judge Edo Tensei Itachi - you know, ‘under brainwashing to protect Leaf’ Itachi on whether he was morally hero or a villain in general.

[chaos-dont-look]

That’s… not what they said tho. They just said that Itachi should’ve been called out on his bs by literally anyone. Not that he should ‘pull himself up by his bootstraps’ as a traumatized 13 yo. Just that someone should’ve made him realize where he went wrong instead of praising him as a hero.

It’s a critique of Kishimoto’s writing, not the character himself.

[likorys-shimenawa]

itachi (…) fails to see where he went wrong well into his twenties.

They sure didn’t write what you suggest they secretly meant though.

Also, I haven’t watched Breaking Bad, but I’m gonna keep my opinion that ‘man in his 40s who starts making drugs’ and ‘12 year old child soldier forced into commiting genocide’ are still a wee bit differnt and cannot be compared at all.

[chaos-dont-look]

Except he does fail to see where he’s gone wrong. And it’s not necessarily his own fault - he was a child when it happened and nobody older/removed emotionally from the situation showed him and what he could’ve done differently (once again, a jab at Kishimoto, not Itachi).

I’ve never watched Breaking Bad either, but I don’t have to to see what OP meant. They didn’t say that Itachi and… the other guy are morally the same - because, as you pointed out, they’re not. Rather, they should’ve got the same, or similar, narrative treatment - Itachi should’ve been called out. ‘Cause maybe what he’s doing and has done isn’t exactly as morally right as he thinks. And sure, the fact that he even thinks that SCREAMS trauma, but that’s why Kishimoto should’ve implemented that realization as part of Itachi’s redemption.

No one is saying your fave is a horrible terrible person, they’re just criticizing the writing.

[likorys-shimenawa]

They’re failing at it more like. I point you back to the piece I quoted.

his alternative solution is literally that he should’ve made sasuke talk to the uchiha to stop the coup. seven year old sasuke. like come on, it’s ridiculous.

Here is another hilarious ‘why didn’t this brainwashed dude just think logically’.

[chaos-dont-look]

Yeah, the fact that he thinks that's a good solution is ridiculous. Once again - because, as you've said, he's traumatized and cannot think clearly. Which is why someone should've called him out.

Also - no one is vilifying Itachi. You're just strangely defensive. Saying anything along the lines of 'what they did/thought didn't make a lot of sense/wasn't morally good' isn't vilifying.

[eggytoast-deactivated20211219]

itachi isn’t an “ends justify the means” character, his “means” are directly contradictory to the ends he hopes to achieve, which is a nonviolent and stable world. not only does he massacre civilians, but he drives the sole survivor besides him to the brink of insanity, and fails to see where he went wrong well into his twenties. his alternative solution is literally that he should’ve made sasuke talk to the uchiha to stop the coup. seven year old sasuke. like come on, it’s ridiculous.

itachi would be best handled as a walter white type character - at some point, someone really needed to directly point out to him that his “this is for sasuke” justification is completely flimsy, just like walt’s “this is for my family” justification was bullshit. you can’t claim to love sasuke more than the village when you attempted to brainwash him to serve said village, knowing it was still partially run by a guy that wanted to kill sasuke as a child lol

[eggytoast-deactivated20211219]

the way all this post says is “itachi’s villainous actions should in fact be regarded as villainous instead of literally being called heroic by naruto, kakashi, hashirama, countless others” and yet there’s been multiple itachi stans on it like how dare you suggest itachi the 21 year old minor has any ability to think for himself

[margretescrimsonatelier-deactiv]

There should definitely be a more proper analysis on it than what I’m writing right now, and perhaps I’ll make it one day, but the phrase the end justifies the means does not mean what many of us think it means

Itachi, by killing his clan members, does not achieve a good goal using dirty methods. His goal is to exterminate the clan and serve the village, but he does not ever achieve anything tangible. Here is a simple quote from Simple English Wikipedia:

The end justifies the means is a phrase of Niccolò Machiavelli. It means that if a goal is morally important enough, any method of getting it is acceptable.

The idea is ancient, but it was not meant to justify unnecessary cruelty. It was part of a political philosophy called consequentialism. The basic idea is that a policy can be judged by its outcome. All modern versions of consequentialism have to deal with the limitations necessary to prevent tyrants abusing this idea.

Calling Itachi a man/child who believes that philosophy implies that he had a more important part in the politics in Konoha and indeed aimed at a goal that can be considered morally good. In his twisted morality, perhaps. But in the end, the genocide that ensued brought no benefits to anyone (Danzo does not count) and was a goal in itself.

If there are characters in Naruto whose actions embody that philosophy, it would be Madara and, to a lesser extent, Tobirama.

Madara sees peace as a morally good goal - as we all do - and while the goal itself is not twisted, his methods become such. Peace becomes so important to Madara that he resorts to immoral means to achieve it: taking freedom away from people through the Infinite Tsukuyomi, his elaborate manipulation of Obito, enslavement of the tailed beasts. He perceives these means are acceptable in the name of the goal that everyone would wish for and that can be considered objectively morally good.

Tobirama’s methods also can be seen as reprehensible, even though his goal was peace as well. And in his mind, the stability of the village meant peace, which remains a morally good goal. The forbidden jutsu he creates, the system he comes up with that becomes more impaired as time passes, the willingness to let other people drain themselves and die for the village that borders exploitation (not only what he did with the Uchiha but also how easily he seemed to throw his own life away) - these are the immoral ways in which he tried to establish peace.

The difference between other characters and these two is that they accept the immoral nature of their methods and do the dirty job, while characters like Itachi or Naruto are guided by their moral compass and see morality in what they do. They introduce their philosophies and justify their actions, while people like Madara and Tobirama may explain, but that’s it - you won’t get a biblical like elaboration of their actions from them

I hope the last paragraph make sense, not sure how to word it

Thanks for listening to my TED Talk

[likorys-shimenawa]

Gotta say I’m always baffled by people going ‘this traumatized child soldier should’ve gave himself therapy at age 12 and just pulled himself by his bootstraps’ and then act surprised when character fans tell them to get bent. xD

Also LMAO at people trying to judge Edo Tensei Itachi - you know, ‘under brainwashing to protect Leaf’ Itachi on whether he was morally hero or a villain in general.

[chaos-dont-look]

That’s… not what they said tho. They just said that Itachi should’ve been called out on his bs by literally anyone. Not that he should ‘pull himself up by his bootstraps’ as a traumatized 13 yo. Just that someone should’ve made him realize where he went wrong instead of praising him as a hero.

It’s a critique of Kishimoto’s writing, not the character himself.

[likorys-shimenawa]

itachi (…) fails to see where he went wrong well into his twenties.

They sure didn’t write what you suggest they secretly meant though.

Also, I haven’t watched Breaking Bad, but I’m gonna keep my opinion that ‘man in his 40s who starts making drugs’ and ‘12 year old child soldier forced into commiting genocide’ are still a wee bit differnt and cannot be compared at all.

[chaos-dont-look]

Except he does fail to see where he's gone wrong. And it's not necessarily his own fault - he was a child when it happened and nobody older/removed emotionally from the situation showed him and what he could've done differently (once again, a jab at Kishimoto, not Itachi).

I've never watched Breaking Bad either, but I don't have to to see what OP meant. They didn't say that Itachi and... the other guy are morally the same - because, as you pointed out, they're not. Rather, they should've got the same, or similar, narrative treatment - Itachi should've been called out. 'Cause maybe what he's doing and has done isn't exactly as morally right as he thinks. And sure, the fact that he even thinks that SCREAMS trauma, but that's why Kishimoto should've implemented that realization as part of Itachi's redemption.

No one is saying your fave is a horrible terrible person, they're just criticizing the writing.

[eggytoast-deactivated20211219]

itachi isn’t an “ends justify the means” character, his “means” are directly contradictory to the ends he hopes to achieve, which is a nonviolent and stable world. not only does he massacre civilians, but he drives the sole survivor besides him to the brink of insanity, and fails to see where he went wrong well into his twenties. his alternative solution is literally that he should’ve made sasuke talk to the uchiha to stop the coup. seven year old sasuke. like come on, it’s ridiculous.

itachi would be best handled as a walter white type character - at some point, someone really needed to directly point out to him that his “this is for sasuke” justification is completely flimsy, just like walt’s “this is for my family” justification was bullshit. you can’t claim to love sasuke more than the village when you attempted to brainwash him to serve said village, knowing it was still partially run by a guy that wanted to kill sasuke as a child lol

[eggytoast-deactivated20211219]

the way all this post says is “itachi’s villainous actions should in fact be regarded as villainous instead of literally being called heroic by naruto, kakashi, hashirama, countless others” and yet there’s been multiple itachi stans on it like how dare you suggest itachi the 21 year old minor has any ability to think for himself

[margretescrimsonatelier-deactiv]

There should definitely be a more proper analysis on it than what I’m writing right now, and perhaps I’ll make it one day, but the phrase the end justifies the means does not mean what many of us think it means

Itachi, by killing his clan members, does not achieve a good goal using dirty methods. His goal is to exterminate the clan and serve the village, but he does not ever achieve anything tangible. Here is a simple quote from Simple English Wikipedia:

The end justifies the means is a phrase of Niccolò Machiavelli. It means that if a goal is morally important enough, any method of getting it is acceptable.

The idea is ancient, but it was not meant to justify unnecessary cruelty. It was part of a political philosophy called consequentialism. The basic idea is that a policy can be judged by its outcome. All modern versions of consequentialism have to deal with the limitations necessary to prevent tyrants abusing this idea.

Calling Itachi a man/child who believes that philosophy implies that he had a more important part in the politics in Konoha and indeed aimed at a goal that can be considered morally good. In his twisted morality, perhaps. But in the end, the genocide that ensued brought no benefits to anyone (Danzo does not count) and was a goal in itself.

If there are characters in Naruto whose actions embody that philosophy, it would be Madara and, to a lesser extent, Tobirama.

Madara sees peace as a morally good goal - as we all do - and while the goal itself is not twisted, his methods become such. Peace becomes so important to Madara that he resorts to immoral means to achieve it: taking freedom away from people through the Infinite Tsukuyomi, his elaborate manipulation of Obito, enslavement of the tailed beasts. He perceives these means are acceptable in the name of the goal that everyone would wish for and that can be considered objectively morally good.

Tobirama’s methods also can be seen as reprehensible, even though his goal was peace as well. And in his mind, the stability of the village meant peace, which remains a morally good goal. The forbidden jutsu he creates, the system he comes up with that becomes more impaired as time passes, the willingness to let other people drain themselves and die for the village that borders exploitation (not only what he did with the Uchiha but also how easily he seemed to throw his own life away) - these are the immoral ways in which he tried to establish peace.

The difference between other characters and these two is that they accept the immoral nature of their methods and do the dirty job, while characters like Itachi or Naruto are guided by their moral compass and see morality in what they do. They introduce their philosophies and justify their actions, while people like Madara and Tobirama may explain, but that’s it - you won’t get a biblical like elaboration of their actions from them

I hope the last paragraph make sense, not sure how to word it

Thanks for listening to my TED Talk

[likorys-shimenawa]

Gotta say I’m always baffled by people going ‘this traumatized child soldier should’ve gave himself therapy at age 12 and just pulled himself by his bootstraps’ and then act surprised when character fans tell them to get bent. xD

Also LMAO at people trying to judge Edo Tensei Itachi - you know, ‘under brainwashing to protect Leaf’ Itachi on whether he was morally hero or a villain in general.

[chaos-dont-look]

That's... not what they said tho. They just said that Itachi should've been called out on his bs by literally anyone. Not that he should 'pull himself up by his bootstraps' as a traumatized 13 yo. Just that someone should've made him realize where he went wrong instead of praising him as a hero.

It's a critique of Kishimoto's writing, not the character himself.

[weonsinnombre]

[sirartwork]

reblog for noises

[owwmyeye]

lookit them sing along <3

[tendermiasma]

I designed some seals! Raya Lucaria crest and Morgott’s great rune 🌌✨