big fan of telling people "have fun" when they say theyre going to the restroom

@theartofmadeline

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
Not today Justin
Xuebing Du
d e v o n
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

★
we're not kids anymore.
untitled
RMH
Misplaced Lens Cap
noise dept.

Origami Around
No title available
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
KIROKAZE
ojovivo

#extradirty
The Bowery Presents
trying on a metaphor

seen from Türkiye
seen from Canada
seen from United States

seen from Sweden
seen from Canada
seen from Netherlands

seen from South Korea
seen from United States
seen from Philippines
seen from Argentina
seen from Bangladesh
seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
@cutiestiel
big fan of telling people "have fun" when they say theyre going to the restroom
conservatives have fully lost the plot its actually extremely normal for little kids to pretend to be animals. it's a pretty essential part of their mental development and helps them practice creative skills actually. if a kid comes up to you and says "I'm a kitty cat" you don't need to reality check them. it's fine actually. the correct response is to say "are you? have you caught any mice today? what kind of kitty cat? do you have orange stripes? should we have tuna salad for lunch?"
I mean it's entirely possible that they'll take one bite of your tuna salad and say "hmm. I don't want to be a cat anymore i think"
crazy that in the 1970s they were like, "fine, women can play sports. but because they're innately less athletic than men, only in a special ghettoized League For The Frail And Delicate where they get paid less 😊". And not only is that still the system in 2023, but viciously lashing out at the smallest challenges to that system gets framed as Feminist Praxis
even setting aside the fact that gendered bodytype averages aren't universals, and plenty of individual (cis) women and (cis) men could easily go to toe to toe. have we considered that the fact that all the most prominent and well-paid sports are ones that require things like Being Tall and Having Muscle Mass, as opposed to, ex, gymnastics...is itself an artifact of sexism
Also consider the existence of sports where women would have an advantage, and yet, somehow, the most famous and well paid ones are not women.
I'm thinking of jockeys. Jockeys get an advantage from being smaller and lighter, and while obviously you need sufficient strength to stay on the horse, a well-trained horse does enough of the work that you don't need upper body strength to do the job. Given this and that the majority of children obsessed with horses are female, you'd think most jockeys would be women. Yet somehow they are not.
NASCAR at one point threatened to handicap Danica Patrick by putting extra weight in her car to compensate for the fact that she is smaller and lighter than other racecar drivers. If she gets an advantage as a driver, why is she like practically the only female racecar driver, or at least the only one anyone knows about?
Women, apparently, have an advantage in long distance swimming. Higher body fat percentage and higher endurance means that women can go greater distances in the water. Is long distance swimming even a competitive sport?
Women have actually been excluded from competitive Olympic skiing on the grounds that the jumps required could damage their uterus. The people who actually have unsupported reproductive organs hanging outside their body are considered to have better support than the people whose reproductive organs are nestled in alongside unisex organs like the small intestine and stomach. How does this make any goddamn sense at all? If a uterus could dislodge from the force of a skiing jump, so could intestines and the sport wouldn't be safe for anyone.
Theoretically, any sport where you get an advantage from low center of gravity, better balance, higher flexibility, or being closer to the ground, women should have an advantage. This should include soccer (football in non-US places), and might include hockey if the hockey players hadn't introduced unnecessary viciousness to the sport.
So in any sport where women would excel over men, they're either excluded, unfairly penalized, the sport doesn't exist, or the sport is considered unimportant and no one makes money on it. Hmm. I am thinking the problems here are not actually what the TERFs and transphobes make them out to be.
For those of you wondering "Why did OP say the 70's?" It's because that's when Title IX was passed in the US, prohibiting gender-based discrimination in federally funded education, e.g. public schools & universities. So anti-feminists couldn't just straight up say "no girls allowed" but instead resorted to what's been described above.
It's as if intolerance can't be magically be solved with pieces of paper alone.
it wasnt that long ago that i was in a little lamborghini sleeping on bookshelves in the hollywood hills with only 47 billion dollars in my bank account. and only 47 lamborghinis in my lamborghini account. and only 47 hills in my hollywood account.
did you seriously just let it linger
It was completely unacceptable that you could ever edit other peoples posts on here to begin with & i would give up anything to have that back
I love you trans people I love you so much I'm so glad you're alive I'm so glad you're here I'm so glad you exist
give it up for another 70 years of goo
hey. what the fuck does this mean