must be hard not being liked by women but it's lowkey always something wrong with the men that say that cause women will date anyone I've seen it I've fought it to no avail

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Keni

JVL
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
Three Goblin Art

Product Placement
art blog(derogatory)
noise dept.
styofa doing anything
trying on a metaphor

@theartofmadeline
todays bird

tannertan36

祝日 / Permanent Vacation
Cosmic Funnies

Kiana Khansmith
Misplaced Lens Cap
Show & Tell

★
Stranger Things

seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from Italy

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from France

seen from Malaysia
seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
@chronicillnesscollector
must be hard not being liked by women but it's lowkey always something wrong with the men that say that cause women will date anyone I've seen it I've fought it to no avail
One of my biggest pieces of advice to improve your reading comprehension is to look up every single word you're not sure of.
It doesn't matter if it's the first time you're seeing the word or you've looked it up every day for the last year. If you don't know or are not sure what a word means, look it up.
I’ll never forget when I was arguing with a person in favor of total prison abolition and I asked them “what about violent offenders?” And they said “Well, in a world where prisons have been abolished, we’ll have leveled the playing field and everyone will have their basic needs met, and crime won’t be as much of an issue.” And then I was like “okay. But…no. Because rich people also rape and murder, so it isn’t just a poor person thing. So what will we do about that?” And I don’t think they answered me after that. I’m ashamed to say I continued to think that the problem was that I simply didn’t understand prison abolitionists enough and that their point was right in front of me, and it would click once I finally let myself understand it. It took me a long time to realize that if something is going to make sense, it needs to make sense. If you want to turn theory into Praxis (I’m using that word right don’t correct me I’ll vomit) everyone needs to be on board, which mean it all needs to click and it needs to click fast and fucking clear. You need to turn a complex idea into something both digestible and flexible enough to be expanded upon. Every time I ask a prison abolitionist what they actually intend to do about violent crime, I get directed to a summer reading list and a BreadTuber. It’s like a sleight-of-hand trick. Where’s the answer to my question. There it is. No wait, there it is. It’s under this cup. No it isn’t. “There’s theory that can explain this better than I can.” As if most theory isn’t just a collection of essays meant to be absorbed and discussed by academics, not the average skeptic. “Read this book.” And the book won’t even answer the question. The book tells you to go ask someone else. “Oh, watch this so-and-so, she totally explains it better than me.” Why can’t you explain it at all? Why did you even bring it up if you were going to point me to someone else to give me the basics that you should probably already know? Maybe I’m just one of those crazy people who thinks that some people need to be kept away from the public for everyone’s good. Maybe that just makes me insane. Maybe not believing that pervasive systemic misogyny could be solved with a UBI and a prayer circle makes me a bad guy. But it’s not like women’s safety is a priority anyway. It’s not like there is an objective claim to be made that re-releasing violent offenders or simply not locking them up is deadly.
I've done a lot of reading about prison abolition, particularly academic sources, and the general idea is that crimes will still happen, but the communty will essentially sort it out on their own.
A lot of prison abolition frameworks rely on what we know about how societies met their own and each others needs before currency. So, if someone needed milk, they'd take eggs from their chicken and trade it with the person who has a cow. This ensured that everyone's physical needs were usually met.
Prison abolitonists won't say it, but their idea of how rape should be handled is exactly how these early agricultural societies handled it. It was a "majority rules" system. Meaning, if the community liked the women more, the man would be ousted or punished. And if the community liked the man more, the woman would be ousted or punished.
The general goal of prison abolition is not a society in which everyone is safe and has their individual needs met. It's a society that's stable and can maintain itself, where most people have their physical needs met enough to reproduce and continue the society.
This is why they can never give you a straight answer. Because the prison abolition framework doesn't aim to abolish rape, it aims to keep it as quiet as possible. Their solution is to keep men only raping their own wives and daughters, and for those women and girls to have enough other needs met that they'll shut up about it for fear of not having those other needs met.
Most prison abolitionists do not actually understand their framework, because they don't read the academic sources and they don't know how their ideal society would function. But the academics know exactly what it would look like, and it's a regressive society where instead of a justice system making prisons to keep the violent men contained, each household has a woman to keep that household's men contained.
If you want to know what prison abolition looks like, don't ask a prison abolitionist who says "I don't know what that would be like". Look at examples of early agricultural communities where their primary goal is survival. That's what it would look like, because in the absence of large scale people management, all of the social duties fall to women.
how it feels to accept you're fucked forever
Human females urgently have to unite to kill aggressive males like the female bonobos do, it's a behavior for betterment of societies that humans missed and should get back
if you’re going to kill yourself you should do it at work so you can make it everyone else’s problem
mixing lesbianism with feminism will be detrimental to lesbians always. feminism is meant to benefit women as a whole, most women are het attracted, thus most women are homophobic, thus feminism will always work on slightly homophobic gears. feminism does benefit lesbians because we're women, but homosexuality and femaleness are not related and should not be approached within the same context.
meditations on first philosophy (1641) - rene descartes
"who give a shit"
Anastasia Yarygina
i bet it feels good to be an underwater plant just swaying in sync with the flow of water
recently saw ppl discuss whether they put their medicines in a kitchen cabinet or a bathroom cabinet and i was shocked by the fact that many ppl said kitchen cabinet. so now i need you to reblog this and say where you keep yours
As every YouTube 'leftist' is being a freak
If a woman is going to have an abortion because the foetus is disabled and you respond with any version of no/ she should think about it because disabled people have big smiles/ disabled people are oppressed that's eugenics, you're a fanatic trying to guilt, shame and force a woman into a pregnancy she no longer wants to continue. You are just as bad as conservatives and essentially saying abortion is fine if the foetus doesnt tick an oppressed identity box which it cant do because its not a person and you're a zealot. You might as well call her a sinner and drop the eugenics rhetoric. An 'oppressed' foetus is more important than a woman who wants to abort it.
' we all need care' shut the fuck up. She does not want that pregnancy.
'you shouldn't get pregnant if you wouldnt have a disabled child' a foetus isnt a disabled child because its not a person.
You dont need a good reason to have an abortion because the female body isnt a democracy, you want one because you're a misogynistic fanatic with entitlement issues who likes the idea of womanhood being about martyrdom because what do you mean you dont want to do motherhood if birthing a disabled child will make it more challenging 🤬. But id be aborted :( Boo fucking woo!!! Get your feelings out her uterus.
Women arent vessels to make sure the world has enough disabled people 🤷🏾♀️
Abortions arent a dirty secret. I do not care if someone makes a video about having one
Laughs jovially I can’t bear it anymore
Pangaea was wasted on the dinosaurs. Imagine the railway network.
auto immune disorders happen when the immune system ignores regulatory factors and begins attacking healthy bodily tissues, due to what scientists refer to as "sheer love of the game"
i don’t know how people care about sports but it’s okay
it’s really not.
i’m tired of pretending it’s okay. we have to kill them