[counterphobes]

Intro😈

-Isfp cp6w7 2w1 9w1 sxso

-the cp6 is a recent development but makes sense.

-I hate subtype theory and naranjo

-IV is probably my favorite part of personality theory so I'll post a lot about that. Clear up misconceptions about sx and sp-blinds because until proven otherwise im assuming im the only actual sxso on typo tumblr rn ;3

- I tag my posts with "mine" and will try to tag everything I reblog too

-been in typo for 6 years now its rough lmao, dont ask me for sources its all blurry by this point.

-I like Riso Hudson even though also kind of meh

- 21 years old! Please let me know if you're a minor when we're interacting lil bros:)

- honestly go die if you're racist/homophobic/misogynistic/shit human being

- send me asks!!!

[counterphobes]

Papas Poppers

[counterphobes]

I read one post of a luko/gray supporter and I have brain damage

[counterphobes]

If anybody has questions about what sp-overfocus is like... this is it. The trenches😭

[counterphobes]

Chip, coin and tissue are the only real ones around💯

[counterphobes]

If anybody has questions about what sp-overfocus is like... this is it. The trenches😭

[counterphobes]

Perspective is important

A rant about the general approach to typology and why it does more harm than good.

So, Instinctual variants has always been a bit controversial and hard to understand for people. Its the best theory to showcase the point I'm making because of its less direct nature. People, if they were synflow, would simply reject the synflow/contraflow dichotomy because it just "didn't make sense" which translated to: "I don't have it, so I can't understand it" Big obstacle for most people who try to get into it.

I found it easy, probably because it takes a lot of observation of others rather than taking people's word for it. Its not a clear cut set of descriptors of personality like enneagram, but a categorization of people's mental and social energy flows. The Se really helps me out here.

Instinctual variants, like the name suggests, are instinctual, lots of it is subconscious behavior but its very evident to other people. It shows in body language, adjustment to society, opinions, rather than set personality markers.

There used to be a theory talking about how the instincts develop based on survival needs, sx is pair bonding, so is community, and sp is basic survival. That was the idea. Personally, I never liked it much, but thats probably for my own lack of sp and the fact that I simply never viewed the world in terms of survival. Its very obvious this perspective was written by an sp-dom, and thats the thing, even if I have other problems with the survival idea -> like the overall lacking sp-blind descriptions because sp blindness inherently invalidates the association of sp=human drive for survival. ( I mean, erybody has that! Even sp-blinds!) or depicting sp-blinds as leaching off of others for survival, I still see the benefit because this perspective explains an sp-dom to me, someone I'm never gonna relate to, this is what they see in the world.

We should realize that the source of those descriptions basically give us an "in" to the brain of the author. Its much more valuable to me to dissect somebody's perspective. than somebody's personality. How their brain works, how they conceptualize things around them, how they're able to understand the world.

Logic is not objective, the things we consider to make sense don't make sense for another and their inability to understand our point doesn't translate to any lack of intelligence. It simply points towards a perspective so different, their way of making sense and understanding things is not comparable, and thats interesting. We need perspectives, we need different interpretations, we need to understand eachother, thats what typology is about for me. Not "who is more intelligent" and making a pissing contest out of it.

I encourage anyone to make their own theories, to make sense of things themselves, translate your world with the descriptors of typology and let other people begin to understand your perspective. Analysis is typology, no matter where you're coming from, as long as you're dissecting things and sorting them, I wish to know by what order the world works to you. What categories do you apply? What similarities do you see? Where do you recognize yourself? What do you find important?

Tell everyone! Write your own shit. Who cares.

[counterphobes]

What do you think about subtype theory?

Boo!! Tomato! Tomato!

I think its an oversimplified version of the instinctual variants. Its alright if you're just getting into it and check it out because its an introduction to the instincts, but other than that its pretty bad in my opinion.

There's so many sx subtype descriptions that just describe sx-overfocus (when an sx-blind-> spso/sosp, gets unhealthy and becomes obsessed with their blindspot) instead of actual sx. Naranjo is very obviously sx-blind and his own delusion around being sx-dom led him to making descriptions that essentially mistype everyone.

That's a matter of perspective though. You can be sx5 in naranjo and an spso5 in instinctual variants simply because of the way its presented. I don't conflate the 2 usually, but in theory and application subtype is inferior and simplified to me.

[counterphobes]

will the sx post come anytime soon :3 no rush though of course

Would you be mad at me if I said I forgot entirely .....

[mbtiguy-archive]

I hope you find your self-worth and heal your massive insecurities. I can only imagine how much pain you've been through to find joy in being cruel to others.

How am I cruel?

[mbtiguy-archive]

Time to throw in my 2 cents which is probably the sort of action that led to this sort of anon ask anyway. 

I hate people who are tongue-in-cheek “I hope you get better.” 

I know you don’t give a shit about me. In fact, if I blogged about some of the people who hurt and betrayed recently, you’d probably righteously laugh to yourself about how I deserve it. 

But what you wouldn’t laugh at is seeing a 5 year old hide their younger sisters in between a bed to shelter them from the violence and abuse in the house. 

You wouldn’t laugh at a 5 year old getting in between their parents, crying and screaming and pleading with them to stop. 

You wouldn’t laugh at an 8 year old writing a will for the possibility that they may kill themselves. 

You wouldn’t laugh at a 10 year old crying and holding their cat, begging and asking this creature “you still love me, right?” or stroking the fur of their prematurely dead rabbit, knowing that was one of two things gone that they thought loved them. 

You wouldn’t laugh at a 12 year old cornered by their own mother, screaming and crying to please, PLEASE GOD LEAVE ME ALONE! PLEASE! I’M BEGGING YOU! I’LL BE GOOD I SWEAR I WON’T DO IT AGAIN! JUST STOP PLEASE I DIDN’T DO ANYTHING PLEASE I’M TRYING TO BE GOOD PLEASE MOM PLEASE I SWEAR TO GOD I’LL NEVER DO ANYTHING WRONG AGAIN I’M SORRY I’M SORRY I’M SORRY I’M SORRY I WAS SELFISH PLEASE GOD MAKE IT STOP SOMEONE PLEASE MAKE IT STOP I’LL DO ANYTHING I’LL DO ANYTHING PLEASE I CAN’T BREATHE PLEASE JESUS JUST LEAVE ME ALONE

 I’LL BE GOOD

 I’LL BE GOOD 

I’LLBEGOODI’LLBEGOODI’LLBEGOODI’LLBEGOOD

I SWEAR TO GOD I’LL BE GOOD

Blubbering and screaming and choking and feeling their fucking soul be torn out. 

Only to be told that never happened. 

You wouldn’t laugh at a 13 year old feeling so weak they start choking on their own breath from a lack of power and thinking they may die. 

None of the shit I’ve been through excuses any of my negative behavior. In fact, it’s a god damn miracle I’m not more “cruel” than I am. But what you see and are looking at is the externalized rage of someone who has been through incredible suffering and somehow survived. 

You just see me as a bad person because I probably offended you somehow. Yeah, I can be cruel and have problems regulating my anger but I frequently apologize for it and work on it. I can tell you don’t give a shit because you assume that its the fact that I copypasta: must fucking hate myself that I am “cruel.” I’ve been through and overcome a lot of shit in my life and some shitty anon doing a shitty job giving a fuck isn’t gonna do anything. 

No. Let me explain something, and I’m not going to condone it. Growing up I was weak and powerless, abused by loved ones, isolated from everyone. Being an 8, I feel protected and empowered by my anger. Yeah, on the inside I’m a broken kid. Never hid this fact. But what people like you don’t seem to get is this faux “I give a shit” only makes people like me angry. It makes me want to crush people like you. I don’t, because I have an idea of what control is and so the result is something more of a watered-down anger response. 

If this anon were really meant to demonstrate true compassion, you wouldn’t be hiding in anon. 

Fortunately, I have loving, understanding people that are helping me heal slowly from the lacerations which have marked my life, my mind, my heart and my body. 

So this essay goes out to my followers who don’t always behave the best and are healing. Usually, I’d ignore something like this but this is a good chance to express myself. 

And if you’re young and going through what I just dictated, I’ll let you know that you can survive, and you will. And you won’t be perfect because no one is.

There are people like this in the world that are selfish and will mark conflict as cruelty and abuse. 

Ignore these people and keep on keeping on. 

[counterphobes]

Annalise Keating is a 1w2 core and I love her so much for it <3 136 tritype probably.. I think she's either Entj or Enfj. Im always skeptical about typing Te when they're a 1 core. If anybody has watched how to get away with murder and has ideas for her type tell meee

[counterphobes]

Jump to heaven!🧊🕊

[counterphobes]

Projecting desire and sx

Why yearning for intensity actually proves you're sx-blind

We're all familiar with the usual descriptions of the sx-dom or rather SX Subtype. It describes an individual preoccupied with finding highs within people, seeking out the intimate and intense to then finally merge with their partner of choosing. Its wishing for psychological nudity and to be indistinguishable from the person you desire.

What if I told you that this is all wrong? Or rather, terribly worded.

Its not all wrong, some of this does characterize sx to an extent, but only a very specific kind. The sx-overfocus. This is due to the fact that most authors attempting to relate to sx-doms failed miserably and were only able to comprehend them through their own sx-blind lense, even mistyping themselves as sx in the process.

The sx-overfocus happens to sx-blinds when their wish to connect through soc is unsuccessful. They feel abandoned, ignored, just not seen. So when they're disgruntled with the people around them and deem them all superficial, yearning for someone or somebody real that actually cares, and to then merge with them. Its an overwhelming desire to live beneath somebody's skin, breathe their air and be one with them.

Its a reaction to their own overstepping of their sp, their boundaries, their privacy, their own protected energy and relationship to themselves. The more they open up the more vulnerable and exposed they feel. The sensation feels addicting, scary, new, overwhelming, and ultimately leads to obsession.

They mistake vulnerability as intensity. And thats the misconception surrounding sx.

In later stages, there's a level of discomfort surrounding the interaction, their own anger at their boundaries being overstepped turns into desire to own another and regain their sense of self. Regain the boundary that was ultimately lost within the other and thats why they believe they can only be whole through merging. Its ultimately an attempt to regain control of their autonomy. You're projecting all of your desire, wishes and needs on somebody.

Through media and culture, our idea of love has become the overstepping of one's personhood and "perfect unity", to compromise yourself, this has become a cultural ideal. Something individuals feel they need to seek out, because vulnerability is only reserved for romantic intimate partners. If you're a romantic, its a high chance you're sx-blind. Essentially its a romantized version of something inherently toxic, but accepted by society which they've picked up through soc. That's why, the popular idea and overall understanding of sx is tainted by this and leads to mistyping.

So ..what exactly is sx?

I'll write that post eventually

[counterphobes]

Lol @ your description. I don't think you can tell when someone is wrong because isfps are idiots. I've never met a smart isfp in my life.

And I bet you type as some Xntx, thinking it feeds your superiority complex but you're still wanking it alone with a cumsock so old that if a woman let you near her the wasted cum would be a 10yo

[counterphobes]

The mistype IV epidemic is real. At this point being sx-blind IS the new sx😭 You guys r so so goofy typing your yanderes as sx doms...

[counterphobes]

Am I finally escaping the grasp of typology😳 its been 6 years...

[counterphobes]

Is sx the wish to know yourself through another? Soc to know yourself through belonging to something larger? Sp to know yourself in solitude?

Find out next episode

[orbitalyear-deactivated20230513]

ive got nothing new to say i should be shot