Cleanqueer 🌈🧼

Cleanqueer is an anti harassment, pro recovery label. Somewhat connected to radnormal. Also serves as an alternative to "anti."

[cleanqueer]

My Intro ~

I am Cleanqueer! And I coined Cleanqueer. Please read the coining post! I also like Moralqueer. I’m not sure what people can call me yet. Usually I’d go by my URL, but…….

🫧Resources🫧 Cq decor

common acronyms and shortenings

This blog is for:

🫧Spreading awareness about the harm of radqueer, pro/darkship, and adjacent communities.

🫧Letting people know that they can recover! And to be a safe space for recovering and ex Radqueers and pro/darkshippers

🫧Sometimes flag coining? Maybe? If I feel like it? 🫧Being a center to the Cleanqueer community if it is to grow.

Asks:

🫧now, anon is on. I really hope I can keep it this way.

🫧 Talk about how the RQ or P/Dship or para community has harmed you or why you left it! These types of asks are always helpful!

🫧Yes, you can send me screenshots. 🫧Yes, you can make anon claims. Rules n stuff about them here

DNI:

-Non healing / anti help paraphiles, people that treat harmful paras as a kink, any kind of pro contact or nue contact para, ect. -T.R.A.S.H (transphobes, racists, ableists, sexists, homophobes) -Radqueer, Xenosatanist and adjacent

-Proship/Darkship, kodacon, and adjacent

As for the last two, you are welcome to send an anon ask regarding advice on leaving your community or asking for places to get help

-Pro ED, thinspo, adjacent

-Pro harassment of any kind

-Transandrophobia/Transmisogyny deniers and people that use tme/tma

askers keep breaking my DNI. You guys do realize that I can just, delete asks, right? Like you sending me an anon calling me a “stupid anti” isn’t going to change my mind. Stop wasting your own time lol??

Thank You!!

blinkies by @/radically-normal <prev username. Actually by @/hihi-puffy-yumi who deleted their blog

[cleanqueer]

https://www.tumblr.com/cleanqueer/823536856760221696/can-white-people-stop-trying-to-say-that-incest

REAL. notice how 99.9% of people into that stuff are white combined with the fact that incest (I’m not exactly sure about pedophilia but probably since they go hand in hand) is rooted in white supremacy. like 👀👀👀

- 📿

REEEALL

I mean sites that host that stuff like tumblr are mostly white (and by mostly holy shit do I mean it) and those are the sites that host this bs

and these communities tend to excuse things like racist stereotypes in media bc “fiction doesn’t affect reality” or things like transracial

AND ESPECIALLY about how incest is rooted in white supremacy!!! And sexual (and non sexual) child abuse is actually a part of facism. It’s not rooted in racism but is definitely used to perpetuate it (as we’re seeing RIGHT NOW with ICE raping young girls they’ve kidnapped)

[wooper-official]

Can white people stop trying to say that incest and pedophilia are an inherent part of trans culture

[cleanqueer]

I find it interesting that cleanqueer is automatically called an "endo hate group" despite the term being stanceless

Guys I think proship and radqueer stuff is a bigger focus. Nobody is using cleanqueer for syscourse bullshit (well, except people like Sophie) I promise you 🥹🥹 I say this as someone who's anti endo, it's GOOD that the term is stanceless. It focuses on something that can harm way more people and it focuses on being anti harassment!! I'm PROUD that there's pro-endos probably using this label, it's nice to unite over something this fucked up as people who don't believe in harassment even when beliefs differ

I hope people stop bugging you about syscourse!!/gen

It genuinely feels like people are trying to find ways to demonize the term that's harmless as hell :(

yesssss exactly tysm! :D

[cleanqueer]

Saw a post calling cleanqueers an anti proship and endo hate group

Aren't you guys like pro endo / syscourse avoidant

I’d say syscourse avoidant describes it (I promise everyone there are genuine reasons for this but the reasons prevent me from saying what the reasons are 😭 shxoabdiqnjdjw everyone keeps asking me about syscourse)

[cleanqueer]

it’s really difficult to just ignore things sometimes

There is 100% such a thing as a harmful paraphilia. Pedophilia, Zoophilia, Necrophilia, and others all involve non-consenting individuals and are incredibly harmful. “Thought crimes aren’t real” doesn’t mean “if you’re aroused by rape it’s ok and awesome!” It is a phrase meant to comfort people with intrusive thoughts.

I really don’t want to put this person on blast but creating a space for children to talk about their attraction to animals, dead bodies, and younger children is not okay. And I know they’re a kid, but although it is true that kids deserve a safe place to discuss their attraction, publicly on tumblr is NOT a safe space!!! This is practically a buffet for predators and MAPs! Do not harass the original poster.

I genuinely feel bad for this person, that they’ve been convinced by this community that something like this is okay.

[exradqueeruni]

First of all, there is no such thing as a "harmful paraphilia". A paraphilia is an uncontrollable attraction, an emotion in someone's brain, which is inherently not harmful. It can become harmful if it develops into a paraphilic disorder (which harms the person who has it) or if it is acted on, at which point it becomes the associated action (child abuse, bestiality, etc).

"Thought crime isn't real" doesn't suddenly stop applying to people you don't like. You cannot designate some thought as bad because they don't hurt the person thinking them.

Regardless of whether you think this blog should exist or not, minors with paraphilias exist and they deserve to have a space to talk about them in a SFW manner. I developed a MADIR paraphilia when I was 16 and blogs like that not only helped me but fully prevented me from developing a paraphilic disorder. I also want to point out that the blog is not for any explicit discussions, which you can see if you actually scroll through it.

To sign off this post, I'm going to show a lot of examples of this account actually helping people through their internal shame.

[cleanqueer]

okay. So first of all, an uncontrollable attraction and thoughts in someone’s brain can still be harmful and I have no idea what leads you to believe it can’t. Attraction to non-consenting individuals is inherently harmful. This type of attraction is not normal and is caused by disorders like OCD and PTSD. If left untreated (aka being convinced your attraction is something that is safe and cool and good and awesome and cute and sexy and completely normal) it can worsen. People with these types of attractions are incredibly susceptible to addictions to content involving their paraphilia (the “taboo” nature of it (which is inherently part of the content because it involves rape) causes extreme dopamine spikes (porn + not allowed = excitement) and is incredibly harmful)

Secondly, the phrase “thought crimes aren’t real” applies to people with intrusive thoughts. It’s not “so people that you don’t like don’t get to use it?” It’s a phrase for people with intrusive thoughts because people can literally believe that their bad thoughts can influence the real world. That’s what the phrase is for. And btw, acting on something in the real world is not a “thought crime” and people need to stop appropriating that term. Writing fanfic is not a “thought crime.” Creating a tumblr blog for minors to express publicly that they are zoophiles is not a “thought crime.” Proudly proclaiming that you are a zoophile is not a “thought crime.”

And these screenshots you’re showing of “helping people” is first of all, mostly not even paras at all but people with OCD. And the reason this seems like it’s helping is because, again, it’s “your thoughts about rape are cool and awesome.” Which can be comforting, because it makes you feel good about your intrusive thoughts. But in reality, people who have intrusive thoughts shouldn’t be learning that they’re cool and awesome, they should be learning that it doesn’t define them or say anything about them as a person. And that they’re involuntarily. These communities are incredibly unsafe for people with intrusive thoughts because these people absolutely love convincing you to do things that make your thoughts more prevalent and project your thoughts into the real world through looking at porn and telling strangers online about it. Things like darkshipping, which can be extremely harmful even to people who don’t have intrusive thoughts, are especially dangerous to people with intrusive thoughts, especially paraphilias, because they encourage you to treat your disorder and/or symptoms of a disorder like a cute innocent kink. And it is BECAUSE these things are so stigmatized that these types of communities and blogs arise, because some people see it as a kink, and paraphiles, which have no where else to go, are forced to see it as a kink in order to be accepted. Paraphiles deserve spaces that aren’t kink spaces, that are separate from actual kinks like objectum, to talk honestly about what they feel, rather than being forced to make their paraphilias worse because the only place they have to go is fetish spaces.

This blog is not a safe place for minors to talk about their paraphilias because it frames paraphilias as a fetish/kink, or something inherently normal. It’s a blog for minors to talk about things that sexually arouse them, publicly, online. If you have a paraphilic disorder, chances are this kind of thing is your only option. Chances are people are actively conditioning you into thinking the symptoms of a disorder that you need and deserve help for are not only normal, but something to be proud of! Ideas like this are why it is so stigmatized. Because people don’t have anywhere else to go. A harmful paraphilia is not just a fetish, but people who constantly insist that it is, and that there’s actually no such thing as a harmful paraphilia, contribute so much to the demedicalization of harmful paraphilias. People don’t want to get the help they need, either because they think they don’t need it or because they don’t want to be seen as a weirdo with a fetish for dead bodies. And it makes people refuse to listen to anyone trying to help them because they see them as bigots who just hate paraphiles. The fetishization of harmful paraphilias is what stigmatizes then the MOST out of anything, and it’s the same from the anti (it’s a weird fetish) and pro (it’s completely harmless) sides but with a different coat of paint. And it needs to stop.

[exradqueeruni]

I am absolutely blown away by this. What exactly do you think a paraphilia is? What do you think a paraphilic disorder is? Half of the things you've said are built entirely on your opinion and ignore the reality of how paraphilias are defined and studied.

The DSM-5 defines a paraphilia as an "intense and persistent sexual interest other than sexual interest in genital stimulation or preparatory fondling with phenotypically normal, physiologically mature, consenting human partners". Which just means, to put it shortly, a sexual interest in a non-sexual thing or being that isn't capable of sexual consent.

The DSM-5 (as does the ICD-11) also makes a point to distinguish paraphilias from paraphilic disorders. A paraphilia is only considered a paraphilic disorder, and diagnosed as such, if it causes marked distress to the individual or has been acted on with unconsenting beings.

An attraction cannot be inherently harmful because it is purely a thought. Without influence that pushes it into a paraphilic disorder, it cannot hurt the person who has it. And, as I said before, if it is acted on the action itself is the thing that is harmful.

Paraphilias that are not paraphilic disorders cannot be treated because there is nothing to treat. Again, this is agreed on by the literal DSM-5 and ICD-11. If someone is existing as a MADIR paraphile, is fully okay with their paraphilia and is not at risk of harming another person, there is literally nothing else you can do. You cannot get rid of a paraphilia.

Also - "This type of attraction is not normal and is caused by disorders like OCD and PTSD" - I would love to see a source on this because it is objectively not true. Paraphilias and paraphilic disorders do have an overlap with both of those things, but it is common knowledge that paraphilias are developed through a mix of sources.

Speaking entirely from my own terms I can say that my paraphilias were not caused by some trauma or mental illness. I have several that developed in very early childhood, before I had any exposure to sexual content. Some developed in my late teenage years but, again, were not caused by a trauma or mental illness. I know that is anecdotal evidence but I feel it is worth saying.

I also feel like I can't correctly address the rest of your points because, as mentioned, your ideas on paraphilias and paraphilic disorders just straight up don't match current clinical knowledge and understanding of them.

[cleanqueer]

the use of this definition is pointless in this conversation because you know exactly what I’m talking about and are purposely choosing to ignore it. But that’s kind of besides the point I suppose. Anyway, I looked it up. It says this:

Source

Pt: Characteristics of Paraphilic Disorders Most people with atypical sexual interests do not have a mental disorder. To be diagnosed with a para- philic disorder, DSM-5 requires that people with these interests:

feel personal distress about their interest, not merely distress resulting from society’s disapproval; or

have a sexual desire or behavior that involves another person’s psychological distress, injury, or death, or a desire for sexual behaviors involving unwilling persons or persons unable to give legal consent.

so yes “distress” can classify a paraphilic disorder, but a sexual desire involving non-consent (aka sexual desire for kids, Animals, and dead bodies) also classifies it. At least in the DSM source that I could find, which I am willing to admit isn’t incredibly recent (2013) however this source from 2025 claims that the DSM defines one of the criteria for pedophilic disorders as “The patient reports recurrent and intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving sexual activity with a prepubescent child or children…; symptoms must be present for at least 6 months” (with very similar definitions for each respective paraphilia; I chose this one because I felt it was the most relevant.) Notice that the definition also includes FANTASIES, AKA thoughts.

(also, MADIR? What? MADIR pedophile?? I’d like if you could explain this because I couldn’t find that anywhere even when I searched on tumblr for it /gen)

This next part is kind of nitpicky, and I apologize for that but I can’t not address it, but “if it causes marked distress to the individual or has been acted on with unconsenting beings”…. Something only being a disorder if it has been acted upon already, is, obviously not correct? Extreme actions like rape happen as a result of untreated disorders (in this case, not in the case of some misogynistic man doing it cause he can or something), it doesn’t just happen randomly and then you’re disabled because you did it? Again that was nitpicky af so I’m sorry about that…

and, things that are “purely thoughts” CAN hurt people and have an effect on them. Because like all things we see, thoughts affect our emotions and influence us, especially if they are involuntary because then you have no control over them. We act based on our thoughts and emotions. For people with intrusive thoughts, they aren’t just passing thoughts that you can let the wind carry away, they stick there and fester and fester and grow worse and convince you all the worst things about yourself. Thoughts can be harmful because they can cause actions, and because they can significantly worsen your mental state (intrusive thoughts mainly being the second one, unless they get extremely bad, which is rare). If opinions can form from thoughts, then thoughts can affect us. This includes opinions about ourselves.

What I said about OCD and PTSD were examples. Here’s what the source you linked in that paragraph says can be sources: “

Anxiety or early emotional trauma interferes with normal psychosexual development.

The standard pattern of arousal is replaced by another pattern, sometimes through early exposure to highly charged sexual experiences that reinforce the person’s unusual experience of sexual pleasure.

The pattern of sexual arousal often acquires symbolic and conditioning elements (eg, a fetish symbolizes the object of arousal but may have been chosen because the fetish was accidentally associated with sexual curiosity, desire, and excitement).

It is controversial whether all paraphilic development results from these psychodynamic processes, and some evidence of altered brain functioning and functional anatomy is present in some paraphilias (eg, pedophilia)  “ (btw a psychodynamic process is basically how an unconscious event or early childhood experience affects behavior and stuff for anyone reading, I had to look that one up lol)

The source you used literally sites anxiety and trauma, early exposure to sexually charged experiences, and sexual conditioning, and describes them as psychodynamic processes? Which doesn’t really dismantle my point at all in my opinion? I guess I could be wrong maybe or maybe I just wasn’t clear enough that they were examples. However I stand by my point that attraction to rape isn’t normal.

And obviously, utilizing these definitions, not all paraphilias are harmful, since they do not include rape. As for not addressing the rest of my points, not all of them are opinion based (such as the appropriation of the phrase “thought crime” and the fact that actions are not thought crimes) I just think (no offense really) that you just didn’t want to address them. And if that’s the case just don’t say anything about it. Cherry-picking points on tumblr is something literally everyone I’ve ever seen do. So whatever. You might’ve just missed it. Just don’t say I’m basing it on opinion. Also sorry this was so god damn long

[radnormal]

censorship is a very interesting topic in my opinion , the debates , questions and talk around it make me think about it .

censorship , in my opinion , is bad .

well , most of it actually . i believe that yes : certain things should actually be censored , a good point i saw regarding censorship was the talk about CSEM / CSAM .

CSEM / CSAM is inherently and will always be harmful due to its subject matter and what has happened to the individuals in the materials , not to mention that distributing or having property of CSEM / CSAM is literally illegal . let alone it also being a privacy breach of someone’s identity being harmed in it . that is an example of censorship — not being able to share material — , that however , is not bad censorship .

this goes same for things like bestiality as animals are harmed and sexually abused / raped . another goes for necrophilia videos or gore . they’re all censored for a reason .

though with censorship also comes up with topics like literature , fiction , creation and so and so .

my opinion on it depends on what is being created and understanding the background around it ( whether it be plot of the story , or who the author / creator is) , therefore , i am unable to give a definitive answer . however i will say , whatever you make is not free from criticism . sure , you have creative freedom of speech and expression , but just because you do does not mean you won’t be criticized if it happens to be harmful , or in distaste to a sensitive subject or matter .

my wording can come off as off or incorrect so if anything is confusing , let me know . censorship is an interesting topic that i want to hear what others think about it or what their opinions are — whether your pro , neutral or anti censorship , comments and reblogs or open , though i might not see nor respond to everything .

[iiiiime]

i think some people need to learn the difference between censorship and rules/regulation. In school you are taught that if you say mean things about others you will get punished, (parents called, go to the principal, excluded on fun things), but people leave their graces behind on the Internet.

These people who scream about censorship being so oppressive will not realize that banning harmful images or talking about how kids/animals being in sexual art is bad, is not at all equal to censorship that censors political opinions that differ from the controlling government or opinions about a genocide that are being censored.

By the way, OP great take.

[cleanqueer]

jsyk exradqueeruni is a proshipper

yeah I kinda figured that one out

[pusheenagainstrq]

Genuinely, I feel like being in a radqueer space deteriorates someone.

Artists who have become radqueers and entered the community start making sloppier art without much care. Writers stop writing different kinds of things and just focus on fetish art.

I used to be a proshipper (due to grooming) and I literally wouldn't ever draw anything other than my ex-proships and my art was ASS. I've seen it so many times with other artists too who have fallen into negative spaces.

[slashyuri]

i have no empathy for any of you transrace people, you are ALL disgusting for seeing how POC suffer and then thinking “yeah I want to be that!” you are GROSS

[the-sides-dimension]

Me being against proship is not : "censor, take down, no one should be allowed to talk about this"

Me being against proship is: "people aren't going to like you if you romanticize pedophilia. I am allowed to not want to be around you, cut you out of my life, whatever, because you romanticize disgusting, serious, awful things that happen to real people. And I'm not the only one who will"

[cleanqueer]

yeah I can’t handle ts I’m logging off for the day

edit: I lied

[cleanqueer]

hi I'm the eldrich numbers abomination that has been liking your posts, but on anon. your blog is great and you should feel great! I am on a blank semi anonymous blog since I cannot lock my main, I have had it with Tumblr plugging their ears at the word "consent" and have decided to interact with likes only

have a nice day! 👋

lol thank you for the compliments :)

[cleanqueer]

it’s really difficult to just ignore things sometimes

There is 100% such a thing as a harmful paraphilia. Pedophilia, Zoophilia, Necrophilia, and others all involve non-consenting individuals and are incredibly harmful. “Thought crimes aren’t real” doesn’t mean “if you’re aroused by rape it’s ok and awesome!” It is a phrase meant to comfort people with intrusive thoughts.

I really don’t want to put this person on blast but creating a space for children to talk about their attraction to animals, dead bodies, and younger children is not okay. And I know they’re a kid, but although it is true that kids deserve a safe place to discuss their attraction, publicly on tumblr is NOT a safe space!!! This is practically a buffet for predators and MAPs! Do not harass the original poster.

I genuinely feel bad for this person, that they’ve been convinced by this community that something like this is okay.

[exradqueeruni]

First of all, there is no such thing as a "harmful paraphilia". A paraphilia is an uncontrollable attraction, an emotion in someone's brain, which is inherently not harmful. It can become harmful if it develops into a paraphilic disorder (which harms the person who has it) or if it is acted on, at which point it becomes the associated action (child abuse, bestiality, etc).

"Thought crime isn't real" doesn't suddenly stop applying to people you don't like. You cannot designate some thought as bad because they don't hurt the person thinking them.

Regardless of whether you think this blog should exist or not, minors with paraphilias exist and they deserve to have a space to talk about them in a SFW manner. I developed a MADIR paraphilia when I was 16 and blogs like that not only helped me but fully prevented me from developing a paraphilic disorder. I also want to point out that the blog is not for any explicit discussions, which you can see if you actually scroll through it.

To sign off this post, I'm going to show a lot of examples of this account actually helping people through their internal shame.

[cleanqueer]

okay. So first of all, an uncontrollable attraction and thoughts in someone’s brain can still be harmful and I have no idea what leads you to believe it can’t. Attraction to non-consenting individuals is inherently harmful. This type of attraction is not normal and is caused by disorders like OCD and PTSD. If left untreated (aka being convinced your attraction is something that is safe and cool and good and awesome and cute and sexy and completely normal) it can worsen. People with these types of attractions are incredibly susceptible to addictions to content involving their paraphilia (the “taboo” nature of it (which is inherently part of the content because it involves rape) causes extreme dopamine spikes (porn + not allowed = excitement) and is incredibly harmful)

Secondly, the phrase “thought crimes aren’t real” applies to people with intrusive thoughts. It’s not “so people that you don’t like don’t get to use it?” It’s a phrase for people with intrusive thoughts because people can literally believe that their bad thoughts can influence the real world. That’s what the phrase is for. And btw, acting on something in the real world is not a “thought crime” and people need to stop appropriating that term. Writing fanfic is not a “thought crime.” Creating a tumblr blog for minors to express publicly that they are zoophiles is not a “thought crime.” Proudly proclaiming that you are a zoophile is not a “thought crime.”

And these screenshots you’re showing of “helping people” is first of all, mostly not even paras at all but people with OCD. And the reason this seems like it’s helping is because, again, it’s “your thoughts about rape are cool and awesome.” Which can be comforting, because it makes you feel good about your intrusive thoughts. But in reality, people who have intrusive thoughts shouldn’t be learning that they’re cool and awesome, they should be learning that it doesn’t define them or say anything about them as a person. And that they’re involuntarily. These communities are incredibly unsafe for people with intrusive thoughts because these people absolutely love convincing you to do things that make your thoughts more prevalent and project your thoughts into the real world through looking at porn and telling strangers online about it. Things like darkshipping, which can be extremely harmful even to people who don’t have intrusive thoughts, are especially dangerous to people with intrusive thoughts, especially paraphilias, because they encourage you to treat your disorder and/or symptoms of a disorder like a cute innocent kink. And it is BECAUSE these things are so stigmatized that these types of communities and blogs arise, because some people see it as a kink, and paraphiles, which have no where else to go, are forced to see it as a kink in order to be accepted. Paraphiles deserve spaces that aren’t kink spaces, that are separate from actual kinks like objectum, to talk honestly about what they feel, rather than being forced to make their paraphilias worse because the only place they have to go is fetish spaces.

This blog is not a safe place for minors to talk about their paraphilias because it frames paraphilias as a fetish/kink, or something inherently normal. It’s a blog for minors to talk about things that sexually arouse them, publicly, online. If you have a paraphilic disorder, chances are this kind of thing is your only option. Chances are people are actively conditioning you into thinking the symptoms of a disorder that you need and deserve help for are not only normal, but something to be proud of! Ideas like this are why it is so stigmatized. Because people don’t have anywhere else to go. A harmful paraphilia is not just a fetish, but people who constantly insist that it is, and that there’s actually no such thing as a harmful paraphilia, contribute so much to the demedicalization of harmful paraphilias. People don’t want to get the help they need, either because they think they don’t need it or because they don’t want to be seen as a weirdo with a fetish for dead bodies. And it makes people refuse to listen to anyone trying to help them because they see them as bigots who just hate paraphiles. The fetishization of harmful paraphilias is what stigmatizes then the MOST out of anything, and it’s the same from the anti (it’s a weird fetish) and pro (it’s completely harmless) sides but with a different coat of paint. And it needs to stop.

[cleanqueer]

absolutely disgusting that xenosatanists claim to be pro youth liberation and anti ageism.

you people are quite literally pro grooming, pro rape, and pro CSAM. You literally want to legalize incest and remove laws against molestation, laws that protect YOUTH more than anyone. You do not understand coercion or grooming or why and how that affects young people. You cannot base a political ideology around removing abuse laws that protect youth and then claim to be a youth liberationist. This “ideology” is genuinely disgusting.

[more-youthlib-now]

edit: for people who don’t know what xenosatanism is

[cleanqueer]

https://www.tumblr.com/cleanqueer/823458495907217408/a-reminder-for-all-antis-that-i-knew-better-at?source=share

THIS!!

Tws- a little yap about some of my life

I was abused most of my life. I didn't understand that incest was bad (and even now still struggle to, even knowing better!). I didn't understand things like necrophilia or zoophilia etc, hell I got groomed by someone only a year and a half older than me online ffs! I'm still recovering and trying to find the lines between when something is proship or when something is actually healthy kink because I was exposed to NSFW and had shitty parents.

I only realized in the past couple years that I had unhealthy coping habits that I THOUGHT were okay. I'm 19 already. I still struggle because of the harm I faced from not knowing better as a child.

I don’t know how people genuinely expect kids as young as like 6 to know better. You’d think that’s absurd but parents put their kids on the internet SUPER young nowadays.

[cleanqueer]

For a while I’ve been struggling morally because while I would consistently advocate against proship darkship type of stuff I would often find myself drawn to underage (I at the time was underage but it was underage/adult) non-con, type of fics. This lasted from ages like 13/14 to age 18 and I am currently making a recovery. It’s not super linear but this is the most success I’ve had so far. I think becoming an adult legally gave me a little bit more perspective. I’m neurodivergent in the way that makes it very difficult to manage my dopamine system so I’m currently trying to untrain myself from darkfic.

I understand, that type of content is very addictive

I’m so happy you’re getting better anon :]