I don't wanna give the impression that this is a recent argument, btw. I wouldn't be speaking on this openly if I weren't confident that this discourse is long dead, because it's not like I'm interested in reopening that can of worms.
I was specifically reacting to the way that whenever queer content gets mentioned in this manga, it is often dismissed or spoken about as though it is a silly accidental quirk rather than something intentionally added by Naoko Takeuchi. And a fake anecdote about how she totally meant to make a character bisexual, but got confused and made her nonbinary by mistake, wouldn't have had people accepting it as fact if she weren't a female Japanese author.
This isn't about which version is better, this is about which version gets treated as intentional and thoughtful and nuanced, and which one strangely, mysteriously, does not.