If anyone knows of any chill star wars discord servers, lmk. I'm looking for a place with minimal drama to try and branch out a bit and meet more people in fandom. Gotta be an autism-friendly, queer-friendly space.

Discoholic 🪩

No title available
RMH
No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
hello vonnie
macklin celebrini has autism
occasionally subtle

★
noise dept.
NASA
Noah Kahan
No title available

pixel skylines

roma★
Three Goblin Art

oozey mess

tannertan36
official daine visual archive
d e v o n

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Singapore

seen from Türkiye
seen from South Korea

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@colorblockshirts
If anyone knows of any chill star wars discord servers, lmk. I'm looking for a place with minimal drama to try and branch out a bit and meet more people in fandom. Gotta be an autism-friendly, queer-friendly space.
"You can't tell me Vader isn't redeemed at the end when he regains his autonomy to save his son."
Ho boy, YES I CAN!
You know why? Because multiple ENTIRE CULTURES are still eradicated.
There are a HANDFUL of Jedi left alive when Anakin dies. Out of THOUSANDS. Think about that one again. Literally only a few that we can confirm are actually alive when Anakin kicks the bucket (Luke, Ahsoka, probably Ezra). Most of the rest were killed during Order 66 (a LARGE number of which Anakin was directly responsible for killing) or were hunted down BY ANAKIN in the last 20-odd years. Or were turned into Inquisitors that Anakin personally tortured for years, forcing them to live among the frozen remains of the Jedi just for extra shits and giggles, until all of them were killed off, too.
There are TWO clones we can confirm are left alive when Anakin dies, out of MILLIONS. Two. I'm counting this one as a second genocide that Anakin helps commit during Order 66 since that's effectively what it ends up meaning for the clones.
And this doesn't count the number of planets we know were devastated by the Empire that Anakin helped put into place and keep in power like Lothal, Ryloth, and Mandalore.
So you know what? No. I don't honestly give a shit that he saved one person that is related to him in the end. I don't care that it meant he had to make a personal sacrifice to do it. I don't care that he had to finally grow a fucking spine in order to kill Palpatine. There is nothing Anakin can do here that will EVER redeem him for the lifetime of absolute atrocities he has committed. There is no sacrifice Anakin can make that wipe out the oceans of blood he lives in.
The Jedi are still dead. The clones are still dead. Mandalore is still glassed. Ryloth and Lothal will take generations to recover from the decades of war and oppression they've lived through. Anakin's death means NOTHING because the people he's ACTUALLY hurt with his actions aren't the reason he decides to kill Palpatine. He can't kill Palpatine in order to save people he doesn't know, or because it's the right thing to do, or to provide the tiniest bit of justice to everyone he's hurt. He does it specifically to save someone he already loves and considers family.
There's no redemption in that for everything he's done. How could there be? Everything he's done is completely irredeemable to begin with.
"Redemption" doesn't always mean "righting all the wrongs they ever did." Sometimes it's a matter of turning away from an evil path.
Saving Luke and yeeting palps didn't undo the bad things Anakin did, but it DOES represent an about-face, which is one possible definition of "redemption."
Furthermore, Anakin's redemption isn't necessarily meant to be about him making up for all the wrongs he ever did. It's supposed to be about children bringing out the good in you, per Lucas:
George Lucas: ultimately Vader is redeemed by his children. And — and especially having children. I believe that. I believe that you are redeemed by your children
Later in the same interview, he repeats that again:
BILL MOYERS: Essentially, isn’t “Star Wars” about transformation?
GEORGE LUCAS: Well, it is about transformation. And — and ultimately it’ll be about transformation of how young Anakin Skywalker became evil and then was redeemed by his son. But it’s also about transformation of how his son came to — to find the call. Luke works intuitively through most of the movie until he gets to the very end.
There are different ways you could interpret those phrases, I suppose, but it seems to me that the message is less "everything Anakin did is made up for by saving Luke" and more "your children bring out the good in you."
Vader turned back to the Light. That's a good thing. It doesn't erase the horrible things he did, but it is an objectively good thing that he stopped doing those things.
The fandom trend of "bad guys can never turn back to the light because they're BAD and DID BAD THINGS so they can't just do good things and be REDEEMED or FORGIVEN" is kinda annoying, because it completely removes any nuance.
People can do horrible things and then turn to a different path. That doesn't change the harm they caused, it doesn't mean anyone has to forgive them for the harm they caused, but it DOES mean that they are on a better path, and having someone start contributing positively to society is certainly better than staying evil forever or doing nothing at all.
I don't particularly care for your patronizing and condescending tone, but fine, let's discuss this.
I get to use Lucas quotes to back my own argument up because he's been contradictory on this apparently.
"Anakin can't be redeemed for all the pain and suffering he's caused."
Anakin has an OUNCE of good left in him and he uses it to save Luke. Yes, that's a good thing. But is it not, in some ways, still self-serving? He does it for HIS SON, he wouldn't have done it for anybody else. The only thing that makes it even slightly selfless is the possibility that he won't live through the attempt to kill Palpatine, so he's willing to die for Luke I guess, but like. Does this get to count as redemption?
I don't know that I'd say Anakin "turned back to the Light" honestly. Like I know that that's what happens in canon, but Anakin uses that tiny ounce of goodness in him to save someone he personally cares about from dying. Big whoop. It's not honestly all that different from the last time he decided to cause a regime change to save someone he personally cares about from dying aside from the fact that he's going to die, too. Saving someone he cares about from dying by personally murdering the people in charge doesn't make Anakin Light because it's exactly the same thing he does when he goes full Sith, too. The galaxy just got lucky that Luke was stupid enough to throw away his weapon in front of the fucking Sith Master, making himself completely vulnerable and forcing Anakin to make a choice that ultimately led to the fulfillment of a prophecy almost by accident.
This is why it doesn't feel like redemption to me. Nothing is truly fixed, nothing is changed. Anakin himself hasn't even changed all that much. Anakin didn't kill Palpatine because he recognized that he should've done that in the first place, he doesn't do it for the sake of the galaxy, he doesn't do it to make amends for anything he's done, and he never would've even done it for a random stranger Palpatine was crispy frying.
The whole "children bring out the best in you" message doesn't work for me with Anakin because the personal connection to Luke is part of the problem here. Anakin has ALWAYS been perfectly capable of murder for people he considers family. He massacres a Tusken village for Shmi, he commits double genocide for Padme, he murders Palpatine for Luke.
I haven't removed any nuance from the story from my perspective. You can go read my post about redemption via Eliot Spencer from Leverage where I discuss my feelings on redemption in more detail. You can be irredeemable and still choose to be a better person. Or, more accurately, you can do irredeemable things and still choose to be a better person, but those things you've done are still irredeemable. And that's how I choose to view it for Anakin, too. Anakin's not redeemed, he's not redeemable, the things he's done are too big and too unfixable for redemption. Those Jedi can't be brought back to life, the trauma the few who have survived have undergone can't be erased, the Temple can't be un-desecrated and defiled, their history can't be remade. There's no redeeming that. But of course he can choose to make better choices from this point out. Of course he can choose to be better today than he was yesterday. That doesn't change how irredeemable he or his actions are.
Choice is important in Star Wars. Anakin can always make better choices, he's just choosing not to do so right up until the last possible moment where he makes the smallest of better choices by saving someone he personally gives a shit about via murdering a dude who is not so great generally. But the choices he made before still matter. And the things he's done still matter.
I think it's OKAY for someone to be irredeemable, personally. Maybe you're the one who lacks some nuance here. Because at no point have I ever argued that just because Anakin can't be redeemed doesn't mean he can't be better or make better choices. I'm just divorcing the concept of redemption from the fact that he can make better choices. That's not what redemption means to me.
I don't think Anakin can be redeemed. I do think Anakin can always choose to be a better person and I think he makes one final "better" choice at the end of his life. I don't think that means he "turned back to the Light" because quite honestly I think if he'd survived ROTJ and been forced to keep living with the consequences of his actions that he wouldn't have suddenly been a fucking angel who shit roses and rainbows out his burnt up asshole. That man is still someone who was fully a fascist while "in the Light," who 100% believed in dictatorship as a good form of government so long as the right person was in charge while "in the Light" (and we see no sign of that changing, just that his opinion of Palpatine being the right person has probably changed), who is fully willing and capable of murder to protect the people he cares about while "in the Light." Anakin post ROTJ is going to struggle a LOT with still being someone fully immersed in darkness and whose first instinct is NOT going to generally be the better one. I don't see Anakin doing well in a world where he survives ROTJ, honestly. There's just not enough goodness left in him to do well in that world. One ounce isn't enough, it just isn't.
So at this point, yet again, we're at a semantic stand still. Your definition of redemption seems to be about just whether they've made even one better choice. Anakin makes one singular better choice and so he is now redeemed. That's what redemption means to you. More power to you. My definition of redemption is about how well a person can actually make up for what they've done, how much they can fix the mistakes they've made. And it's separate from whether someone can make better choices going forward. So by my definition, Anakin isn't redeemed, regardless of whether he's made a single better choice or many better choices, because there's no undoing what he's done and no fixing any of the damage he's caused. There's no redemption for that available.
But there's no real arguing over semantics. If your definition of redemption differs from mine, I think you're just going to have to accept that. If that bothers you, you know where the block button is, no one's forcing you to read my posts.
Look.
I have been here.
I have let myself get so taken over by a fandom drama and my feelings about it that I let it consume me and I started making assumptions about other real people in the fandom and treated them like shit if they didn't agree with literally every single one of my opinions on the story. It felt like I couldn't do anything else or then I WAS the bad person, I was the monster.
And I promise, it's better to walk away. Stay in your own lane if you don't agree with someone and don't feel capable of discussing it calmly and with an open mind. If you disagree enough with some random person on the internet that you really just have to be rude about it, make your own post. Go talk to a friend who you know agrees with you in DMs and laugh over how dumb of a take this is THERE. Choosing to interact with me in this way, by treating me like I'm somehow an awful monster because we have different definitions of what it means to be redeemed as it relates to a FICTIONAL CHARACTER in the space opera pew pew story, is not a healthy way to be in this fandom. I promise you it isn't.
You do not have to let this be your identity. You really don't. I've had to completely leave multiple fandoms because I got too involved in it and was making the entire place toxic with my behavior. And I was better off because I could recognize that I needed to take a step back and really rethink how I was choosing to interact with other real people. Your life is going to be immensely improved when you decide that this isn't the kind of person you want to be and learn how to just keep scrolling or walk away.
For example, I can obviously tell you have now blocked me, good for you, that's step one. But step two would have been just blocking me without leaving me this really rude response. If interacting with someone who disagrees with you on something you feel this strongly about is going to make you act like this, learn how to simply choose NOT TO INTERACT.
One of the main themes of Star Wars as I have chosen to interpret it is that you always have the choice to be compassionate and selfless to others, and I think perhaps you might want to pay more attention to that particular lesson in terms of how you choose to interact with this fandom in the future.
#if you cannot handle having a discussion with someone who doesn't agree with you - just don't start one#rule 1 of debating is to accept that you might be wrong#rule 2 is to accept that you may not be able to change the other person's mind and that's okay#if you aren't prepared to follow both of those rules then just don't get into a debate with someone else#it's that simple#there is an etiquette to this
Bro....
look man I agree with these concepts but you saw someone make a reasonable reblog on your post having a discussion, assumed the worst of them and called them "patronizing and condescending", were aggressive af in your entire reply, and then you think you've got a leg to stand on to lecture THEM on being "compassionate" and cry that they're "treating you like you're an awful monster?"
They didn't treat you like a monster. They posted a reasonable response with a different opinion than you, and then after you replied they left a sarcastic reply to your close-minded aggressive response where you twisted their words, and they blocked you like you said they should if they don't want to deal with you.
Yet here you are patronizing them, twisting things to make yourself look like a victim bravely offering wise words to a lost soul.
Maybe you should take your own advice and not respond to people if you can't handle disagreement. And you sure as hell can't expect people not to get sarcastic with you if you're gonna accuse them of having a "patronizing and condescending tone" and then use your own rude tone.
If interacting with someone is gonna make YOU act like that, maybe you should've just blocked them to begin with instead of going on the attack.
Playing the victim ain't cute bud.
The Clone Wars
Pros: Clones
Cons: War
Mimic Octopus has had enough of Dancing Crab’s shenanigans
darn dancing crabs and their jazz crab hands
‘HELLO MY BABY HELLO MY H-“ “NO”
i cant control my hand suddenly
Everyone has seen this post, right? Right?
#JEDI KNIGHT DOOKU TEACHING A CLASS OF YOUNGLINGS #BEING SO PATIENT AND GENTLE WITH THEM #SHUT UP I’M GONNA CRY FOR WHO HE USED TO BE
the idea that your friends won't like you if you're too weird is wrong for example one time I told a friend whenever I was losing my mind I laid down on the floor under my desk and stared at it until I was better and next time she visited me she taped a bag of salami snacks to the underside of my desk with a message saying "going insane all by yourself, handsome?" which I only saw months later when I had a breakdown. that's friendship.
I do love how funny it is that Star Wars keeps having villains discuss how great the Jedi are and none of it sticks in the heads of anti-Jedi fans.
Tarkin: The Jedi are too soft and never violent or ruthless enough to win battles. Anti-Jedi fans: The Jedi completely lost their way and went against their philosophies by joining and WAR and KILLING people.
Tarkin and the Kaminoans: The Jedi helped the clones learn individuality. Anti-Jedi fans: The Jedi ENSLAVED the Clones and didn't care about them or fight for them ever.
Grand Inquisitor: The Jedi's main weakness is how much they want to help people and can't stop themselves from doing so even if it means they expose themselves to their enemies. Anti-Jedi fans: The Jedi feel no emotions/repress their emotions/don't understand what they feel/think they need to refuse all feelings, and they abused an already traumatized child because they didn't care about him/wouldn't let themselves care about him.
A puddle
(via)
Natasha Liu Bordizzo as Sabine Wren AHSOKA (2023)
Once the baby, always the baby
Sky puppies
The long wavelengths of the light spectrum—red, yellow, and orange—can penetrate to approximately 15, 30, and 50 meters (49, 98, and 164 feet), respectively, while the short wavelengths of the light spectrum—violet, blue and green—can penetrate further, to the lower limits of the euphotic zone. Blue penetrates the deepest, which is why deep, clear ocean water and some tropical water appear to be blue most of the time. Moreover, clearer waters have fewer particles to affect the transmission of light, and scattering by the water itself controls color. Water in shallow coastal areas tends to contain a greater amount of particles that scatter or absorb light wavelengths differently, which is why sea water close to shore may appear more green or brown in color.
Checkout @scienceisdope for more science and daily facts.
Video credit: Kendall Roberg
Fun fact! This is why there are some sea creatures in the twilight zone in the ocean who use red pigment to camoflauge. Red light doesn't reach down that far, so there isn't any light to reflect and the animals appear black.
does the pink stay looking pink because it’s a fake color? 🤔
i cant take it anymore god made a baby lynx without any regards for proportions and i cant stop thinking about that. look at this
he feet too big for he goddamn he
Here's the thing: the Canadian Lynx STAYS disproportionate.
can’t believe i have to do everything myself
So do seahorses read fpreg.
Cabbage worm..
Cheetah calls for his sibling. (via)