Ideas & the Application of Conceptual Association (I)
*Post Is Liable To Revision*
All things are able to be particularized within the conceptual spectrum of fundamental duality. Once this is acknowledged, the practitioner can begin determining subjects and concepts through attribution, mutuality, or contrast.
The initiation of this practice is not best regarded as a pseudoscience but a scientifically applicable mode of logic; to nullify it as pseudoscience would neglect the objective working forces of existence that are encompassed by it. Conceptual Association is a subjective work which is rationalized and verified through the premise of the objective world; it is then to be translated as conceptual. It also has the audacity to weave a gradient of mutualities between the polarities of our physical existence; diagnoses of complex concepts through the vehicle of science increases the precision of the conceptual and spectral degree of the topic.
It is to be acknowledged that absolute linearity and its quality of straightness are mere semblances within physical reality. This is the same for the absolution of circularity and its quality of perfect repetition. There is instead the diorigination's evolutive successors; recurrent curvature and relativity. In physicality, linear properties are merely a concept to regard as an underlying force or an antithetical potentiality to circularity, and circular properties inherit linear qualities due to the properties of a waveform. In relationship, linearity has been defined as for an antithesis to display compartmentalized or distinct facets of the potentiality of circularity. Therefore, it is inferred within the principles of this realm that linearity is a simplification of circularity, essentially, a âribbingâ concept. There are many practices that feature concepts that are found relating to linearity to have been a dominant predecessor to qualities relating to circularity, but this is restricted to our sense of how physicality manifests and it takes away from the centripetal presentness of actuality, the fusion of polarities itself. It is in fact that they are paradoxically one in the same, just as the principle of protrusion and envelopment (the pattern of manifestation). This questions the validity of inferences to a physical instance prior to this (without vibration, what exists?) The prior would be a practice extracted from the feature of time (duration) itself. Instead, CA strives to open the mind up to concepts both in and outside of manifestation or subjective perceptions. Â
The ultimate goal is to pave a road between the eternal duel of polar absolutions for further understanding of our existence; to create transparency in the mental restrictions of humanity's predominant sense of duality. Both polarities have a standard conventionalism of form and force, yet, they have the capability to contradict; this is due to perspective or the angular approach to the said topic. In the cognitive assimilation of a systematic world, according to the collective depth of our human perceptions, we are able to grasp recurring phenomena which we can define by form and force (a consequence of manifestation). Between the potentiality of manifestation, the essence of mind, and the physical world, there is a "One Expression" of what seems to be appropriate to call a geometry with the addition of numerology and frequency; all this stems from the initial concept of cause and effect (or more specifically to a universal principle, 'Protrusion and Envelopment' - CA). Fundamental duality, or in Conceptual Association, the 'Dioriginations/Genesis Duality' (Linearity and Circularity), are inheritances of this Expression not only objectively and conceptually, but also within the subjective essences of the psyche: It is revealed within the dissection of the very fabric of physicality; waveform. The attempt of conceptual minimalism ever creates the opportunity for complex speculations to be simplified to an appropriate measurement in their respective crucial elements relating to the subject/object itself.
To clarify the oneness in all things, another concept is to be taken into account; Unicity, and this is also found within the apparent duality recognizable within the construction of circularity, that it must contradict itself after the cause. The concept of unicity is primordial to the causes of linearity and circularity. The principle of protrusion and envelopment is a direct expression of unicity, for both are one in the same within the consistent manifestation, but just as well can be seen as a two-part expression. This is the pretense of spectral correspondence's capability of contradiction.
By deciphering the unique intricacies of an object/subject's form and force one may determine concepts in relativity. Keep in mind that lone concepts are better defined with adjacencies and juxtapositions; this further weaves the spectrum within polarity in the evidence of there being preconditions of mutualities.
For example, the physical state of a liquid has an immediate conceptual orientation to spatial measurement due to its form; it is free to fill the volume in any container. Because of this, a liquid's form conventionally associates with the conceptual polarity of circularity, because of the form that circularity initially implies consisting of omnidirectional potential, and that its encompassing quality immediately implies space for its form (area, volume, etc.). As for the force of liquid, this is ultimately dependent on the state of the substance. A conceptual adjacency to liquid's form is the potentiality of emotions. Between liquid and air, it is most considerable to associate liquid with emotions for the conceptual integrity of air being of less dense matter, in relation to the subjective cognition of sentience, emotions have a more solidifying effect on the psyche for the intrusion of extra stimuli. Thus, air may be associated with the extensive potentiality and agility of thought. A juxtaposing speculation to apply emotions with the state of liquid is through the contrast quality of dense or solid objects; because a solid object such as a brick does not have the properties of filling space, that it exists by its own terms (this is conceptually derivative of linearity).
The association of water with the bearing of emotion is tied to the concept of what we can address as fluidity. Emotions have the capability of changing from one moment to the next based on conditions. Perhaps the unscientific surface speculation is only a generality of the underlying forces which ordain the effect of the topic, but the outward expression seen through the simplicity of form and force bring about a fairness of calculation. The intricate speculation of sciences will offer for a more accurate diagnosis to the qualities of the topic.
The basic alchemy of determining concepts and polar conventionalism are:
Separate things of a mutuality in concepts creating an adjacency
Contrasting or juxtaposing qualities clarifying a conventional polar alignment of the subjects
In dealing with concepts, form is objectively fixed until the event of physical transmutation (it is also determinate to sensual subjection), however, force is ultimately indeterminate for its paradoxical capability. Essentially, what is fixed on the Spectrum is the form, and what is capable of contradiction is force. For example; the act of restoration causing destruction to the act of destruction. While restoration in itself is conventionally a concept of things such as healing, renewal, the force of restoration can very well be the undoing of something. The Principle of Spectrum Correspondence (a principle of force) implies that every polar set is in a constant cross-fluctuation. Another similar view of this is that for everything there is a cost(s); polar correspondence infers direct effectiveness between one event and its antithesis.
Let us begin the practice with assimilating the qualities of a white sphere and a black cube. We will then compare one another with mutualities and determine them in juxtaposition. In addition, we will include other subjects through the mutual derivation of what we have first interrogated. First, their physicality must be clarified. Both are 3 ft. in height, 3 ft. in width, and 3 ft. in length. They are solid objects of the same material. The following is an example of the objective mode of speculation in conceptual interrogation; we are interrogating an object, and not a topic or concept. An 'Objective Interrogation'. Note that, when interrogating, speculation, comparison, and orientation give way to a potentially paradoxical complex of concepts. For the following interrogation, examples of conventionalism, juxtaposition, and adjacency will be given.
(The following statement is an example of Conceptual Conventionalism, Keyword: Omnidirectional) - The omnidirectional physicality of the sphere is the conventional analogy of space in terms such as area and volume. - (This relates the basic structural form of the sphere to the fundamental polarity of Circularity).
(The following statement is an example of Conceptual Juxtaposition, Keyphrase: Color Absorption) - The sphere is white. In color absorption, this implies that the sphere absorbs no light, but reflects all (This quality is an immediate orientation to Linearity, that Circularity expresses the attribution of absorption; the force concept of the phrase 'reflecting all' can be determined as Circularity). The cube is black, and therefore in color reflection, the cube reflects no light but absorbs all. (Due to reflection having a consequential force to emission, which is relative to Linearity, the quality of absorption then in contrast associates with Circularity, and is also supported by the instance of Absolute Circularity's physicality of falling in on itself; by the absorbing of its own protrusion, in terms of manifestation.)
(The following statement is an example of Conceptual Adjacency, Keyword: Volume) - Although in equitable perimeters, the sphere takes up less volume in comparison to the black cube. Therefore in existence, it is something relatively of less Circular affluence. Both immediately inherit the spatial quality of circularity for their existence and taking up of space.
(While force cannot be objectified, it can be conceptualized; we will describe the immediate capability of the object's existence based on its form.)
(The following statement is an example of Conceptual Adjacency, Keyphrase: Molecular Velocity) - The white sphere, in turn of its lack of color absorption, will emit less heat. It's relatively lesser heat, fundamentally being determined by the molecular velocity of quantum vibration, implies that it is, relative to the black cube, oriented as a linear concept (Absolute Linearity attributes a lacking of vibration). It should not take away from the force's immediate concept of circularity (depth, the catalyst of vibration), however. All things are indeed a fusion of duality.
(The following statement is an example of Conceptual Juxtaposition, Keywords: Movement, Friction) - The sphere's form gives it a greater ability of movement along surfaces without friction. The cube's form, however, gives it a quality of having more friction along any surface, this, in turn, hinders its ability of movement.
(The following statement is an example of Conceptual Conventionalism, Keyword: Reflect) - The white sphere has the capacity to reflect light in any direction.
The spectral measurement of the white sphere as a concept in itself relies strictly on its physical characteristics, force can only be measured with concepts. Due to fused manifestation, all things are prone to spectral complexity. It is truly the characteristics and qualities of the subject/object that create the conceptualization that may be appropriated to either polarity. While color absorption and reflection are more-so a force, we are describing the physicality of the sphere's consequential existence against potentiality; there is the state in the objection of the force upon it.
The following is an example of the subjective mode of speculation in conceptual interrogation; we are interrogating a subject and not an object. A 'Subjective Interrogation'. We will begin by assimilating the qualities of the subject, 'Restoreâ.
In describing the form of the word, we will regard to a definition of the subject.
Restore, verb; 1) To bring back; reinstate. 2) To repair. 3) To return to a former condition, place, or position.
Subjective interrogations should always conceptualize the topic as a force; the form is the construction of the word which creates a definition. Again, form is fixed, force is ultimately indefinite. The idea of this word is that something is being reconstructed back to its original state. This action is similar to the form of circularity and its quality of resolution due to the falling in on itself. It can also be associated with circularity for a quality of unification, the process of being made whole. Therefore, this concept of restoration is best associated with circularity. In juxtaposition, an antonym of restoration would be deterioration (a force of destruction, as mentioned above).
Deteriorate, verb; 1) To become progressively worse.
The force of this definition is one that is not resolving, or bringing some sort of resolution, but one that causes detriment. This definition as contrast best associates with linearity and its force quality of separation, or in this case, an affliction against a state of wholeness.
After the concepts have been deciphered from the interrogation of a subject/object they may be addressed to either polarity of duality for better understanding and clarification within the gradient of polarization. Not only this, but there becomes a better understanding of the form and or force of the topic(s) by relativity. The more this is done, the more one is able to see the levels of complexity and mutuality between all things regardless of their intrinsic differences.
